iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Tony Newman

GET UPDATES FROM Tony Newman
 

New Rhetoric, Same Old Drug War Policies: Drug Czar Addresses African American Community

Posted: 11/22/11 12:43 PM ET

Drug Czar Gil Kerlikowske held a media briefing today to discuss the disproportionate impact our nation's "drug problem" has on African-American communities.

It is simply Orwellian for the drug czar to focus on the disproportionate impact of our nation's drug problem on African-American communities without acknowledging the disproportionate racial impact of drug law enforcement. According to the federal government's own yearly research surveys, African Americans use and sell drugs at similar rates at whites -- yet African Americans are arrested for drugs at 13 times the rate of whites.

While it is clear that drug misuse of both illicit and legal drugs can ruin lives and cause incredible pain, it is also clear that the drug war causes even more damage than drug misuse itself -- especially in African American communities.

While the Drug Czar's rhetoric is all about the need for a public health approach -- he even says we "can't arrest our way out of the drug problem" -- the reality is the drug war under Obama is as vicious and as racist as ever before. More than 1.6 million people were arrested last year on nonviolent drug charges, and the vast majority of these arrests were for low-level possession, not selling or trafficking. Almost half of these arrests -- 750,000 of them -- were for marijuana possession alone. While the Drug Czar talks about a "balanced" approach, the reality is that U.S. still spends two-thirds of the $50 billion-a-year "drug control" budget on enforcement, guns, jails and interdiction -- about the same proportion as under Bush and previous administrations. And, despite the new rhetoric about a "public health approach," the vast majority of people who have a drug problem still can't get treatment.

The reality is that despite the 40-year-old, $1 trillion drug war, our society is swimming in drugs. Though we urge people to be "drug free", we use caffeine to boost our energy, alcohol to celebrate and recreate, and prescription and over-the-counter drugs to modify our moods, lift us out of depression, and help us work, study and sleep. Yet only certain people and certain drugs are stigmatized, while others are normalized.

As Michele Alexander describes in her renowned book, The New Jim Crow, the war on drugs has had a devastating impact on African American communities, on a scale entirely out of proportion with the actual levels of criminal activity taking place within these communities. People of color are classified as "criminals," permanently trapping them in a second-class status and allowing a whole range of legal discrimination (in employment, housing, education, public benefits, voting rights, jury duty and so forth).

Leaders in the African-American community are increasingly speaking out against the drug war. The NAACP, Congressional Black Caucus and black state legislators are often at the forefront of sentencing and other drug policy reform efforts. Alice Huffman, the influential head of the California NAACP, has been an especially vocal proponent of drug policy reform -- she broke new ground by endorsing California's 2010 marijuana legalization initiative, drawing unprecedented attention to the disproportionate rate of marijuana arrests among African Americans.

Hopefully the media and the public will continue to question the Drug Czar about the disproportionate rate of enforcement in African-American communities. Why it is that young white people use and sell drugs at similar rates yet our prisons are filled mostly with African Americans and Latinos? What are the consequences of arresting our young people for small amounts of marijuana: the loss of college financial aid, food stamps, public housing and, in some cases, even voting rights? Money wasted and lives ruined ... and for what?

The fact of the matter is that we have to learn how to live with drugs, because they aren't going anywhere. Drugs have been around for thousands of years and will be here for thousands more. We need to educate people about the possible harms of drug use, offer compassion and treatment to people who have problems, and leave in peace the people who are not causing harm. And we need to take action against the incarceration of so many of our brothers and sisters who are suffering behind bars because of the substance that they choose to use.

Tony Newman is the director of media relations at the Drug Policy Alliance.

 

Follow Tony Newman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/TonyNewmanDPA

Drug Czar Gil Kerlikowske held a media briefing today to discuss the disproportionate impact our nation's "drug problem" has on African-American communities. It is simply Orwellian for the drug czar...
Drug Czar Gil Kerlikowske held a media briefing today to discuss the disproportionate impact our nation's "drug problem" has on African-American communities. It is simply Orwellian for the drug czar...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:16 PM on 12/01/2011
"... yet African Americans are arrested for drugs at 13 times the rate of whites."

The New Jim Crow Laws of the 21st century. Time for people to Rise Up against injustice!

Who's with me???

