iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Tom Vander Ark

GET UPDATES FROM Tom Vander Ark

Utah Poised to Lead in Online Learning

Posted: 02/12/11 12:56 AM ET

Utah is on the verge of having the best K-12 online learning policy in the country. SB65 makes provision for multiple statewide providers and student choice to the course level.

While high schools around the country are cutting expensive courses, students in Utah high schools this fall may have access to every AP course, any foreign language, and high level STEM courses rich with computer simulations. Assuming bill passage, students that are struggling will have several personalized options that will allow them to catch up.

SB65 encourages providers to support completion by withholding 40 percent of the funding until the student successfully finishes a course. The bill expands options and creates the opportunity for students to graduate early. More options, better outcomes, reduced costs --it's a good deal for Utah students, schools, and taxpayers.

The bill reflects the recommendations of Digital Learning Now, a December report from an expert panel co-chaired by former governors Jeb Bush and Bob Wise.

Super-advocate Robyn Bagley of Parents for Choice in Education and Open High School organized a capital breakfast for legislators this morning. Michael Horn of the Innosight Institute shared findings from his book Disrupting Class, co-authored with local hero Clayton Christensen. Michael thinks online learning is an important disruption to ineffective historical education practices because it is affordable, scalable, flexible, and a mode natural for students.

Horn was great, but a panel of sophomores from Open High was the highlight for senators and representatives, and school board member. They mentioned ten benefits of online learning:

1. I can work ahead if I'm able to
2. I get nearly instant responses from my teachers
3. I get personalized support when I need it
4. My teachers are just as excited about online learning as I am
5. I can do all my math for the week on one day if I want to
6. I know how I'm doing, my grades are right on the screen
7. My parents can see my work and grades
8. My courses are more challenging
9. I can keep up with my work when my family travels
10. I can work around a busy schedule

Utah has a history of innovation in education. Utah was an early leader in distance learning with Electronic High School but the content is dated and it's funded through a supplemental appropriation (which is not sustainable or scalable). Utah also gave birth to Western Governor's University, a leader in affordable competency-based higher education. Gov Leavitt was a leader in the development of early college high schools where student can earn an AA degree with their high school diploma. Open High School is a statewide virtual high school making extensive use of open education resources.

Mickey Revenaugh, Connections Academy, and I represented the International Association for K-12 Online Learning (iNACOL) at the breakfast.

Utah is at the bottom of average per pupil funding in the U.S. but near the top in terms of the tax burden per capita as a result of youngest demographic distributions in the country. School funding isn't going to get better any time soon. Many legislators realize that they'll need to incorporate online learning to expand options, boost achievement, and do it for less. Sen. Howard Stephenson, the bill sponsor, thinks SB65 fits the bill.

 

Follow Tom Vander Ark on Twitter: www.twitter.com/tvanderark

 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
lcr999
scientist
02:30 AM on 02/17/2011
There is a big difference between learning and information transfer. Computer based instruction is about downloading fixed information, not learning to think. While it is good for memorizatiion and rote practice, that is a long way from critical thinking. The more useful (real world) direction is probably the other direction, i.e. more personal interaction, more critical thinking, more teamwork. On line learning is not much different than trying to take a class and learn over the telephone.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Tom Vander Ark
03:19 PM on 02/19/2011
You have an old view of learning online. Kids at Open High have far more teacher engagement and engaging personalized learning experiences than kids in a traditional school.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:31 AM on 02/16/2011
The picture created by Mr. VanderArk is School As We Know It--only on-line. Where it's more efficient and (key point) cheaper. Nearly all the "advantages" and "disruptions" he lists are structural: faster, more convenient, greater parent control. And--oh yeah-- cheaper.

Horn lists "my courses are more challenging"--but what does that mean? That more content can be memorized, faster? This vision of on-line education is an efficiency model, but where is the depth, the application, the personal engagement and creative, interactive use of content? Where is the student in this vision?

I worry when I read seductive language like this--"affordable, scalable, flexible"--because none of it has to do with quality of learning. Reminds me of Bill Gates' famous quote--that we should be putting the best teachers' "lectures" on video, to more efficiently share their expertise. Teaching isn't telling, and learning isn't listening, whether you're listening through headphones or in person.

The comments from the students--they can get ahead on their homework using on-line learning--reveal the lack of innovation. Same old, same old. Only now we get to use computers.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Tom Vander Ark
03:22 PM on 02/19/2011
Most learning online is still flat & sequential (like school) but Open High is a pretty good v1.5.
What's exciting about the sector is all the 2.0 components & tools out there. It's almost possible to pull together an engaging, student-centered, competency-based school.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bobzmcishl
04:26 PM on 02/15/2011
I hope these online courses are better than the one I took. They were absolutely horrible. Too much paint by the numbers and not enough thought and understanding.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Will Richardson
02:44 PM on 02/15/2011
What's really different here? At the end of the day, students take away from their online "learning" experience a mastery of the curriculum that the school (virtual or otherwise) delivered to them just like those who take the course in building. This isn't innovation, it's just a reformatting. Do students practice inquiry in these settings? Are they able to ask their own questions? Are they assessed any differently? Do they create any new knowledge in the process and, if so, is that knowledge shared anywhere? Does their experience in the course replicate real life in any new way? Does it teach them how to learn on their own? To go deep? Doubtful.

This misses the larger point. The problem with education right now is that it's less and less relevant to the type of learning we can now do in online communities and networks and elsewhere. My kids don't need teachers and curriculum, online or otherwise, in the same way that the system has provided them for 150 years. Learning is about exploration, experience, creating, not passing digital unit tests and final exams around information that they'll most likely forget six months after the course ends. But we're so wedded to this one very traditional picture of how "learning" is transacted, one that was created for a much different time, that we just can't seem to focus on really changing the system instead of tinkering on the edges with new forms of delivery.

I'll ask again: what's different here?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Tom Vander Ark
03:24 PM on 02/19/2011
I'm reporting on a pretty good v1.5 school in this piece.
You and the other folks looking for deeper learning may appreciate this sketch
http://edreformer.com/2011/02/high-school-design-that-asks-big-questions/
06:18 PM on 02/25/2011
I totally agree that students need more relevant, inquiry-oriented experiences like that in their learning, online or not. It is a bit difficult but not impossible to design courses like that. I teach instructional designers how to try to create more engaging and relevant problem-based learning or other constructivist or social learning activities (games, scenarios, simulations, social learning, etc.) in their online courses, but it is a pretty big mind shift for some of them, especially right after learning traditional addie stuff in the previous course. Frameworks like Backward Design and TPACK are helpful, along with the free online book How People Learn (google the title to find it).

So I guess I'm saying it takes some training and/or some modeling of these types of strategies for teaching and designing learning activities. It would be nice to for example have some master database of excellently designed and openly licensed modules or learning communities for kids, along with some online professional development resources - sort of like an online center for teaching and learning, except for K-12 (although higher education needs such a resource even more, too).
10:03 AM on 02/15/2011
In addition to Mr. Horns thoughts about online learning being, "an important disruption to ineffective historical education practices because it is affordable, scalable, flexible, and a mode natural for students," I would argue online learning allows students to attain an education that is customized, connected, resilient, relevant, amplified, and authentic; all things that I believe describe the future of learning and education.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eric Mann
Do you want to be on the opposite side of Progress
11:38 AM on 02/15/2011
What authenticity happens when there are no peers to exchange ideas with?

The phrase "ineffectiv­e historical education practices" is code words for public schools-the way you all on the Right portray them at least. As an education professional I recognize online learning as an important tool to help students learn, but absolutely positively NOT a replacement for real classrooms.

Tell me, how do you do AP Chem online? You got a lab at home?
12:23 AM on 02/16/2011
With all the benefits that have been listed, this is the constant refrain from the nay sayers against online learning - that kids can't do a science lab online.

Kids very badly need an education that is customized to their abilities - not forcing them to sit in classes where they struggle so that their ineptitude is obvious to everyone (it only gets worse when their teachers baby them during class discussion). We also hold kids back in those areas where they are gifted. Even when they are able to take an AP class, many gifted kids are ready to go in all kinds of directions - but their classroom constricted learning means they can never go any faster than the "lowest common denominator in their class".

As far as Biology Lab goes, new technologies are coming out that could put this argument to rest. Imagine using Microsoft Kinect with capable software that allows you to run ANY kind of lab you want to with absolutely no restrictions on what you can afford or what is safe to use in the lab.

Public school teachers are just scared to death that they will be replaced. The future is full of potential - too many of us are stuck in the safe and ineffective status quo.

Public Education in school buildings (and probably all public schooling) is on its last leg. Privatizing and deregulating education will bring incredible rewards.

Out with the old, in with the new. What was of value
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Tom Vander Ark
03:27 PM on 02/19/2011
Kids at Open High have more teacher interaction than kids in a traditional school and a far amount of student interaction without the hallway drama. The whole school gets together monthly.
New school models that blend online and onsite build in between 1-5 days a week on site with lots of interaction, application, extension.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:53 AM on 02/15/2011
Seems like a powerful tool for Home Schooled Students. Especially if they have teacher support.
The link http://www.openhighschool.org/ provides more details, easy to navigate. No charge, lap-top assigned at the start of the year, four class minimum requirement, early graduation...

I wonder if it's ever been attempted in a classroom setting. Example; Math class, when a student learns addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division, they simply close up their lap-top and moves to the algebra class.

Really curious as to how motivating the "early graduation" benefit is to students.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Tom Vander Ark
03:30 PM on 02/19/2011
About 3m kids learned online last year, about half in traditional schools. At least 1m kids selected online courses as part of their schedule in a traditional school.
An Innosight.org study that came out last week featured 40 models that blend online and onsite.