Durango

Recent comments by this user

Pentagon "Media Analysts" Appeared On Major Networks Or Were Quoted More Than 4,500

Did you miss the fact the issue is taxpayer paid propaganda?

As far as I can see, one violation is enough. Or rather Too many. posted 05/13/2008 at 15:58:19
Right.

And your count shows how many times these Pentagon experts were on ABC, CBS, Fox etc, etc?

I want to see your study published citing the sources (likeMedia Matters does) to refute them.

Still waiting. posted 05/13/2008 at 15:55:10
Didn't need to be.

Whoever organized them was paid by the Pentagon.

Travel? Expenses?

"No part of any appropriation."

I suppose if Rumsfeld et al used their own money it would be different. But then that would be VERY UNREPUBLICAN, wouldn't it? posted 05/13/2008 at 15:51:31

Cease-fire holds in Sadr City after deadly clashes

Better lookup the definition of INVADER.

My dictionary says "To enter forceably or hostilely. To intrude upon. Violate."

Sounds pretty much what we did in Iraq. Don't remember anyone inviting us in. Or throwing flowers for that matter. posted 05/13/2008 at 15:32:17
Al Sadr is, first off, an Iraqi.

Second, he is the leader of a political party and political faction. He may or may not be the leader of a militia.

Third, His party was ELECTED to seats in the Parliment.

In otherwords, he has legitimacy to represent Iraq.

Something the US troops will never have.

You may not like those facts. But I sincerely doubt any Iraqis give a rats ass about what any of us here think. posted 05/13/2008 at 15:27:38
Hey, Ghosty boy. Show me the source that says no civilians were killed in the air strikes. posted 05/13/2008 at 15:03:34
Good comparison.

But tell me? How would you feel if those 181 murders in Wasington or 497 in New York came from Iraqi soldiers occupying those cities?

You probably wouldn't mind. You would probably be a collaborator. posted 05/13/2008 at 14:57:46
I thought it was Saddam who was the boogie man? Or wasn't it Osama Bin Ladin? Who never came close to Iraq.

Now its some Shia.

Don't you know that al Sadr is the leader of a MOVEMENT. If he is killed he will be replaced.

But why we are in Iraq killing Shia in Iraq remains the biggest mystery. posted 05/13/2008 at 14:52:55

Ex-officials: Bush admin. ignored Iraq corruption

That depends.

I have hope for the Obama Justice Department.

Keep a good watch of his Attorney General appointment. Contact Senators on the Judical Committee. Force them to get committments to investigate and prosecute corruption, where ever it leads.
Tee,hee,tee,hee,tee,hee,tee,hee. posted 05/13/2008 at 09:22:27

Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty Jokes His Wife Won't Have Sex With Him

You know Larry Craigs bathroom stall was in Minnesota. posted 05/12/2008 at 17:32:51

Obama Islam Smear Changes Stripes

Absolutely. It is none of your business what Baraks religious beliefs might be. None of my business either.

And it sure as HELL is NONE OF THE MEDIAS business. Or the CRYPTO-FACISTS who are bring it up. posted 05/13/2008 at 15:08:17
Excuse me. This is the United States of America.

What is Barak Obama's religion?

Anything he wants it to be. We have the 1st Amendment which says of religion "no law . . .prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

The Constitution also prohibits religious tests for any office.

In other words we, as Americans, are guaranteed the right to see God in any way, shape, or form we desire. Or to reject it outright.

Baraks religion is between himself and his God.

It is none of our DAMN BUSINESS!! posted 05/13/2008 at 09:45:40

Lieberman Parrots Obama Hamas Smear

actually, I think Andrea Mitchell looks more like Smeagle. posted 05/12/2008 at 18:54:34
i heard Satan has just endorsed Obama also. posted 05/12/2008 at 17:38:08

Fierce Fighting Erupts Outside Beirut

If you want an unexcelled example of pandering take a good look at McCain.

Blaming Democrats for what the Repubs are up to is a game that is getting old.

Obama pandering? Only if you define the word as using intelligence in decision making rather than slogans and bad ideology. posted 05/12/2008 at 09:22:56
Shia in Gaza?

