KatieBeGood

Recent comments by this user

Report: Key Superdelegates Set To Endorse Obama When Time Is Right

I really do wish that some Clinton supporter would explain her "math" where she has more popular votes. The only way she can do this is to include MI's popular vote for herself and award Obama zero popular votes for MI. Now, does she think anyone is going to buy the fact that Obama would have garnered zero popular votes in MI if his name was on the ballot? And then there's the inconvenient truth of the caucus states which she totally ignores in her "popular vote math".

The only people who believe her are her supporters who are desperate for some string to hang on to. posted 04/25/2008 at 17:15:20
Oh really. Then please explain why, when this race started, Hillary had 70% of the black vote? Blacks are voting for Obama because he has earned their vote and Hillary lost their vote.

You sound very much like a bigot. Perhaps you should go take a long hard look at yourself in the mirror. posted 04/25/2008 at 17:12:11
It may be in Clinton's benefit to continue, but it is not to the benefit of her party or her nation.

I also agree with a previous poster. She is dying a death of a thousand cuts. If she had super delegates who have pledged to her, she would be having them come out now. Not all of them, but enough to show that she still has some clout. posted 04/25/2008 at 17:07:42
Their reasons, ones they have held for months, have not changed - and by their very nature are unlikely to.
--------------------------

And what would those reasons be? If they are really supporting Obama, now is the time to step up to the plate. Don't they care how much damage is being done to the Democratic party by what they are doing?

I am so furious with Ron Wyden I send him daily e-mails telling him to $hit or get off the pot! posted 04/25/2008 at 17:03:37

McCain On Obama: "Clear Who Hamas Wants to be the Next President"

Just like situational ethics, the Bush Crime Family believes in situational democracy. posted 04/25/2008 at 16:34:14
You just spoke to my biggest fear. I fear the day Obama actually becomes the candidate, his life will be in danger from that day forward. Between the racist nuts, crazy Hillary supporters, crazy neoCONs and just plain crazy people, I fear for Obama's health and safety. posted 04/25/2008 at 16:32:53
How about having a president who will even listen to your position? That would be refreshing. posted 04/25/2008 at 16:31:03
If you consider Hamas to be terrorists, then what do you think Israel is? Israel is responsible for as much bloodshed in the ME as Hamas is. So what makes one a terrorist group and the other our friend? posted 04/25/2008 at 16:30:23
McBush has no more respect for a democratically elected party in a foreign country than his mentor Bush has. They only believe in democracy when it suits them. posted 04/25/2008 at 16:29:13

Krugman Hits Obama Over Working-Class Voters

Because his girl is getting her ass handed to her and is being shown the door? posted 04/25/2008 at 12:09:36
The two negative ads that Reps in NC just ran.....now THAT is negative attack ads....Clinton has been playing softball with Obama and his glass jaw has already cracked.
----------------------------

And where is Clintons condemnation of the negative ads being run by the Republicans? McCain has condemned the ads. Clinton has been strangely silent.

And if you think that Clinton has been playing softball, you have a seriously distorted version of reality.

Obama does not have a glass jaw and it is not cracked. He is as strong, or even stronger than he ever was. The fact that he is where he is considering all the advantages Hillary had coming into this race is simply amazing.

So, let Clinton continue with her scorched earth policy. She and her minions like you don't seem to recognize that the more mud she slings the higher her disapproval ratings go. posted 04/25/2008 at 12:06:54
I have not seen ANY Obama supporter do anything other than criticize Hillary for her scorched earth tactics like saying only she and McCain have passed the "commander in chief" test or having her husband say that only McCain and Hillary love America. They have also criticized Hillary for her lies and distortions (Bosnia, NAFTA, Irish peace process, SCHIP, etc).

We would like Hillary to quit before she weakens Obama to the point where McCain may win. You would be saying the same thing if the positions were reversed, where Hillary clearly had the numbers on their side and Obama was hanging on while bashing Hillary.

Be honest with yourself. Sit back and reverse the situation. Put Hillary where Obama is and Obama where Hillary is. Would you really not be suggesting that Obama drop out for the good of the Democratic party and for the good of this nation?

