AuntSally
Recent comments by this user
Gore Surprises Netroots Nation, Says Not Eager To Serve In Obama Cabinet (VIDEO)
Obama's Foreign Trip: Yes, He Should
I don't recall Clinton doing anything like this, nor Bush.
I strongly support Obama's candidacy and a trip such as this, gathering information, talking to foreign leadership, is certainly appropriate. It's the very public speeches that are scheduled that make me uneasy. At the moment he is not our predident; he doesn't speak for the nation. If he behaves as though he does, it will be problematic. I'm a supporter, and it makes me uncomfortable -- that is problematic.
I'd support a low-key trip; indications are this is going to be very high profile. posted 07/18/2008 at 15:57:07
I strongly support Obama's candidacy and a trip such as this, gathering information, talking to foreign leadership, is certainly appropriate. It's the very public speeches that are scheduled that make me uneasy. At the moment he is not our predident; he doesn't speak for the nation. If he behaves as though he does, it will be problematic. I'm a supporter, and it makes me uncomfortable -- that is problematic.
I'd support a low-key trip; indications are this is going to be very high profile. posted 07/18/2008 at 15:57:07
The Republican Albatross: Conservatives, Ideology, and the Human Condition As Seen By David Brooks
Don't forget:
-- longer life expectancies;
-- lower infant mortality rates; and
-- greater financial security in retirement.
Oh, and Europeans use roughly half the energy per capita that we in the U.S. use. posted 07/19/2008 at 11:24:19
-- longer life expectancies;
-- lower infant mortality rates; and
-- greater financial security in retirement.
Oh, and Europeans use roughly half the energy per capita that we in the U.S. use. posted 07/19/2008 at 11:24:19
Bob Barr, will.i.am Attend Gore's New Energy Challenge Speech
You realize, of course, it took us less than a year to spend $150 Billion on Iraq.
So for a financial committment less than one-tenth that of the Iraq debacle, we could be well on our way... posted 07/17/2008 at 14:42:37
So for a financial committment less than one-tenth that of the Iraq debacle, we could be well on our way... posted 07/17/2008 at 14:42:37
Something Strange is Happening at the Coldest, Driest Place on Earth
Beck and others are also hyperventilating about Pixar's Wall.E
(I'm not sure why, the movie clearly indicates that cockroaches have nothing to worry about...) posted 07/17/2008 at 12:51:36
(I'm not sure why, the movie clearly indicates that cockroaches have nothing to worry about...) posted 07/17/2008 at 12:51:36
Reeling From Polls -- Obama Strikes Back
Serious damage has been done.
What he did today was deliver a speech. A month ago I would've said the speech was bold vision; now I'm inclined to call it lip service. When it comes to action, e.g., an actual vote on an actual issue such as FISA, Obama has strongly detracted from his carefully cultivated image as the change candidate.
I still want him to be that candidate, and think he can be. But it's now clear to me that he will require constant pressure from serious progressives. Left to his own devices, he does not appear to have the courage of his convictions. posted 07/15/2008 at 20:50:04
What he did today was deliver a speech. A month ago I would've said the speech was bold vision; now I'm inclined to call it lip service. When it comes to action, e.g., an actual vote on an actual issue such as FISA, Obama has strongly detracted from his carefully cultivated image as the change candidate.
I still want him to be that candidate, and think he can be. But it's now clear to me that he will require constant pressure from serious progressives. Left to his own devices, he does not appear to have the courage of his convictions. posted 07/15/2008 at 20:50:04
Obama Campaign Manager Airs Cash Woes In Video
I have been an ardent supporter of Senator Obama. However....
Since his rush to the right, he is well down in the polls and well down in fundraising. And the Rs haven't even cranked up the slime machine yet. So the decline is principally attributable to his own actions.
I find myself no longer supporting Obama, so much as opposing McCain. I will register my opposition to McCain by voting for Obama. But how do I push Obama back to where he needs to be -- more progressive, and with a better chance of winning -- other than cutting off my donations?
Seriously, I'm not sure what the answer is... posted 07/14/2008 at 13:06:44
Since his rush to the right, he is well down in the polls and well down in fundraising. And the Rs haven't even cranked up the slime machine yet. So the decline is principally attributable to his own actions.
I find myself no longer supporting Obama, so much as opposing McCain. I will register my opposition to McCain by voting for Obama. But how do I push Obama back to where he needs to be -- more progressive, and with a better chance of winning -- other than cutting off my donations?
Seriously, I'm not sure what the answer is... posted 07/14/2008 at 13:06:44
...and he wouldn't get elected. posted 07/14/2008 at 12:59:51
Yikes! Controversial New Yorker Cover Shows Muslim, Flag-Burning, Osama-Loving, Fist-Bumping Obama
I actually think it's pretty funny. But then, I'm a strong believer in the power of satire...
It might be outrageous if it appeared on the cover of Time, but this is The New Yorker -- somiething like six people who don't get it are going to see this picture. posted 07/13/2008 at 19:45:06
It might be outrageous if it appeared on the cover of Time, but this is The New Yorker -- somiething like six people who don't get it are going to see this picture. posted 07/13/2008 at 19:45:06
Obama Lead In Newsweek Poll Drops From 15 To 3
Thank goodness we've got someone on the "inside" giving us the "real" scoop. posted 07/12/2008 at 16:07:00
A week after clinching the nomination, Obama was up 12-15 points in this poll and his fundraising numbers were looking astronomical. He didn't need the Clinton dead-enders or their money. He got there by firm talk on all issues progressive.
Flash forward 1 month: Obama made a mad dash for the right, most importantly on FISA and thrashing the 4th Amendment. Given the chance to actually DO something progressive, Obama failed to deliver. It was a thumb in the eye to his avid supporters, a wake up call to independents who thought Obama was actually serious, and a great big bucket of cold water on legions of enthusiastic young people.
Now he's lost considerable support, and his fundraising has plunged. Is this really surprising.
I stopped sending my weekly checks because I don't know how else to make my voice heard.
What could have been a landslide and a once-in-a-lifetime chance for real change is turning into more triangulating; if he wins, it'll be by a hair. Makes all the difference in the world when it comes to actually governing. posted 07/12/2008 at 14:47:58
Flash forward 1 month: Obama made a mad dash for the right, most importantly on FISA and thrashing the 4th Amendment. Given the chance to actually DO something progressive, Obama failed to deliver. It was a thumb in the eye to his avid supporters, a wake up call to independents who thought Obama was actually serious, and a great big bucket of cold water on legions of enthusiastic young people.
Now he's lost considerable support, and his fundraising has plunged. Is this really surprising.
I stopped sending my weekly checks because I don't know how else to make my voice heard.
What could have been a landslide and a once-in-a-lifetime chance for real change is turning into more triangulating; if he wins, it'll be by a hair. Makes all the difference in the world when it comes to actually governing. posted 07/12/2008 at 14:47:58
The Unitary Executive Congress
There is no doubt in my mind that Clinton's vote was also sheer poltical calculation. I suspect that she's still got fantasies running around her mind of somehow wresting the nomination; she saw a vigorous progressive uprising against Obama on this, and threw her lot the other way. I doubt she's even read the bill. posted 07/13/2008 at 19:53:30
German Chancellor Skeptical Of Obama Speech Plan
I just don't understand this guy. What in the world is he trying to accomplish?
He's behaving as though he were already President. His campaign -- he -- has been making blunder after blunder since June 3rd.
He could've won the election with just the support he had coming out of the primary. He'll likely still win. But with far less enthusiasm among Americans.
Is there a word for "so intensely disappointed I could puke" ? posted 07/09/2008 at 12:10:30
He's behaving as though he were already President. His campaign -- he -- has been making blunder after blunder since June 3rd.
He could've won the election with just the support he had coming out of the primary. He'll likely still win. But with far less enthusiasm among Americans.
Is there a word for "so intensely disappointed I could puke" ? posted 07/09/2008 at 12:10:30
Oh, Yes She Can
As intensely disappointing Obama has been of late...