And if you are waiting for video of good guys vs bad guys . . .you will be waiting for a very long time. posted 05/12/2008 at 09:18:44

Thoughts on Yesterday's Rebel Attempt to Topple Khartoum

Mobile war far in the sudan.

Now there is a military leader with some BALLS.

Although I am certain Farrow is right you still have to admire the audacity.

And it would certainly be one way to end the conflict. posted 05/11/2008 at 16:48:43

Bill Kristol Predicts Obama Veep As...Dick Gephardt?

Right, and all the Democrats who worked so hard to get Obama where he is can just go to Hell.

I don't think so. posted 05/13/2008 at 09:29:55
Would that be before or after she is indicted.

Pure fantasy. posted 05/12/2008 at 15:50:10
When in Hell has anyone here, except the obvious Republican trolls EVER AGREED with Kristol?

And praising him?

You are in a whole different democratic Party than the one I know. posted 05/12/2008 at 10:57:27
You forget. The Republicans, of the Bush Administration, which Fox is a major portion, make up their own reality.

And the rest of us are left to react to it. posted 05/12/2008 at 09:33:51
Like Jon Stewart said " Oh Bill, have you ever been right about anything?"

We can pretty much rest assured that whom ever the VP Candidate will be, it won't be Gephardt. posted 05/12/2008 at 09:32:04

Arianna's New Book Shows How Media Ignored 'Downing Street Memo'

According to Scott Ritter 90% of materials were accounted for. Accounted for on the ground.

The other 10% were paper error. In a third world country. After a war and massive bombing.

That "bad intelligence" was the Bush Admin seeking scapegoats so they would not take responsibility for their lies. Something you may have noticed over the past 7 1/2 years. They have NEVER taken responsibiilty for anything. I have never seen such 6 year old behavior in my life. Even among 6 year olds.

If you were paying attention you would have seen the CIA knew the claims of WMD were lies. BEFORE the invasion. posted 05/12/2008 at 15:57:26
Sorry. I read what I wanted not what you wrote.

You said Dems cowed by Clinton' not the media. I wouldn't necessarily agree that we are cowed.

But not certain that we aren't either.

At any rate SORRY! posted 05/12/2008 at 10:44:30
I agree they are not interested in objective, and not just investigative, journalism.

But being in love with Obama? I don't think so.

The problem is not the media liking or disliking Obama or any other candidate.

The problem is the lameness of the media, the inability to think and their pursuit of exactly the wrong stories. The whole campaign, to date has focused on lame stories taken out of context. The media, in general, wouldn't know an important issue if it bit them on the ass.

P.S. There is no "dirt" there. Just meaningless trivia elevated to discussion by a ridiculously stupid and corrupt media. posted 05/12/2008 at 10:39:27
I agree we need to elect new leaders BUT: media cowed by the Clintons?

Where were you from 1992 to 2000? I have never seen a more disgraceful example of media frenzy involving no facts and no scandals. That went on for 8 full years.

Of course I have seen even more disgraceful media coverage since. posted 05/12/2008 at 09:51:55
So its all Clintons fault?

That broken record has been played long enough.

1. Clinton had left office years previously.

2. The intelligence was "fixed" around the policy. ie: if they didn't have the intelligence they would make it up. Which is EXACTLY what they did.

3. This is compelling evidence of a War Crime and/or Crime Against Humanity (see: Nuremburg on Aggressive War) although more investigation needs to take place.

4. See also: Germans under Hitlers orders dressing up German prisoners in Polish uniforms and executing them near a German radio station as justification of Germany's aggressive war on Poland.
Compare and contrast that with Bush's plan to paint an American reconnaissance plane in UN colors in the hope it would get shot down and provide the causus belli for the invasion of Iraq. posted 05/12/2008 at 09:47:22
Could you possibly have missed the point by a wider margin? posted 05/12/2008 at 09:38:39

Laughing Baby Gets The Giggles

Dogs:

Don't shit or piss in the house.
Don't talk behind your back.
Are always happy to see you. Even if you have been gone 30 seconds.
Protect you from burglers, rapists, and bad people in general.
Are excellent chick magnets. Or guy,as the case may be.
Never have cold feet.
Keep cats way. posted 05/12/2008 at 16:28:41

Cease-fire reported with Iraqi militants in Sadr City

I think Bin Ladin is hidden away in Yemen. Amongst his family. After all, blood is much thicker than water especially in the ME.

