JohnKemp

Does make one wonder why such a courageous Democrat with an eloquent history doens't derserve more recognition during his times of trouble.

Puzzling, as great a man as he is. posted 05/17/2008 at 18:01:55

Just curious.

Can one post a negative comment about Obama on this site?

Doesn't work on any of the others. posted 05/17/2008 at 08:19:11

Let me get this straight.

1. Bush is in Israel.

2. Carter has become anti Jewish becasue of the millions of donations given to him by militant Arabs.

3. Carter has VERY PUBLICLY "negotiated" with Hamas VERY RECENTLY on their own soil; pictured hugging them.

4. And Bush's comments were directed toward Obama?

Huh? posted 05/16/2008 at 07:23:38

Being it's Friday, let me give Obama a small piece of free advice. Obviously, as of yesterday, Axelrod proved to be as inept as Obama.

When Rove sets a pile of dog poop in front of you with signs all around clearlly labeled "Pile of Dog Poop" with arrows pointing toward the pile, try not to step in it; or at least don't dive in head first.

I mean is it possible that the Dems could look anymore foolish today? Appeasement caused millions of Jews to be burned to death; did the HuffPo ever mention that Bush's statement (which he had used many times previously) received a thunderous ovation? posted 05/16/2008 at 07:06:31

"So, Colonel North," sneered the Senator, "is it true that you bought a $65,000 home security system?"

"Yes, sir," responded North., "I fear for my family's safety."

"And who is it that you are so afraid of?" laughed the Senator.

"Osama bin laden," answered North.

"Ocana tin madin, oshama, omama - Who?" the amused Senator stammered as he turned to the cameras & looked stupid.

The genius Senator? None other than the one & only algore. posted 05/16/2008 at 06:57:44

I have to admit, it would be fun to watch.

Oliver North made the Senate committee look like impotent fools; I imagine Rove would do even better.

Rove & Conyers? A man & a boy. posted 05/16/2008 at 06:34:32

WOW! Not again.

Nothing libs hate worse than the replaying or the retelling of exactly what they did or said. posted 05/16/2008 at 06:20:21

So, four judges overturn the will of 61% of all CA voters which must be several million.

And the libs are ecstatic.

Libs love activist judges, dictators, censorship & revisionism. posted 05/16/2008 at 14:06:41

Dems could not run a one-car parade.

Bet my paycheck that Karl Rove wrote this speech; knowing full well that this line to Dems would be like a fat worm to a hungry bass.

This is exactly the type of attention that Obama should avoid, but Rove reeled the Dems in with one cast. posted 05/15/2008 at 16:47:07

Give me a DAMN break.

Whenever religion is placed into discussion, the libs demonize Republicans. Romney comes to mind.

But Obama playing to the religious crowd? Met with open arms. posted 05/14/2008 at 19:07:07

Edwards could not even carry his own home county when Kerry chose him as VP in 2004; worst mistake Kerry ever made.

Edwards endorsement of Obama will help Hillary in KY & elsewhere. posted 05/14/2008 at 18:31:10

Rush talked about this at great length today; evidently the flier even states that obama is "ready to do God's work."

Let's wait for the hysteria from the ACLU, not to mention the libs who always decry religion in politics.

This stuff makes Pat Robertson & Jerry Falwell look like rank amateurs.

The silence will be deafening. posted 05/14/2008 at 18:28:46

Really?

Would that be the same John Edwards who could not even carry his own home COUNTY as Kerry's VP?

Just curious. posted 05/14/2008 at 20:22:44

You sort of neglect the fact that the "racist" (sic) WV voters have continually elected Sheets Byrd & "From my Father to me" Jay Rockefeller. posted 05/14/2008 at 19:58:40

Man, what an ass-whipping; very embarassing fro Obama. Worse than anyone predicted.

In 1960 Catholic "prejudice" was said to be strong in WV, & Humphrey was projected to be the easy winner.

JFK (and his whole family) spent a lot of time in WV, won 60% of the vote and finished Humphrey.

JFK & Obama; opposiite, not similar.

Obama is much more akin to Jimmmmmmmy. posted 05/14/2008 at 05:38:52

This the HuffPo top story?

Guess WV must have been disastrous.

Looking forward to the Obamania spin. posted 05/14/2008 at 05:50:17

Damn, 60-34% at present count?

