May 18, 2008
Please wait, your request is processed...
Cathexis
I am a reformed neoconservative who finally woke up when I saw the unwarranted rabid dogpile on Bill Clinton (whom I disliked intensely) -- the final straw of idiocy, duplicity, and mendacity that I was unable to rationalize. Impeachment?!? Unfounded, no matter how much I (without real cause) hated the man. My denial and rationalization came up hard against my sense of honor and principle. Denial and rationalization lost. (The political denial regarding the environment had already driven a wedge in -- I knew too much science to accept that party line.)
Once I started seriously and honestly questioning *one* Neoconservative "belief," I found myself questioning others. One by one, bereft of Unquestioning Loyalty and subject to Honest Evaluation, they fell. I had to face the fact that I had been politically "wrong." *Very* wrong. Finally free of labels and upbringing, I have now embraced my Inner Liberal. My abject apologies for almost four decades of being a knee-jerk Neoconservative ass.
Once I started seriously and honestly questioning *one* Neoconservative "belief," I found myself questioning others. One by one, bereft of Unquestioning Loyalty and subject to Honest Evaluation, they fell. I had to face the fact that I had been politically "wrong." *Very* wrong. Finally free of labels and upbringing, I have now embraced my Inner Liberal. My abject apologies for almost four decades of being a knee-jerk Neoconservative ass.
Recent comments by this user
Why Don't We Hear About Labor Issues Anymore?
If Not Impeachment, At Least Boycott His Records
Impeachment of boycott ... ?
That shouldn't be an "or" situation. posted 05/16/2008 at 11:27:23
That shouldn't be an "or" situation. posted 05/16/2008 at 11:27:23
Beer May Not Be Recession-Proof
By "low alcohol," do you mean the Near-Beer (e.g., O'Doul's), the 3.2% stuff they made for 18-year-olds a decade or so ago, or "beers that aren't high-alcohol?"
My thoughts, in sequence, are:
1. Because they taste like horse **** and besides, what's the point.
2. Why bother.
3. There are plenty of decent non-high-content beers on the market already.
Basically, I am not seeing "more brands/types" as solving anything, especially expense. We probably have more types and gimmicks out there than we need, already. posted 05/16/2008 at 11:41:03
My thoughts, in sequence, are:
1. Because they taste like horse **** and besides, what's the point.
2. Why bother.
3. There are plenty of decent non-high-content beers on the market already.
Basically, I am not seeing "more brands/types" as solving anything, especially expense. We probably have more types and gimmicks out there than we need, already. posted 05/16/2008 at 11:41:03
The Second Time Around
Please get your facts straight, 1st-Shirt:
1. A Democrat was president during that time, but it was Cheney, as Secretary of defense in 1990, and Rumsfeld, as Secretary of Defense under Bush, who "gutted" your military, wanting a "smaller, leaner, faster fighting force." Just because something happens during teh same time doesn't prove causality. Check your facts before you make false accusations.
2. The "intelligence" was cooked, and even the Intelligence Community affirms this. Any "intelligence" that didn't support the Bush Administrations foregone conclusion was suppressed or changed.
3. Out country hasn't been attacked since 9/11 ... and you assert that is "proof" that the measures work? Again, let me direct your attention to my previous statement about "proving Causality." I started a new job shortly after 9/11 and we haven't been attacked. By your logic, *I* am responsible for this "secure" period.
BTW, your argument is particularly disengenuous when you try to work the same conclusion from opposite situations. No attacks = Proof security is working. Attacks = Proof we need additional security. Such arguments are dishonest and unproven.
4. No, quite the opposite: We want to remove a weak president and continue removing a pandering Congress. HTH. posted 05/16/2008 at 10:50:35
1. A Democrat was president during that time, but it was Cheney, as Secretary of defense in 1990, and Rumsfeld, as Secretary of Defense under Bush, who "gutted" your military, wanting a "smaller, leaner, faster fighting force." Just because something happens during teh same time doesn't prove causality. Check your facts before you make false accusations.
2. The "intelligence" was cooked, and even the Intelligence Community affirms this. Any "intelligence" that didn't support the Bush Administrations foregone conclusion was suppressed or changed.
3. Out country hasn't been attacked since 9/11 ... and you assert that is "proof" that the measures work? Again, let me direct your attention to my previous statement about "proving Causality." I started a new job shortly after 9/11 and we haven't been attacked. By your logic, *I* am responsible for this "secure" period.
BTW, your argument is particularly disengenuous when you try to work the same conclusion from opposite situations. No attacks = Proof security is working. Attacks = Proof we need additional security. Such arguments are dishonest and unproven.
4. No, quite the opposite: We want to remove a weak president and continue removing a pandering Congress. HTH. posted 05/16/2008 at 10:50:35
Solar Power Bra: Would You Wear It?
Just out of curiosity ...
A solar-powered *brassiere*?!?
Not a solar-powered shirt or blouse. Not a hat. Not any article of clothing that is traditionally worn -- oh, I don't know -- OUTSIDE the clothing?!?
But a bra.
What's wrong with this picture ...? posted 05/16/2008 at 12:05:20
A solar-powered *brassiere*?!?
Not a solar-powered shirt or blouse. Not a hat. Not any article of clothing that is traditionally worn -- oh, I don't know -- OUTSIDE the clothing?!?
But a bra.
What's wrong with this picture ...? posted 05/16/2008 at 12:05:20
Auntie,
私は馬鹿である 私のお金"べてを取りなさい
HTH. ;-) posted 05/16/2008 at 12:03:33
私は馬鹿である 私のお金"べてを取りなさい
HTH. ;-) posted 05/16/2008 at 12:03:33
Future Shock?
Well, I partially agree.
I think such homes of the future *will* exist.
Unfortunately, they'll be affordable to only 0.1% of the population.
Some of the former Middle Class will have homes with dirt floors.
The rest ...
I wonder if enough things will still come in cardboard boxes? posted 05/16/2008 at 11:49:37
I think such homes of the future *will* exist.
Unfortunately, they'll be affordable to only 0.1% of the population.
Some of the former Middle Class will have homes with dirt floors.
The rest ...
I wonder if enough things will still come in cardboard boxes? posted 05/16/2008 at 11:49:37
Why John Edwards Endorsed Obama Today
Methinks thou doth project too much. posted 05/15/2008 at 10:16:52
Better Get Efficient...and Fast
Wow ... four bullet items ... now *that* was an efficient way to discuss three ways to improve efficiency! ;-D posted 05/15/2008 at 11:13:55
Cindy McCain Sells Sudan-Related Investments
I am no fan of McCain, but I have to admit: I view this as a "non-story."
So she had investments in Sudan. We're supposed to attribute guilt by association? I have investments ... I'll confess I have no idea what geopolitical impacts they may or may not have. If someone pointed out to me that I had investments in Sudan or a similar area, I'd divest. Should I be reviled because AI had them to begin with?
The McCain's have plenty to answer for. Divesting Sudanese investments when made aware of them isn't one of the, posted 05/15/2008 at 10:29:08
So she had investments in Sudan. We're supposed to attribute guilt by association? I have investments ... I'll confess I have no idea what geopolitical impacts they may or may not have. If someone pointed out to me that I had investments in Sudan or a similar area, I'd divest. Should I be reviled because AI had them to begin with?
The McCain's have plenty to answer for. Divesting Sudanese investments when made aware of them isn't one of the, posted 05/15/2008 at 10:29:08
Democrats Sweep Special Elections For First Time In 30 Years
It's kind of sad.
But what is sadder is the fact that, because they are absolutely incapable of meaningful introspection and honest evaluation, they will not change their ideology, but merely seek to change the packaging. posted 05/15/2008 at 10:50:49
But what is sadder is the fact that, because they are absolutely incapable of meaningful introspection and honest evaluation, they will not change their ideology, but merely seek to change the packaging. posted 05/15/2008 at 10:50:49
Will The Next President Obliterate The Auto Industry?
Yeah, I'm sure Unions are responsible for 12 mpg SUVs, too.
Oh, and Bill Clinton, of course. posted 05/16/2008 at 11:45:02
Oh, and Bill Clinton, of course. posted 05/16/2008 at 11:45:02
Obliterate? No.
Radically and fundamentally transform? Hoperfully!
This situation is a perfect example of a problem that should NOT be left solely to the God of "Free Markets." It demands centralized planning and some actual forethought of ALL (including non-$) costs and benefits. Subsidies for such transformations could be appropriate (but anathema in a true Free Market setting). posted 05/15/2008 at 11:19:42
Radically and fundamentally transform? Hoperfully!
This situation is a perfect example of a problem that should NOT be left solely to the God of "Free Markets." It demands centralized planning and some actual forethought of ALL (including non-$) costs and benefits. Subsidies for such transformations could be appropriate (but anathema in a true Free Market setting). posted 05/15/2008 at 11:19:42
Do Republicans Believe In Free Markets?
"Free Markets" can be useful, but they are not a panacea for every problem, despite what hardcore "Conservatives" may have been led to believe. The elevation of Free Markets to almost religious worship has been one of the worst things ever to befall this ocuntry. posted 05/15/2008 at 11:16:30
Republicans Who Just Don't Get It
Er ... I think you are engaging in some serious hyperbole, bgregs. OTOH, your point is well taken that "power corrupts" and uncontested power can be dangerous when concentrated in any single group's hands.