Doesn't mean we shouldn't drag Zawahiri and the rest of their crew out of Pakistan.

Seeing as the (mostly) Arab fighters of Al Qaida did not have a good reputation in Afghanistan among the locals. And seeing as they are being hidden by mostly Pashtun tribesmen with no clan or blood ties. Probably in exchange for money (most likely supplied by Saudi and Gulf financiers).

Doesn't that seem like a relationship ripe for treachery? posted 05/11/2008 at 10:03:18
So, in a rational world the USA should be supporting Hezbollah? And with their help and the help of Iran do you suppose we could eradicate them?

See what happens when you don't talk to people? posted 05/10/2008 at 17:50:07

Hezbollah to withdraw fighters in Beirut; 12 die in clash

Is that telephone or telecommunications system?

And now that you mention it. Wasn't the shutting down of al Sadr's newspaper what initiated the original confrontation with the Mahdi Army in Iraq?

Do I see a trend? posted 05/12/2008 at 11:00:51
"They don't have the 'moral authority' to disarm the rebel Islamists"

Hell, they don't have the ARMS to disarm Hezbollah. Or fight Israeli invasion for that matter.

And since when has Hezbollah refused to participate in Parliment?

You might try living in a reality based world instead of relying on slogans about leftists etc. Living in a fantasy world has resulted in the Catastrofuck that has been US policy for the past 7 years. Time for that stupidity to end. posted 05/11/2008 at 09:51:32

Beirut Is Burning

What I wrote makes every bit as much sense as what you wrote about Islamic Jihadists.

Except I wasn't serious. I was mocking your post.

P.S. that crack about Afrocentrists Churches? You wouldn't want to admit to being a racist would you?

Racist towards African Americans. because you are clearly one with regard to Muslims. posted 05/13/2008 at 15:39:46
That hadn't occurred to me.

But I think you are right. posted 05/12/2008 at 15:46:23
You have to wonder how big a mess Lebanon would be if it wasn't bordered on the South by Israel?. posted 05/12/2008 at 15:45:27
Americans of all stripes are driven by the ideology of Imperialistic war. The only peace for them is world domination, only one truth American power. Their vision is non negotiable. posted 05/12/2008 at 15:40:28
Go tell that to the diplomats cited in the article.

Were you a veteran at 14?

My understanding of the Iraq/Iran War is that it was very close to the carnage of WW I.

At any rate: Playing the game, my carnage was worse than your carnage is a fools errand.

And I am certain nearly EVERY Iranian has a much better understanding of the cost of war than almost ANY American.

P.S I didn't call you an idiot. You did. posted 05/12/2008 at 11:16:30
Clinton? Clinton?

Why not Ronald Reagan? Saint Ronald who And then totally screwed up our standing in Lebanon. And then skeedaddled like a scared rat. But then threw gasoline back on the fire by trading arms for hostages (we WILL NOT NEGOTIATE WITH TERRORISTS? Unless we do)

And by selling arms to our Enemy Iran, pissed off our alleged ally Saddam, who later became our worst enemy. Excpet for Osama Bin Ladin who we don't really need to worry about.

Excuse me. My head is beginning to hurt trying to follow the logic.

Oh, BTW Shouldn't we blame Eisenhower? The Republican who "started" all the problems? posted 05/12/2008 at 11:09:40
#1 American interest in Middle East: Oil
#2 Oil
#3Oil
#$Oil.

Our entire economy is dependent upon cheap oil.
Repeat: OUR ENTIRE ECONOMY IS DEPENDENT ON CHEAP OIL. posted 05/11/2008 at 16:33:01
Try dealing with the world as it is, not how your fevered imagination makes it.

Things are not Black and White. Iran and Hezbollah are not Germany or Japan. That is a ridiculous comparison.

And f you think it is a war "to the death" then you are fool.

Pure and simple.

Reality is a long way from your frantic imagination. posted 05/11/2008 at 12:42:21
Get a grip. posted 05/11/2008 at 11:23:56
Nationalism is the single most powerful political force in the world.

Nothing, not Marxism, not Capitalism, not religion even comes close.

It is remarkable how many well educated and informed people (as opposed to those in the Bush Admin) fail to realize this fact. posted 05/11/2008 at 10:22:16
I wsh to amend my comment.

PORTIONS of the Right Wing have always been crypto- Nazis.

I got excited. Not all Right Wingers were anti semitic. But many were. And many secretly admired Hitler while despising Roosevelt. posted 05/11/2008 at 10:18:20
I think that is right. It is not either or. Class struggle is fused into religious struggles.

But in order to better understand what is happening in the Middle East it is best to look at things from different perspectives. posted 05/11/2008 at 10:15:15
You really don't know anything about the Iraqi/Iran war do you?

It was plenty bloody enough. posted 05/11/2008 at 10:08:44
Bull shit. Don't ascribe conservative values to the left. Buclkey was 100% correct.

Right wingers have always been crypto Nazis. posted 05/11/2008 at 10:06:37
And people will put up with an enormous about of bad government if it comes from their own citizens and leaders.

But will revolt over ANY AND ALL governments imposed by foreigners.

Nearly every time. posted 05/10/2008 at 17:17:48
Regardless of who started democracy in the area, wasn't Lebanon administered by the Ottomans as a part of Syria?

And wasn't the region betrayed at Versailles by being given over to the French Empire?

And wasn't the British installed King kicked out by the French, who wanted their own puppets, and as a consolation prize given Iraq as his Kingdom?

No wonder people don't trust the wests "good intentions?

And isn't it a shame that the Corporate Media can't be bothered to give us stories on the background and history of the regions we just happen to be meddling with. At great cost in lives and treasure.

Instead they focus on an endless Presidential campaign, where nothing happens, and stories about someone who knows someone who sat next to a candidate some time, or, other.

God forbid we should expect our President to know something about the world. posted 05/10/2008 at 17:13:44
Could it be that Bush, Cheney, Rice et al are right about arms smuggling in Iran Iraq.

Except the American arms are being smuggled out of Iraq and into Iran?

Too bad the bush Administration, all Republicans and the trolls on this site live in an IRONY FREE ZONE.

Because this one could be delicious. posted 05/10/2008 at 16:53:34
If you ignore Marxist templates don't be surprised when the Marxists take over, leaving you to wonder what in Hell happened.

But I am no Marxist. I simply noticed a common thread. And why would anyone be surprised at class struggle. Bush and Republicans have been waging it for years. Calling it Americanism (look up the American Legion circs 1919 100% Americanism).

Amal supporting Israel would explain the rise of Hezbollah very well also. With or without the Iranians why should the Shia support the invaders of the ir country? Or the occupation of the same?

I know I would fight like hell if anyone invaded and occupied mine. posted 05/10/2008 at 16:49:02
I asked for opinions.

You offer insults. Nice petty little world you live in. posted 05/10/2008 at 16:41:49
I posted this on another thread but I would like to see a reaction.

Since this started with Hezbollah's support for striking workers I think I am beginning to see a pattern.

Shia in the Middle East have been a minority. And being the minority tend to make up the under classes in their respective societies.

Ahmedinijad came to power in Iran as the champion of the lower classes. He got elected on the basis of his promises to increase economic prosperity.

Al Sadr is the champion of the poor and unemployed in Iraq. His base of support is Sadr City, the enormous Shia slum.

Hezbollah came to power in the Civil War as protectors of the Shia of Lebanon who had been used and abused by the Christian and Sunni upper classes.

I am wondering if we are looking at this the wrong way. Rather than a religious struggle maybe it is a class struggle.

Which would also explain the Bush Administrations mismanagement. They have been at war against the American working and middle class for some time. posted 05/10/2008 at 12:38:18
Wasn't Lebanon split off from greater Syria after WW I when the League of Nations in all its wisdom gave control of the region to France.

So maybe Syria has some legitimacy in Lebanese affairs. Do they recognize the decisions of the Imperialists? I know I wouldn't.

And didn't Israel seek a partnership with the Shia in it's first invasion of Lebanon? And wasn't the creation of Hezbollah a reaction in part to this "collaboration?"

Or did Israel help create Hezbollah as a counter to the Yasir Arafat, like they did when the encourage the creation of Hamas? posted 05/10/2008 at 12:35:44

Most Race-Baiting Column EVER! O'Reilly Uses Nearly Entire Column To Conjure Up A Race War Over Obama

From It's inception the United States of America has been a profoundly racist nation.