Obama is getting his ass kicked so badly that his nose is bleeding.

Embarrassing, pitiful even.

The MSM spin will be comical to behold. posted 05/13/2008 at 21:06:21

Let me help the HuffPo & the MSM with tonight's "story."

"Hillary Clinton is thought to have eased past presumptive Presidential Democratic nominee Barack Obama by a much slimmer margin than anticipated by all political experts, (insert any vote tally here).

Final numbers were not yet available; WV is one of the poorest states and ranks near the bottom in terms of education and literacy.

Barack Obama's support among all demographics wildly exceeded the expectations of legendary pollsters, and Barack Obama's 99.9% African American vote in WV astounded even the most seasoned political observers.

A confident Barack Obama & his beautiful wife Michelle joined their WV supporters on a teleconference call. Barack Obama, the presumptive Presidential Democratic Party nominee, thanked all of his WV supporters for their undying support. Barack Obama pledged to skp KY as well, er, Scratch that; pledged to head for Oregon with his nomination a certainty.

Clinton showed up for a sparsely attended post-election celebration at the Charleston Econo-Lodge where both she & Bill appeared tired and distraught. Political experts are questioning Clinton's racist WV strategy which appeared to backfire in the campaign's closing days.

She pledged to remain in the race until the convention in Denver, even though presumptive Presidential Democratic nominee Barack Obama's nomination is all but assured, again causing many loyal Democrats to decry her decision which they fear will disappoint the HuffPo and the MSM; damn, scratch that, which they fear will do further damage to the Democratic Party." posted 05/13/2008 at 17:17:52

Don't think so.

Planes are full; seats difficult to come by.

Pretty tough on the HuffPo to spin planes at capacity & a "slow" (sic) economy in a "recession," (sic) - not to mention record tax revenues in April and record crowds at all DIsney resorts.

No doubt the HuffPo will keep trying. posted 05/14/2008 at 05:31:56

Even if she did, she'd never get it past her fellow Dems.

Drilling for oil on our own soil, refining it here as well & supplying it to our own people at low cost is just too big a pill for the Dems to swallow.

Anytime they have the chance to help our poorest citizens, the Dems fail to meet the challenge. posted 05/13/2008 at 15:51:04

Obama's the's the uniter; you forget. posted 05/13/2008 at 15:42:39

Isn't he the one who told us that Hillary would win PA, he would win NC and that IN was to be the swing state? posted 05/13/2008 at 14:52:21

Are you with the MSM?

This is their latest ploy; 80-20.

Whatever Hillary wins by will be spun as inaccurately as was Obama's "win" last week in NC.

If she gets 100% of the WV vote, the MSM spin will be about how many voters stayed home.

I guess it must work for 3-year olds; I'm not sure about anyone else. posted 05/13/2008 at 14:00:48

You mean he spent a lot of money that he inherited from his Father. & grandparents. posted 05/13/2008 at 13:46:06

I wonder if Hillary will get 92% of the White vote in WV? posted 05/13/2008 at 12:51:33

Your first word must be a typo; believe you meant "his." posted 05/13/2008 at 10:18:56

WOW! The mighty HufPo has actually mentioned the WV primary; surprising.

Last week the Messiah's followers were hysterical about the primaries, this week, hardly a peep.

And the objective, straight-arrow MSM marching in lockstep.

Hillary will not only win today but will capture the remaining primaries as well & head to Denver with momentum. posted 05/13/2008 at 09:32:22

Really?

Didn't Obama buy a lot next to Rezko's after having inspected such with Rezko in tow?

Didn't that deal turn out to be a boon for the pristine Obama?

All while Rezko's tenements went without water & electriciity?

Damn, what a man. posted 05/11/2008 at 18:58:08

True story.

My wife works for the airlines & is upstairs as I type working on a schedule for our daughter & several of her college friends to visit England, Italy, France & Germany in late May & early June..

Only problem is that the flights are full; lots of scrambling to get them all over there & back.

Libs & reality; oil & water. posted 05/10/2008 at 18:02:05

Damn, looking forward to Rezko being found guilty next week, and then his coming clean about Obama to reduce his prison term.

Should be a grand old time.