I have another question for you. Why do the Republicans so desperately want Hillary to win? Do you think it is because they like her? Also, why are so many Republicans re-registering just to vote for Hillary? Is it because they like her? posted 04/25/2008 at 12:03:15
But, but, I thought Clinton was thoroughly vetted. I heard Randy Rhodes read an article by someone (I forget who and really wish I remembered) who made a list of things about Clinton that have come out since the primary started and another list of things the Republicans will be bringing up if she is the candidate. Things like what she did as an attorney before she went into politics (she defended corporations and rapists), the fact that she sat on the Board of Walmart, how her inability to organize well and her secrecy caused her health care plan to crash & burn, on and on and on. In actuality Hillary has many more things in her background that the Republicans can exploit that does Obama. posted 04/25/2008 at 11:50:50
And nevermind the destruction of the Democratic party. If her scorched earth policies damage Obama to the point where McCain wins, the Democratic party will be virtually destroyed. The people who supported Obama will probably leave and start their own party.

Also, if Hillary thinks she can come back in 2012 and run after destroying this country and the Democratic party, she is way more delusional than I thought. posted 04/25/2008 at 11:48:00
I think part of the problem is Obama's style of speaking. It is boring.
--------------------------

Boring, huh. Then why does Obama regularly pack auditoriums? He spoke in Eugene and packed the place. There were another 1,000 people outside listening on loud speakers. posted 04/25/2008 at 11:46:17

Democrats Launch Ad Targeting McCain

I believe he has also made statements similar to that recently. On the other hand, now that he can't deny the fact that we are in a recession, he is changing his tune somewhat. posted 04/25/2008 at 11:05:15
I would love to see the photoshopped version of that photo, but that's not going to happen. It would be considered obscene. What is obscene is the fact that McBush could even hug George after what they did to him in the 2000 campaign. That alone would disqualify McBush for me if I was a conservative. posted 04/25/2008 at 10:57:54
I would rather donate to moveon.org. The DNC is responsible for the mess we are in right now. posted 04/25/2008 at 10:55:16
It's about time. The should have started running ads like this a month ago. Now, how about an ad that shows McCain saying something, and then later saying the opposite. It would have to be a half hour ad, but they could just start a series of 30 second ads. At the end the ad should say "John McCain, maverick or panderer?" posted 04/25/2008 at 10:52:47

Keith Olbermann's Idea For Beating Hillary: Literally Beating Hillary

Because she was embarrassed? posted 04/25/2008 at 16:21:51
Would you like to give us some examples of how Obama went negative. I'm sure we would all like to hear what you have to say. Enlighten us. posted 04/25/2008 at 16:20:57
And as far as I can see, he is pretty much the only one who has been reporting on this atrocity. And then there's the Bushies using Generals for propaganda. Another topic that has been ignored by the MSM. Another story that Keith covered on Countdown. If you want to know what is going on in the world around you there are two places to find out, the internet and Countdown. posted 04/25/2008 at 16:19:29
Oh really. And why should he be suspended. Just because someone here makes much ado about nothing is not grounds for suspending anyone. As far as needing reining in, I suspect that you are a Hillary supporter and don't like the fact that Keith calls her on her bull$hit.

I think you need to leave MSNBC and go over to Fox. Didn't you hear, they LOVE Hillary over there on Fox. posted 04/25/2008 at 16:15:51
What makes me think you are a Hillary supporter? Perhaps you should go over to Fox. They love Hillary over there. posted 04/25/2008 at 16:13:19
That's exactly how I took it. It is ludicrous to think that Kieth was advocating violence.

You Clinton supporters are so full of hyperbole it's amazing you don't explode. posted 04/25/2008 at 16:10:58

Clinton Debt $5 Million Higher Than Reported

No, but the truth is the truth. Hillary wouldn't know the truth if it hit her in the head with a two by four. posted 04/25/2008 at 17:01:21
It would be nice if that was what they are doing with the money. Unfortunately it is not. They are not paying off their debts, they are using the money to continue her campaign. I wonder if some of those little guys who made the mistake of extending her credit will ever be paid. Will she be willing to dip into her personal wealth to pay her creditors when she finally bows out? I doubt it. posted 04/25/2008 at 16:59:59
Unfortunately until we have public financing of presidential campaigns, that is the way it will be. But, which would you rather have? A candidate that is spending corporations money on their race or a candidate who is spending money given to him by "we the people"? Personally I'll pick the candidate who is being supported by the people before the candidate who is being supported by the corporations.

