Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Tony Newman

GET UPDATES FROM Tony Newman
 

All of Us Use Drugs, but Only Some of Us Go to Jail!

Posted: 05/20/10 06:48 PM ET

Despite a $40 billion a year "war on drugs" that is premised on the goal of creating a "drug-free society," our country is swimming in drugs.

Most people start using drugs before they even leave the house in the morning. Yes, that first cup of coffee is what many of us need to start the day. The next drug that millions of Americans use, sometimes up to 20 times a day, is our nicotine! And then, after a long day of work, many of us head to a local bar or to our refrigerator and pour ourselves a cocktail, ice cold beer or a nice glass of wine.

And I'm just getting started. There are over 100 million Americans who have used marijuana. Thirty years after Nancy Reagan told us to "Just Say No," half of high-school seniors will try marijuana and 75% will try alcohol before they graduate. And what about the college students who use Ritalin to help them focus and put in long hours at the library? And how about all of the superstar athletes who use performance enhancing substances? What about all of the men (and women) who are deeply grateful for the "little blue pill"? And how about the businessmen who stay up until three in the morning with the help of a "little bump"?

Drugs are so popular because people use them for both pleasure and for pain. Drugs can be fun. How many of us enjoy having some drinks and going out dancing? How many of us enjoy a little smoke after a nice dinner with friends? Many people bond with others or find inspiration alone while under the influence of drugs. On the flip side, many people self-medicate to try to ease the pain in their lives. How many have us have had too much to drink to drown our sorrows over a breakup or some other painful event? How many of us smoke cigarettes or take prescription drugs to deal with anxiety or stress? Throughout recorded history, people have inevitably altered their consciousness to fall asleep, wake up, deal with stress, and for creative and spiritual purposes.

While it is clear that drug use doesn't discriminate and the majority of us are using one drug or another, the reality is that the war on drug users does discriminate. More than 1.8 million people are arrested every year on nonviolent drug charges. In New York City, "moderate" Mayor Bloomberg's police arrested close to 50,000 people for marijuana possession in 2009 - and 87% of those arrested were black and Latino, despite similar rates of marijuana use as whites. The reason for the discrepancy is that the NYPD stops and frisks blacks and Latinos - but not white people. Last week the New York Times ran a front page story that showed blacks and Latinos were nine times more likely to be frisked than whites.

The racist enforcement of drug laws is not limited to just New York or just marijuana. Thanks to the mass incarceration of people for nonviolent drug law violations, the U.S. is the world's leading jailer. The U.S. has 5% of the world's population but has 25% of the world's prison population. Nationally, blacks are 13 times more likely to be incarcerated on drug charges as whites, despite similar rates of drug use.

Why are some drugs legal and other drugs illegal today? It's not based on any scientific assessment of the relative risks of these drugs - but it has everything to do with who is associated with these drugs. The first anti-opium laws in the 1870s were directed at Chinese immigrants. The first anti-cocaine laws, in the South in the early 1900s, were directed at black men. The first anti-marijuana laws, in the Midwest and the Southwest in the early 1900s, were directed at Mexican migrants and Mexican Americans.

Too often, the stereotypical "drug user" is someone we see panhandling on the street or the image of a young person of color. The reality is that most Americans use some drugs and most families include someone who is dealing with addiction to a legal or illegal drug. By declaring a "war on drugs" we have declared a war on ourselves, our families, and our communities.

We have to learn how to live with drugs, because they aren't going anywhere. Drugs have been around for thousands of years and will be here for thousands more. We need to educate people about the possible harms of drug use, offer compassion and treatment to people who have problems, and leave in peace the people who are not causing harm. And we need to take action against the incarceration of so many of our brothers and sisters who are suffering behind bars because of the substance that they choose to use.


Tony Newman is a drug user and the director of media relations at the Drug Policy Alliance (www.drugpolicy.org)

 

Follow Tony Newman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/TonyNewmanDPA

 
 
  • Comments
  • 15
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
pyradius
Microbiologist
03:46 AM on 05/25/2010
We all know that there is no logic to this 'war' and that education is the ONLY way to reach people on this, yet somehow the idiots we put in power always seem to give this issue a back seat and nothing is ever done. It really makes me never want to vote again.