Yes we can. posted 05/10/2008 at 17:57:38

Weak, very weak on Obama's part; the supposed "winner" too timid to appear in two states with 6 million citizens. posted 05/10/2008 at 14:06:44

From Wednesday AM on, the MSM has been offering various "reports" of grandeur about Obama's Tuesday's "victory." (sic)

Nonsense.

Obama's "victory" was the monolithic Black vote in NC at 92%; Hillary did very well with all other demographics. posted 05/10/2008 at 07:32:41

Obama might worry more about Tuesday's results & less about Hillary's financial situation, as much as I am certain that she appreciates his advice & concern.

KY is bigger than IA & NH combined, & WV is a lock.

The MSM can only keep this charade up so long. posted 05/10/2008 at 07:16:05

Misses the point entirely.

This is the primary, not the general.

Look at the Black voting percentages in Dem primaries. posted 05/09/2008 at 20:13:59

Neither bigoted nor nasty, simply realistic.

But thanks anyway.

The HuffPo violates its own stated censorship policy each & every time that Obama is involved.

Typical "lib." posted 05/09/2008 at 20:10:32

(6) Underestimated the effect of White guilt & their desire to lessen it by assigning the blame to others. posted 05/09/2008 at 20:03:36

Hillary's "two" is two more than Obama has ever had. posted 05/09/2008 at 19:57:48

92% Black vote for Obuma - How would you describe it? posted 05/09/2008 at 19:56:30

Well-said.

One of the great Dem misconceptions misreported by the MSM are the Hispanics who are hard-working, honest people.

They'll not vote for Obama; they want nothing to do with givernment welfare. I work with them every day. posted 05/09/2008 at 19:15:20

Be a real shame to see the genius of Ginsburg having to be replaced; her eloquence & vision on so many cases has been without comparison.

Maybe she can pick up a few bucks in traffic court after her retirement as the most overmatched Supreme Court Justice in the history of the Court. posted 05/09/2008 at 19:08:52

Don't let the 92% Obama Black vote interfere with your conclusion. posted 05/09/2008 at 19:04:18

Don't forget to pay homage to Margaret Sanger, one of your heroines. posted 05/09/2008 at 19:00:37

Obama said while campaigning in IN, "Hillary will win PA, I will win NC, and IN will be the 'swing state.''"

Must have lost his bearings. posted 05/09/2008 at 18:56:35

Seems like only yesterday that Obama followers were decrying the superless-delegates.

"We can't win with eggheads & African-Americans." - Paul Begala.

Classic.

Obama can "win" the nomination only if the DNC excludes FL & MI; in other words, he won't "win" anything, the DNC will give him the nomination while disenfranchising voters in 2 of the 10 most populous states. posted 05/09/2008 at 18:52:20

Which is the point all are missing.

The monolithic Black vote (92%) is the only thing that went right fro Obama on Tuesday; Hillary's demographics were much more positive in NC & IN.

If you believe the opposite of what the MSM tells you, you'll be much closer to reality. posted 05/09/2008 at 18:45:24

Hillary hard on the campaign trail while Obama snuggles in Washington DC.

Hillary will win big in WV & KY, gain momentum & head to the convention.

Obama is a crier & a whiner; he'll never win the nomination, though it may be given to him. posted 05/09/2008 at 18:38:24

You mean Bush's sending $130 billion to NO with a current population of 270,000; or roughly $480,000 for every man, woman & child?

Just curious. posted 05/10/2008 at 06:28:47

Fascinationg, & thanks to Mr. McQuaid.

A micrososm of both the MSM & the American left.

Weeks ago, hysteria was rampant re: China's alledged mistreatments in Tibet. Protests, disruption of the Olympic torch, libs ranting & raving all over the world.

Here, we have basic genocide being committed right before everyone's eyes as the regime steals what supplies that are even "allowed" into the country.

Not a single peep from a kook nor a single hint of protest.

Kudos to John McQuaid & the HuffPo for at least mentioning it. posted 05/10/2008 at 06:20:21

Oh, I'm not suffering; the ones who always suffer the most are the world's poorest as is the case today.

Domestic & international poor face no bigger obstacle to a better life than American liberals.

My current favorite is the town in Tennessee (Greenburg?) that was destroyed by a tornado (I believe the same one that Obama said 10,000 died in) that is being "rebuilt" as a "green" city under the auspices of some idiot "green" college professor from TX.