That candidate is Barack Obama. I have him on an automatic contribution every month until the election in November. I wonder how many people have done that for Hillary? posted 04/25/2008 at 16:58:26
They are cowards. They want to come down on the winning side and they are not yet convinced that Clinton can pull a rabbit out of the hat. All it says is that these people have no courage and ethics. I can't believe that each and every super delegate doesn't already know who they support. So every day they wait to make their endorsement makes them more and more of a coward.

I live in Oregon and I am very angry with Ron Wyden for being one of these cowards. I write him daily telling him that. posted 04/25/2008 at 16:53:48
So, why is that all she is willing to loan to her campaign? Hill and Bill have collected $110 million since he left office (probably more since they haven't released their 2007 taxes). Romney believed in his campaign enough to loan it $42 million but all Hill and Bill are willing to spend is $5 million?

They seem pretty happy blowing through the contributions people like you make to her campaign, while she stiffs the vendors that extended her credit. But she's not willing to invest her own money in her campaign. Is that OK with you? posted 04/25/2008 at 16:49:14
Also, one has to wonder why they won't loan themselves more money out of that $110 million. Romney loaned his campaign $ 48 million. And he's eating it because he didn't have that amount of money left in his war chest to pay himself back.

So, why doesn't Bill and Hill have enough faith in her campaign to loan it more money? They seem content to blow through their donors money and stiff their creditors, but they won't spend another penny of their ill-gotten gains. posted 04/25/2008 at 16:46:38
I suppose you are trying to infer that Obama paid off Richardson's debts in exchange for his endorsement. Do you have any proof of this? A link to a reputable news agency reporting this will suffice. posted 04/25/2008 at 16:44:12
How much do you want to bet the $10 million she supposedly has collected since the PA primary is also a lie? Oh, I forgot, she will have "misspoke". posted 04/25/2008 at 16:42:45
At least Obama pays his bills. Your gal Hillary, on the other hand, is stiffing her creditors to the tune of $10 million. This is the woman who wants to be President and cares about the little guy. A large majority of the creditors on her list ARE the little guy and she is putting their businesses in jeopardy. I'm quite sure, when she contracted for their services, she did not say "By the way, I'll pay you some time after the presidential race is over". posted 04/25/2008 at 16:41:41

Hillary Clinton Raises $10 Million After Pennsylvania Win

Is that what you are hoping? If so, you are a traitor to your country. This country can't survive another 4 years of Republican rule.

Obama will win and he will win big once American is introduced to the real John McCain, not the "maverick" that is being perpetuated by the right wing MSM. posted 04/24/2008 at 14:12:39
She had 9 million on hand at the beginning of April. If you think she still has that 9 million after running her campaign in PA, you are dreaming.

And I disagree with you. Debt does matter because she has a moral obligation to pay the people who extended her credit. Do you really think she told them "extend me credit now and I'll pay you when the campaign is over"?

I certainly hope that the vendors she contacts in the next round of primaries are smart enough to make her pay cash for their services. posted 04/24/2008 at 14:00:00
If that's the case then why isn't Obama in debt? Why has he paid all his bills? I'll tell you why. Because he has morals and ethics. posted 04/24/2008 at 13:57:59
The fact that you want a woman who lies, cheats and plays dirty to be our next president is very scary. I feel very sorry for you and your family that you value the ugliness that Clinton has shown us. posted 04/24/2008 at 13:49:56
As you wish. Obama's lead in delegates and popular vote is a personal rejection of Clinton by the voters in the states that have voted. posted 04/24/2008 at 13:46:47
If the future of the democratic party is republican light Hillary Rove Clinton then this country is doomed. It cannot survive another 4 years of this. posted 04/24/2008 at 13:42:45
So you think it's ok for her to stiff those vendors who were kind enough to extend her credit? If so, you are creepy. posted 04/24/2008 at 13:40:15
You can dream, no one can take it away from you.