Just how much it remains so we are about to see. I fear it will get very ugly.

Hold on to your seats. We are about to take a terrible ride. posted 05/10/2008 at 18:45:31

McCain to Me in 1999: Bush "As Dumb as a Stump"

His price is a shot at the Presidency.

Lincoln said something about the horrendous ambition that takes hold over an individual when he/she thinks the Presidency is a possibility.

McCain's ambition has taken over his common sense. posted 05/11/2008 at 10:26:28
The ONLY qualification Bush had for the Presidency, his SOLE qualification was that he had Daddy's donor list and could raise more money than anyone else.

that's it.

That's It.

THAT"S IT. posted 05/10/2008 at 18:23:14

Secretary Rice Blames Iran, Syria For Lebanon Violence

Cheney as the Penguin! Classic!

He has a whole new career open to him. If he escapes prosecution, that is. posted 05/10/2008 at 17:41:09
Hey, ask Karl Rove not me.

I am sure they have developed some theory, or other to justifying what they want to do in partisan political terms.

And however they justify it I have no doubt it will end as a catsrofuck like every thing else they have touched.

The Permanent Republican Majority doesn't look so good these days.

I'm just offering the observation. Don't ask me to make sense out of what these fools do. posted 05/10/2008 at 17:35:17
Need to read some history.

try starting with WW I and colonialism. Treaty of Versailles. And how the Kingdom of Iraq came about. Not to mention France Lebanon and Syria.

And while you are at it look up the history of British Petroleum. And how fair they were in developing Iranian natural resources. Or why there might be a problem between the West and Iran.

I'm not saying what you are saying is necessarily wrong mind you. But you need WAY more context.

P.S. Lose the Islamofascism. Even the Bush Administration got rid of that word. posted 05/10/2008 at 17:31:13
You know. we COULD give it a try. See what happens. Could it be any worse than having the USA and Israel meddle in their internal affairs?

I for one would give it a shot. posted 05/10/2008 at 12:15:55
It is certainly about Obama, or who ever the Democratic candidate may be.

You can be assured that Bush and Cheney did not take one step over the past 7 1/2 years without carefully considering how it could be used to gain partisan political advantage.

And that has not changed simply because they are lame ducks. posted 05/10/2008 at 12:11:38
Palestinians do not make up Hezbollah. It is an indigenous political party of Shia Lebanese. It may be supported by Iran but it is doubtful they take orders from Tehran.

They have their own agenda and are responsible for their own actions.

They were created in response to the Lebanese Civil War as protection for (I believe) lower income Lebanese Shia who were being killed by all side in the Civil War. They have their own media and communications because that is the way things are done over there. posted 05/10/2008 at 12:08:18
Rome went to war against their niegbors, often on trumped up charges. The killed their people. Stole their possessions, and enslaved their people.

Yes Rome did a lot of wonderful things.

But mostly for Romans.

If you talked to a number of Germanic tribes in the era you might get a different perspective in Rome. posted 05/10/2008 at 10:52:32
That happens to be the mantra of every Empire from the beginning of time.

If we could only get these ungrateful barbarians to accept the wisdom of our Empire (by killing them, looting their possessions and enslaving their people) everything will be fine.

Problem is: there is an inexhaustible supply of barbarians. posted 05/10/2008 at 10:47:49
Since this started with Hezbollah's support for striking workers I think I am beginning to see a pattern.

Shia in the Middle East have been a minority. And being the minority tend to make up the under classes in their respective societies.

Ahmedinijad came to power in Iran as the champion of the lower classes. He got elected on the basis of his promises to increase economic prosperity.

Al Sadr is the champion of the poor and unemployed in Iraq. His base of support is Sadr City, the enormous Shia slum.

Hezbollah came to power in the Civil War as protectors of the Shia of Lebanon who had been used and abused by the Christian and Sunni upper classes.

I am wondering if we are looking at this the wrong way. Rather than a religious struggle maybe it is a class struggle.

Which would also explain the Bush Administrations mismanagement. They have been at war against the American working and middle class for some time. posted 05/10/2008 at 10:43:48
And when you go to war who gets killed. Those warm and friendly people. posted 05/10/2008 at 10:31:50

Bill Clinton's Angry Confrontation With Voter (VIDEO)

As someone who has litigated open records cases I can tell you from experience it doesn't matter a whit how many documents they have declassified.

The interesting material is what they don't want you to see.

So when our opponents bragged about the three boxes of materials they handed over we called Bullshit. The interesting stuff is what they tried to hide. posted 05/10/2008 at 18:00:18
Hillary won an election against Guiliani who failed to show up. Not sure how that makes her "tough" or a "fighter." Neither Obama or Hillary exactly went to the wall.

But you have to admit Obama's was the best political collapse of ALL TIME.

Your opponent pressuring his wife to attend public sex clubs.

PRICELESS. Brought to you from the Party for Family Values. posted 05/10/2008 at 17:56:13

Arianna On Colbert Report: The McCain Of 2000 Will Not Be On The Ballot In 2008

Personally I liked the acid trip.

So Stephan IS Experienced!

Don't know why I should be surprised. posted 05/10/2008 at 18:55:55
The weapons were traded for hostages in Lebanon.

Although what they did for the hostages from the US Embassy is still up for debate. But that, as they say, is another story. posted 05/10/2008 at 18:54:18
If Stephan is a Republican

Then so am I.

But I ain't. posted 05/10/2008 at 18:52:29
Wrong hostages.

And wrong Ollie as well. posted 05/10/2008 at 11:06:42
The charachter Colbert is to the right of Limbaugh.

The person Colbert is hardly a Republican. If you think that you haven't been watching his show. Or if you have been watching. You are missing the punch lines.

He is pissed off about what Bush and Company have done to our great nation.

Extremely pissed. posted 05/10/2008 at 11:04:06

The Clashes in Beirut: Is the Bush Administration Stirring the Pot?

Another prime example of Bush style diplomacy.

Gratuitously insult other people every chance you get. posted 05/09/2008 at 11:10:55
There is a comprehensive Middle East strategy.

More war. posted 05/09/2008 at 11:07:52
This appears to be a continuation of Bush/ Cheney strategy which can be simply summed up as: If we kill a few more people everything will be all right.

This time they are extending our war into Lebannon. I see this as a proxy war with Iran. The chances of it being successful are next to nil. Yet these fools are going ahead and fanning the flames throughout the Middle East.

The winners will be, no doubt, Iran, Hezbollah and Osam Bin Ladin. Who gains from any chaos in the region.

We allegedly went into Iraq to give them the benefits of "Democracy." yet every time there is a vote and the "enemies" of Bush/Cheney seem to prevail. (Not enemies of the USA. I would never conceed that US interests coincide with Bush/Cheney).

I guess they were right in one respect. Democracy has been flourishing. Elections have served to gain power and legitimacy of what we see as "terrorist". Hamas, Hezbollah, al Sadr etc etc etc. posted 05/09/2008 at 11:06:13
It all depends on how you look at it. Hezbollah can just as easily be seen as a political party which has been able to protect the, generally poor and underclass Shia from the exploitation of the Sunni and Christian population. An exploitation that has been going on for years.

They can also be seen as the only effective fighting force to stand up the Israel. And oppose the illegal invasion and occupation of Lebanon's sovereign territory.

Hezbollah is a FACT in Lebanon. And must be dealt with. It does no good to simply label them as "terrorist" and seek to obliterate them. It is not going to happen.

And how does it serve US interests, let alone Lebannese interests or the world's interest to restart the Civil War?

On the other hand it is clear to me how it serves Israel's interest. Percieved interests. When Hezbollah comes out stronger than ever Israel's interests might be seen in a different light. posted 05/09/2008 at 10:55:44
B.S. Didn't you read? The Bush Administration is advising a crack down on Hezbollah.

All that trite blaming it on "thousands of years of conflict" is just so much BS.

The US is once again playing a proxy war. This time in Lebannon. Instead of working for peace they are trying to punish Iran through Hezbollah.

And the Lebannese people are going to pay the price. posted 05/09/2008 at 10:46:36

Study: "Daily Show" Very Similar To "O'Reilly Factor"

And polite. posted 05/11/2008 at 11:10:18
And thats why the airwaves are full of conservative humor.