Viva la Revolucion!
04:55 PM on 11/28/2011
This should be issue number one for the black community and we should make our support for candidates dependent on it regardless of their color. No other group is more impacted or has more reason to take a aggressive stance against the drug war.
03:52 PM on 11/30/2011
agreed. not too optimistic about the possibility of mobilizing a large number of black voters in support of ron paul though...the only candidate campaigning to end the war on drugs. the irony is so thick it's palpable.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Akhet
Is kind of like 2Pac+Doctor Who
04:27 PM on 11/30/2011
agreed. It is (and i mean the war not the drugs) hands down they most damaging thing to the innercity. at this point, its obvious its only made things worst. If it were any other group of people it would have been ended already. Like alcohol prohibition. Seemed like a good Idea, but did far more harm to family's and the nation then alcohol did, and increased the power of the mob. So it was ended.
The drug war just needs to end. It needed to end years ago. At this point its really just human sacrifice to profit private jails, and to pad the resumes of tough on crime (or black folk) politicians.
12:37 PM on 11/28/2011
Short URL: http://wh.gov/jd6

We petition the obama administration to:
Reconsider all petitions on cannabis without input from the ONDCP because they are required to oppose legalization.

According to Title VII Office of National Drug Control Policy Reauthorization Act of 1998:
Responsibilities: The Director "Drug Czar" (12) shall ensure that no Federal funds . . . study or contract relating to the legalization (for a medical use or any other use) of a substance listed in schedule I of section 202 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812) and take such actions as necessary to oppose any attempt to legalize the use of a substance (in any form) that-- (A) is listed in schedule I of section 202 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812); and (B) has not been approved for use for medical purposes by the Food and Drug Administration;

Therefore the office of the ONDCP is not reliable. Science has shown it to be less harmful than alcohol and for many a safe medicine.

We appreciate any help recruiting signature by emailing this to your friendlies, posting on facebook, twitter, etc.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MalcolmKyle
04:25 AM on 11/28/2011
If you support prohibition then you've helped trigger the worst crime wave in history.

If you support prohibition you've a helped create a black market with massive incentives to hook both adults and children alike.

If you support prohibition you've helped to make these dangerous substances available in schools and prisons.

If you support prohibition you've helped raise gang warfare to a level not seen since the days of alcohol bootlegging.

If you support prohibition you've helped create the prison-for-profit synergy with drug lords.

If you support prohibition you've helped remove many important civil liberties from those citizens you falsely claim to represent.

If you support prohibition you've helped put previously unknown and contaminated drugs on the streets.

If you support prohibition you've helped to divert scarce law-enforcement resources away from protecting your fellow citizens from the ever escalating violence against their person or property.

If you support prohibition you've helped evolve local gangs into transnational enterprises with intricate power structures that reach into every corner of society, controlling vast swaths of territory with significant social and military resources at their disposal.

If you support prohibition then you are guilty of turning the federal, state and local governments into a gargantuan organized crime syndicate, interested only in protecting it's own corrupt interests. -- The very acts for which we initially created governments to protect us from, have become institutionalized. Thanks to prohibition, government now provides 'services' at the barrel of a gun.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Akhet
Is kind of like 2Pac+Doctor Who
04:29 PM on 11/30/2011
Well said, f&f
05:40 PM on 11/23/2011
Anti-drug policy, including the War of Drugs, has always had a political, economic and racial bent; going all the way back to the 1910's. By criminalizing drug use, possession and sale, politicans were (are) able to eliminate more minority voters: laws to deny felons the right to vote were first passed in the 1880's to prevent the Irish and Jews from voting. Criminalizing drug use added African Americans, Hispanics and Asians to the mix. It's the main reason drug laws are still selectively enforced.

While those convicted of drug offenses are in jail or released as ex-convicts, they are prohibited, by law, from fully competing for resources for themselves of their families. Thus, there's less competition for white males in the battle to acquire scarce resources.

The racial angle is conservative politicans and those who desire conservative votes (Former NY Gov. Nelson Rockefeller) can appear "tough on crime" by proposing and supporting draconian drug laws which will primarily be enforced in minority communities.
12:28 PM on 11/23/2011
The Fed is not going to budge on this issue clearly
Obama lied on the campaign trail about not prosecuting medical MJ
Nothing will change until Washington, California, Colorado Legalize and directly challenge the Fed's Stance on MJ.
09:41 AM on 11/23/2011
"Why it is that young white people use and sell drugs at similar rates yet our prisons are filled mostly with African Americans and Latinos?"