The dems have an historic chance to build an enduring Majority.
If they can refrain from corruption, incompetence, complacency, and hubris. posted 05/15/2008 at 11:02:20
The dems have an historic chance to build an enduring Majority.
If they can refrain from corruption, incompetence, complacency, and hubris. posted 05/15/2008 at 11:02:20
True. It's wasn't Black Magic -- it was that old GOP favorite: If we say it often enough, everyone will believe it is true! posted 05/15/2008 at 10:59:01
Republicans: The New Whigs
IF the Democrats can avoid falling victim to their own hubris, as the Republicans were so egregiously incapable of doing when they attained across-the-board majorities, they may well be able to establish permanent majorities in Government.
I'm holding my breath, though, hoping against hope that Dems are above the glaring levels of incompetence, corruption, and outright stupidity that the GOP has demonstrated these past 8 years.
Absolute power ... posted 05/15/2008 at 10:55:37
I'm holding my breath, though, hoping against hope that Dems are above the glaring levels of incompetence, corruption, and outright stupidity that the GOP has demonstrated these past 8 years.
Absolute power ... posted 05/15/2008 at 10:55:37
Inflation Eases Despite Huge Food Price Jump
Does anyone really think it is possible that inflation is too high and set to go higher?
We have experienced horrendous increases and now we are supposed to be mollified because it isn't going up *as fast as it has been*?!?
Also, here is a clue: When fuel prices continue to skyrocket out of control, anything and everything that has to get shipped/ tranported WILL get more expensive. If it costs more to transport, that cost has to be made up somewhere. High oil means high prices on almost everything. posted 05/15/2008 at 11:32:05
We have experienced horrendous increases and now we are supposed to be mollified because it isn't going up *as fast as it has been*?!?
Also, here is a clue: When fuel prices continue to skyrocket out of control, anything and everything that has to get shipped/ tranported WILL get more expensive. If it costs more to transport, that cost has to be made up somewhere. High oil means high prices on almost everything. posted 05/15/2008 at 11:32:05
In Defense of Being Educated
I keep hearing "Who would you rather have a beer with?"
I'd rather have a beer with someone intelligent, who can carry on a discussion while we drink. I wouldn't be caught dead having a drink with some brain-dead frat boy whose idea of humour is "Pull my finger!" posted 05/14/2008 at 10:26:58
I'd rather have a beer with someone intelligent, who can carry on a discussion while we drink. I wouldn't be caught dead having a drink with some brain-dead frat boy whose idea of humour is "Pull my finger!" posted 05/14/2008 at 10:26:58
Millennials: Downtrodden or Just Dumb?
Conversely, how much of this "common knowledge" is perception filtered through our own biases (I was born in '57). True, they don't have our "experience" yet. Then again, "experience" doesn't always translate to judgment. Some people just get older, without getting wiser.
The so-called Millenials are members of our Society *now*. There is no means-test of Wisdom applied to us Boomers (would that there *had* been!) so it seems hypocritical to tell young people "wait until you are wiser."
They are part of the Society; they should be part of the Process. Just as our Viewpoints have the benefit (?) of Experience, theirs has the benefit of Idealism and Possibility. The flip side of "They haven't been tempered by Real Life" is that they haven't become jaded, disillusioned, cynical, or limited by Real Life. posted 05/14/2008 at 10:34:25
The so-called Millenials are members of our Society *now*. There is no means-test of Wisdom applied to us Boomers (would that there *had* been!) so it seems hypocritical to tell young people "wait until you are wiser."
They are part of the Society; they should be part of the Process. Just as our Viewpoints have the benefit (?) of Experience, theirs has the benefit of Idealism and Possibility. The flip side of "They haven't been tempered by Real Life" is that they haven't become jaded, disillusioned, cynical, or limited by Real Life. posted 05/14/2008 at 10:34:25
Singling out one generation of young people to criticize -- especially when too few of any generation appear to be doing anything -- seems like scapegoating. posted 05/13/2008 at 12:03:34
The Waking Beast
You forgot "Republicans running on a platform of Change ... while asserting that the past 8 years have been great for the country!" posted 05/13/2008 at 12:56:29
Health Care As the New Terrorist to Fear
Sums it up for me, Oldchef. posted 05/13/2008 at 12:14:24
Sex And The American Mom: 1 In 3 Report Getting Action On The Side
Puh-leeez!
My wife is my equal, not a submissive Stepford Wife or Barbie doll. I take responsibility for my own masculinity and am not dependent on anyone else to fluff me. Do you believe that women should be (remain) 2nd class citizens because it makes some men feel more macho? That strikes me as reprehensible.
You know what makes me feel manly? Knowing my wife is a 1st class citizen and her own person, first -- that both of us are together because we want to be, not because we need to be or becuase one is superior/inferior. posted 05/13/2008 at 15:05:37
My wife is my equal, not a submissive Stepford Wife or Barbie doll. I take responsibility for my own masculinity and am not dependent on anyone else to fluff me. Do you believe that women should be (remain) 2nd class citizens because it makes some men feel more macho? That strikes me as reprehensible.
You know what makes me feel manly? Knowing my wife is a 1st class citizen and her own person, first -- that both of us are together because we want to be, not because we need to be or becuase one is superior/inferior. posted 05/13/2008 at 15:05:37
Hahahaha!!!
Seriously, guy ... you need to stop extrapolating your initial perceptions as universals.
All men are not the same and do not have the same, interchangeable sex drives.
All women are not the same and do not have the same, interchangeable sex drives.
The reasons men or women have affairs are not necessarily the same. Much depend son the individual and their perceived situation. posted 05/13/2008 at 14:59:25
Seriously, guy ... you need to stop extrapolating your initial perceptions as universals.
All men are not the same and do not have the same, interchangeable sex drives.
All women are not the same and do not have the same, interchangeable sex drives.
The reasons men or women have affairs are not necessarily the same. Much depend son the individual and their perceived situation. posted 05/13/2008 at 14:59:25
Well said, JustShare.
No man should hit a woman.
Ever.
For any reason.
There are always other options. posted 05/13/2008 at 14:54:12
No man should hit a woman.
Ever.
For any reason.
There are always other options. posted 05/13/2008 at 14:54:12
Um ... what do you mean "we," Kimosabi?
This man never thought such labels were useful or meaningful. posted 05/13/2008 at 14:51:56
This man never thought such labels were useful or meaningful. posted 05/13/2008 at 14:51:56
Do you give up the first time you fall off a bicycle?
My first marriage failed. Painful, but we both walked away changed -- although not "hating" the other.
I am in a second marriage and am applying the lessons learned from previous experience. Things are going very well, IMO.
I'm glad I didn't give up, after the first failure to succeed. posted 05/13/2008 at 14:46:21
My first marriage failed. Painful, but we both walked away changed -- although not "hating" the other.
I am in a second marriage and am applying the lessons learned from previous experience. Things are going very well, IMO.
I'm glad I didn't give up, after the first failure to succeed. posted 05/13/2008 at 14:46:21
Ha! *Someone* is sounding a bit beleaguered! ;-D posted 05/13/2008 at 14:42:52
Tsk! Such a generalization! Some of us, you may be shocked to learn, stay in a marriage out of choice/preference. I'm sure the situation(s) you mention exist, but don't assume they are the norm. posted 05/13/2008 at 14:41:19
Do You Really Need To Resolve To Drink More Water?
Good point, ex-umb! Most people get roughly enough water each day, but the form in which that water come is important.
By drinking straight water, a person is less likely to indulge in "water hidden in other sources" -- such as high-calorie soft drinks and even food! The body is not good at differentiating low-level thirst from low-level hunger ... some degree of our everyday eating, I understand, is really because we need more water. posted 05/13/2008 at 14:29:17
By drinking straight water, a person is less likely to indulge in "water hidden in other sources" -- such as high-calorie soft drinks and even food! The body is not good at differentiating low-level thirst from low-level hunger ... some degree of our everyday eating, I understand, is really because we need more water. posted 05/13/2008 at 14:29:17
Rand and the Bush Tax Rebate
Exactly ... if it takes that long.
Me ... I'm banking mine. I'll spend on what I need, if and when I have the resources. To hell with spending for spending's sake. Don't we all have enough clutter and crap in our lives to make us wake up and realize we really don't need *most* of what we buy?!? posted 05/13/2008 at 13:40:49
Me ... I'm banking mine. I'll spend on what I need, if and when I have the resources. To hell with spending for spending's sake. Don't we all have enough clutter and crap in our lives to make us wake up and realize we really don't need *most* of what we buy?!? posted 05/13/2008 at 13:40:49
Blind Man Bowls Perfect Game
Who did the scoring ... Diebold? posted 05/13/2008 at 14:34:21
Why You Should Be Optimistic About November
Good point. The press makes out "low Congressional approval ratings" to signify "the public doesn't support Bush OR Congress," when the reality is that Congressional approval ratings are that low exactly *because* they haven't been more confrontational.
I used to be a lifelong Republican. I voted my first straight-Democratic ticket ever, in 2004 and followed it up again in 2006 ... because I wanted to stop the insanity!
And yet ... the insanity continues. less, admittedly ... but no one is in prison and no one has been impeached. In my book, that means Congress isn't doing its job. posted 05/13/2008 at 12:42:31
I used to be a lifelong Republican. I voted my first straight-Democratic ticket ever, in 2004 and followed it up again in 2006 ... because I wanted to stop the insanity!
