Tom Vander Ark

Tom Vander Ark

Posted: June 27, 2009 12:54 AM

School Choice for Equity

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

Education is political -- especially in America. We argue about ends (standards), means (pedagogy), how students show what they know (assessment), scope (e.g., food, sex ed, services), funding, employment, governance, and accountability.

Some use a Horace Mann 'education for democracy' argument to justify a vision of a 'Common School.' But we also embrace our history of local control, so common but local -- an initial paradox. Common and local sort of worked when many communities were homogeneous. As many communities became more diverse, so did visions of schooling and differences in provisioning.

Our differences lead me to believe in educational choice -- a parent's right to choose an environment that best suits their child. These choices can and should be bounded particularly when public funding is involved (but not as standardized as current state standards require). They can and should include an obligation to teach US History and Civics. But beyond basic literacy, numeracy, and civics standards, I'm with the Dutch -- let interested folks start schools and pay for it.

Like Paul Hill, I think an environment of choice can be governed in a way that promotes equity. The Center for Reinventing Public Education has produced a number of helpful resources in this regard including Doing Choice Right. It requires that we pay attention to where new schools are formed, who gets in, how transportation is provided, and how they're funded.

Some folks promote choice as competition. I buy the argument, but haven't seen much improvement as a result of competition -- there are still terrible schools near KIPP academies. Good ideas don't seem to walk across the street in education.

I support choice to promote equity. I think that's also true for President Obama and Secretary Duncan. We can govern and fund a system that allows options, provides safeguards, and produces far more equitable results than we have today. And, perhaps we can resolve at least some of the arguments.

Follow Tom Vander Ark on Twitter: www.twitter.com/tvanderark

 
Comments
2
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- TopProf I'm a Fan of TopProf 5 fans permalink

Where is the proof behind your opinions? Data show that schools get more segregated under choice policies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:32 AM on 06/27/2009
- Tom Vander Ark - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of Tom Vander Ark 18 fans permalink

Our schools are already segregated because our neighborhoods are segregated (and in big diverse schools, the tracks are segregated).
The right policies can improve integration; i.e., High Tech High is able to match county demographics in their lottery; Hartford magnates blend urban and suburban kids.
Also worth noting that most charter management organizations are targeting low income and minority students. In NYC, they serve a higher percentage of low income and minority students than city schools.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:03 PM on 06/29/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect