The Changing Politics of Evangelicals

Posted December 13, 2007 | 04:36 PM (EST)



stumbleupon :The Changing Politics of Evangelicals   digg: The Changing Politics of Evangelicals   reddit: The Changing Politics of Evangelicals   del.icio.us: The Changing Politics of Evangelicals

It is increasingly obvious that the unified front that the Religious Right once presented to the world is fractured and has fallen into a variety of pieces. Chuck Colson, one of the most intelligent and effective spokespersons for that powerful bloc of Evangelical voters that so faithfully delivered elections into the hands of the Republican Party, has been claiming otherwise. But with Pat Robertson endorsing Rudy Giuliani; most Southern Baptist leaders find their flag bearer in Mike Huckabee; Bob Jones, Jr. endorsing Matt Romey; and the late Jerry Falwell having blessed John McCain at the last graduation at his Liberty University; it is clear that the Religious Right has become fragmented in its political allegiances. Furthermore, all of Karl Rove's horses and Jim Dobson's men are not likely to be able to put that once unified bloc together again.

Perhaps, if Hillary Clinton gets the nod from the Democratic Party, this dynamic woman, often defined by "Christian radio" as a common enemy of the Religious Right, will bring the increasingly diverse segments of this conservative movement together for the general election. That is, of course, if someone other than Rudy Giuliani gets the nomination for the Republican Party. If Rudy gets the nomination, it is significant that Paul Wyrich, co-founder of the Heritage Foundation, has declared that he is likely to support Hillary, should she be the Democrat's nominee. He has said that Hillary, while not wanting to make abortions illegal, really wants to make them rare; while Rudy has lent support to pro-abortion advocates. Furthermore, while Hillary wants gays and lesbians to have legal rights that go with civil unions, she does not want to legitimate these unions as marriages. Rudy, on the other hand, when mayor of New York, supported legitimating gay marriage. Thus, Wyrich finds Hillary to be the most pro-family of the two.

While the Religious Right is politically fracturing on the one hand, politically progressive Evangelicals, on the other hand, are showing signs of becoming increasingly unified. If we consider Brian McLaren, a primary spokesperson for the Emerging Church movement; Jim Wallis of the Call to Renewal movement; Ron Sider of Evangelicals for Social Action; Richard Rohr of the Center for Action and Contemplation; and Shane Clairborne of the Simple Way movement; we will find among these politically progressive leaders an increasing oneness. They are formally coming together under the designation of being Red Letter Christians. This is a label that they adopted from a secular Jewish country and western disc jockey in Nashville, Tennessee, who said, "You guys are into those red letters in the Bible."

Moving beyond the "hot button" issues of abortion and gay marriage (neither of which are referred to in the red letters of the New Testament), these politically progressive Evangelicals also advocate concerns for the environment, peace in Iraq, an end to religious persecution, and, especially, a commitment to end world poverty.

These Red Letter Christians are likely to play a significant role in the upcoming 2008 elections. For the most part, they show preferences for Clinton, Obama and Edwards over any of the candidates that the Republicans have to offer. While most Evangelicals will still go for Republican candidates, it is possible that Red Letter Christians will be able to peel away enough Evangelical votes to swing the next election.

Stay on the lookout for this new movement. It has a great appeal to a great many of the younger Evangelicals who, while still pro-life and questioning gay marriage, want to embrace the broader agenda espoused by Red Letter Christians.

These younger evangelicals may not necessarily vote Democratic, but they certainly are no longer safely in the pocket of the Republican Party. Instead, they are prone to declare with Red Letter Christians that Jesus is neither a Democrat nor a Republican. When asked about party affiliation, they are likely to say, "Cite the issue." On some issues they will go with one party and on some issues they will go with the other.

With that kind of flexibility, those Evangelicals who call themselves Red Letter Christians will be increasingly politically unpredictable. It is hard to say what the future holds, but this is probable--it won't be just like the past.