And yet ... the insanity continues. less, admittedly ... but no one is in prison and no one has been impeached. In my book, that means Congress isn't doing its job. posted 05/13/2008 at 12:42:31
overclocker, I hope that being a member of a self-professed superior minority will be comforting, in November. You can either "be the bigger person" and lead by example, or you can sit back and refuse to have anything to do with those with whom you have grivances (real or imagined) until they acknowledge their sins.
Me ... I'll go the Lead by Example route and work on ideological Unity against a foe whose only real ideology is the Pursuit of Power (i.e., the new millenium GOP). posted 05/12/2008 at 13:22:59
Me ... I'll go the Lead by Example route and work on ideological Unity against a foe whose only real ideology is the Pursuit of Power (i.e., the new millenium GOP). posted 05/12/2008 at 13:22:59
Swinging Headed To CBS Primetime
Anyone who calls a gimlet a "gimlet martini" is not to be trusted. ;-D posted 05/13/2008 at 14:07:51
The Why of Chokingly High Oil Prices: Bush Together with Saudi Arabia Spells Disaster for America
Sadly, you make an excellent point. posted 05/12/2008 at 11:04:08
The Presidency of Al Gore, 2001-2009
The reality of 8 years of Bush-Cheney is sickening enough, when one contemplates the utter devastation the Righwting GOP has inflicted on this country, but when one stops to think what MIGHT have been, under the presidency of a man like Al Gore ...
I think I'll take the rest of the day off and drink until the bitter pain of lost opportunity is finally numbed.
Nah ... I'll have one or two, but then work on converting my pain to anger, and my anger to action. posted 05/12/2008 at 11:18:31
I think I'll take the rest of the day off and drink until the bitter pain of lost opportunity is finally numbed.
Nah ... I'll have one or two, but then work on converting my pain to anger, and my anger to action. posted 05/12/2008 at 11:18:31
The Fierce Urgency of Now
"Radicalized leftwing politics?!?"
BWAH HA HA HA HA!!!
Oh wait ... were you serious?
It pains me to burst your bubble, Steve, but the US hasn't had a serious "leftwing" since the 60s. It *has* become popular to characterize the Left-of-Center as "The Far Left," primarily to hide the power-shift to the Right, the past decade or so. But your "Angry Left" is basically "everyone who isn't Far Right." Threatening to paint the Center as "Left" and the "Mildly Left" as "Far Left" is a sophist bit of trickery that we see through. posted 05/12/2008 at 11:11:32
BWAH HA HA HA HA!!!
Oh wait ... were you serious?
It pains me to burst your bubble, Steve, but the US hasn't had a serious "leftwing" since the 60s. It *has* become popular to characterize the Left-of-Center as "The Far Left," primarily to hide the power-shift to the Right, the past decade or so. But your "Angry Left" is basically "everyone who isn't Far Right." Threatening to paint the Center as "Left" and the "Mildly Left" as "Far Left" is a sophist bit of trickery that we see through. posted 05/12/2008 at 11:11:32
Comic-book Movies Have Ruined Special Effects
You guys are not allowing yourself to immerse in the storyline.
If you're sitting back wondering "How did they do that *during the movie*, you haven't successfully suspended disbelief and are not truly "into" the movie. It is only afterwards, walking back to the car, perhaps, that the thought "Say, how did they DO that?!?" should hit. Or maybe think it in the back of your mind, as most of your attention is on the "here and now."
This could be a failing of the movie: It failed to pull you into the story sufficiently.
Or it could be a failing on your part: You've become so enamored/aware of the mechanics that you allow it to interfere with your immersion.
Or both. posted 05/13/2008 at 13:55:20
If you're sitting back wondering "How did they do that *during the movie*, you haven't successfully suspended disbelief and are not truly "into" the movie. It is only afterwards, walking back to the car, perhaps, that the thought "Say, how did they DO that?!?" should hit. Or maybe think it in the back of your mind, as most of your attention is on the "here and now."
This could be a failing of the movie: It failed to pull you into the story sufficiently.
Or it could be a failing on your part: You've become so enamored/aware of the mechanics that you allow it to interfere with your immersion.
Or both. posted 05/13/2008 at 13:55:20
The Obama Democrats' Ostrich Moment
Let me be clear: I don't care much which of the two Dems gets the nomination. Despite the demonization going on from various factions within the Dem party, either would make a fine President, IMO. Argue their policies or personalities, but PLEASE ... stop going off into Republicanland with unfounded leaps of pseudo-logic attacks. posted 05/09/2008 at 10:29:33
Tsk, Mr Johnson!
I'd expect such an exaggerated attack piece from the GOP, but not from a Dem-supporter. Allow me to address two major flaws in your assertions:
1. As has been stated repeatedly, performance in any state, during a primary, is NOT indicative of the General Election. I don't understand why so many still have trouble grasping this simple bit of logic. As an extreme example:
Joe & Jane are campaigning against one another to see which one will get to compete against
"The Clone of Adolph Hitler," in a subsequent General Election. Do you *really* think that if Jane
does better in ANY set of geographic areas that it means Joe will do poorly in those areas, in a
General Election?
Primaries are set to determine preferences AMONG THE CANDIDATES RUNNING. They
cannot be logically extrapolated to competitions with different candidates because that changes
the dynamics.
2. Will people PLEASE stop whining about whether Obama is "vetted" or not. IT. DOESN'T. MATTER!
Remember John Kerry, in 2004, and the smears that were launched because we failed to vet him
enough to discover that he didn't deserve his Purple Hearts!
Oh wait ... he DID deserve them! But that didn't stop the Republicans from launching lies.
Have you forgotten already that Republicans don't need "truth" to launch their smears? What they
don't have, they make up. If Obama gets the nomination, they WILL make stuff up. If Hillary gets
the nomination, they WILL make stuff up. posted 05/09/2008 at 10:27:24
I'd expect such an exaggerated attack piece from the GOP, but not from a Dem-supporter. Allow me to address two major flaws in your assertions:
1. As has been stated repeatedly, performance in any state, during a primary, is NOT indicative of the General Election. I don't understand why so many still have trouble grasping this simple bit of logic. As an extreme example:
Joe & Jane are campaigning against one another to see which one will get to compete against
"The Clone of Adolph Hitler," in a subsequent General Election. Do you *really* think that if Jane
does better in ANY set of geographic areas that it means Joe will do poorly in those areas, in a
General Election?
Primaries are set to determine preferences AMONG THE CANDIDATES RUNNING. They
cannot be logically extrapolated to competitions with different candidates because that changes
the dynamics.
2. Will people PLEASE stop whining about whether Obama is "vetted" or not. IT. DOESN'T. MATTER!
Remember John Kerry, in 2004, and the smears that were launched because we failed to vet him
enough to discover that he didn't deserve his Purple Hearts!
Oh wait ... he DID deserve them! But that didn't stop the Republicans from launching lies.
Have you forgotten already that Republicans don't need "truth" to launch their smears? What they
don't have, they make up. If Obama gets the nomination, they WILL make stuff up. If Hillary gets
the nomination, they WILL make stuff up. posted 05/09/2008 at 10:27:24
Franken Called Limbaugh a Big Fat Idiot, But Just Who Was the Idiot in Limbaugh's Latest Con?
I have to agree with Mr Hutchinson's analysis. Attributing any degree of the results to Limbaugh's boasts, in addition to being inaccurate, tacitly imbues the rightwing bloviator with a degree of power he doesn't have. In stead of looking for scapegoats when something doesn't go our way, we need to stick to Reality. posted 05/09/2008 at 10:36:51
Should Hillary Drop Out? Absolutely not!
This isn't a football game in the final quarter. It is a tryout to see which of two outstanding boxers on your team will be selected to go against the well-financed contender in the upcoming Title bout.
Either would be a viable option. But they have been going at it for 15 rounds already, in this try-out. While both have fought spiritedly, one is significantly ahead on points.
The question now arises: Do you make a decision as to which boxer will go to the Title match, maximizing the time you have to train and prepare? Or do you let the two continue duking it out, when both are already bloody, risking serious injury that could cripple your team's chances in the "Match That Counts?" posted 05/09/2008 at 10:43:04
Either would be a viable option. But they have been going at it for 15 rounds already, in this try-out. While both have fought spiritedly, one is significantly ahead on points.
The question now arises: Do you make a decision as to which boxer will go to the Title match, maximizing the time you have to train and prepare? Or do you let the two continue duking it out, when both are already bloody, risking serious injury that could cripple your team's chances in the "Match That Counts?" posted 05/09/2008 at 10:43:04
Is Golf a Sport? Seriously.
Golf is a game.
It requires skill, but not athleticism -- thus, it is not really a sport, except in the minds of those who want to cling to the delusion that their pasttime makes them an athlete. ;-) posted 05/13/2008 at 14:03:40
It requires skill, but not athleticism -- thus, it is not really a sport, except in the minds of those who want to cling to the delusion that their pasttime makes them an athlete. ;-) posted 05/13/2008 at 14:03:40
Will Obama Win Enough White Votes to Beat McCain?
Will Obama Win Enough White Votes to Beat McCain?
Yes.
This comment has been brought to you by "Simple Answers to Simple Questions."