Problem is, the newly built "green" homes are too expensive for the town's former residents to afford.

Just what pople who have lost everything need; more expensive housing.

The results of lib actions are always the ass-opposite of their stated intention; never seen one fail yet. posted 05/11/2008 at 14:58:46

England just completed perhaps its most conservative election in its history; guess you missed it.

April was one of the coldest Aprils ever; temperature figures for Anarctica "revised" (meaning the original lie has now been exposed); Greenland about to gain its independence from Denmark because "global warming" is allowing it to become financially independent by making it easier to get to its oil & mineral resources.

You should read Dr. Williams article. The same nonsense that the the greenies are espousing today is simply a rehashing of the bulls--t that former greenies have espoused for centuries.

Just remarkable to me that tere continue to be sheep who follow the Pied Pipers.

If federal givernment grants were eliminated today, the green movement & "global warming" would disappear by tomorrow. posted 05/11/2008 at 07:45:43

Do hope all the greenies get to read Walter Williams editiorial this weekend, "False prophets of doom."

If there has ever been a group more consistently wrong than "environmentalists,' I don't know what it would be.

1968, Paul Ehrlich, al gore's hero & mentor, said that 65 million Americans would starve during the 1980's and by 1999 the US population would be 22 million.

Worldwide starvation & food riots occurring today because of the greenies; algore should be imprisoned.

A great hoax but one that, likeall its predecessors, seems to rapidly be entering its tailspin.

"There's a sucker born every minute," attributed to P.T. Barnum. posted 05/10/2008 at 06:38:14

More starvation & food riots worldwide today because of algore; if ever anyone should be brought before the world court, tried & imprisoned, it's him.

Food shortages, rapidly rising energy prices, neddlessly more expensive homes, all thanks to American greenies.

Meanwhile, algore's "green investments" under his control have risen to 1.9 billion, and of course the main benefactor of their profits & dividends is gore.

Then again, his collossal mansion in TN does have some big utility bills that have to be paid.

No question, when PT Barnum spoke, algore was paying attention. posted 05/11/2008 at 10:46:07

Rush finally complimented the Slickmeister for being correct today for stating that, "You know, when Obama was campaigning in IN, he kept saying that he would win NC, Hillary would win PA and that IN would be the "swing-state."

Guess Obama was losing his bearings. posted 05/09/2008 at 15:54:59

WOW!

A glowing picture of Barry & Proud Mary followed by more hero worshipping.

what a surprise. posted 05/09/2008 at 15:46:01

Weeks ago, the kooks were everywhere, showing their concernnnnn for Tibetians by chaining themselves to one another, chasing the Olympic torch all over the globe, etc.

Here we have basic genocide right before our eyes & not a kook to be heard from.

I know it's tough protesting coal plants in the US, cocoa butter in the rain forests and being in Burma at the same time, but you'd think at least one kook would demand to be chained to a bale of food & dropped inside Burma.

Or maybe they could stage a sit-it at the dictator's palace? posted 05/11/2008 at 07:59:52

As Paul Begala so accurately stated, "Dems can't win with eggheads & Blacks." posted 05/08/2008 at 19:25:26

Obama cannot "win" unless the voters of MI & FL are disenfranchised.

He will simply be given the nomination.

Dems, you've gotta love em. posted 05/08/2008 at 18:26:03

If you believe the opposite of what the MSM tells you, you'l be much closer to reality.

Tuesday was a good day for Hillary & a bad one for Obama.

She remains on the campaign trail, while he hides in DC, afraid to campaign in either WV or KY.

Hillary will head to the convention with the momentum and the most votes & dleegates unless FL & MI are denied their votes. posted 05/09/2008 at 05:02:44

Hey . let's try this post.

HuffPo's gutless censors do not allow dissenting opinions on the "I Love Obama" sites.


Obama has not & will not win anything unless MI & FL voters are disenfranchised; he wlll simply be given the nomination because the Scream & his henchmen are so very weak. posted 05/08/2008 at 19:07:05

WOW!

NYT cuttng back even further while Wal-Mart same store sales exceed "expectations."

Tough day for libs all-around. posted 05/08/2008 at 10:28:50

Really an interesting phenomenon to watch one candidate & his followers beg his opponent to drop out of the race; never seen it before.