...you're right -- I have seen Hillary Clinton in action -- and I don't want her anywhere near the Oval Office.
I agree: just because John McCain isn't the 'right' guy, it doesn't mean Obama is.
And just because Obama doesn't appear to be the right guy
It doesn't mean Hillary is.
Sigh. posted 07/09/2008 at 12:01:18
...you're right -- I have seen Hillary Clinton in action -- and I don't want her anywhere near the Oval Office.
I agree: just because John McCain isn't the 'right' guy, it doesn't mean Obama is.
And just because Obama doesn't appear to be the right guy
It doesn't mean Hillary is.
Sigh. posted 07/09/2008 at 12:01:18
Victims of Global Warming: The "Lucky Ones" Got Shot
And how many of those U.S. cities have accomplished the same?
I thought so...
We've become a "can'd do" nation whose only discernable product is excuses. posted 07/09/2008 at 11:55:29
I thought so...
We've become a "can'd do" nation whose only discernable product is excuses. posted 07/09/2008 at 11:55:29
They're Lying
One candidate misrepresenting the other's policy proposals? Unprecedented! posted 07/07/2008 at 23:21:07
Obama's Response To FISA Critics: A Vital Exchange With An Empty Center
I've been thinking about his a great deal, wondering what constituency he could possibly be chasing with this FISA position.
I think he, like many Democratic senators, is allowing himself to be bullied.
I think he's afraid that, in the event of another attack of some kind, the Republicans will claim (almost certainly falsely) that it could have been prevented w/ the tyrannical FISA package. Rather than have to call their deceit, Obama is choosing the route of capitulation.
Rather than trust his legions of supporters to have his back, he's choosing to sell us down the river.
If ever there were an issue to stand firm on, it's the overreaching of government against it's citizens -- in the form of habeus corpus, extraordinary rendition, illegal searches and seizures.
If Obama is willing to lay down on this very basic principle, will he stand up or me when they toss me into prison without charges? Will the next President? I'm not anxious to 'trust' that they will. posted 07/07/2008 at 19:40:15
I think he, like many Democratic senators, is allowing himself to be bullied.
I think he's afraid that, in the event of another attack of some kind, the Republicans will claim (almost certainly falsely) that it could have been prevented w/ the tyrannical FISA package. Rather than have to call their deceit, Obama is choosing the route of capitulation.
Rather than trust his legions of supporters to have his back, he's choosing to sell us down the river.
If ever there were an issue to stand firm on, it's the overreaching of government against it's citizens -- in the form of habeus corpus, extraordinary rendition, illegal searches and seizures.
If Obama is willing to lay down on this very basic principle, will he stand up or me when they toss me into prison without charges? Will the next President? I'm not anxious to 'trust' that they will. posted 07/07/2008 at 19:40:15
Obama, Stay the Course!
I don't smell McAuliffe and Penn, so much as Daschle, whom the Obama campaign has acknowledged as a close advisor.
Tom Daschle is the king of roll over, don't take a stand, can't everyone just get along. More than any other single Democrat, Tom Dasche presided over early capitulations to BushCo -- and Harry Reid has followed suit. posted 07/07/2008 at 13:49:29
Tom Daschle is the king of roll over, don't take a stand, can't everyone just get along. More than any other single Democrat, Tom Dasche presided over early capitulations to BushCo -- and Harry Reid has followed suit. posted 07/07/2008 at 13:49:29
Opponents of Retroactive Immunity Live To Fight Another Day
Senator Dodd,
The person you need to reach is Senator Obama. For reasons passing understanding, he has chosen to capitulate on this issue.
I suspect the Democratic nominee for President could help you muster 41 votes -- but he's not even trying. Change we can believe in? Apparently not... posted 07/07/2008 at 13:39:57
The person you need to reach is Senator Obama. For reasons passing understanding, he has chosen to capitulate on this issue.
I suspect the Democratic nominee for President could help you muster 41 votes -- but he's not even trying. Change we can believe in? Apparently not... posted 07/07/2008 at 13:39:57
Obama, FISA and the Netroots
Spot on, Mr. Ostertag -- Spot. On. posted 07/07/2008 at 10:40:33
Progressives Must Guard Against Helping to Promote Republican Narrative That Alleges Obama "Flip Flops"
Barack Obama is not simply "one vote" any more. He is the Democratic Party's nominee for President -- and the favorite to win.
He is in the position to exert pressure on the other senators -- by way of the likelihood of his becoming president, and by way of millions of (previously) juiced supporters.
Sadly, he has chosen not to lead on this issue.
Instead, it looks to me as though he's afraid -- afraid that there will be some sort of attack and the Rs will claim it could have been prevented if FISA had passed. It'll be nonsense of course, but Obama, like every other week-kneed Dem in congress, doesn't seem to have the courage to stand up to the troglodite demographic these days. posted 07/07/2008 at 00:51:42
He is in the position to exert pressure on the other senators -- by way of the likelihood of his becoming president, and by way of millions of (previously) juiced supporters.
Sadly, he has chosen not to lead on this issue.
Instead, it looks to me as though he's afraid -- afraid that there will be some sort of attack and the Rs will claim it could have been prevented if FISA had passed. It'll be nonsense of course, but Obama, like every other week-kneed Dem in congress, doesn't seem to have the courage to stand up to the troglodite demographic these days. posted 07/07/2008 at 00:51:42
Sounds like someone is still having ... er... issues.... posted 07/07/2008 at 00:38:47
I'll See Your GrassRoots FISA Problem and Raise You Some Pissed Off Women
please stop shouting. posted 07/05/2008 at 15:42:28
Top GOP VP Choices: Failed Business Leaders, Former Dems, Confirmed Bachelors and Creationists
How are Mormon beliefs stranger than, say, Catholics for example? posted 07/07/2008 at 00:28:56
NY Times Slams Obama For Being "New And Not Improved"
Blackberry? I'd have taken him for an iPhone man... posted 07/04/2008 at 16:57:15
My Position On FISA
Among the big telecoms, only Qwest refused to comply with NSA's request for illegal wiretaps:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-05-10-nsa_x.htm
-- after which their CEO, Joe Nacchio, was prosecuted and convicted for insider trading. That conviction was overturned, and Nacchio claims the prosecution was bogus and punishment for not going along w/ illegal wiretapping.
From the USA Today article:
"Unable to get comfortable with what NSA was proposing, Qwest's lawyers asked NSA to take its proposal to the FISA court. According to the sources, the agency refused.
The NSA's explanation did little to satisfy Qwest's lawyers. "They told (Qwest) they didn't want to do that because FISA might not agree with them," one person recalled. For similar reasons, this person said, NSA rejected Qwest's suggestion of getting a letter of authorization from the U.S. attorney general's office. A second person confirmed this version of events." posted 07/03/2008 at 18:55:10
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-05-10-nsa_x.htm
-- after which their CEO, Joe Nacchio, was prosecuted and convicted for insider trading. That conviction was overturned, and Nacchio claims the prosecution was bogus and punishment for not going along w/ illegal wiretapping.
From the USA Today article:
"Unable to get comfortable with what NSA was proposing, Qwest's lawyers asked NSA to take its proposal to the FISA court. According to the sources, the agency refused.
The NSA's explanation did little to satisfy Qwest's lawyers. "They told (Qwest) they didn't want to do that because FISA might not agree with them," one person recalled. For similar reasons, this person said, NSA rejected Qwest's suggestion of getting a letter of authorization from the U.S. attorney general's office. A second person confirmed this version of events." posted 07/03/2008 at 18:55:10
Rush Limbaugh On His New Deal: "I'm Not Retiring Until Every American Agrees With Me"
Could somebody in charge make a decision to get Limbaugh's grotesque, smirking face off this website and keep it off?
Just asking. posted 07/03/2008 at 14:25:35
Just asking. posted 07/03/2008 at 14:25:35
G-8 Climate Scorecard Puts U.S. In Last Place
That's the spirit!