I love how you say if Obama "hangs on". It's not Obama that is hanging on it is Clinton. She's willing to destroy the Democratic party if she can't have the prize. That is someone you admire? If so, I fell very sorry for you. posted 04/24/2008 at 13:37:47
Why can't Clinton close the deal...is she flawed. Considering the head start she had on this race, it's amazing that Obama is where he is right now. posted 04/24/2008 at 13:35:36
Wow...good on Wu. Now if Ron Wyden would just get off his duff. I am rapidly losing respect for the remaining super delegates. You can't tell me that they don't already know who they support. They are just waiting to make sure they are on the winning team. What a bunch of cowards they are. posted 04/24/2008 at 13:33:57
Right..... it had absolutely nothing to do with Clinton's scorched earth policies. It's all the supporters fault. posted 04/24/2008 at 13:32:18
Nah...she isn't going to invest any of her personal money in her losing campaign. She's fine with spending her donor's money, but not hers. I'm quite sure she paid herself back the loan she made to her campaign while she is stiffing 10 million dollars worth of vendors. Classy lady...NOT! posted 04/24/2008 at 13:31:14
The campaign said she would spend money in both Indiana, where the race is considered close, and North Carolina, where Obama is favored. Both states hold primaries May 6.
-----------------------

So, she's not going to spend the money on paying off her creditors. Screw the little guy who was stupid enough to extend her credit. So much for her support for the small business person. Hopefully the people in Indiana are smart enough to make her pay cash for their services. posted 04/24/2008 at 13:29:32

Evan Bayh, Hillary Supporter, Discourages Superdelegates From Endorsing

No, they were talking about consequences Hillary will have to pay for what she is doing to the Democratic Party. Kieth was talking to Howard Feinman who has a lot of contacts in the Senate and the House and he said that there is already evidence that she is going to pay big for her traitorous actions. Hillary is also sinking in approval polls in NY. By the time she is done, she won't be able to be elected dog catcher. posted 04/24/2008 at 14:24:29
You are right, they are all a bunch of weenies. They all know who they support in their heart of hearts. They are just waiting to make sure they are on the side of the winner. Shame on them. They are hurting the Democratic party as much as Clinton is. posted 04/24/2008 at 14:19:23
No, you are the liar. Wright said no such thing. He simply said that Obama is a politician and lives in the world of a politician. How can you be anything else if you are running for President of the United States.

Wow, you brainwashed Clintonians sure do know how to twist words. But, then, you learned from a master. posted 04/24/2008 at 14:17:01

Obama Strategist: Don't Worry, Dems Usually Lose White Working Class

And what makes you think that Obama is ready to write off PA? Has he said so? posted 04/23/2008 at 20:02:43
And yet these people will vote Republican because they will protect them from the gays and the people who want to take away their guns. And they still will have to struggle day to day to pay their bills and they still will have inadequate health insurance. posted 04/23/2008 at 20:01:02
They are not discounting white working class. They are only pointing out the truth. The white working class more often than not votes Republican even though it is not in their financial interest to do so. They consistently allow gays, guns and religion to dictate what party they vote for even though by doing so they are dooming themselves to a life of poverty and dooming their children to a similar life.

If you take the time to listen to Obama you will see that he truly is the candidate who will help the working class in America. He will end tax breaks to companies that send good jobs over seas. He will pump more money into our educational system so more people can pull themselves out of poverty. If you think Hillary will do any of these things, you really do need to get a clue. posted 04/23/2008 at 19:56:00
That's something I will never understand. They constantly vote against their own best self interest. They watch the Republicans send their jobs over seas and pass tax laws that benefit the rich and make them poor. But when it comes to voting, it 's gays, guns and religion. I am beginning to think that they deserve to be poor since that's what they vote for. posted 04/23/2008 at 19:52:29

Ball Is Now in Obama's Court

Every single state Obama has won has been impressive considering how little people knew about him when he started his race. He didn't have the "name" factor, he didn't have the huge Democratic machine behind him and he didn't have an ex who was once President. Even though he was at that much a disadvantage he is currently the front runner and will certainly be the Democratic nominee for President. All that is not only impressive, it is also amazing.