Obama's can't win unless FL & MI are disenfranchised; he can only be given the nomination. posted 05/08/2008 at 08:05:15

Yeah, unless somehting very odd occurs; like MI & FL votes being counted.

OPbama can only be given the nomination if MI & FL don't count; he'll not "win" anything.. posted 05/08/2008 at 07:38:21

Watergate?

Yeah, what a horror.

Really overshadows Tonkin, JFK's stolen election & wiretapping o0f MLK's phones, Carter's hostage cowardice and Waco, the greatest act of terror ever committed by our government against its own citizens.

Watergate? Pul-leeze.

Nixon was a good man; the MSM hystericalized Watergate. posted 05/08/2008 at 07:34:55

The next states line up very well for Hillary; particularly WV.

Obama is "taking the day off," not a wise decision while Hillary was in WV Wednesday AM.

Hillary will finish the campaign with momentum. posted 05/08/2008 at 06:50:14

Hey, don't give up in IN yet.

They're still voting & "counting" in Gary; by the way, how many votes are 1.2 points? posted 05/08/2008 at 06:25:55

My favoriite is McGovern "recommending" that Hillary drop out.

He's desperate to get Obama as the candidate so that finally a Dem will get beat worse than he did. posted 05/08/2008 at 06:22:56

Did you see where the most reverend wright stole a man's wife from him while the most reverend was "counselling" them about their marriage problems?

Funny how quickly libs tired of wright's "controversy;" Obama hung with him for 20 years. posted 05/07/2008 at 16:28:06

But Obama did campaign in FL. posted 05/07/2008 at 11:53:16

Te remaining states line up very well for Hillary; whe'll head to the convention with the most momentum. posted 05/07/2008 at 11:52:07

If there is any good to come of this, I certainly hope that the farce of NH & Iowa being the "deciders" will be put to rest. posted 05/07/2008 at 11:48:43

Didn't SC move its primary up against the rules?

Why are its delegates counted? posted 05/07/2008 at 11:33:33

Didn't SC move its primary up?

Why were its votes counted? posted 05/07/2008 at 11:32:34

McGovern?

Damn, what a joke.

Did he win one state or two? Why the hell did he even run?

Hillary looks like Atlas compared to McGovern. posted 05/07/2008 at 11:31:25

I blelieve the title should more correctly be, "Obama camp desperate NOT to count FL & MI."

Only the "all-caring, open-minded, Rainbow coalitioned" crowd can consider the banning of primary votes in two of our most populous states to be a good thing. posted 05/07/2008 at 11:04:41

The target is actually about 200 delegates more, but the DNC & The Scream are too afraid of Obama to count FL & MI. posted 05/07/2008 at 12:57:01

The next states line up well for Hillary; she'll head to the convention with the momemtum.

Obama will lose the remainder so badly that it will be embarrassing. posted 05/07/2008 at 12:52:36

The only racists in the whole deal, OBVIOUSLY, are the Blacks.

91% is monolithic; never seen anything like it. posted 05/07/2008 at 10:49:49

Obuma carried 91% of the Black vote in NC but only 33% of the White vpte. according to the Charlotte Observer and had actually lost ground in NC recently.

WV & KY will go big for Hillary. posted 05/07/2008 at 06:33:40

Having watched the objective news coverage on TV & in print since Tuesday PM, I can only assume that the mighty HuffPo will devote as much attention to the begging, crying, whining, pleading, predicting, etc. ad nauseum, that the Chris Matthews of the world are vomiting up for Obama as it does to worrying about Rush. posted 05/08/2008 at 06:55:41

Hey, the real reason for Obama's giddiness is that he was able to stock up on cheap cigarettes while in NC; for a three-pack-a-day Marlboro man, he really saved some funds.



I understand that he left here with a tunk-full. posted 05/07/2008 at 18:57:25

Hey, the most reverend Jeremiah Wright managed to steal away the wife of a couple that he was administering marriage counseling to - Damn, what a man!

Obama's confidante. posted 05/07/2008 at 18:50:48

Including Obama. posted 05/07/2008 at 18:40:36

Just gave you one glaring example.

But of course if made light of your hero Obama, so you could not digest the logic.