Sorry to tell you but abject stupdity is funny. And we have been subjected to more stupidity in the past 7 years than in all the previous Administrations put together. posted 05/09/2008 at 19:03:26
Don't watch the show much do you?

They make plenty of jokes about Gore/Kerry.

But the simple fact is:They are not nearly as funny.

See the Daily Show writers thrive on downright STUPIDITY. And they have an endless source in the Bush/Cheney Administration.

Hell, they don't even have to make anything up! posted 05/09/2008 at 11:36:45
But the problem is: Democrats are just not nearly as funny as Republicans. At least the crew of fools that have been running things for the past 7 years. More if you want to include Newt and Company.

But if you have been paying attention to both Stewart and Colbert their comedy is tinged with bitterness at the stupidity present in the policies of Bush/Cheney and the incredible lameness of American media.

When the Dem's get into power and become very boring, sometime around year 3 of the Obama Administration the DS and CR will have plenty of fun to make of the ridiculously lame American media. posted 05/09/2008 at 11:32:39
Saint Ronald.

They are in the process of beatifying him. Have you noticed any miracles? posted 05/09/2008 at 11:25:30
But, but,but . .

Bush IS dumb and clumsy. A fact that is very difficult to ignore.

Downright impossible in fact, if you are a COMEDY writer. posted 05/09/2008 at 11:23:43
Lets get something straight here.

Fox, CNN, MSNBC are not NEWS channels. They are opinion channels.

FOX is a REPUBLICAN channel. Not conservative, REPUBLICAN. CNN and MSNBC are trying to catch up but are not quite there yet. Although CNN is trying harder.

None of these channels show news. They have different personalities ponificating on issues of the day. If the showed "NEWS" would they have been broadcasting nonstop election coverage for the past 2 years?

Case close.

As far as the Daily Show. We do not go there for NEWS. Although it is simply amazing the news stories they pick up on that the rest of the corporate media miss.

We go there for COMMENTARY on the news. They help us put the news into perspective. And do an A #! first rate job of it. posted 05/09/2008 at 11:22:11

The Daily Show's Marathon Take On A Marathon Primary Night

While it is Stewarts show and he deserves all the credit that can be bestowed, he is the BEST mind in politics. THE BEST. No one is even close.

We should give plenty of credit to his writers. They are absolutely terrific.

So I amend my previous comment. Jon Stewart and his team of writers are the BEST MINDS IN POLITICS.

Bare none. posted 05/11/2008 at 10:56:05

Chris Matthews Admits: MSNBC Bosses Were "Basically Pro-War"

Al Capone was a Muslim? posted 05/08/2008 at 10:35:40
Bullwinkle was a BOXER!

See here:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gskP3Satr4

Raging Bullwinkle; Italian sausage OR squirrel meat. posted 05/07/2008 at 15:17:06
Gushing? Gushing? GUSHING?

He was getting a woody. posted 05/07/2008 at 14:09:35
"Meet the Press interview with Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff was about as priapic a display as you're ever likely to see outside of a porno film or the monkey cage at the zoo,"

Excellent, classic, tremendous. What a great job Arianna. Best insult I have seen in years.

But still doesn't convey the absolute contempt I have for Mathews, Russert, Stephanopolis etc, etc.

Like Jon Stewart said "Please, quit hurting America." Just go away.

Change your name. Get a job as a paralegal working in a legal aid center. A District Attorneys office. A big city hospital emergency room or better yet an ambulance. Or an Inner City school. Hell, any school. As a beat cop.

Work for a living.

Live on the wages provided. Worry yourself sick because you don't have health insurance. Or not enough. Wonder if you should fill up your gas tank on your 10 year old Honda or buy groceries.

Go back and learn what it means to be an American. And how Americans think.Get in touch, because you clearly have no idea what it is to be anything but a self inflated celebrity.

And never inflict your bloated simple minded pontificating crap on America again. posted 05/07/2008 at 12:37:38

Hezbollah Is in Iran, Michael Gordon Says American Officials Say

Even if he is in Iran at present, which I doubt ,but could be true the fact is that he has credibility with the Iraqi people because he and his family did not flee to Iran under the terror of Saddam. They stayed and fought.

And paid a tremendous price for that fight.