Sincerely,
A 50-year-old white guy. posted 05/09/2008 at 10:47:20
Yes.
This comment has been brought to you by "Simple Answers to Simple Questions."
Sincerely,
A 50-year-old white guy. posted 05/09/2008 at 10:47:20
Study: "Daily Show" Very Similar To "O'Reilly Factor"
I guess "fire" is similar to "water" ... since too much of both can kill you.
It's a vacuous comparison and I suspect the "study" has an agenda to either ennoble The Factor or diminish The Daily Show. posted 05/09/2008 at 11:18:39
It's a vacuous comparison and I suspect the "study" has an agenda to either ennoble The Factor or diminish The Daily Show. posted 05/09/2008 at 11:18:39
Economic Suicide
Depends on the population density and logistics, Cooltruth.
If the majority of trips are within 5 miles or so, but the population density is not high, then yes ... your suggestion may well be more cost effective. But if the population density is high enough and/or the distances prohibitive, then the economies of scale from a more rigorous Transit System could be more efficient. posted 05/13/2008 at 13:35:15
If the majority of trips are within 5 miles or so, but the population density is not high, then yes ... your suggestion may well be more cost effective. But if the population density is high enough and/or the distances prohibitive, then the economies of scale from a more rigorous Transit System could be more efficient. posted 05/13/2008 at 13:35:15
Excellent point, Herrington! This is a problem that was MADE for a concerted, national effort! posted 05/13/2008 at 13:28:33
Car pools could be an option, although I see that as more of a temporary measure, for most, unless they are in a suitabel social network.
"Public transportation" would be great ... if that infrastructure existed. Right now, the only viable "public transportation" I have is a cab ... and that isn't really an alternative.
My assertion is that this problem is imminently suited for a centralized (government) response ... and it won't be effectively solved (acros steh country) until that centralized, concerted effort is made. posted 05/13/2008 at 13:26:07
"Public transportation" would be great ... if that infrastructure existed. Right now, the only viable "public transportation" I have is a cab ... and that isn't really an alternative.
My assertion is that this problem is imminently suited for a centralized (government) response ... and it won't be effectively solved (acros steh country) until that centralized, concerted effort is made. posted 05/13/2008 at 13:26:07
Great article, although I do disagree with one assertion: That "a major tax on imported oil is the only way to stop the greatest wealth transfer in human history."
I can see the overarching logic of such an action, but I have the same problem with this as I have for those advocating higher gasoline taxes: The effects such actions would have on those with little or no discretionary income. For those people, such actions would price gasoline out of their reach, affecting the ability of many to commute to or from work.
Sure, mass transit is an option -- for those places with sufficient population densities to support such options. I live in Raleigh, NC -- we don't have any well-developed alternatives to automobiles. I have a 24-mile commmute (one way). My fault for living so far away? Tell that to the people who successfully got a job, albeit farther away, after getting laid off. You say we should move closer? To our "job o fthe moment?" Every time our insecure employment status changes, we should relocate to accommodate? Aside from being an inherently repugnant suggestion, who is going to buy my house? Population densities aren't that great and I don't live next to a Corporation.
I appreciate what you're trying to achieve, but disagree with the suggestion as to how we get there. posted 05/09/2008 at 11:00:40
I can see the overarching logic of such an action, but I have the same problem with this as I have for those advocating higher gasoline taxes: The effects such actions would have on those with little or no discretionary income. For those people, such actions would price gasoline out of their reach, affecting the ability of many to commute to or from work.
Sure, mass transit is an option -- for those places with sufficient population densities to support such options. I live in Raleigh, NC -- we don't have any well-developed alternatives to automobiles. I have a 24-mile commmute (one way). My fault for living so far away? Tell that to the people who successfully got a job, albeit farther away, after getting laid off. You say we should move closer? To our "job o fthe moment?" Every time our insecure employment status changes, we should relocate to accommodate? Aside from being an inherently repugnant suggestion, who is going to buy my house? Population densities aren't that great and I don't live next to a Corporation.
I appreciate what you're trying to achieve, but disagree with the suggestion as to how we get there. posted 05/09/2008 at 11:00:40
Too Much, Too Little Sleep Tied To Ill Health In CDC Study
Sounds as if abnormal sleep patterns are a coincidental, rather than causitive, factor indicative of some other underlying problem that causes both sleep and weight problems. posted 05/08/2008 at 12:41:05
Obama's Clinton Dilemma
I disagree, Mr Welsh.
Her behavior now will set the basis for her next move. If she is the gracious Team Player, people will note that and will remember that -- positioning her well the next time around. Even if that is in 16 years. Even people who currently support Obama will remember and may be swayed more positively, going forward.
If she sulks, takes her ball and goes home, or scorches the earth ... well, people will note that and remember it. When she come sup to bat next time, even if it is more quickly, she will not have as much support and will have greater numbers solidly opposed.
You're right that she can get another "at bat" more quickly if she snubs Obama. You're wrong that this is worth the cost. posted 05/07/2008 at 11:07:20
Her behavior now will set the basis for her next move. If she is the gracious Team Player, people will note that and will remember that -- positioning her well the next time around. Even if that is in 16 years. Even people who currently support Obama will remember and may be swayed more positively, going forward.
If she sulks, takes her ball and goes home, or scorches the earth ... well, people will note that and remember it. When she come sup to bat next time, even if it is more quickly, she will not have as much support and will have greater numbers solidly opposed.
You're right that she can get another "at bat" more quickly if she snubs Obama. You're wrong that this is worth the cost. posted 05/07/2008 at 11:07:20
Will The Real Feminist Please Stand Up...
You're right, Ms Yerman. This country still has centuries of Social Conditioning to overcome before we can even get a clearer picture of reality. Perception filters everything. posted 05/07/2008 at 11:41:25
The Smoking Gun
Not a day goes by that I don't stand in wonder at how our institutions (government, press, etc.) can cloak themselves in Denial and continue ignoring the atrocities that are going on, right now, in our lifetimes and under our noses.
Any gradeschooler can tell you that what is happening is wrong. Any high school Civics class attendee can tell you that it is Anti-American and against everything this country holds dear.
The only outrage is from pockets of us who vent on the Internet and cry out truth to anyone who will listen. My gratitude to each and every one of you who speaks out -- it is only by hearing the affirmation of your cries of protest and outrage that I reassure myself I haven't slipped into some parallel universe where none of the Principles with which I was raised still apply. posted 05/07/2008 at 11:12:11
Any gradeschooler can tell you that what is happening is wrong. Any high school Civics class attendee can tell you that it is Anti-American and against everything this country holds dear.
The only outrage is from pockets of us who vent on the Internet and cry out truth to anyone who will listen. My gratitude to each and every one of you who speaks out -- it is only by hearing the affirmation of your cries of protest and outrage that I reassure myself I haven't slipped into some parallel universe where none of the Principles with which I was raised still apply. posted 05/07/2008 at 11:12:11
Leader to Laggard
Sound advice. I've already pulled out of Real Estate and most Equities, parking my funds in safer (albeit with no stellar returns) areas. The goal, at this time, is capital preservation, not growth! posted 05/07/2008 at 11:50:36
Designer Genes: How Drew Endy Uses Uses DNA To Make New And Improved Versions Of Life
What happens when a genetic sequence that Monsanto puts in corn, preventing it from being used as Seed Corn by frugal farmers (and forcing farmers to buy from the company year after year, rather than work from seed saved from last year's harvest) finds an accidental vector that allows it to escape into the environment and effectively start sterilizing wild grasses out in the wild?
What happens to our resources when the genetic sequence they discover and sell for humans to stay trim becomes widespread, allowing people to gorge until they vomit but never gain weight? Will food supplies become strained, from widespread hedonistic lifestyles? Will something go wrong where we HAVE to gorge ourselves, to keep our bodies from starving?
What happens when the fun phosporescent gene they market to kids turns out to induce melanomas, 30 years later?
My point is: Business will not take the time or money to think of questions like this. They will do what they do today: They will externalize the risk of unknowns to Society, raking in profits while we bear the "costs."
DNA is Life. And Life reproduces/spreads in unexpected ways. posted 05/07/2008 at 12:22:35
What happens to our resources when the genetic sequence they discover and sell for humans to stay trim becomes widespread, allowing people to gorge until they vomit but never gain weight? Will food supplies become strained, from widespread hedonistic lifestyles? Will something go wrong where we HAVE to gorge ourselves, to keep our bodies from starving?
What happens when the fun phosporescent gene they market to kids turns out to induce melanomas, 30 years later?
My point is: Business will not take the time or money to think of questions like this. They will do what they do today: They will externalize the risk of unknowns to Society, raking in profits while we bear the "costs."
DNA is Life. And Life reproduces/spreads in unexpected ways. posted 05/07/2008 at 12:22:35
I'm of mixed mind on this ...
On one hand, I have always been a big Science buff and have always loved Biology-related fields. I think Science has a lot to offer, to help mankind.
On the other hand, I have been in Business for several decades now and I have seen what happens when Science meets Business -- Science gets bent over the old apple-barrel and forced to become Business' bitch.
Money becomes the metric. Corners get cut. Timetables must be met. Testing is abbreviated, if it isn't sidestepped completely. Gotta get it to market and gotta increase profits.