We're not the worst at protecting the environment;
We're the BEST at destroying it! posted 07/03/2008 at 12:33:55
We're not the worst at protecting the environment;
We're the BEST at destroying it! posted 07/03/2008 at 12:33:55
Seven Things Barack Obama Should Do to Keep from Blowing It
Arianna, with all your friends and connections, don't you have any sway with this guy ?!?
For the love of God, can't somebody get through to him? He's throwing cold water on an uber-energized young electorate faster than the melting Greenland glaciers can spew it out -- and that's saying something.
And if I hear one more pundit blather on about the blue collar white males, I'm gonna lose it. Forget 'em! It's like courting George Wallace or Rush Limbaugh.
Obama is raining on his own parade in Katrina-scale fashion. Is he going to be surprised when the levies break? posted 07/03/2008 at 12:14:54
For the love of God, can't somebody get through to him? He's throwing cold water on an uber-energized young electorate faster than the melting Greenland glaciers can spew it out -- and that's saying something.
And if I hear one more pundit blather on about the blue collar white males, I'm gonna lose it. Forget 'em! It's like courting George Wallace or Rush Limbaugh.
Obama is raining on his own parade in Katrina-scale fashion. Is he going to be surprised when the levies break? posted 07/03/2008 at 12:14:54
Since when is protecting fundamental constitutional rights a radical liberal position? Look in the rearview mirror, my friend, the middle is way, way back there... posted 07/03/2008 at 12:14:53
The Changing Times and the Equinox Voter
For the love of all that is bright and holy...
Forget about blue collar white males as a demographic. God bless 'em, they're like all of us -- complicated people who are, basically, good people. But we don't need their votes to win. The polls already show that. And when we win, they'll be better off, despite their own rotten judgement.
It's the uber-energized young voters that we need -- and right now Obama is doing his best to throw cold water on that crowd. I never saw a politician rain on his own parade as badly as Obama is doing right now. posted 07/03/2008 at 12:03:40
Forget about blue collar white males as a demographic. God bless 'em, they're like all of us -- complicated people who are, basically, good people. But we don't need their votes to win. The polls already show that. And when we win, they'll be better off, despite their own rotten judgement.
It's the uber-energized young voters that we need -- and right now Obama is doing his best to throw cold water on that crowd. I never saw a politician rain on his own parade as badly as Obama is doing right now. posted 07/03/2008 at 12:03:40
Surveillance Protest Group Now Tops Obama Website
He'd have had a better chance of winning election if he'd stuck to his original position.
Which demographic is now going to vote for him, due to his new FISA position, that wasn't voting for him before? Seriously, I'd like to know.
The only thing he's accomplishing with this position is souring his base. posted 07/03/2008 at 01:20:16
Which demographic is now going to vote for him, due to his new FISA position, that wasn't voting for him before? Seriously, I'd like to know.
The only thing he's accomplishing with this position is souring his base. posted 07/03/2008 at 01:20:16
Membership is now nearly 12,000. (Wed. noon) posted 07/02/2008 at 15:26:50
No, "we" are trying very hard to win this election -- and to win in a manner that allows Obama leverage he'll need in achieving the substantial changes he must champion when President.
He needs to win with an energized base. That's the leverage. Backing away from both a pramgmatic and principled stand on protecting citizens from government (4th Amendment) is in no way winning him votes - from anyone.
Seriously, show me the demographic that is now going vote for Obama because of this FISA support.
Further, the OLD FISA law also had judicial oversight. It was ignored. The new one simply says "There is judicial oversight - and this time we mean it, gosh darn it!" posted 07/02/2008 at 15:26:06
He needs to win with an energized base. That's the leverage. Backing away from both a pramgmatic and principled stand on protecting citizens from government (4th Amendment) is in no way winning him votes - from anyone.
Seriously, show me the demographic that is now going vote for Obama because of this FISA support.
Further, the OLD FISA law also had judicial oversight. It was ignored. The new one simply says "There is judicial oversight - and this time we mean it, gosh darn it!" posted 07/02/2008 at 15:26:06
Obama Keeps Five Point Lead In Gallup Poll
Two weeks ago he was up by 15 points and 12 points in two separate polls, respectively.
Following his moves to the right (not the center), he's up by 5 points.
So the move does seem to be working... for McCain. posted 07/03/2008 at 14:44:22
Following his moves to the right (not the center), he's up by 5 points.
So the move does seem to be working... for McCain. posted 07/03/2008 at 14:44:22
All of McCain's Base Belongs to Us: Why It Won't Even Be Close
Abraham Lincoln was running for President of a third-rate, backwater of a country.
Don't get me wrong, I think Obama has plenty of experience, and a first-rate mind. He'll find the technocrats necessary to run the government.
But let's not confuse the backwater 1860 American Republic w/ the 21st Century American Empire. posted 07/04/2008 at 00:41:13
Don't get me wrong, I think Obama has plenty of experience, and a first-rate mind. He'll find the technocrats necessary to run the government.
But let's not confuse the backwater 1860 American Republic w/ the 21st Century American Empire. posted 07/04/2008 at 00:41:13
Stephen Baldwin On Fox News: If Obama Wins, I'll Leave The Country
Hmm. If we shouldn't care what Sarandon, Affleck and the rest think about the issues, why should we care what Stephen Baldwin thinks? Honestly, I never heard of this guy. Has he been in anything good? posted 07/01/2008 at 22:35:45
Geoengineering of Climate Change
Dr. Takahashi,
Geoengineering is a bad, bad idea on many levels. Here are the top three:
1. By promising "instant fix", governments and societies are less motivated to get the job done right.
2. We simply have no idea what other effects may cascade out of these nutty schemes.
3. It doesn't address the problem. Rather than take pills for the symptoms, why don't we just excise the inflamed organ?
We know what to do to address this crisis, and we have the technology to do it.
We need to stop burnng fossil fuels and move to a renewable energy economy. Without minimizing the engineering challenge, it is simply a fact that collecting the solar energy falling on roughly 200 square miles of the earth, all of the US electrical needs can be met. That's a swatch of ground 10 miles by 20 miles. We have the technology, and we have the resources.
Let's. Just. Get. On. With. It. !
(Also, I disagree that the Montreal protocol, outlawing CFCs, is an example of geoengineering. Rather, it's an example of addressing the problem directly: CFCs are destroying ozone, so stop pumping CFCs into the atmosphere.) posted 07/01/2008 at 11:34:18
Geoengineering is a bad, bad idea on many levels. Here are the top three:
1. By promising "instant fix", governments and societies are less motivated to get the job done right.
2. We simply have no idea what other effects may cascade out of these nutty schemes.
3. It doesn't address the problem. Rather than take pills for the symptoms, why don't we just excise the inflamed organ?
We know what to do to address this crisis, and we have the technology to do it.
We need to stop burnng fossil fuels and move to a renewable energy economy. Without minimizing the engineering challenge, it is simply a fact that collecting the solar energy falling on roughly 200 square miles of the earth, all of the US electrical needs can be met. That's a swatch of ground 10 miles by 20 miles. We have the technology, and we have the resources.
Let's. Just. Get. On. With. It. !
(Also, I disagree that the Montreal protocol, outlawing CFCs, is an example of geoengineering. Rather, it's an example of addressing the problem directly: CFCs are destroying ozone, so stop pumping CFCs into the atmosphere.) posted 07/01/2008 at 11:34:18
Hillary Clinton Campaign Insiders Dish On What Went Wrong
Sigh.
There is no such thing as a "popular vote" in the Democratic primary. First, the existence of caucus states precludes the very notion; second, it's a delegate thing.
It's like saying the tennis player who gets louderst applause wins the match, regardless of the score.
I need a drink. posted 06/30/2008 at 19:27:33
There is no such thing as a "popular vote" in the Democratic primary. First, the existence of caucus states precludes the very notion; second, it's a delegate thing.
It's like saying the tennis player who gets louderst applause wins the match, regardless of the score.
I need a drink. posted 06/30/2008 at 19:27:33
Nipping Solar Energy in the Bud
Environmental impact assessment of large solar projects is considerably more complicated than for oil and gas drilling. The difference being, renewables displace the higher-impact fossil fuel projects. In other words, while fossil fuel projects are all negative impact, renewable projects are a mix of negative and positive.