"President Jimmy Carter told Congress in 1977, that: "Penalties against drug use should not be more damaging to an individual than the use of the drug itself. Nowhere is this more clear than in the laws against the possession of marijuana in private for personal use." "

Anyone that we put into office that ignores the absolute ridiculousness of current policy is either a shill or a coward, and I refuse to put any more of those into office.
09:03 PM on 05/23/2010
Make drugs legal, in Holland they are not actually legal but tolerated and the system works quite well.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Supernatoir
08:43 PM on 05/23/2010
And i know why because i was high because i was high
_afroman
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
khanti
Cultivator
09:49 AM on 05/23/2010
I wonder if pleasure drug users( including tranquilizers users) have increased due to the down turn? By how much?
04:03 AM on 07/12/2010
probably not... drug use generally seems to be inelastic; that is, the drug users will sacrifice other parts of their life to continue using the drug. Alcohol in particular is a drug where usage surges during both economically rough and great times.
10:51 PM on 05/21/2010
Why did it take a Constitutional Amendment to Criminalize Alcohol and all it took was a declaration of war and Nixon's establishment of the DEA to push this whole ridiculous, emotional mess into the status of a meatgrinder that chews up citizens of many nations for no good reason at all?
01:50 AM on 05/22/2010
The Supreme Court became much more tolerant of government power between the early 20s and the early 70s.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:36 AM on 05/23/2010
Going even further, the Constitutional amendment that prohibited alcohol did not criminalize possession. Regulating the manufacture and sales of the substance were seen as something the constitution allowed. People weren't put in jail for drinking or having alcohol, ever, and the number of sacramental wine brands was incredible. Medical recommendations of alcohol went through the roof. Prohibition has never worked for any substance in any society anywhere on our planet. It is time to end this unconstitutional absurdity, it may already be too late for Mexico.
10:13 PM on 05/21/2010
As I have posted on HP before, if drugs were legalized many government employees would be out of work. I think that is a big incentive to keep up the "war on drugs". Prohibition did not work and neither is the current policy against illegal drugs. I see nothing wrong with people deciding for themselves how to treat their bodies but I don't think they then should be allowed to soak up extra medical care because of the damage they may have done to their bodies. People need to be responsible for their own choices no matter how poor those choices may be.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dSco
11:05 AM on 05/22/2010
I think you have a very good point, something that I've considered many times when thinking about the war on drugs. Simply put, if you kill the war on drugs, inevitably, you end up cutting jobs... and LOTS of them; Obviously no politician wants to be put in the position where he/she will inevitably be accused of killing American jobs and being against job growth. Jobs are a big factor in the upcoming elections, and a big part of Obama's campaign platform. I wouldn't expect to see any kind of debate on the war on drugs until after the elections, and after California votes on legalization.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:54 AM on 05/23/2010
Law enforcement can be redirected. Instead of arresting people for what they choose to do in their own homes, who wouldn't prefer our police making it safe for us to go places at night, or actually responding to burglary calls instead of sending a form for your insurance company. Maybe they could even take fingerprints, do some investigation of crimes that actually have victims? Other jobs could be created by diverting a small portion of what is spent on enforcement toward treatment. The original poster, i think incorrectly, stated that there would be an increase in medical needs (implying that prohibition reduces use, a "fact" that Portugal's recent experience, as well as many other instances, dispels). If there were an increase in needs, that means more employment, without increased costs, as it is paid for with diverted funds. No cost, healthier citizens. The cost to society of alcohol dwarfs that of illegal drug use, yet nobody is suggesting we spend $40 billion a year to lock up alcohol users.
How many are employed by alcohol in the US? Bar tenders to tap maintenance, marketing to retail? Why couldn't marijuana do the same, from farmers, to accessory makers and retailers?
It almost sounds like some people are saying the War on Drugs is another "Too Big to Fail".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vippy
Carpe Diem!
12:02 PM on 05/24/2010
ah baloney, we could concentrate more on street crime, etc. by putting more policemen on foot to scan areas. How many times do we say "there is never a policeman around when you
need one?" Schools should be included as well. Surely we can come up with something
better than this illegal drug pushing. I always said, the government wins on both ends, by bringing in the drugs and then fighting it!
01:16 PM on 05/23/2010
According to a 2008 congressional heearing, the FBI has/had ONLY 33 FTE seeking Cyber Child Porn, while Knowing where More than 600,000 computers were/are, with video's showing adults sodomizing, raping and having oral sex with little kids.

1500 FBI were/are assigned to seek Drugs/Drug consumers.
2200 More, assigned to White Collar Crime units.

A warehouse Full of Unprocessed rape kits, and "they" want to know "what message does this send the kids?"
Well, I think the kids have gotten the message that busting the "Willie Nelsons, Michael Phelps and Rush Limbaughs" are More important that getting them out of this unspeakable Hell!
I am outraged that women (unprocessed rape kits) and children (left in horrific circumstances) are still being tossed under the bus in favor of maintaining the prohibition of cannabis so they can keep their jobs. It Is a Direct conflict of interest to allow LEO to lobby, create and involve in any manner the process of creating laws, rules and policies that goven anything.
I was always taught that LEO's Only task is to enforce the laws that we, the people make. Nothing More.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Social Construct
Go left, young man.
07:36 PM on 05/21/2010
Excellent reminder of something that every citizen should already be aware of. Gee, I wonder why this type of information, as pertinent as it is to society at large, repeatedly only exposed in the margins of national discourse?