But DNA-products aren't software, mechanical, or electronic products. If a software application is rushed to market and hasn't been well-thought out, it may bomb. It may not work. Customers may lose valuable data. If a mechanical vehicle is rushed to market, it may result in the injury or death of its operator.
But the Earth isn't permanently compromised. posted 05/07/2008 at 12:14:46
On one hand, I have always been a big Science buff and have always loved Biology-related fields. I think Science has a lot to offer, to help mankind.
On the other hand, I have been in Business for several decades now and I have seen what happens when Science meets Business -- Science gets bent over the old apple-barrel and forced to become Business' bitch.
Money becomes the metric. Corners get cut. Timetables must be met. Testing is abbreviated, if it isn't sidestepped completely. Gotta get it to market and gotta increase profits.
But DNA-products aren't software, mechanical, or electronic products. If a software application is rushed to market and hasn't been well-thought out, it may bomb. It may not work. Customers may lose valuable data. If a mechanical vehicle is rushed to market, it may result in the injury or death of its operator.
But the Earth isn't permanently compromised. posted 05/07/2008 at 12:14:46
America: A Moral Leader?
Tsk. I can only assume that you never bothered to read the post.
Tell me what *substantive point* Rev Jackson makes that is not valid. What conclusions does he reach that are not completely and intuitively obvious?
I don't care if the information is original or aggregated ... it is accurate and it is germane. What will you triviality will you criticize next ... his font choice? posted 05/07/2008 at 11:38:59
Tell me what *substantive point* Rev Jackson makes that is not valid. What conclusions does he reach that are not completely and intuitively obvious?
I don't care if the information is original or aggregated ... it is accurate and it is germane. What will you triviality will you criticize next ... his font choice? posted 05/07/2008 at 11:38:59
For the past 7 years, the Rightwing American Extremists have definitely positioned us as an Amoral "Leader." posted 05/07/2008 at 11:31:34
At the Heart of the Knowledge Economy: Should Patents Be Limited To Technology?
Excellent points. I tend to agree that the applicability of patents should be limited. That goes for some areas of science, as well -- e.g., genetic discoveries. I'm all for granting teh discoverer some form of compensation for their work, if it benefits science/mankind, but granting an exclusive monopoly power?!? What a bottleneck on scientific progress! posted 05/07/2008 at 11:57:08
The Falling Federal Gas Tax
THANK YOU, Mr Goldstein.
Even if voters aren't required to take Econ 101, anyone who runs for office should be! posted 05/07/2008 at 11:52:00
Even if voters aren't required to take Econ 101, anyone who runs for office should be! posted 05/07/2008 at 11:52:00
McCain and Me: Hero Worship Dies Hard (But When It Does...)
Well Faxus, this 50-year-old lifelong Republican -- who finally woke up when W and his cronies hijacked the party and made it a rightwing nightmare -- *will* vote for Obama and I suspect that millions more feel the same way.
Anyone who would vote for McCain over Obama OR Hillary is either foolish, racist/ misogynist, or still suffering from the effects of anaesthesia from a recent operation. posted 05/07/2008 at 10:59:36
Anyone who would vote for McCain over Obama OR Hillary is either foolish, racist/ misogynist, or still suffering from the effects of anaesthesia from a recent operation. posted 05/07/2008 at 10:59:36
That vs. Who: The Politics of Linguistics
Excellent point. Language is powerful because it can be used to frame perception, thus influencing thought and action. posted 05/06/2008 at 15:11:50
Is W a T or an F?
Whiel I can see the rationale, I would peg W as an ENFJ.
I just don't see W having any interest or patience with data. He repeatedly asserts he "goes from his gut," which is a definite N characteristic. If anything, his disdain for information or details, much less building any conclusions form them when he already "knows" the answer would certainly plac ehim as an N.
Not a very effective N, mind you, but we're talking Operating Mode preferences, not effectiveness.
I'd also definitely put W as a J, for exactly the reasons cited in the article: "They make decisions quickly and want to know where they stand. He is impatient with keeping things open, doesn't like long decision-making processes.
W lives in a black-or-white world that is foreign to the shades-of-grey Perceivers. W doesn't like "nuance" and prefers a quick decision (even if it is wrong -- ask him to say "nuclear").
Yup, I'd definitely peg George Junior as an ENFJ. A singularly untalented, undisciplined, immature, ignorant ENFJ, at that.
But all of you other ENFJs take heart -- this just describes preferred modes of operation, it doesn't mean you are all W clones. ;-) posted 05/06/2008 at 12:40:28
I just don't see W having any interest or patience with data. He repeatedly asserts he "goes from his gut," which is a definite N characteristic. If anything, his disdain for information or details, much less building any conclusions form them when he already "knows" the answer would certainly plac ehim as an N.
Not a very effective N, mind you, but we're talking Operating Mode preferences, not effectiveness.
I'd also definitely put W as a J, for exactly the reasons cited in the article: "They make decisions quickly and want to know where they stand. He is impatient with keeping things open, doesn't like long decision-making processes.
W lives in a black-or-white world that is foreign to the shades-of-grey Perceivers. W doesn't like "nuance" and prefers a quick decision (even if it is wrong -- ask him to say "nuclear").
Yup, I'd definitely peg George Junior as an ENFJ. A singularly untalented, undisciplined, immature, ignorant ENFJ, at that.
But all of you other ENFJs take heart -- this just describes preferred modes of operation, it doesn't mean you are all W clones. ;-) posted 05/06/2008 at 12:40:28
Let's Bring Back...Part V
Bring back the practice and art of "Letter Writing."
We have devolved to leaving voice messages, dashing off e-mails, or (worse) the transient IM. All methods designed to be fast and cheap.
But is that the message you want to send to the recipient: Fast and cheap?
Sure, it is great for business communication and a degree of quick, casual back and forth, but ...
Years ago, when thoughts were put to durable medium; I believe more care, attention, and thought tended to go into our missives. They were longer and deeper. Receiving a letter was a big deal and much anticipated. A person was naturally grateful to have received a true letter, perhaps knowing the time and energy that went into crafting it and accepting this as an indication of the esteem in which the writer held one. Some letters, from particularly articulate and/or witty writers, could be considered works of Literature!
But today?
Even the best e-mail tends to be dashed off. How many people bother to "edit" their messages before sending? A few Luddites such as me might, but it is obvious that most don't bother. And IMs? People can't even be bothered to spell out entire words! I suppose the abbreviations are cute, in their way, but, I submit, the practice is still telling.
Communication *has* become quick and effortless ... and in doing so, has lost much of its impact.
Bring back some of the old ways. posted 05/06/2008 at 15:02:56
We have devolved to leaving voice messages, dashing off e-mails, or (worse) the transient IM. All methods designed to be fast and cheap.
But is that the message you want to send to the recipient: Fast and cheap?
Sure, it is great for business communication and a degree of quick, casual back and forth, but ...
Years ago, when thoughts were put to durable medium; I believe more care, attention, and thought tended to go into our missives. They were longer and deeper. Receiving a letter was a big deal and much anticipated. A person was naturally grateful to have received a true letter, perhaps knowing the time and energy that went into crafting it and accepting this as an indication of the esteem in which the writer held one. Some letters, from particularly articulate and/or witty writers, could be considered works of Literature!
But today?
Even the best e-mail tends to be dashed off. How many people bother to "edit" their messages before sending? A few Luddites such as me might, but it is obvious that most don't bother. And IMs? People can't even be bothered to spell out entire words! I suppose the abbreviations are cute, in their way, but, I submit, the practice is still telling.
Communication *has* become quick and effortless ... and in doing so, has lost much of its impact.
Bring back some of the old ways. posted 05/06/2008 at 15:02:56
On an Obama/Clinton Ticket: A Response to Andrew Sullivan
For as much animosity as some people exhibit towards Hillary, they seem to take it as a given (or not considered) the need for healing and being inclusive of the many supporters she had. If 45-49% of the population supported her, it is foolish to continue to demonize her -- whether deserved or not.
Some Obama supporters already realize this and temper their words. Some still appear oblivious, focusing so intently on the current competition that they haven't begun to seriously look at the post-nomination situation.
To those people, I say: Wake up. Don't let your emotions get the best of you. The wise tactician plans for the following conflict, even as the first is being fought. posted 05/06/2008 at 12:19:26
Some Obama supporters already realize this and temper their words. Some still appear oblivious, focusing so intently on the current competition that they haven't begun to seriously look at the post-nomination situation.
To those people, I say: Wake up. Don't let your emotions get the best of you. The wise tactician plans for the following conflict, even as the first is being fought. posted 05/06/2008 at 12:19:26
Bush, Bushit, Boom, and Bust
Actually, fish, it's still wrong. Ignoring the biases you harbor twoards Clinton, even if everything you asserted *were* true, that still doesn't justify or excuse the Bush Administration's (and teh GOP Congress') woeful fiscal mismanagement.
If I am hired to replace some other middle manager at a company, who screwed things up on his watch, I don't go about "fixing" it by expensing new boats for all of my cronies at the last job.
Swallow your bile and look at what has actually happened, without giving in to knee-jerk tendencies to defend people who *call* themselves Conservatives or to lash out at people you are convinced are Liberals. Wrong is wrong, no matter who does it; and continuing to enable those who do wrong makes you guilty, as well. posted 05/06/2008 at 14:36:14
If I am hired to replace some other middle manager at a company, who screwed things up on his watch, I don't go about "fixing" it by expensing new boats for all of my cronies at the last job.