For example, if you want to assess a big solar array in the desert, there are the negative impacts to the local ecosystem, and the positive impacts to displacing, say, a coal-fired power plant, with it's associated enormous environmental footprint (mining and transporting the coal, as well as burning the coal). posted 06/30/2008 at 11:04:08
For example, if you want to assess a big solar array in the desert, there are the negative impacts to the local ecosystem, and the positive impacts to displacing, say, a coal-fired power plant, with it's associated enormous environmental footprint (mining and transporting the coal, as well as burning the coal). posted 06/30/2008 at 11:04:08
Hawaii Requires Solar Water Heaters For New Homes
The $6k cost of the solar hot water heater is one percent of the quoted $600k cost of the home. As a cost of reducing the power used by the home 25-40% (as quoted in the article), cost here is a non issue. posted 06/30/2008 at 11:11:49
Bill Clinton Says Obama Must 'Kiss My Ass' For His Support
Regardless of the press accuracy on this one...
... I'd rather see Bill Clinton sit this one out. He's a distraction at this point. I don't see him bringing many voters to the ball, but I do see him scaring them away. posted 06/29/2008 at 23:31:12
... I'd rather see Bill Clinton sit this one out. He's a distraction at this point. I don't see him bringing many voters to the ball, but I do see him scaring them away. posted 06/29/2008 at 23:31:12
A Reminder For Senator Obama: Fortune Favors The Bold
Tom Daschle is a good and decent man.
He was also an utterly ineffective Majority leader.
Obama played his heart out, played with abandon to get to center court. No that he's there, he's completely tightened up. If this is Daschle's doing, I will be forced to use harsh language.
Bold is right.
Goddammit Obama, get back into your game! posted 06/29/2008 at 23:13:32
He was also an utterly ineffective Majority leader.
Obama played his heart out, played with abandon to get to center court. No that he's there, he's completely tightened up. If this is Daschle's doing, I will be forced to use harsh language.
Bold is right.
Goddammit Obama, get back into your game! posted 06/29/2008 at 23:13:32
Reminder: Obama Told Us To Judge Him, and Pressure Him
He's already "actually in office." He's a U.S. senator.
His position on FISA is fundamentally different than, say, commenting on Supreme Court decisions because, in the case of FISA, he's actually casting a vote. Now. Not a year from now; now. He's shaping our nation.
He could choose to shape it -- now -- on the side of protecting citizens from an overreaching government and leaders, present and future, with tyrannical tendencies. He could choose to oppose this bill and rally the legions of support he has across this nation to pressure their senators; he could deliver a major victory against disastrous Bush policies before even becoming president. Now wouldn't that be something to behold!
So far he chooses differently.
I choose not to overlook his choice. posted 06/29/2008 at 15:51:10
His position on FISA is fundamentally different than, say, commenting on Supreme Court decisions because, in the case of FISA, he's actually casting a vote. Now. Not a year from now; now. He's shaping our nation.
He could choose to shape it -- now -- on the side of protecting citizens from an overreaching government and leaders, present and future, with tyrannical tendencies. He could choose to oppose this bill and rally the legions of support he has across this nation to pressure their senators; he could deliver a major victory against disastrous Bush policies before even becoming president. Now wouldn't that be something to behold!
So far he chooses differently.
I choose not to overlook his choice. posted 06/29/2008 at 15:51:10
Arianna On ABC's This Week Discussing Obama, McCain And More
I'm sure that the lying, parents, and teenagers are all related, but I'm not sure you've got the sequence right... posted 06/29/2008 at 15:38:50
Don't Worry About Obama's Brand For God's Sake!
1. In what way is supporting FISA expansion and retroactive telecom immunity 'centrist?'
2. The point of Obama is his ability to reframe the issues. Don't accept the right wing frame, instead present a compelling reframing: opposing FISA strengthens the security of Americans by backing us away from Bush's growing secret police state.
You see, the way we win this thing is by standing up to Mr. 23% and his insane fascist cabal. Backbone, man -- that's what Americans want! posted 06/29/2008 at 01:00:24
2. The point of Obama is his ability to reframe the issues. Don't accept the right wing frame, instead present a compelling reframing: opposing FISA strengthens the security of Americans by backing us away from Bush's growing secret police state.
You see, the way we win this thing is by standing up to Mr. 23% and his insane fascist cabal. Backbone, man -- that's what Americans want! posted 06/29/2008 at 01:00:24
The Daschleization of Barack Obama -- or, How to Lose Your Balance By Centering Yourself
RJ is right,
Obama gains nothing by capitulating on FISA. Tell me, what votes are being courted? Which demographic is this 'compromise' going to win? The only people who support this bill are in the Bush Administration -- which is, in turn, supported by a whopping 23% of Americans. There are, like, six people that might give Obama a lukewarm nod in Nov. because of his FISA vote.
Further, calling crappy legislation crappy is not the same as falling on one's sword. It's taking a stand that ought to be a no brainer -- something a bazillion of us have been waiting for a Democrat to do for an eon.
Before tacking center, Obama was beating McCain handily in the national polls. So why tack center? (And I disagree that supporting FISA qualifies as tacking center; more like tacking sensible.) posted 06/28/2008 at 20:17:18
Obama gains nothing by capitulating on FISA. Tell me, what votes are being courted? Which demographic is this 'compromise' going to win? The only people who support this bill are in the Bush Administration -- which is, in turn, supported by a whopping 23% of Americans. There are, like, six people that might give Obama a lukewarm nod in Nov. because of his FISA vote.
Further, calling crappy legislation crappy is not the same as falling on one's sword. It's taking a stand that ought to be a no brainer -- something a bazillion of us have been waiting for a Democrat to do for an eon.
Before tacking center, Obama was beating McCain handily in the national polls. So why tack center? (And I disagree that supporting FISA qualifies as tacking center; more like tacking sensible.) posted 06/28/2008 at 20:17:18
Obama Undercuts His Brand
I don't see opting out of public financing this cycle as problematic. Accepting no PAC or lobbyist money is the transformative step, and he's taken it.
BUT.... My enthusiasm is way, way down -- principally due to FISA. This isn't a case of giving lip service on an issue in order to win an election, absent any substantive action. Quite the contrary, this is legislation that is here now, and deals with issues fundamental to our identity as a people. This is an issue that candidate Obama could have championed -- and likely won -- before even becoming president! Wow -- wouldn't that have been something to behold. By aggressively pressing his fired up base to, themselves, aggressively pressure their senators, candidate Obama could have brought tremendous force to bear. That's what I call transformational and productive.
Instead, we get this utter capitulation. And I ask: whose votes are being courted? This is a bill supported by Bush who, in turn, is supported by 23% of the country. I ask again: which demographic is he looking to secure with incredibly cowardly, unprincipled position?
Fine, you get elected. I'll still vote against McCain. But I'd rather vote FOR Obama. What chance has he got of pushing through serious reform with a cynical base? Not much, I'm afraid.
This isn't transformative politics -- it's MORE OF THE SAME. posted 06/28/2008 at 14:08:59
BUT.... My enthusiasm is way, way down -- principally due to FISA. This isn't a case of giving lip service on an issue in order to win an election, absent any substantive action. Quite the contrary, this is legislation that is here now, and deals with issues fundamental to our identity as a people. This is an issue that candidate Obama could have championed -- and likely won -- before even becoming president! Wow -- wouldn't that have been something to behold. By aggressively pressing his fired up base to, themselves, aggressively pressure their senators, candidate Obama could have brought tremendous force to bear. That's what I call transformational and productive.
Instead, we get this utter capitulation. And I ask: whose votes are being courted? This is a bill supported by Bush who, in turn, is supported by 23% of the country. I ask again: which demographic is he looking to secure with incredibly cowardly, unprincipled position?
Fine, you get elected. I'll still vote against McCain. But I'd rather vote FOR Obama. What chance has he got of pushing through serious reform with a cynical base? Not much, I'm afraid.