Comments for this post are now closed

 

Comments
56
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

Hint sample
View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

Evangelicals who use the words of Paul to condemn gays, need to look at the Greek translation one of the earliest,and closest to the years Jesus and his Apostles lived. Greeks have VERY specific words for gay male lovers, they DON'T appear in the Greek scrolls. Greeks had an entire culture which had legally binding
contracts of dowery, and division of property to a surviving gay lover. Those words would have been used, if that's what was meant.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:50 PM on 12/14/2007

I have to wonder how expediant and shallow are the "VALUES" Pat Robertson expouses and uses to raise funds for his ministry (anti-choice, anti-gay), yet he endorsed Rudy Giuliani pro-choice, pro-gay. Makes it all seem just a lie, it also ruins Giuliani from getting ANY LGBT votes or gay-friendly and pro-choice votes, because it appears he promised Supreme Court Justice choices to BIGOTS.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:30 PM on 12/14/2007

Ron Paul is would then be the next logical choice for them. Yeah, I know, he has some shortcomings. But at least he isn't an Obama or Hillary, trying to talk tought about Iran and then saying they'd keep military bases in Iraq until who knows when. Dr. Paul is the by far the best option for "Red Letter Christians".

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:57 PM on 12/14/2007

Changing politics of evangelicals is like
CHANGING DIAPERS... because they are so full of sh*t.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:47 PM on 12/14/2007

ABORTIONS AND GAY MARRIAGES SHOULD NOT BE THE REASONS WILL WE VOTE FOR THE NEXT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

These are not political issues but more social and moral.

We should be discussing:
HEALTHCARE
EDUCTION
THE ECONOMY
SOCIAL SECURITY
NATIONAL SECURITY
AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION
ADHERENCE TO THE CONSTITUTION
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
CLIMATE CHANGE

These are the issues we should be discussing.

The Christian right needs to focus on these issues so that all Americans vote for the best candidate and stop worrying about who snorted coke in high school!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:10 PM on 12/14/2007

Check out the documentary MARJOE made in 1972. Nothing has changed. These evangelicals have always been and will always be the dupes of cynical manipulators. When they surrender to God, they surrender their intuitions as well. They believe God is with them, so how could anything go wrong if they stick with their own? There is no other legacy for such credulousness except disappointment.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:10 PM on 12/14/2007

isnt it reasonable, regardless of party or church affiliation to use the response "cite the issue'?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:50 AM on 12/14/2007

The message I get from this:

Go Rudy!

Rudy for President!

(Never thought I'd be saying THAT!)

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:01 AM on 12/14/2007

It's scary that the people who most need to get a grip on the concept of self fulfilling prophecy can't. They're trained to see the power and cause as outside themselves. They subject themselves to the LaHayes and the Haggards and the Bushes and the other snake oil salesmen who make them afraid and pose well as "daddy".

I wish today's fundamentalist Christian would pay more attention to Jesus' sermon on the Mount than he does a few, select passages in Leviticus

I wish today's Evangelical Christian would pray with all their hearts on this:

"The Kingdom of Heaven is within thee. His will be done on earth as it is in heaven. Be not anxious. Seek ye first His Kingdom. Everything will be added unto thee"

-Jesus Christ

and realize that Heaven and Hell are within themselves.

Until they do, they'll follow madmen, idiots and thieves over cliffs in search of miracles or self fulfilled Armageddons on earth.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:31 AM on 12/14/2007

The Republicans have shown that they will never repeal Roe vs Wade. The abortion issue brings out a couple of million voters and so they use it every election year and they don't want to lose it and the law will never change. So who profits from abortion? Be honest. The Republicans are far more in favor of abortion than the Democrats.
By their fruits you shall know them.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:27 AM on 12/14/2007
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in


 
 
Bloggers Index›
Read All Posts by
Tony Campolo›
 

 Site  Web ask.com