Now, I hope he lives long enough to take office. My fear is that some nutso Hillary supporter or some nutso racist will attempt to assassinate him. The closer he gets to the nomination, the more danger he is in. Once he gets the nomination, that's when the real danger begins. posted 04/23/2008 at 18:54:07
You had me with you until your last sentence. She is changing her position because she is a Clinton and she feels entitled. It has nothing to do with being a woman and learning sportsmanship. posted 04/23/2008 at 18:45:09
I would love to know how many votes Hillary has gotten in the open primary states from people who crossed over just to vote for her. And, it's certainly not because they love her?

The people who did it in Ohio were actually committing a felony, even though they will never be prosecuted. States that allow people to switch parties to vote in primaries should pass a law that if you switch parties before a primary, you can't switch back until after the General. That would do away with this kind of skulduggery. posted 04/23/2008 at 18:39:40
You can add to that the fact that many long-time Democrats (in Obama territory) found that they were no longer on the voter registration list and many newly registered Democrats (again many Obama supporters) found that they were missing too. And most of them WERE NOT given provisional ballots. Even if they had been given the ballots, Obama's name wasn't even on many of them.

Now how did all that happen? Was it all just coincidence? Go to bradblog.com and read all about it. posted 04/23/2008 at 18:36:51
Right...Obama should have embraced the Clintons. He should have embraced the good that NAFTA has done for this country. He should have embraced the good the deregulation of our media has done for this country.

Boy, you sure have drunk the kool aid. If the people in PA are so dumb that they think the Clintons are good for them, then they deserve anything that comes their way. posted 04/23/2008 at 18:34:15

Clinton On Target To Raise $10 Million In 24 Hours

Your candidates legal attempts to stop this process from happening at the states for recounts has nothing to do with the DNC seating the delegates.

----------------------------

And the lies keep coming. The Hillary supporters are becoming as good liars as she is. Obama has done nothing legally to stop either MI or FL. All he has done is to say that he will support any solution the DNC comes up with. They made the rules, so it's up to them to find a solution, if they so choose. posted 04/23/2008 at 17:58:19
Sorry, HP did not say she is ahead, they said she is claiming she is ahead. She has to do some pretty fuzzy math to get there though. She has to totally ignore the caucus states (what about that "disenfranchisement" Hillary?) and then give herself all the popular vote from both MI and FL.

No one is going to buy it. If there had been real campaigns in MI and FL and everyone's names were on the ballots, Clinton would be way behind in the popular vote today. And then if you were to award the caucus states a representational number of popular votes, she would be dust. posted 04/23/2008 at 17:56:30
That is her dream. Unfortunately she is rapidly becoming toxic to the Democratic party and if she somehow is able to throw the election to McCain, she won't be able to be elected dog catcher in 2012. posted 04/23/2008 at 17:48:12
He has already addressed all of these "controversies". Holding a town-hall meeting and taking questions isn't going to change anyone's minds. He's better off paying attention to the things that are really important to the people in this country (Iraq, economy, environment, etc) and stay above the gutter politics of the Republican party and Hillary Rove Clinton. posted 04/23/2008 at 17:46:44
But, I'm betting he paid his bill before he left, unlike Hillary who stiffs her vendors. posted 04/23/2008 at 17:43:36
Been there, done that and will do it again next week. posted 04/23/2008 at 17:34:58
That's good. Then maybe she can pay her bills and stop stiffing her vendors.

Anyone want to guess how much Obama's take has been in the last 24 hours? I'm betting he can beat her at that too. I made another donation this morning. posted 04/23/2008 at 17:33:12

Long Primary Damaging Democrats

There will be no 2012 for Hillary. If she throws the election to McCain she will be so toxic no one will want to touch her, including the voters in the State of New York. posted 04/23/2008 at 14:47:03

Obama Camp: Using Popular Vote Metric Just Ain't Gonna Work

Of course he has and this is how he will run the rest of his campaign. One of his PACs will run a really vicious ad and McCain will ask them to pull it. It's called plausible deniability. posted 04/23/2008 at 15:21:45
Been there, done that and will do it again. I'm contributing about every two weeks right now.