Swallow your bile and look at what has actually happened, without giving in to knee-jerk tendencies to defend people who *call* themselves Conservatives or to lash out at people you are convinced are Liberals. Wrong is wrong, no matter who does it; and continuing to enable those who do wrong makes you guilty, as well. posted 05/06/2008 at 14:36:14
World Of Waste: America's Mass Consumption In Images
A powerful reminder of the impact we have on our environment. It is easy to trivialize and ignore the effects we have, as single individuals. But it's past time we started realizing we are not alone in this world and we do not have the right to live as if we were. posted 05/05/2008 at 12:07:38
Hillary Clinton Doesn't Deserve to Be President
Eliminationist rhetoric:
1. Belongs in the GOP camp, not ours.
2. Doesn't do anything to persuade current Hillary followers to come onto your man's bandwagon.
Do you want to burn bridges and scorch earth, in your righteous rage? Then you risk standing alone, or as a minority, when the smoke clears.
I'm not saying "Give up on your support." I'm saying "Bend all your efforts towards being constructive, in the Big Picture and be open enough to appreciate that others value their viewpoints, as well." posted 05/14/2008 at 12:45:18
1. Belongs in the GOP camp, not ours.
2. Doesn't do anything to persuade current Hillary followers to come onto your man's bandwagon.
Do you want to burn bridges and scorch earth, in your righteous rage? Then you risk standing alone, or as a minority, when the smoke clears.
I'm not saying "Give up on your support." I'm saying "Bend all your efforts towards being constructive, in the Big Picture and be open enough to appreciate that others value their viewpoints, as well." posted 05/14/2008 at 12:45:18
Here is a word of advice for all the people who are still rabid about Hillary Clinton's still being in the race:
Nothing is more dangerous than a cornered animal.
If you corner a wild animal, it will fight to the death -- why not, it has no other options. But if you allow an escape route, most wild animals will take it.
Senator Clinton has put a lot of time, resources, and "self" on the line in her bid for the nomination. But now, short of an Act of God, Barak Obama will win the nod. I suspect she knows this. It is probably a bitter pill and it takes time to assimilate and digest it. But she will slowly start reorienting and will be seeking an exit strategy.
If you are really that upset about her still being in the race, you should be looking to help identify acceptable exit strategies -- ways to drop out and save face ... perhaps even land in some other prominent capacity.
Dropping into an enraged All-or-Nothing mode and demonizing opponents is what the 2000-era Republicans do.
We're better. posted 05/13/2008 at 12:52:50
Nothing is more dangerous than a cornered animal.
If you corner a wild animal, it will fight to the death -- why not, it has no other options. But if you allow an escape route, most wild animals will take it.
Senator Clinton has put a lot of time, resources, and "self" on the line in her bid for the nomination. But now, short of an Act of God, Barak Obama will win the nod. I suspect she knows this. It is probably a bitter pill and it takes time to assimilate and digest it. But she will slowly start reorienting and will be seeking an exit strategy.
If you are really that upset about her still being in the race, you should be looking to help identify acceptable exit strategies -- ways to drop out and save face ... perhaps even land in some other prominent capacity.
Dropping into an enraged All-or-Nothing mode and demonizing opponents is what the 2000-era Republicans do.
We're better. posted 05/13/2008 at 12:52:50
*sigh*
You missed a spot on that dead horse, Mr Handler.
I know you passionately believe what you are saying. But what do you hope to achieve by posting your diatribe?
Is it right? Is it wrong? I suppose people will continue to debate.
Is it constructive?
At this point, I suggest the answer is "No." All you'll succeed in doing is further alienating people who are sympathetic towards Senator Clinton. posted 05/13/2008 at 12:46:02
You missed a spot on that dead horse, Mr Handler.
I know you passionately believe what you are saying. But what do you hope to achieve by posting your diatribe?
Is it right? Is it wrong? I suppose people will continue to debate.
Is it constructive?
At this point, I suggest the answer is "No." All you'll succeed in doing is further alienating people who are sympathetic towards Senator Clinton. posted 05/13/2008 at 12:46:02
The Mind of Chinese Men: the Anxiety of Disorientation
I have to say, I tend to agree with Pip, above.
When reading, I didn't consider the race of the author, but *was* struck by what seemed a significant generalization of a very large subset of the population. The author opines: "Contemporary Chinese men are filled with lingering anxiety and a nebulous loss of control." Hell, *I* am filled with lingering anxiety and a nebulous loss of control, increasingly so over the past few decades. ;-D
I can't help but think that much of this may be rationalizations for already-held perceptions/beliefs regaarding Chinese men. posted 05/05/2008 at 12:24:13
When reading, I didn't consider the race of the author, but *was* struck by what seemed a significant generalization of a very large subset of the population. The author opines: "Contemporary Chinese men are filled with lingering anxiety and a nebulous loss of control." Hell, *I* am filled with lingering anxiety and a nebulous loss of control, increasingly so over the past few decades. ;-D
I can't help but think that much of this may be rationalizations for already-held perceptions/beliefs regaarding Chinese men. posted 05/05/2008 at 12:24:13
20,000 Jobs Lost In April
A few important corrections, ohiomark:
"Bad news that comes about as a direct result of Republican mismanagement provides myriad opportunities for Democrats."
Never confuse "Republican politicans" with "America." It is an insulting trasnposition.
PS: If you really loved America, you'd be incensed at the people who persistently caused bad things to happen to her. posted 05/05/2008 at 12:11:35
"Bad news that comes about as a direct result of Republican mismanagement provides myriad opportunities for Democrats."
Never confuse "Republican politicans" with "America." It is an insulting trasnposition.
PS: If you really loved America, you'd be incensed at the people who persistently caused bad things to happen to her. posted 05/05/2008 at 12:11:35
On Lost: "Something Nice Back Home"
Great point! Have to admit, I didn't notice the lack of scar, but I was struck by Hurley's speculation and by the fact that this scenario did seem very idyllic -- too idyllic for being so early in the season. ;-)
I have always suspected an "island as metaphor" situation where all of this is not actually real. I know, I know, the writers have denied this. Still, it just seems to fit SO conveniently! posted 05/05/2008 at 12:35:11
I have always suspected an "island as metaphor" situation where all of this is not actually real. I know, I know, the writers have denied this. Still, it just seems to fit SO conveniently! posted 05/05/2008 at 12:35:11
Consumer spending up mainly because of sharp price increases
"The Market" is not "the Economy," despite the simplistic substitution exercises many people (and the Media) like to attempt. It is just easier to track, therefore, because it *can* be measured, people use those measurements ... whether they apply or not. posted 05/05/2008 at 12:15:37
The DC Madam: She Took the Fall for Everyone
Ditto, LRM! posted 05/02/2008 at 10:33:57
India's Baby-Dropping Ritual (VIDEO)
What is a "trimeter abortion?"
Are you referring to an abortion in the third trimester?
If so, know that there are no "discretionary third trimester abortions" in this country. The only reason an abortion would take place in the trimester is due to a critical medical emergency.
Things aren't so simple when one deals with reality rather than Rightwing Talking Points, eh? ;-)
If you're referring to something else ... I'd ask you to define the term. I never heard it. posted 05/01/2008 at 14:35:28
Are you referring to an abortion in the third trimester?
If so, know that there are no "discretionary third trimester abortions" in this country. The only reason an abortion would take place in the trimester is due to a critical medical emergency.
Things aren't so simple when one deals with reality rather than Rightwing Talking Points, eh? ;-)
If you're referring to something else ... I'd ask you to define the term. I never heard it. posted 05/01/2008 at 14:35:28
Why Wal-Mart Does Not Strengthen Our Economy
No company is going to be able to compete with a huge organization that pays subsidixatiopn-level wages to US employees and uses vendors that pay 1/6th or less what US wage earners would earn.
You can call it what you like -- Free Enterprise or Sliced Bread -- but that doesn't make it good; and it does put this ocuntry on a path to 3rd-world economic status.
IMO, we have to stop worshiping labels (e.g., Free Enterprise) and start using our judgment and common sense again. posted 05/01/2008 at 13:55:16
You can call it what you like -- Free Enterprise or Sliced Bread -- but that doesn't make it good; and it does put this ocuntry on a path to 3rd-world economic status.
IMO, we have to stop worshiping labels (e.g., Free Enterprise) and start using our judgment and common sense again. posted 05/01/2008 at 13:55:16
I'm Mad At Everybody - Except My Dogs
Your dogs called, Ms Drexler. They've max'd the credit cards again at Hooters. ;-) posted 05/06/2008 at 15:15:55
The Billionaire Income Tax Proposal
You know ... I think that says it all. posted 04/22/2008 at 12:27:08
GOP Strategist Says Racism Would Give McCain 15% Edge on Obama
I agree that there will be some number of people who will not vote for Obama because of race. However:
* I don't accept 15%. This number comes from a GOP strategist, thereby making his credibility and perceptions suspect, by definition.
* It doesn't take into account the additional numbers who *will* vote for Obama, and who may not have voted/turned-out before.
* It doesn't take into account the huge numbers of people who are fed up and diisgusted with two terms of GOP misrule and would vote for a Jelly-Filled Doughnut, if it ran as a Democrat. ;-) posted 04/22/2008 at 10:26:09
* I don't accept 15%. This number comes from a GOP strategist, thereby making his credibility and perceptions suspect, by definition.