This isn't transformative politics -- it's MORE OF THE SAME. posted 06/28/2008 at 14:08:59
Justin Gimelstob, Anna Kournikova: Gimelstob Calls Kournikova A "Bitch," Threatens To "Hurt" Her
I've heard of Kournikova.... posted 06/29/2008 at 23:36:16
"You Can't Always Get What You Want"
If he opposes FISA, he's only open to the attacks you cite if he allows the right to frame the issue.
The whole point of Obama SHOULD be exercising an enormously energized base to reframe the issue properly: The agencies don't need an expansion of FISA -- or absolved corporate criminals -- in order to do their jobs. They can already tap anyone they want -- without a warrant for up to three days! There is already a process to get this done.
That's the reframe. He's got the money, the intellect and the support to do it. Just not the confidence, apparently. He made it to the finals, he's the strong odds-on favorite, and all of a sudden he's changing up his game?!? What's that all about? posted 06/29/2008 at 18:59:50
The whole point of Obama SHOULD be exercising an enormously energized base to reframe the issue properly: The agencies don't need an expansion of FISA -- or absolved corporate criminals -- in order to do their jobs. They can already tap anyone they want -- without a warrant for up to three days! There is already a process to get this done.
That's the reframe. He's got the money, the intellect and the support to do it. Just not the confidence, apparently. He made it to the finals, he's the strong odds-on favorite, and all of a sudden he's changing up his game?!? What's that all about? posted 06/29/2008 at 18:59:50
Joining GOP's Bold March Backwards, Bobby Jindal and Louisiana Democrats Pass "Stealth Creationism" Education Bill
"Do we really know that evolution is unsupervised?"
Science assumes it is not. It is axiomatic. Thus, teaching that natural processes progress via supernatural intervention is, by definition, not science
Put it in a philosophy class. posted 06/28/2008 at 12:10:11
Science assumes it is not. It is axiomatic. Thus, teaching that natural processes progress via supernatural intervention is, by definition, not science
Put it in a philosophy class. posted 06/28/2008 at 12:10:11
Why can't we understand this? Hmm. I'm not sure. Perhaps if you explained it to us using shorter words. And all caps. Also, if you called us a few more names, I'm sure we'd be more inclined to listen to your thoughtful arguments. posted 06/28/2008 at 10:39:07
Oh yes - as Stephen Colbert pointed out a couple of years ago, progressives have a distinct and pernicious "reality-based" bias. posted 06/28/2008 at 10:31:57
Well, you're wrong, actually. Evolution theory goes back to the formation of the building blocks of life: RNA, simple proteins and amino acids, etc. posted 06/28/2008 at 10:29:25
The enterprise of science takes as axiomatic the absence of supernatural intervention in the natural world.
In other words, it is simply assumed that natural processes unfold according to fixed laws. The ultimate origin of these laws is not knowable; their existence is assumed and a scientific description, based on observation and analysis, is built. This approach is often mistaken for atheism, which it is not. Science is simply a-religious.
Imagine losing your car keys: you go about searching for them methodically -- your assumption being that the keys are somewhere and, wherever they are, they got there by perfectly understandable, nonsupernatural means. Assuming a supernatural power (God) had nothing to do with your missing car keys is not atheism. Nor is it agnosticism.
Now, when we teach a class about how to find your car keys, should we teach kids to consider the possibility that God disappeared them? posted 06/28/2008 at 10:07:58
In other words, it is simply assumed that natural processes unfold according to fixed laws. The ultimate origin of these laws is not knowable; their existence is assumed and a scientific description, based on observation and analysis, is built. This approach is often mistaken for atheism, which it is not. Science is simply a-religious.
Imagine losing your car keys: you go about searching for them methodically -- your assumption being that the keys are somewhere and, wherever they are, they got there by perfectly understandable, nonsupernatural means. Assuming a supernatural power (God) had nothing to do with your missing car keys is not atheism. Nor is it agnosticism.
Now, when we teach a class about how to find your car keys, should we teach kids to consider the possibility that God disappeared them? posted 06/28/2008 at 10:07:58
Tension In Unity: Clinton Donors Give Obama Cold Shoulder
Are these the same wealthy donors that threatened Pelosi back in April? The ones w/ the sense of entitlement that says "we've got money, our opinions matter more."
Of course they should be invited onboard, but let's not bend over backwards.
Support him, don't support him. Whatever.
I don't think it would be a bad thing to make clear to them that they will not wield the same influence over Obama that they did over Clinton. posted 06/27/2008 at 14:16:08
Of course they should be invited onboard, but let's not bend over backwards.
Support him, don't support him. Whatever.
I don't think it would be a bad thing to make clear to them that they will not wield the same influence over Obama that they did over Clinton. posted 06/27/2008 at 14:16:08
Oh I Get It, The Left Just Doesn't Want to Win This Year
They are already required to go through the FISA court. They didn't do it, they broke the law, they committed a felony. And they're paying no price. Why? Because congress refuses to aggressively assert oversight.
So now the new law also requires court approval. What's changed? If no one enforces the law, it's worthless.
Though I keep asking, no one yet has been able to explain to me what's wrong with the current law. posted 06/27/2008 at 14:31:41
So now the new law also requires court approval. What's changed? If no one enforces the law, it's worthless.
Though I keep asking, no one yet has been able to explain to me what's wrong with the current law. posted 06/27/2008 at 14:31:41
True enough, but I'm not ready to give up on transformational. And capitulating on FISA is pure conventional. Obama won the primary by changing the game. Why change the strategy now?
Obama is already leading, substantially. There is no need to tack right and risk de-energizing a youth-base that is voting in unprecedented numbers. Why go so heavy for the center votes, when you've got such enormous, fervent support among real progressives. posted 06/27/2008 at 14:25:30
Obama is already leading, substantially. There is no need to tack right and risk de-energizing a youth-base that is voting in unprecedented numbers. Why go so heavy for the center votes, when you've got such enormous, fervent support among real progressives. posted 06/27/2008 at 14:25:30
You're worried about white men?
Forget 'em.
Barack Obama is already winning -- by 15 points in two separate polls. He's winning the swing states, New England, the Great Lakes and the west coast. If the election had been held last week, all indications are he'd have won more than 340 electoral votes -- 70 than needed to win.
Do you know why he's winning?
Young voters.
Young, energized voters.
Do you know how to keep young, energized voters from voting on election day? De-energize them. Show them you're no change at all, you're just more Clinton-style triangulation, that you'll capitulate on fundamental issues to a president less popular than satan.
Let's see what happens to those poll numbers, now that Obama has folded on fundamental civil rights. And the worst part: he can't change his mind now. Then he's just an unprincipled poll chaser. This was a knucklehead mistake from start to finish. Very disappointing. posted 06/27/2008 at 10:25:05
Forget 'em.
Barack Obama is already winning -- by 15 points in two separate polls. He's winning the swing states, New England, the Great Lakes and the west coast. If the election had been held last week, all indications are he'd have won more than 340 electoral votes -- 70 than needed to win.
Do you know why he's winning?
Young voters.
Young, energized voters.
Do you know how to keep young, energized voters from voting on election day? De-energize them. Show them you're no change at all, you're just more Clinton-style triangulation, that you'll capitulate on fundamental issues to a president less popular than satan.
Let's see what happens to those poll numbers, now that Obama has folded on fundamental civil rights. And the worst part: he can't change his mind now. Then he's just an unprincipled poll chaser. This was a knucklehead mistake from start to finish. Very disappointing. posted 06/27/2008 at 10:25:05
The singular power Obama has to change the things you want changed, is an energized electorate. An energized electorate pressures congress; an energized electorate is what gives him the ability to be transformational. Without an energized electorate, President Obama will be hamstrung by the same bought and paid for congress - Rs and Ds - that's been complicit in bringing us to where we are.