Hard to fathom. posted 05/07/2008 at 18:39:29

Did he get a "warm feeling up his leg?" posted 05/07/2008 at 18:35:44

Really?

Perhaps that's why Hillary was back on the campaign trail this AM in WV while Obuma huddled with Superless-Delegates in DC? posted 05/07/2008 at 18:26:01

You must agree with the HuffPo's "all-Obama, all the time."

I've never violated the HuffPo's stated censorship "policy" (sic) & yet get comments (especially anti-Obama ones) erased all of the time. posted 05/07/2008 at 18:23:24

Well, maybe they agreed with Rush today & tomorrow realized that they had made a bad decision?

I'm still confused as to where "you" come into the picture? posted 05/07/2008 at 18:19:18

I mean, really, ducks on a pond, and I don't have the time to teach Philosophy 101.

"The numbers suggest one of three things: A) Clinton's support in Indiana, while clearly there, is not entirely solid; B) a large swath of Indiana primary goers simply didn't like the nominees and thought of Clinton as the lesser of two evils; or C) Limbaugh's hatchet plan could be having political ripples"

How about the possibility that voters awoke on Election Day & thought that Hillary looked ravenous in her yellow dress & rushed to vote for her?

After having done so, they began to admire the yellow teeth & fingernails of Obama & switched their allegiance to him?

Then, later on that afternoon, they decided that they liked old people & can't wait to vote for McCain in the general election.

The point being is the same; one's vote is nobody else's business. posted 05/07/2008 at 18:09:24

If you'll simply read FunkyP's excellent post, you'll get the point.

Stein's "arguments" ae based on his interpretation of the data; data that can be interpreted in any number of ways.

Your main point, as evidenced by your numerous posts, is that some "supreme being" should be charged with deciding what it is that a voter actually meant to do when he voted.

Nonsense.

One's vote is without qualification (other than age & residence) or restriction. posted 05/07/2008 at 17:53:19

"when they have NO intention of voting for her EVER in a G/E."

Just how do you know that?

Are you going to decide that?

One can't change their mind?

I can't vote straight Republican all my life, become enthralled with Obama today, switch parties & vote for him in the primary, lose my fascination after hearing the most reverend Wright & go back to voting Republican?

That's illegal?

Seriously, you libs are on a "slippery slope" here.

How & why one votes is his own business, no one else's. posted 05/07/2008 at 17:42:00

And you completely & totally ignore the fact that people are capable of changing their mind, often on a whim, without checking with you first.

I might be for McCain today, Obama next week & Hillary the week after.

What business is it of yours? posted 05/07/2008 at 17:36:07

"Mr. Stein, your point is not proved, nor is it logical."

Excellent post.

However, you are dealing with lib Dems on this site, & their "logic" dictates that they know more about what you are doing and why you are doing it than you do. posted 05/07/2008 at 17:31:49

What?

You're welcome to vote anywhere, anytime without restriction as long as you meet the proper guidelines.

Once those guidelines are met, you can vote as you please.

I'm not smart enough to know your reasoning, but then again, I'm not a lib. posted 05/07/2008 at 17:28:29

Actually, I'm in NC.

Believe you're talking to Dems in FL & MI. posted 05/07/2008 at 17:26:09

Not playing games at all.

What are the principles, & who decides if I am following them?

Pretty simple really.

Libs support the requiring of a voter to take an oath before voting; typical. posted 05/07/2008 at 17:21:40

Wonder why Grant owned slaves?

Wonder why every domestic slave ship was registered to Northern companies? Common-share stock to finance slave ships was big business in Rhode Island.

Ever read the first sentence of the Emancipation Proclamation? "Those states in rebellion" ring any bells.

Lincoln only freed the slaves in the South. posted 05/07/2008 at 17:14:09

Not to mention exercising your right to vote your own desires without givernment restriction or interference. posted 05/07/2008 at 17:08:55

A lot of people are in prison for using cocaine. posted 05/07/2008 at 17:05:48

"supports the principles of the political party whose ballot the person desires to vote"

Exactly just what would those principles be, who defines them, and then who decides if I am following those principles?

Do you pay your poll tax to the same people? posted 05/07/2008 at 17:03:08

You libs constantly miss the main point.

My vote & the reasons for it are my business; no one else's. posted 05/07/2008 at 16:34:27