To all the Hillary supporters here...why can't SHE close the deal? Why does Obama get 10 times more contributions than she does? posted 04/23/2008 at 15:16:02
Oh, I see, it is racist that 90% of the black vote goes to Obama. I guess you aren't aware of the fact that when this race started Hillary had 70% of the black vote. What happened is that Obama earned the black vote away from Hillary. They were hers to lose and she did just that.

There is nothing racist about 90% of blacks voting for Obama, they just think he is the best candidate.

Just like it's not sexist that Hillary wins a majority of the women vote. They just think she is the best candidate. posted 04/23/2008 at 15:13:27
The "Dems" didn't tell Michigan and Florida that they can vote. Those states chose to hold an election even though they knew that the election would not count. They knew that when they went into the election and they know it now.

And, this has nothing to do with who will carry the states in November. Hopefully the people in these states care about what has happened and what can happen further to this once great country and will vote accordingly. If they choose to vote for McCain in spite, then they deserve what will happen to them. Unfortunately the same thing will happen to the rest of use. I have faith that the Democrats in Florida and Michigan will do the right thing in the end. posted 04/23/2008 at 15:10:15
Since "Barry" isn't losing, there is nothing to swallow. On the other hand Hillary has lost. She hasn't the money and she hasn't the support.

How come Hillary with her name recognition, 35 years of experience and the backing of heavy hitter Democrats hasn't been able to "close the deal".

How come Hillary can't pay her bills? How come Obama can fund raise so much better than she can? How come Hillary has tapped out her large donors and doesn't have the small donors to fill the gap?

YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH and changing the rules of the game isn't going to make the final outcome any different. posted 04/23/2008 at 15:07:03
So Hill, what about all the people in the caucus states who didn't get to vote. You are counting the delegates in the state as popular votes. A better barometer would be the polls at the time the caucus happened and a snapshot of voting trends in the state. If you do that, Obama is ahead by millions of votes.

Fuzzy math and situational ethics, the mark of the Clintons. Can't win, then make up the rules! posted 04/23/2008 at 15:02:43

Clinton Camp Misrepresents ABC's Popular Vote Tally

In order for that scenario to work, Hillary totally dismisses the caucus states. I guess they don't count since they are not in her court. I read an article that said if the caucus states were turned into popular vote, based on polling data and past turnout at elections, Obama would be way ahead of Hillary in the popular vote even if you did include MI and FL.

Situational ethics and fuzzy math. The only way Clinton can win. posted 04/23/2008 at 11:06:22

The Same Old Story: Discrediting Hillary

If you think she is going to do that you have really drank the kool-aid. Hillary supported NAFTA and probably still does. Do yourself a favor and listen to an Obama speech or read his website and be truthful with yourself as to who might just really help our economy and even yourself.

And be careful what you wish for. Hillary Clinton has left a lot of small towns without paying her bills. Is that what you want for your town? posted 04/23/2008 at 19:41:30
And I seriously doubt HRC would even win California or New York if their primaries were held today, after all of her baggage and negative campaigning.
-------------------
Bingo! My daughter lives in California and she knows lots of people who are sooooo sorry they voted for Hillary. Another problem in California was also early voting. Many people voted for Hillary way before Obama ever even came to the state.

All the people my daughter knows (including herself) will be campaigning if Obama wins and staying home if he loses. They will probably vote for Hillary if they have to but they certainly won't be involved in the political process. That would be such a shame because this country certainly needs all the help it can get and having the help of the young would be a great benefit. posted 04/23/2008 at 19:37:45
And what would this coalition look like? Money donors? No. Delegates? No. Popular vote? No. Ok I give, what is this coalition? posted 04/23/2008 at 19:33:38
Spin...spin...spin... my how we can spin. Nothing you say means anything other than spin, but spin away if it makes you feel better.

And, regarding the black vote, I'm constantly amazed that all Hillary supporters seem to forget that she originally had the black vote by quite a high margin. I think it was something like 70%. Obama won the black vote and Hillary lost it. posted 04/23/2008 at 19:32:35
So, exactly when is she going to be taking this "high road". She's so far down the low road right now I'm not sure she could ever get to the high road.