* It doesn't take into account the additional numbers who *will* vote for Obama, and who may not have voted/turned-out before.
* It doesn't take into account the huge numbers of people who are fed up and diisgusted with two terms of GOP misrule and would vote for a Jelly-Filled Doughnut, if it ran as a Democrat. ;-) posted 04/22/2008 at 10:26:09
Could The Recession Have Been Prevented?
The recession might have been prevented, or at least mitigated. But action would have needed to have been taken back in the early 2000s.
First, let me say this is not a "typical recession" where low interest rates are a panacea. Many of our current problems were *caused* by low interest rates that were kept too low for too long, resulting in a housing bubble. The foolish tax deferments (I won't call them cuts) didn't help.
In many ways, we never really got out of the 2001 recession -- at least, not as a country.
And the authors' implication that the recession was caused mainly by "pessimistic talk" makes me question whether they really have a grasp on the factors that did lead us to where we are.
How could we have avoided it?
* Raised interest rates back when the old recession was starting to lift. If the "recovery" was too fragile to survive interest rates going to normal, it wasn't a real recovery.
* Stop wholesale business deregulation. It only allowed excesses and abuses. (Personally, I won't buy ground beef when Republicans are in office -- I won't eat what they will allow in.)
* Deal with the hemorrhaging of US jobs. A populace without incomes can't spend.
* Avoid unneeded wars.
* Invest in some national infrastructure -- road/bridge repair, for example. Water pipes and sewer systems. Creates jobs, improves the country.
* IF we're to give tax cuts, do so where it will benefit: The bottom posted 04/22/2008 at 12:24:22
First, let me say this is not a "typical recession" where low interest rates are a panacea. Many of our current problems were *caused* by low interest rates that were kept too low for too long, resulting in a housing bubble. The foolish tax deferments (I won't call them cuts) didn't help.
In many ways, we never really got out of the 2001 recession -- at least, not as a country.
And the authors' implication that the recession was caused mainly by "pessimistic talk" makes me question whether they really have a grasp on the factors that did lead us to where we are.
How could we have avoided it?
* Raised interest rates back when the old recession was starting to lift. If the "recovery" was too fragile to survive interest rates going to normal, it wasn't a real recovery.
* Stop wholesale business deregulation. It only allowed excesses and abuses. (Personally, I won't buy ground beef when Republicans are in office -- I won't eat what they will allow in.)
* Deal with the hemorrhaging of US jobs. A populace without incomes can't spend.
* Avoid unneeded wars.
* Invest in some national infrastructure -- road/bridge repair, for example. Water pipes and sewer systems. Creates jobs, improves the country.
* IF we're to give tax cuts, do so where it will benefit: The bottom posted 04/22/2008 at 12:24:22
Is Wednesday D-Day For Superdelegates?
You ask: "Which is the more plausible path to the White House? Clinton's better chance in the king maker states, or Obama's shot at putting new ones into play?"
The answer: Neither.
Both assertions are based on false reasoning, extrapolating Party Primary results into General Election results. The rules/trends for one do not, de facto, apply to the other, since we deal with supersets of populations (discounts impact of those who don't vote in primaries but do vote in GE, discounts ratio of "Dem supporters" to "die-hard GOP supporters.")
Both assertions are put forth by people who are passionate about one or the other of the candidates.
I appreciate your passion, but let's all try to stay Reality Based. The GOP has a prior claim to fitting "facts" to fit ideology/desires ... let's not try to compete in that arena. posted 04/22/2008 at 11:38:40
The answer: Neither.
Both assertions are based on false reasoning, extrapolating Party Primary results into General Election results. The rules/trends for one do not, de facto, apply to the other, since we deal with supersets of populations (discounts impact of those who don't vote in primaries but do vote in GE, discounts ratio of "Dem supporters" to "die-hard GOP supporters.")
Both assertions are put forth by people who are passionate about one or the other of the candidates.
I appreciate your passion, but let's all try to stay Reality Based. The GOP has a prior claim to fitting "facts" to fit ideology/desires ... let's not try to compete in that arena. posted 04/22/2008 at 11:38:40
Damn the Moderators... Full Speed Ahead
Don't give me "it was about character," because it wasn't. It was about trotting out GOP smear attempts, for the most part. Conversely (although we're in no danger of this, it seems) I don't want moderators to snipe at McCain's mistress, how he dumped his ill wife, or how he was forced into being used as a propaganda tool during the Vietnam war. or if he wears a lapel pin.
Those. Things. Don't. Matter. They are petty distractions.
Focus on the issues. Focus on when candidates say one thing at one time and reverse themselves in front of a different audience. THOSE speak to character and consistency. Focus on what the substantive differences are between candidates and what we could expect to be different if one or the other were elected.
All the rest is just a sad "Reality Show" wannabe with manufactured controversy.
And do we need debates? Yes. Otherwise, all we have are partisan commercials with lies and distortion, and "journalism" which is put out by people who (all too often) are just stenographers for the candidates campaign, if not actual partisan shills. posted 04/22/2008 at 11:57:09
Those. Things. Don't. Matter. They are petty distractions.
Focus on the issues. Focus on when candidates say one thing at one time and reverse themselves in front of a different audience. THOSE speak to character and consistency. Focus on what the substantive differences are between candidates and what we could expect to be different if one or the other were elected.
All the rest is just a sad "Reality Show" wannabe with manufactured controversy.
And do we need debates? Yes. Otherwise, all we have are partisan commercials with lies and distortion, and "journalism" which is put out by people who (all too often) are just stenographers for the candidates campaign, if not actual partisan shills. posted 04/22/2008 at 11:57:09
We're not used to seeing "real journalists?"
Perhaps I failed to follow the thrust of your post, Mr Kitman. I am not an Obama-maniac ... to be honest, I fon't give a damn who wins the nomin ation as long as it is a Dem. But I found the last debate reprehensible. It was all about trying to find a scandal that might stick and poking a finger into any and all allegations and insinuations ... whether founded or not. I'm tired of the sheer asininity (is that a word?) of it all.
Previous debates have sucked, as well. BTW, Russert's performance sucked. If he was to be an "attack dog" on issues or substantive areas, I'd agree. But petty gotcha's on trivialities (and/or more GOP smear attempt points) hardly qualify as journalism ... no matter how tenacious one might be.
Do we need debate moderators? Yes, as a matter of fact , I believe we do. But they need to be impartial professionals who add to the level of discourse by providing meaningful structure ... not stooping to the level of a political Entertainment Tonight! And that means focusing on substance ... not lapel pins or whiskey shots or alleged lesbianism or Weatherman accusations. posted 04/22/2008 at 11:56:52
Perhaps I failed to follow the thrust of your post, Mr Kitman. I am not an Obama-maniac ... to be honest, I fon't give a damn who wins the nomin ation as long as it is a Dem. But I found the last debate reprehensible. It was all about trying to find a scandal that might stick and poking a finger into any and all allegations and insinuations ... whether founded or not. I'm tired of the sheer asininity (is that a word?) of it all.
Previous debates have sucked, as well. BTW, Russert's performance sucked. If he was to be an "attack dog" on issues or substantive areas, I'd agree. But petty gotcha's on trivialities (and/or more GOP smear attempt points) hardly qualify as journalism ... no matter how tenacious one might be.
Do we need debate moderators? Yes, as a matter of fact , I believe we do. But they need to be impartial professionals who add to the level of discourse by providing meaningful structure ... not stooping to the level of a political Entertainment Tonight! And that means focusing on substance ... not lapel pins or whiskey shots or alleged lesbianism or Weatherman accusations. posted 04/22/2008 at 11:56:52
McCain in 2008 = Clinton in 2012
I believe Mr Seery gives too much credit to the Republican Attack Teams (RATs). Sure, they will do exactly as he describes. But I don't believe McCain is the candidate Mr Seery fears him to be. McCain, despite the Press Love, will be another Bob Dole -- and the press will wander aimlessly afterwards, doing story aftyer story on the Major Upset that swept the Dem candidate (whomever that is) into office.
I suggest that Mr Seery's perceptions may be coloured a tad by his frustration that Sen Clinton is still in the race and at her perceived campaign tactics. But throwing up your hands and declaring "all is lost" isn't a good response.
McCain's support isn't as strong as many make it out to be. And he has a lot of negatives, waiting to be exploited. posted 04/21/2008 at 12:03:24
I suggest that Mr Seery's perceptions may be coloured a tad by his frustration that Sen Clinton is still in the race and at her perceived campaign tactics. But throwing up your hands and declaring "all is lost" isn't a good response.
McCain's support isn't as strong as many make it out to be. And he has a lot of negatives, waiting to be exploited. posted 04/21/2008 at 12:03:24
And Al Gore Helps John McCain into the White House
Undeservedly harsh, Mr Stoller.
Positive reinforcement when someone does something good, negative reinforcement when someone does something "not good." It's just basic interaction tactic, not some insightful revelation of treachery. posted 04/21/2008 at 12:19:28
Positive reinforcement when someone does something good, negative reinforcement when someone does something "not good." It's just basic interaction tactic, not some insightful revelation of treachery. posted 04/21/2008 at 12:19:28
Is Business Casual Ever Casual?
