For the second time in a year, The New York Times has covered the devastation of alcohol abuse on the Native American tribe of Oglala Sioux and their efforts to prohibit alcohol consumption.
On Sunday, Times columnist Nicolas Kristof painted a heartbreaking picture when describing the harms of alcohol in the Oglala Sioux community. "Alcohol fuels stunning rates of domestic violence, suicide and crime on the reservation. I [Kristof] spoke to one family that first lost a father to cirrhosis, then a son, killed in a knife fight with his own cousin over a bottle of beer. A few weeks later, the dead man's younger sister killed herself at age 16." John Yellow Bird Steele, the tribe president is quoted in the piece, "Every person on this reservation has personally seen the negative effects of alcohol, with loved ones or themselves."
While alcohol is illegal on the reservation, Whiteclay, a small town close to the reservation sells incredible amounts of alcohol to the Oglala Sioux who visit the town for the sole purpose of buying the legal alcohol. Kristof rails against Anheuser-Busch for exploiting the Pine Ridge alcohol ban by selling beer to Whiteclay and calls for a boycott on the company.
While Kristof's column makes clear the horror alcohol abuse can cause, he fails to acknowledge that while alcohol prohibition is not only failing to stop drinking, it's also producing other negative and harmful consequences. Despite the tribe's best intentions, the Oglala Sioux bought four million cans of "forbidden" beer. Because alcohol is prohibited, the police are arresting people for possession of a single beer. The tribe says that more than 90 percent of arrests by the tribal police are alcohol-related, along with 90 percent of arrests of juveniles. So in addition to the problems of alcohol abuse, tribe members have to deal with arrests, incarceration and criminal records. Would the tragic killing between cousins over a can of beer have happened if alcohol was not illegal? We don't know, but it is clear that the prohibition of alcohol didn't prevent the killing.
One solution Kristof advocates is to expand the Pine Ridge land to take over Whiteclay so that the Oglala Sioux won't be able to buy their alcohol from this neighboring town. But that "solution" would not stop drinking any more than the current prohibition -- it would just mean driving farther to another town to purchase beer, increasing the risk of drinking and driving.
As terrible as alcohol and other drugs are for some people, prohibition is not the answer. It didn't work in the United States in the 1920s and it is not working for the Sioux people today. Education, substance abuse prevention and jobs will have better success than prohibition and the illicit market that will inevitably spring up to meet the demand.
Tony Newman is the director of media relations at the Drug Policy Alliance (www.drugpolicy.org)
Follow Tony Newman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/TonyNewmanDPA
It should be a no brainer that when you take away a group's culture and stick them in an impoverished area there will be problems like this. It's simple CAUSE & EFFECT. This article focuses on the EFFECT, when it's the CAUSE that needs to be addressed...
Addiction is a disease of the Limbic "reward" system, which is not only involved in the experience of pleasure, but is also central to learning, decision-making and motivation. Addicts make terrible decisions because it is their brain's decision-making apparatus that malfunctions.
For a website that discusses the science of addiction in accessible English (what makes it a chronic, progressive disease; what parts of the brain malfunction; how that malfunction results in addict behaviors; how addicts' decision-making is skewed by substance abuse; why some get addicted while others don't; how treatment works; why relapse is common; what family and friends can do; etc.) please click on www.AddictScience.com.
Thank you for writing about the problems on the reservations. Did you know that American Indian youth kill themselves more than any other group of teens in the U.S. Whites, blacks, latinos, etc. The statistics are much higher for rez kids.
It isn't just the road from Whiteoak back to the rez that has wrecks from drunken driving. Read the Navajo Times and see how many people are killed on the road to and from Gallup, NM. It won't make any difference how far an addicted person has to go to get what they "need", they will go anyway. A tribe can buy as many towns as they can afford and it won't help anything. I applaud Kristol's efforts but the overall problem of no jobs, discrimination, BIA's refusal to provide agency clinics and rehabs is keeping the addictions alive.
I have many Navajo friends and have spent years with one that I dearly love and he fights alcohol every day. He had his first drink at age 10. His mom left him with his cousins because his new step-father didn't want him and it was so easy for him to get on that slippery slope to addiction.I met ____when he was 22. He has had periods of sober years since we've met.( I'm a therapist but we live 1500 miles apart.)
More in next post.
Prohibition failed for a reason.