More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Trish Wood

Trish Wood

Posted: March 7, 2010 02:31 PM

The Hurt Locker: Truth in the Fiction

What's Your Reaction:

Isn't it ironic? A Hollywood movie focuses the media away from Kate Gosselin's hair extensions and into a belated frenzy of soldier interviews and Iraq War fact checking. If only this determination to get it right had preceded the invasion.

Excluding some excellent memoirs by Iraq veterans and despite some technical inaccuracies, The Hurt Locker captures more existential truth about the conflict than you'll find anywhere.

A good story is the sum of a series of decisions about what to tell and where in the narrative structure to tell it. Director Kathryn Bigelow and screenwriter Mark Boal were right to focus on explosions as the signature experience of the war. The high wire, without-a-net tensions that attend the film's Explosive Ordnance Disposal unit are a perfect microcosm of the endless, metaphorical booby-traps laid by negligent war planners.

Improvised explosive devices and suicide bombings have maimed and killed more American soldiers and Iraqi civilians than any other weapon. An Army surgeon at Landstuhl, Germany calls Iraq "a body parts war." Marines who served in restive Anbar province will tell you that IEDs are impossible to defend against. The intensity captured by the film is absolutely true for any soldier who navigates Iraq's fraught roadways.

The film's protagonist is a fearless "cowboy" whose daredevil antics put his unit at risk. I can't help wondering if on some level Staff Sergeant William James represents the hubris that propelled America into Iraq in the first place.

Does this portrayal of James defame the nation's vets? Some vets think so, but I don't.
The Hurt Locker makes clear that James is actually a good man who who has come to represent war's absurd paradox -- he's not fully alive unless he is risking death.

Nearly all great contemporary war films have been criticized for taking creative liberties. The Deer Hunter (best picture, best director) director Michael Cimino was accused of inventing the scenes of Viet Cong soldiers forcing Russian roulette games on captured Americans. Francis Ford Coppola caught flack for the surfing-down-the-Mekong scene in his masterpiece, Apocalypse Now (best screenplay, best supporting actor).

But even soldiers themselves sometimes resort to invention when crafting their own stories of war. Tim O'Brien, a Vietnam veteran who wrote an award-winning, fictionalized account of his in-country service explained it best. In The Things They Carried, O'Brien's character says, "I want you to feel what I felt. I want you to know why story-truth is truer sometimes than happening-truth."

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
12:27 AM on 03/09/2010
Jenn Lee who was a producer on "The Hurt Locker" gives a first hand account from the Nic's Oscar party as to what went down behind the scenes at Voltage and how they got it produced. Watch this. It is funny and insightful. You can see it at a friend of Nic's site...

http://filmclosings.com

A great piece.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Balzac
09:30 PM on 03/07/2010
It definitely had a jingoistic edge to it, but the action scenes were very powerful. The guy disarming the bombs was fun to watch in action. Back on base, not much fun.

The fact that he chose to roll the dice again and again, rather than to stay home and raise his son was sad. For me, the most moving scene was the Iraqi man who had the bomb locked onto him with a steel frame. His effort to save him, and the Iraqi family man's final prayer was very poignant.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aznurse
07:14 PM on 03/07/2010
It was a great movie! I didn't think it was pro-war or anti-war. It did explain some of the horrors of war
and how it affects the troops and their families.
I hope it wins.
09:48 AM on 03/08/2010
This was precisely why I enjoyed the movie, it did not lean one way or the other, it told the story and let you make your own ideas. I applaud Bigelow for keeping it objective. So many films are so busy being heavy handed in their own views,that they presume the audience is stupid and cannot tell that the movie has a slant, or that their audience is so stupid that they can't have any rational thought of their own, so they have to help 'guide' them to whatever idea they are trying to propogate.

We all know war is a horrible situation, the movie clearly shows that. It also shows how it can change a person and how above how we individually feel about the war in general, we should be doing everything to support the men and women who bear the title of US Soldier.

Kudos to Bigelow, I hope she has many more good projects to come.