Consequenlty, his stance on FISA is a knucklehead mistake. You imply that a principled stand on fundamental rights is risky. I say the opposite. Capitulation is risky. The mood of the country is overwhelmingly clear: change. Rolling over for what the Imperial Presdent wants is just more of the same from the Democrats. But we want change. We want someone to stand up to BushCo and say shove it. Guess who just passed on the perfect opportunity to do just that. posted 06/27/2008 at 02:02:47
Consequenlty, his stance on FISA is a knucklehead mistake. You imply that a principled stand on fundamental rights is risky. I say the opposite. Capitulation is risky. The mood of the country is overwhelmingly clear: change. Rolling over for what the Imperial Presdent wants is just more of the same from the Democrats. But we want change. We want someone to stand up to BushCo and say shove it. Guess who just passed on the perfect opportunity to do just that. posted 06/27/2008 at 02:02:47
Bill Clinton "Problem" For Obama In Battleground Polls
Easily addressed: don't put Hillary on the ticket. Problem solved. posted 06/27/2008 at 10:30:33
Obama Leads McCain In Four Battleground States
No. There are no polls. There is no lead.
There is only the election.
We're not confident, we're not cocky.
We're pissed and we're focused.
Nov. 4th.
Til then, forget the polls. posted 06/26/2008 at 15:03:46
There is only the election.
We're not confident, we're not cocky.
We're pissed and we're focused.
Nov. 4th.
Til then, forget the polls. posted 06/26/2008 at 15:03:46
Hollywood Hates Me, It Really Hates Me
I agree. That whole Die Hard series was so uber left wing it makes me ill. posted 06/26/2008 at 15:24:29
Barack Obama's iPod: Bob Dylan, Yo-Yo Ma, Sheryl Crow, Jay-Z
Ooooohh... wayoutLeft just got OWNED by BitJam.... posted 06/25/2008 at 11:27:08
John McCain Should Probably Stop Calling Barack Obama "Dr. No"
NO is right.
NO to indefinite occupation of Iraq
NO to continued squandering of enormous resources in Iraq
NO to more of the same failed security policy -- policy that makes us less secure (insecurity policy?)
NO to more of a dying energy source
NO to more health insecurity
NO to torture and extraordinary rendition and illegal wiretaps
NO to fantasy-based government
NO NO NO
The disease is neoconitus, and the doctor is here. posted 06/25/2008 at 13:04:32
NO to indefinite occupation of Iraq
NO to continued squandering of enormous resources in Iraq
NO to more of the same failed security policy -- policy that makes us less secure (insecurity policy?)
NO to more of a dying energy source
NO to more health insecurity
NO to torture and extraordinary rendition and illegal wiretaps
NO to fantasy-based government
NO NO NO
The disease is neoconitus, and the doctor is here. posted 06/25/2008 at 13:04:32
McCain Staffer Turns His Candidate Into A Joke The Whole Internet Can Enjoy
A see a bumper sticker here:
JOHN MCCAIN - Aware of the Internet!
Or the shorter version:
JOHN MCAIN -- Aware! posted 06/25/2008 at 10:17:06
JOHN MCCAIN - Aware of the Internet!
Or the shorter version:
JOHN MCAIN -- Aware! posted 06/25/2008 at 10:17:06
Sungevity Offers Cheap, User-Friendly Solar Rooftop PV
$2k for how many kilowatts?
Right now I believe the national average is about $10,000 / kW installed. posted 06/25/2008 at 16:07:26
Right now I believe the national average is about $10,000 / kW installed. posted 06/25/2008 at 16:07:26
Obama Adviser On FISA: We'll Trust The Inspector General To Prevent Surveillance Abuses
Doesn't sound like you understood it.
How do you answer Greenwald's assessment? posted 06/26/2008 at 15:16:55
How do you answer Greenwald's assessment? posted 06/26/2008 at 15:16:55
What was wrong with the law as it stands?
The bill grants retroactive immunity to the telecoms for past illegal acts, doesn't it?
What I understand is that Bush & Co. committed felonies, the telecoms were complicit (Qwest understood Bush's requests were illegal and refused to comply, good for them), and this bill gives everyone a get out of jail free card.
Did I get that wrong? posted 06/26/2008 at 15:14:30
The bill grants retroactive immunity to the telecoms for past illegal acts, doesn't it?
What I understand is that Bush & Co. committed felonies, the telecoms were complicit (Qwest understood Bush's requests were illegal and refused to comply, good for them), and this bill gives everyone a get out of jail free card.
Did I get that wrong? posted 06/26/2008 at 15:14:30
I hope you're right.
But what has Obama done to this point to earn such a substantial benefit of the doubt? posted 06/26/2008 at 15:08:36
But what has Obama done to this point to earn such a substantial benefit of the doubt? posted 06/26/2008 at 15:08:36
The United States Congress has been unable to ensure accountability to this point; what makes Obama so confident that, all of a sudden, an Inspector General will? posted 06/26/2008 at 15:08:06
Do the Democrats Want to Lose?
Cenk, seriously... you're just coming to this conclusion NOW?!?
For the most part Democtratic politicians are about the power of the party and themselves, not the good of the country (of course, the same is true of the Republicans, which goes without saying).
Oh, they justify it by equating the good of the Democratic Party w/ the good of the country, but we know what that gets us: unlimited funding for Iraq, no impeachment, more dead and wounded Americans and Iraqis, HRC voting for flag-burning amendments and illegal wars.
"We'll fix it when we win back Congress."
"We'll fix it when we have a super-majority in Congress."
"We'll fix it when we have a Democrat in the White House."
Fool me once, er, fool me twice, er.... can't get fooled again. posted 06/24/2008 at 10:00:29
For the most part Democtratic politicians are about the power of the party and themselves, not the good of the country (of course, the same is true of the Republicans, which goes without saying).
Oh, they justify it by equating the good of the Democratic Party w/ the good of the country, but we know what that gets us: unlimited funding for Iraq, no impeachment, more dead and wounded Americans and Iraqis, HRC voting for flag-burning amendments and illegal wars.
"We'll fix it when we win back Congress."
"We'll fix it when we have a super-majority in Congress."
"We'll fix it when we have a Democrat in the White House."
Fool me once, er, fool me twice, er.... can't get fooled again. posted 06/24/2008 at 10:00:29
Twenty Years Later: Tipping Points Near on Global Warming
"there are many good arguments against the "man-made" theory of global climate change..."
I know you think there are. But there aren't. Name one.
Yes, the entire (relevant) scientific community has concluded, to high certainty, that the anthropogenic tug on climate is now by far the largest, by a factor of between 10 and 30. I say 'relevent', because we don't really care what, say, cardiologists think about this particular question, nor do we care what those who aren't actively researching the problem think. Further, by 'community', we don't mean every single scientist. The very strength of science is that consensus means consensus of the literature. Here's the relevant community:
American Geophysical Union
American Meteorological Society
American Association of State Climatologists
American Association for the Advancement of Science
American Physical Society
American Chemical Society
And a plethora of other professional scientific societies. All have convened expert panels, drawing on the expertise of their many tens of thousands of members, and issued statements concurring with the conclusions of the IPCC:
We're warming
The primary tug on the climate in anthropogenic
The consequences to human society and the human ecosystem this century are likely to be significant, and potentially catastrophic.
If you're skeptical at this point, it's not based on evidence, but ignorance. posted 06/24/2008 at 12:04:29
I know you think there are. But there aren't. Name one.
Yes, the entire (relevant) scientific community has concluded, to high certainty, that the anthropogenic tug on climate is now by far the largest, by a factor of between 10 and 30. I say 'relevent', because we don't really care what, say, cardiologists think about this particular question, nor do we care what those who aren't actively researching the problem think. Further, by 'community', we don't mean every single scientist. The very strength of science is that consensus means consensus of the literature. Here's the relevant community:
American Geophysical Union
American Meteorological Society
American Association of State Climatologists
American Association for the Advancement of Science
American Physical Society
American Chemical Society
And a plethora of other professional scientific societies. All have convened expert panels, drawing on the expertise of their many tens of thousands of members, and issued statements concurring with the conclusions of the IPCC:
We're warming
The primary tug on the climate in anthropogenic
The consequences to human society and the human ecosystem this century are likely to be significant, and potentially catastrophic.