I'm always amused by people who profess to be indignant because they can't "dress more casually" at work. And at the people who do "dress casually" in the office ... and blithely ignore the fact that they *are*, still, in the office. Jeans, sneakers, t-shirts ... you may not like to hear this, but: You really have been clueless.
Ms Binkley is absolutely correct: "You are judged." Whether you like it or not ... whether you acknowledge it or not ... you are judged. And this does affect how others perceive you and it does affect your "promotability."
The only matter in question is "Am I going to make use of this tool (dress/appearance/projection) in a constructive manner that furthers my goals." posted 04/21/2008 at 14:15:21
Ms Binkley is absolutely correct: "You are judged." Whether you like it or not ... whether you acknowledge it or not ... you are judged. And this does affect how others perceive you and it does affect your "promotability."
The only matter in question is "Am I going to make use of this tool (dress/appearance/projection) in a constructive manner that furthers my goals." posted 04/21/2008 at 14:15:21
Welcome 2008 Graduates To Our Real World
Man, I am glad I'm not just starting out. My heart goes out to anyone who graduates during the Bush years and tries to find a decent job. posted 04/21/2008 at 13:54:41
Saving the Woods is Class Prejudice
The principal focused solely on one of your rationales and treated it as if it were the sole/main point. The fact is, you weren't trying to save the woods to protect property values -- that was a rationale you came up with after making teh decision to fight, in order to bolsetr your argument.
I suggest the principal was being unwittingly or knowingly obtuse. posted 04/18/2008 at 11:22:45
I suggest the principal was being unwittingly or knowingly obtuse. posted 04/18/2008 at 11:22:45
Mad As Hell At ABC's Debate
While I see your point, to an extent, Dunnage, let me reframe the issue a bit: From my perspective, I am mad about the quality of "news." Voting means making decisions. Any decision is only as good as the information made available upon which to act. IMO, too many of the gatekeepers of information (i.e., the Press) have abdicated this responsibility in an effort to provide infotainment instead of information.
IMO, it is not a matter of "not being able to handle the talking heads," but a degradation of a once-valuable function: Informing the citizenry. It is not a matter of "can they handle it" but "should they have to handle it?" And "what is not being provided, because we have such trivial dramas being presented instead of teh actual information we seek?"
if we don't get good information, too many people then start using stupid criteria ... like "with whom would I rather have a beer?"
And we all saw where that led. posted 04/18/2008 at 10:40:06
IMO, it is not a matter of "not being able to handle the talking heads," but a degradation of a once-valuable function: Informing the citizenry. It is not a matter of "can they handle it" but "should they have to handle it?" And "what is not being provided, because we have such trivial dramas being presented instead of teh actual information we seek?"
if we don't get good information, too many people then start using stupid criteria ... like "with whom would I rather have a beer?"
And we all saw where that led. posted 04/18/2008 at 10:40:06
McCain Wins GOP, Independents Back In New Poll
Here's hoping things get back to sanity once all the Dem infighting is over and we can unite behind a nominee. posted 04/17/2008 at 11:15:35
Hill, You've Got $100 Million; Show Some Class
What gaffe? Obama's only mistake was speaking truth during a time that Conservative Political Correctness won't allow such truths to be spoken.
Has every person who totes guns or gets into religion done so because of bitterness/apathy? No. But IMO, his statement applies to a hell of a lot of 'em.
Same with Wright's "unacceptable" statement. By artfully conflating the country and the bastards who tend to run the government, it becomes unacceptable to criticize because such criticism can be foisted off to "the country" and allow everyone to get righteously, Nationalistically indignant.
But, such is the fate of Truth-tellers, it seems. posted 04/17/2008 at 10:53:42
Has every person who totes guns or gets into religion done so because of bitterness/apathy? No. But IMO, his statement applies to a hell of a lot of 'em.
Same with Wright's "unacceptable" statement. By artfully conflating the country and the bastards who tend to run the government, it becomes unacceptable to criticize because such criticism can be foisted off to "the country" and allow everyone to get righteously, Nationalistically indignant.
But, such is the fate of Truth-tellers, it seems. posted 04/17/2008 at 10:53:42
12 Good Reasons To Look For A New Job
Ha ... with that list, I'd never stay at any job! ;-D posted 04/17/2008 at 12:28:40
The Unmaking of the Market
Um ... Bob ... we "let ourselves be raped?"
Let's not "blame the victim," here. We try to "protect ourselves" by setting up institutions to regulate Business. When the safegaurds are removed due to systemic deregulation, then we get screwed. But that IS becaus eof Wall Street and the "greedy types" who forced/oversaw the mass deregulation!
Further, the whole concept of Caveat Emptor sucks and shows the systemic bias we have towards protecting corrupt Business over consumers and individuals. posted 04/22/2008 at 12:05:14
Let's not "blame the victim," here. We try to "protect ourselves" by setting up institutions to regulate Business. When the safegaurds are removed due to systemic deregulation, then we get screwed. But that IS becaus eof Wall Street and the "greedy types" who forced/oversaw the mass deregulation!
Further, the whole concept of Caveat Emptor sucks and shows the systemic bias we have towards protecting corrupt Business over consumers and individuals. posted 04/22/2008 at 12:05:14
Between the Ds, it's Obama!
An excellent, focused question, DHeil!
Michael: I used to be a Republican myself. I styled myself a Neo-Conservative.
Until I started asking myself many of the questions DHeil poses.
I found I had no good answers ... only rationalizations. Once I started dealing with Reality rather than defending my ideology, I found life much easier. A word of advice: It is infinitely better to base your Ideology on Reality, and adjust ones ideology as needed, than to try to twist one's Reality to fit their Ideology. posted 04/17/2008 at 11:06:35
Michael: I used to be a Republican myself. I styled myself a Neo-Conservative.
Until I started asking myself many of the questions DHeil poses.
I found I had no good answers ... only rationalizations. Once I started dealing with Reality rather than defending my ideology, I found life much easier. A word of advice: It is infinitely better to base your Ideology on Reality, and adjust ones ideology as needed, than to try to twist one's Reality to fit their Ideology. posted 04/17/2008 at 11:06:35
Mr Smerconish, your major reason for prefering Obama is ... because of his stance re: bin Laden?!? And this speaks to your sense of Justice ... Vengeance?
After all of the incompetence, corruption, and Anti-Americanism that the Republican party has repeatedly demonstrated over the past two terms, you still cling to that criminal affiliation, because they call themselves (but are, in fact, not) Conservative? And you will grudgingly admit a preference for a man who would restore honour to our government ... to our country ... just because he has expressed intent to take action against someone you despise?
I could almost weep for you, sir. You make a good choice for the wrong reasons. Worse, you still identify with a political party that has repeatedly demonstrated that it has no principles beyond the acquisition and application of Power.
I pray that someday the veil is lifted from your eyes. posted 04/17/2008 at 11:02:03
After all of the incompetence, corruption, and Anti-Americanism that the Republican party has repeatedly demonstrated over the past two terms, you still cling to that criminal affiliation, because they call themselves (but are, in fact, not) Conservative? And you will grudgingly admit a preference for a man who would restore honour to our government ... to our country ... just because he has expressed intent to take action against someone you despise?
I could almost weep for you, sir. You make a good choice for the wrong reasons. Worse, you still identify with a political party that has repeatedly demonstrated that it has no principles beyond the acquisition and application of Power.
I pray that someday the veil is lifted from your eyes. posted 04/17/2008 at 11:02:03
China Demands Apology From CNN's Cafferty For "Goons And Thugs" Comment
I like Cafferty, as well.
But I think he jumped the gun on this China/Tibet issue. posted 04/16/2008 at 10:57:07
But I think he jumped the gun on this China/Tibet issue. posted 04/16/2008 at 10:57:07
Tibet is part of China. Even the Dalai lama says so. There is no "invasion."
This is what I mean when I say most of us don't really know the situaion and are taking a knee-jerk response. posted 04/16/2008 at 10:55:59
This is what I mean when I say most of us don't really know the situaion and are taking a knee-jerk response. posted 04/16/2008 at 10:55:59
Popular Stories on HuffPost
From the AP: Democrat John Edwards endorsed former rival Barack Obama on Wednesday, a...
*** UPDATED BELOW *** President Bush has said repeatedly that he would not insert himself into the...
Utterly insane goings-on tonight on...
It's a pretty well known fact that most women - attractive women -...
Just off the House floor today, the Crypt overheard House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers tell two...
Tonight, Keith Olbermann unleashed what may well have been his...
The AP reports on Obama's swift and forceful response to Bush and McCain's criticism of...
The Tennessee GOP hasn't yet had their fill of Obama dirty tricks. A few months ago,...
***UPDATE*** Roughly five hours after making comments about...
The Democratic Party has finally decided who's going to break it to Hillary that it's time...
Sixteen tips for getting good sleep. There's a lot of advice out there about getting good...
George W. Bush is unworthy of the presidency. He is a disgrace to himself,...
1. "Labor" has been successfully demonized by the Right, over the past few decades. They have instilled an image of corrupt bosses and "groups of workers all getting paid to stand around, due to some bureaucratic technicality of their contract." They have won the Propaganda War, so far.
2. The Media, itself, has come more and more under Corporate control. Thus, there is purposeful intent not to publicize things that could prove troublesome to the home office's Corporate Control. posted 05/16/2008 at 11:25:54