Yes the campaign has been nasty, thanks to your candidate Hillary Rove Clinton. posted 04/23/2008 at 19:30:41

Clinton says tide is turning

Then there is the inconvenient fact that many registered Democrats showed up to vote to find that they were either not on the roster or were shown to be registered other than Democrat. This was true for people who have been registered Democrat for a long time as well as newly registered voters. Another inconvenient truth was that Obama's name wasn't on many of the provisional ballots passed out and that many people were denied a provisional ballot when they asked for them.

I wonder how all that happened? Just coincidence? Sounds like Clinton and the Republicans formed an unholy alliance in PA to get Clinton elected. posted 04/23/2008 at 12:19:58
Because the MSM is Republican corporate owned. They want Hillary to be the candidate because they know that she is the only one they have a prayer of a chance to beat. They (the Republicans) are scared to death of Obama. posted 04/23/2008 at 12:15:14
And don't forget that Clinton AGREED that FL and MI wouldn't count. It was only when it was to her advantage did she start with the "disenfranchised" voter canard. If she was worried about those voters being disenfranchised, why didn't she stick up for them when the DNC declared them ineligible?

Situational ethics, moving the goalposts and fuzzy math defines the Clintons. posted 04/23/2008 at 12:11:56
If this country is inherently racist (which I fear it may be), then Obama is unelectable. But why you think Hillary can win with her 62% disapproval rating is beyond me.

Are you one of the racists that will vote for McCain when Hillary loses? If so, you are also a traitor to your country. This country can't handle another 4 years of Republican rule. posted 04/23/2008 at 12:08:47
She wins more head to head competitions as opposed to caucuses and wns among traditional Democrats as opposed to Independents and corss over Repubs, who may not vote for a Democratic in the General.
-----------------------

Much of the vote Hillary got in Ohio and Texas came from Republicans who crossed over to vote for her not because they love her but because they would rather run against her than Obama.

As far as the big states are concerned, I doubt that they are going to vote for McCain just because Hillary lost. My daughter lives in California and she thinks if that election was held today that Obama would win by a large margin. She won on early voting and name recognition. My daughter knows several people who regret voting early and voting for Hillary. posted 04/23/2008 at 12:07:07
He will be. And then what are you going to do? Go into an 8 year pout? posted 04/23/2008 at 12:03:03
How about Hillary answer the question as to why Obama is raising so much money and she isn't? Where is her "popular vote" when it comes to donations from the little people?

That is a question that Obama needs to ask her every day. If she's so "popular", where is her financial support? posted 04/23/2008 at 12:02:10
If the working class chooses to vote for McCain, knowing all the damage that the Republican party has done to this country economically, then to hell with them. They will deserve the poverty they will find by voting Republican. posted 04/23/2008 at 11:59:53
Why don't you ask yourself why Hillary can't close the deal. You seem to forget that six months ago Obama wasn't even in the running. And yet with all her name recognition and heavy-hitting Democratic connections, Hillary can't seem to "close the deal".

The fact of the matter is that it is amazing Obama is where he is right now. posted 04/23/2008 at 11:58:50
You are right. You are hearing despair. But not for the Obama candidacy, the despair is for our country. Hillary is well on her way to ensuring that the Republicans have another 4 years to destroy this country. Hillary cares more about herself and her sense of entitlement than she does about this country and what will become of it. posted 04/23/2008 at 11:53:31
So how come Hillary and Bill aren't willing to spend any of their ill gotten gains (the $110 million they have raked in since Bill left office) in order to fund her campaign? Romney spent millions of his fortune to run. I guess he had more faith in his campaign than Hill and Bill have in hers. She is willing to spend her donors money, but not her own. What does that tell you? posted 04/23/2008 at 09:13:32
Hill and Bill both point their fingers at you. It's getting very irritating.