If you're skeptical at this point, it's not based on evidence, but ignorance. posted 06/24/2008 at 12:04:29
Well argued ! You go get 'em, tiger !
Now go crack another cold one, flip over to fox on that 85" plasma -- and crank up the air a notch or two, eh. Gettin' a little warm down there in Florida isn't it... posted 06/24/2008 at 00:50:29
Now go crack another cold one, flip over to fox on that 85" plasma -- and crank up the air a notch or two, eh. Gettin' a little warm down there in Florida isn't it... posted 06/24/2008 at 00:50:29
blah blah blah blah blah.
The tragedy for you, cct84, is that you literally have no idea how much you don't know. Read a few websites, learn a few buzz words, and suddenly you're an expert.
Do you really believe your arguments lay waste to the conclusions of an entire scientific community? Really ?!?
The good news is, we're going ahead anyway, and we'll drag you along. Sigh. posted 06/24/2008 at 00:45:36
The tragedy for you, cct84, is that you literally have no idea how much you don't know. Read a few websites, learn a few buzz words, and suddenly you're an expert.
Do you really believe your arguments lay waste to the conclusions of an entire scientific community? Really ?!?
The good news is, we're going ahead anyway, and we'll drag you along. Sigh. posted 06/24/2008 at 00:45:36
Herb and Obama ... Fired Up and Ready to Go!
I have a picture in my mind of Herb's brother in New York, shuffling out to the stoop to get the paper in his own "Got Hope" Obama t-shirt... posted 06/23/2008 at 17:26:44
Bill Kristol is Not Stupid, So Why Does He Pretend to Be?
I don't think Kristol's intelligence is the relevant trait, but his sociopathy. posted 06/23/2008 at 14:00:24
The Case for Hillary Clinton
Clinton's primary supporters are already voting for Obama; he can certainly win w/out her on the ticket (witness this weekend's Newsweek poll).
I don't see how you can call it a 'change' ticket w/ Clinton on the ticket.
Hillary Clinton is not a second fiddle, don't try to make her into one.
It's a bad, bad, bad, bad idea. Drop it. posted 06/23/2008 at 11:29:45
I don't see how you can call it a 'change' ticket w/ Clinton on the ticket.
Hillary Clinton is not a second fiddle, don't try to make her into one.
It's a bad, bad, bad, bad idea. Drop it. posted 06/23/2008 at 11:29:45
7 Days: A "Democracy Czar" Can Make Up for Obama's Rejection of Public Funding -- w/ Waldman, Huffington, Shrum & Green
I don't care what the particular cause: the word "czar" shouldn't be attached to it.
Drug czar
Security czar
Health czar
Ugh.
We have a Natioal Security Advisor.
A science advisor.
Economic advisors.
Obama needs to make democratic reform a priority. Agreed. That's why I'm voting for him. He needs good advisors - He's the "Democracy Czar" -- it's called a President. posted 06/23/2008 at 00:18:43
Drug czar
Security czar
Health czar
Ugh.
We have a Natioal Security Advisor.
A science advisor.
Economic advisors.
Obama needs to make democratic reform a priority. Agreed. That's why I'm voting for him. He needs good advisors - He's the "Democracy Czar" -- it's called a President. posted 06/23/2008 at 00:18:43
Is Obama Selling Out on FISA bill?
Sorry Michale, "suffice it to say..." doesn't really help me out.
The current law allows for obtaining wiretaps, even allowing for wire tapping without a warrant for up to three days -- giving sufficient time to obtain a warrant.
So again, what's the emergency?
These guys are casting an awfully broad net. Suppose they listen to a conversation of mine, hear me talking about the office football pool. Do they get to prosecute me for that? "NO!" you say, but what's my guarantee?
Personally, I think it's far more likely that someone in government will abuse these sweeping powers, to the detriment of innocents, than use them to foil another attack. Particularly if they're basically immune from oversight. posted 06/22/2008 at 23:07:56
The current law allows for obtaining wiretaps, even allowing for wire tapping without a warrant for up to three days -- giving sufficient time to obtain a warrant.
So again, what's the emergency?
These guys are casting an awfully broad net. Suppose they listen to a conversation of mine, hear me talking about the office football pool. Do they get to prosecute me for that? "NO!" you say, but what's my guarantee?
Personally, I think it's far more likely that someone in government will abuse these sweeping powers, to the detriment of innocents, than use them to foil another attack. Particularly if they're basically immune from oversight. posted 06/22/2008 at 23:07:56
Nice argument!
Yes, that's all we are, just a bunch of hypocrites. Every last one of us... posted 06/22/2008 at 18:52:31
Yes, that's all we are, just a bunch of hypocrites. Every last one of us... posted 06/22/2008 at 18:52:31
Can anyone articulate what's wrong with the FISA law as it currently stands? As I understand, it only takes hours to get a warrant, and there's already a provision to operate a tap for three days without a warrant.
So what's the emergency in getting this legislation through? posted 06/22/2008 at 18:50:41
So what's the emergency in getting this legislation through? posted 06/22/2008 at 18:50:41
Do We Really Need All of the Amendments to the Constitution?
Hmm. One would think the ACLU will challenge the constitutionality of the law -- should it pass -- in the courts. posted 06/22/2008 at 18:57:37
MoveOn To Obama: Keep Your Word, Filibuster Telecom Immunity
I agree we need full accountability.
However, I don't see how we can seek full accountability from the telecoms that complied with illegal requests, without also seeking accountability from those that made the requests.
In other words, how can we prosecute telecoms without impeaching Bush?
Right: we can't, and we shouldn't. posted 06/22/2008 at 14:02:40
However, I don't see how we can seek full accountability from the telecoms that complied with illegal requests, without also seeking accountability from those that made the requests.
In other words, how can we prosecute telecoms without impeaching Bush?
Right: we can't, and we shouldn't. posted 06/22/2008 at 14:02:40
In such a case punishment is deterrant, nonpunishment is license. posted 06/22/2008 at 14:00:33
Obama: No Immunity For Telecoms
Let's see of he pushes it -- if he himself tries to see how much influence he has. This is important and if Obama's position is more than lip service, he should be exerting serious pressure to get retroactive immunity stripped out. posted 06/21/2008 at 17:06:53
Obama, Money, and a Campaign Finance Proposal
(a) Given that Obama doesn't accept PAC or Federal Lobbyist money, I'd say he hasn't opted out of public financing, but that his campaign IS publicly financed -- the first in modern history.
(b) No doubt the money wasn't effectively spent in Pennsylvania. Then again, there's no law that says the money must be spent on ads. Putting together a 50-state campaign, hiring thousands of folks to man the phones and canvas neighborhoods is a thought.
(c) Fat cats give $2300 bucks, all at once. Then there are those like me, who send twenty-five or fifty or a hundred bucks a month, for the duration. At the end of the day the donations may be over $1000, but it's clearly a very different constituency.
(d) Can anyone think of any reason Democrats are voting for retroactive telecom immunity, other than the massive amounts of money donated by those telecoms (Qwest excluded, of course) to their campaigns? Don't tell me it doesn't affect policy. posted 06/21/2008 at 17:45:47
(b) No doubt the money wasn't effectively spent in Pennsylvania. Then again, there's no law that says the money must be spent on ads. Putting together a 50-state campaign, hiring thousands of folks to man the phones and canvas neighborhoods is a thought.
(c) Fat cats give $2300 bucks, all at once. Then there are those like me, who send twenty-five or fifty or a hundred bucks a month, for the duration. At the end of the day the donations may be over $1000, but it's clearly a very different constituency.
(d) Can anyone think of any reason Democrats are voting for retroactive telecom immunity, other than the massive amounts of money donated by those telecoms (Qwest excluded, of course) to their campaigns? Don't tell me it doesn't affect policy. posted 06/21/2008 at 17:45:47
Obama Raises $22 Million In May
These numbers are from May, when Obama was still tangled up w/ Clinton.