If you don't know that fact you know nothing. Nothing other than propaganda.

in addition. When you hear about the crimes of Saddam, you should keep in mind that many of those crimes were committed against al Sadr, his family and his supporters.

I don't expect you to see the irony of our invasion of Iraq to protect the people from Saddam's crimes and then demonizing the exact same people. You no doubt live in the Republican Irony free Zone. posted 05/07/2008 at 15:07:19
When you are running a propaganda campaign you play the cards you are dealt. Unless you can bluff.

Not a very difficult proposition considering the media whores who should be calling your bluff. But never seem to. posted 05/07/2008 at 01:56:08

LA Times Corroborates Arianna's McCain-Bush Report

That is exactly what is wrong with politics as it is played in the USA. especially as played by the Republican Party.

McCain feels free to outright lie to the public. About big stuff, little stuff. Everything is spin. no compunction about not telling the truth. No feeling that truth is better than lies.

You can lie and get away with it.

My Mother taught me not to lie. Not even "little" white lies. She taught me that lying is bad. And taught me that anyone who lies to me is a bad person.

End of story.

Except: I used to have a lot of respect for Senator McCain. I thought better of him than he apparently deserves. posted 05/07/2008 at 14:55:24

Reporter Reveals She Was Raped -- After 24 Years -- and Gets Massive Reaction

Hopefully the days when the police and prosecutors blamed the victims are behind us.

As I understand it, that was SOP back then, the Stone Age, as far as victim rights are concerned.

Had you been raped the questioning would no doubt have been worse. Far worse. posted 05/07/2008 at 12:19:04

Dance-Off! Colbert, Rain Duel Over Time 100 Ranking

Colbert has a certain grace. A funny grace. But it is there.

And he has the most plastic face. He can look SO different at times.

When the Colbert Report gets old, say about year 4 or 5 of the very boring Obama Administration, he can change careers and become a Pop Star. posted 05/07/2008 at 12:48:51
You need to get TIVO. The only way to watch television. Since the Daily Show and Colbert are shown 5 times a day you can always catch one version.

And you can fast forward thru Tim Russert and George Stephanopolus. And all the other whore/pundits. posted 05/07/2008 at 02:03:54

McCain and Me: Hero Worship Dies Hard (But When It Does...)

i have long thought the only heroes you should have are dead heroes. That way they can't disappoint you.

I am sure that Obama is going to break my heart. I will certainly not agree with him on every issue. And as President, any President, he will have to make compromises that I will not understand.

But damn it all. He is intelligent in an era of stupid soundbite policy decisions. He has the strength to back up that intelligence.

And he is the ONLY hope of getting out of the enormous hole that Bush has dug for us in the past 7 years. posted 05/07/2008 at 10:50:56
I see McCain as a tragic figure. There is no question he would have made a better President than Bush had he been the Republican candidate in 2000. (of course that is faint praise)

As a Senator he has taken a number of principled stands against the Congressional Leadership, as well as his Party, and showed a willingness to reach across the aisle to do what he thought was right. And in any number of instances he WAS right.

As a Senator he had excellent political instincts. He was able to reason out issues.And judge what was right for America and the American people.

But as a Presidential Candidate he has lost everything that made him an appealing figure. He has embraced the stupidity he once fought against. He has shown a willingness to pander to the most base elements of the Republican Party in order to further his personal ambitions. And he will support individuals and issues that you know, he knows, are wrong.

I can't find the quote but Lincoln said something about the awful ambition that takes over a man when he decides he could become President. Something he knew better than anyone.

That ambition has trapped McCain. And has ruined what used to be a fine honorable man. posted 05/07/2008 at 10:44:06
List the 2 candidates. Obama and McCain.

And figure out if you really want a 100 years war, or more lying and deceit coming from the White House.

Or $5.00/gallon gasoline. Or more tax cuts for the wealthiest. More recession for the rest of us.

Or Supreme Court Justices whose legal beliefs come from the ice ages.

Give that some long hard thoughts. And think if you really want a continuation of the criminal nonsense we have seen for the past 7 1/2 years. posted 05/07/2008 at 10:33:36

Bloggers I Like

This user isn't a fan of anybody yet!

Posts this user has commented on

 

 Site  Web ask.com