Come on Hillary, if you love your country, give it up while there is still time. Do you really want to throw this election to John McCain? And if you think you can come back in 2012 and run again, you are delusional. You are perilously close to being the pariah of the Democratic party. posted 04/23/2008 at 09:11:41

Pat Buchanan Tells Rachel Maddow To "Hold The Marxist Dialectic"

For the life of me I can't understand why MSNBC is so in love with Buchanan. Rachael Maddow can out-debate Buchanan any day, so he resorts to insults. This is not the first time he has done this with Rachael. posted 04/23/2008 at 11:08:43

Pennsylvania Primary Results: Latest News, Video

So, if she's so popular and the best candidate, why doesn't she have the kind of financial support that Obama has? That's a bigger problem for Hillary than Obama outspending her. posted 04/23/2008 at 13:14:23
I disagree. He would be stupid to put her on as VP. And I think you worry too much about the divisiveness that Clinton has caused in the party. I truly think that once the ugliness is gone, the party will unite once again. The only thing that could stop that would be if Clinton refused to back Obama, or if she chooses to launch a third party candidacy. I believe in the Democratic party and I believe that once the race starts between McCain and Obama, the Hillary supporters will see how bad it would be if they either didn't vote or voted for McCain. I just hope that they can get over their inherent racism. That's the biggest hurdle in my mind. posted 04/23/2008 at 13:12:26
Oh you mean because the news reports Hillary's lies, obfuscations and scorched earth tactics? I guess you would rather they ignore those inconvenient truths.

Have you complained about ABC and the hit job they did on Obama with the last "debate"? Thought not. posted 04/23/2008 at 12:58:46
Clinton wants to count the popular vote in MI and FL. But she also wants to totally ignore the caucus states. They don't count in her book, because she didn't win there. I read recently that if we were to convert the caucus states to a popular vote, based on the polls before the caucus and past voting patterns in the state, that Obama would have a popular vote lead on Clinton of over one million votes!

The only way Clinton can win the popular vote is through the use of fuzzy math, to say the least. posted 04/23/2008 at 12:56:43
And a traitor to your country. You could also add bigot in there if one was being realistic. posted 04/23/2008 at 12:53:50
Clinton spokesman Phil Singer writes: "As of 11:30PM tonight, we are at nearly $2.5 million since PA was called for HRC - 80% of that money is coming from new donors to the campaign. It's our best night ever."
----------------------------

Cool, maybe they can use some of that money to pay off the 10 million or so they currently have in debts. After all, it's not nice to stiff your vendors, even if you think you should be crowned queen of the country. posted 04/23/2008 at 12:52:44

Pennsylvania Primary Results: HuffPost Bloggers Weigh In

She did win. But in the grand scheme of things it means nothing. She is driving a wedge down the middle of the Democratic party and she is spending time we should be using to defeat John McCain. Every day she keeps this going is one less day we can be concentrating on McCain. It's also costing Obama money he can spend to beat McCain. Hillary is in it for her ego, not for her country. That's what makes many of us here very angry.

BTW, Obama has outspent Hillary in every state they have competed in. He has to because he is fighting her name recognition. He has to spend the money to introduce himself to the people in the states where he runs. And the end result is that they like him and vote for him. That's how he cut Hillary's large lead in PA in half. posted 04/23/2008 at 16:38:36
If Hillary has so many supporters who love her and want her to go on, where's the money? Why is Obama still getting 10 times as much in campaign donations as Hillary is? Of course Obama spent a lot more than Hillary. He had to. He came into PA virtually an unknown to the state whereas Hillary was the favorite daughter.

As far as your reference to Obama's "concession speech", you are acting like he lost the election. This was one state. If you go back and listen to all the speeches Hillary gave after losing a state to Obama, not one of them could be called a concession speech. Do you consider that disingenuous?

Finally, he didn't try to bankrupt the Clinton campaign. She did that to herself. She's out of money and there are not over a million voters who are sending her $25-$100 a month to keep her going (like Obama has). She doesn't even think enough of her campaign to put some of the $110 million that HIll and Bill have collected since Bill left office into her campaign. If she truly believes in herself and her campaign, she should be willing to spend some of her money to keep on going. Instead she keeps spending her donors money and going deeper and deeper into debt. It's no wonder that she can't find any new donors. posted 04/23/2008 at 16:34:28

Fan of

This user isn't a fan of anybody yet!

Bloggers I Like

This user isn't a fan of anybody yet!

 

 Site  Web ask.com