The better question is why is ANYONE in prison over a plant? The answer: GREED!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lifeskills
May you be wise and alert in all your responsibili
09:37 AM on 11/23/2011
Ron Paul: Marijuana Policy Should Be Set By The States
The Obama administration had promised a hands-off policy on marijuana laws, saying the issue was best regulated at the state level. But the number of raids has been on the rise, and last month federal prosecutors in California announced a crackdown on medical marijuana dispensaries, threatening to shutter state-licensed businesses.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RocketPower
04:41 PM on 11/22/2011
Legalize it all and educate instead.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jsgaetano
Legum servi sumus ut liberi esse possimus
04:09 PM on 11/22/2011
Just imagine how much better America could be if we weren't allowing international criminals to enrich themselves through illegal drug trafficking. Criminals are the ones who oppose drug legalization.
04:02 PM on 11/30/2011
err...if by criminals you mean to include those involved in the profiteering prison industrial complex that is funded by taxpayer dollars, then yes.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jsgaetano
Legum servi sumus ut liberi esse possimus
04:48 PM on 12/01/2011
Criminals all up and down the food chain. The people making the REAL money are insulated behind thousands of people. Even the "drug lords" who occasionally get caught are just patsies for the bankers, who launder their money and make sure it "disappears" when the "drug lord" gets caught. As a lateral example, it was bankers who came up with the idea of forming OPEC, not the OPEC members themselves.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles Queen
I am a disabled nam vet
01:51 PM on 11/22/2011
This never ends.The fact is that yes,we should legalise marijuana for adult use nation wide.Our govenemt literaly throws away mega billions a year trying to stop pot from getting to the people and it's always a complete and total failure.The yearly yields prove that themselves as they continue to outdo every previous years yields and this does not even include whats smugled into the country.The goverment could be making a huge forune in tax revenuse from legalising it.It wuld wipe out the national deficit within 3-4 years or sooner and put all stsates in the black again within 2-3 years easily.It would eliminate any cuts in S.S./SSi/military disability and medicare-aide.I mean the positive aspect are so numerous their to many to even list on here while the negative aspects are almost nil.It would create jobs as well.It's harmless enough,doesn't cause any deseases unlike all alcahol and tobaco products which are the 2 number one kilers in the country not to mention the life threatening deseases they cause.Pot does not do this.If used with the vaporiser there's no smoke at all so that takes care of lung problems completely.Is only mentaly addictive and not physically so.It's the most sensible,intelligent and logical thing our country could do at this point in time
04:08 PM on 11/30/2011
if they could think of a way to privatize and control the production of marijuana they would have already legalized. but since people can grow it themselves there is no profit incentive for them to consider it. they wouldn't want us to get the idea that we actually have rights after they've spent so much time and energy trying to subvert the rights guaranteed by the founding documents...
01:29 PM on 11/22/2011
we get a relatively progressive president and we still can't get any meaningful movement on drug policy. what will it take? we've been stupid about legalalization for 80 years. i suspect many politicos believe in decriminalization but the grover norquists of drug paranoia impede any significant relaxation of our laws. it's going to change but it sure is taking a lot longer than i thought it would, and in the meantime the african american community suffers disproportionally.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lifeskills
May you be wise and alert in all your responsibili
09:09 AM on 11/23/2011
No Pres. Obama is for making pop legal, just the othe day there talk about many pot related prisoners will finally be cut lose. Don't blame Obama.
Our drug prohibition policy is hopeless, just as Prohibition, our alcohol prohibition policy, was before it. Today there are more drugs in our communities and at lower prices and higher strengths than ever before. We have built large numbers of prisons, but they are overflowing with non-violent drug offenders. The huge profits made from drug sales are corrupting people and institutions here and abroad. And far from being protected by our drug prohibition policy, our children are being recruited by it to a lifestyle of drug use and drug selling.
10:52 AM on 11/24/2011
@ Lifeskills- The prisoners he pardoned had been given ridiculous sentences that were obviously wrong. He did it to counter all the articles coming out about his administration having one of the harshest anti-pot stances we've seen yet. He has never been willing to put himself out on a limb and stand against our failed war on drugs. In the end it doesn't matter what he believes if he isn't willing to do something about it. It is much worse to know what is right and be too much of a coward to act than to be disillusioned and think what you are doing is right.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rtaylor1974
Obama=Austerity at Home..War Abroad
08:55 PM on 11/27/2011
we most certainly can blame Obama for the continued failed war on drugs. Every time he has been approached about it via community related forums...he chuckles a bit about it then says in his most poignant campaign speech mode "No I dont believe in Legalization", and he feels its the wrong path for our country. Never does he explain why in detail, or offer any other solution than what we have now. He just briskly moves onto a new topic. He refuses to spend any political capitol on this issue.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jway86
01:20 PM on 11/22/2011
Half of Congress are millionaires and marijuana just doesn't fit into their elite perspective of society. Brandy, tobacco and beer (for the commoners) are fine but god forbid, not that smokey, sticky herb, cannabis. It simply would not be "proper" for them to legalize adult marijuana sales even though their prohibition *doesn't* prevent people from buying, selling and using marijuana and *does* make marijuana readily accessible to children by creating large profits for drug dealers where otherwise there would be NONE.