Indications seem to be a substantial difference for June:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/06/09/obama-could-raise-100-mil_n_106169.html
I haven't seen any estimates even remotely close to $100 million for McCain. What Obama has proved is that, using the internet, one doesn't need donors with big bank accounts. One can raise more and simultaneously reject PACs and lobbyist money. Clinton's team learned this lesson the hard way. The old-school bundlers (ala Clinton) are dinosaurs.
As for the strong organization, I'm afraid you've been in the cave a little too long. Obama and the DNC have assembled a robust, 50-state organization -- something the Rs can only dream of. Obama's organization out thought, out hustled and out money-raised the Clinton machine. And by comparison, McCain's organization, is laughable. posted 06/21/2008 at 10:18:30
Indications seem to be a substantial difference for June:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/06/09/obama-could-raise-100-mil_n_106169.html
I haven't seen any estimates even remotely close to $100 million for McCain. What Obama has proved is that, using the internet, one doesn't need donors with big bank accounts. One can raise more and simultaneously reject PACs and lobbyist money. Clinton's team learned this lesson the hard way. The old-school bundlers (ala Clinton) are dinosaurs.
As for the strong organization, I'm afraid you've been in the cave a little too long. Obama and the DNC have assembled a robust, 50-state organization -- something the Rs can only dream of. Obama's organization out thought, out hustled and out money-raised the Clinton machine. And by comparison, McCain's organization, is laughable. posted 06/21/2008 at 10:18:30
Obama Backs Bill Giving Immunity To Telecoms
He has stated his opposition to retroactive immunity. That's good -- that's the egregious part of this bill, in my mind.
Now we have to hold his feet to the fire: vote no, and lobby hard against the bill, if retroactive immunity is not removed. posted 06/20/2008 at 20:36:54
Now we have to hold his feet to the fire: vote no, and lobby hard against the bill, if retroactive immunity is not removed. posted 06/20/2008 at 20:36:54
Russert's Legacy: A Woman Meeting the Press?
Bingo.
Rachel Maddow is brilliant, funny, incisive, insightful. She's the person for the job! posted 06/20/2008 at 15:43:06
Rachel Maddow is brilliant, funny, incisive, insightful. She's the person for the job! posted 06/20/2008 at 15:43:06
McClellan: Bush, Cheney Wanted Me To Say Libby Wasn't Involved In CIA Leak Case (VIDEO)
Ok, he testifies: so what?
Will House Dems impeach?
Enforce subpeonas on other officials?
Will they deny telecom immunity?
Or stop funding the war?
no. No. nO. and NO.
And people wonder where cynicism comes from... posted 06/20/2008 at 14:07:11
Will House Dems impeach?
Enforce subpeonas on other officials?
Will they deny telecom immunity?
Or stop funding the war?
no. No. nO. and NO.
And people wonder where cynicism comes from... posted 06/20/2008 at 14:07:11
House easily passes compromise surveillance law
The likelihood of this legislation preventing any sort of 'terrorist' attack is far less than the likelihood -- near certainty -- that our government will abuse this power.
This legislation is not about protecting Americans; it is ONLY about protecting big telecoms who knowingly, willingly broke the law, selling their customers down the river.
Qwest said no.
George Bush said, "we want to listen to your customers", and Qwest said "No, that's illegal. Bring us a warrant."
Know how I know they were right? Because you don't see BushCo taking Qwest to court for refusing.
AT&T said ok; Verizion said ok; Comcast said ok.
No law applies to these people.
I can't begin to express how my disappointed in this Democratic congress grows. Bought and paid for -- cheaply. posted 06/20/2008 at 10:57:35
This legislation is not about protecting Americans; it is ONLY about protecting big telecoms who knowingly, willingly broke the law, selling their customers down the river.
Qwest said no.
George Bush said, "we want to listen to your customers", and Qwest said "No, that's illegal. Bring us a warrant."
Know how I know they were right? Because you don't see BushCo taking Qwest to court for refusing.
AT&T said ok; Verizion said ok; Comcast said ok.
No law applies to these people.
I can't begin to express how my disappointed in this Democratic congress grows. Bought and paid for -- cheaply. posted 06/20/2008 at 10:57:35
Obama Team Weighs Nunn, Edwards As Running Mates
The veep doesn't need "security" credentials. That can be accomplished by announcing picks for National Security Advisor, Sec. of Defense and Sec. of State.
The veep should mirror Obama's approach to government and politics, and his priorities.
Edwards or Dean fit that bill. posted 06/20/2008 at 11:33:43
The veep should mirror Obama's approach to government and politics, and his priorities.
Edwards or Dean fit that bill. posted 06/20/2008 at 11:33:43
What If Obama Isn't A Game Changer?
"Obama has to deliver once in office..."
He hadn't been head of the party for four days when he got the DNC off PAC and lobbyist money. As far as I'm concerned he's already delivered. posted 06/20/2008 at 01:34:56
He hadn't been head of the party for four days when he got the DNC off PAC and lobbyist money. As far as I'm concerned he's already delivered. posted 06/20/2008 at 01:34:56
Resource: How To Talk To A Global Warming Skeptic
Obama Accuser Has 27-Year Rap Sheet
Follow the money.
Someone put him up to this, and it shouldn't be too difficult to find out who.
That would be a story. posted 06/18/2008 at 10:55:40
Someone put him up to this, and it shouldn't be too difficult to find out who.
That would be a story. posted 06/18/2008 at 10:55:40
Clinton asks top donors to meeting with Obama
No, not typical at all.
I know quite a number of folks who supported Sen. Clinton in the primaries, and none of them would consider voting for McCain. They're all sending checks to Obama now.... posted 06/19/2008 at 21:11:42
I know quite a number of folks who supported Sen. Clinton in the primaries, and none of them would consider voting for McCain. They're all sending checks to Obama now.... posted 06/19/2008 at 21:11:42
"Gore bought the mansion in the Nashville suburb of Belle Meade in 2002 for $2.3 million. It houses his offices and those of his wife, Tipper, as well as a commercial kitchen for formal events."
" "Short of tearing it down and staring anew, I don't know how it could have been rated any higher," said Kim Shinn of the U.S. Green Building Council, which gave the house its second-highest rating for sustainable design."
So it's not so much a home, as an office suite and place for entertaining large gatherings. Why don't we compare it's energy consumption to something more appropriate than the 'average American home?" posted 06/18/2008 at 13:21:38
" "Short of tearing it down and staring anew, I don't know how it could have been rated any higher," said Kim Shinn of the U.S. Green Building Council, which gave the house its second-highest rating for sustainable design."
So it's not so much a home, as an office suite and place for entertaining large gatherings. Why don't we compare it's energy consumption to something more appropriate than the 'average American home?" posted 06/18/2008 at 13:21:38
"Grampa Grampa Grampa, what'd you do during the transformational, revolutionary election of '08?"
"I stayed home and cut off my nose. Face hasn't been the same since." posted 06/18/2008 at 13:14:06
"I stayed home and cut off my nose. Face hasn't been the same since." posted 06/18/2008 at 13:14:06
Popular Stories on HuffPost
**UPDATE** The full Starbucks closure list is available here in a searchable web...
Starbucks is closing 600 U.S. stores thanks to hard times and poor real estate...
Thursday morning on "The View," during a discussion on...
As we approach the August vacation season, naturally our thoughts turn to President...
Again last week, we saw the arrogance of former White House advisor Karl Rove when an...
One of the common Republican criticisms directed at a potential Obama presidency...
Reuters reports that McCain shared details of Obama's trip to Iraq at a fundraiser: Republican
Dominic West, the underappreciated lead of the HBO show "The Wire", gave...
There's a lesson for us all in the recent story of a couple who had been married for 80 years.They wisely...
Watch as Naomi Klein, author of The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster...
This speech was given today at the D.A.R. Constitutional Hall Ladies...
This is a man who could've run for President this year, and almost certainly would've won. Why in the world would he want to be in the Cabinet?!? He certainly already weilds enormous political influence; jumping into any administration would serve to tie his hands, not further free them. posted 07/19/2008 at 14:43:29