Please wait, your request is processed...

Micaanab

Recent comments by this user

Electing Sweetie

Democrats are falling into the same old crap as last time. Are we that gullible? Do the Republicans really know how to push our buttons?

We are split up once again and the republicans will win if we don't stop this!!!!!!!!!

Please stop these types of blogs and work on bringing us back together. posted 05/16/2008 at 15:03:17

John..... Is that you?

That was a good one Mr. McCain. You almost had me goin'. posted 05/16/2008 at 14:28:25

So woman RISE UP. Lets show men who's the boss. Don't vote for Obama who has supported womans rights. Let's vote for McCain who calls his wife the "C" word. Then Woman will be respected.

Doesn't make much sense does it? posted 05/16/2008 at 14:00:57

Woman apparently do feel slighted by Obama and the press and maybe they are right. I feel it mostly comes from the press. And since the same press has been talking highly of Obama they feel Obama is the target of their frustration.
My frustration though is woman making a point of making Obama look bad so McCain will win. Or voting for McCain purely out of spite. Almost like saying "I will show those men, I will vote for the guy that will hurt this country the most. Then maybe woman will be heard".

This makes me feel resentment toward woman. I don't support Obama because he's a male. I support him because I believe him. At the beginning I felt if Obama lost the primary I would vote for Hillery (pre-kitchen sink). I would not have voted for McCain over Hillery. I'm not suggesting woman give up their fight. But don't fight against the man. Fight for the woman. posted 05/16/2008 at 13:30:01

You are comparing whitewater to Obama calling a woman sweetie?

First off, this sweeties thing is another ridicules thing MSM (and you) seems to want to promote. Every morning, at the gas station I get coffee, the WOMAN behind the counter calls me sweetie. I'm probably twice her age and I'm sure she's not trying to belittle me. Do you really think he was just trying to "shut her up" as you say. Please stop making something of nothing. Maybe some people could be offended and maybe Obama should give up this habit, but do you really believe he thinks less of her than he does any other reporter?

Second, Hillery has plenty for the republicans to dig up. And nothing ever does need to stick. All it needs is to be out there for some people to feel there is some truth to it. Please tell me you actually believe "everyone" believes Hillery was completely innocent of any wrong doing in the whitewater case?
My point is it's out there for the picking. And do you actually believe the republicans will say "oh darn... we already used that years ago" and then sit twitling their thumbs while Clinton marches on to the White house? Please. All her issues will be out there again. And they will come out with new ones too. So actually Hillery probably has even more dirt. posted 05/16/2008 at 12:35:59

Exclusive Video: McCain Was For Talking To Hamas Before He Was Against It...

It's one thing to flip flop, opinions should be able to change with the times, but this is coming from a guy who had his own opinions and then sold his soul to the republicans. You don't attack someone that shares the same opinion just to kiss up to your party. Attack him on things you disagree with. McCain is lying to not only himself, he's lying to American voters to get the conservative votes.
If you ask me McCain should have run his own campaign rather than let the party take it over. the republicans have a very low approval rating and McCains battles with the republicans in the past would only help him right now. The conservative votes would have come anyway but the independents are up for grabs. McCain will loose those votes because he's trying too hard to prove he's a republican.
Not that I care. I support Obama and think this is a good thing. posted 05/16/2008 at 08:40:34

McCain's Diplomacy: I'd Tell Shiites And Sunnis To Stop The Bullsh*t

Maybe he can have him sit in time out. posted 05/16/2008 at 08:46:37

That woman that has the show "The Nanny" could be his running mate. posted 05/16/2008 at 08:46:06

Bush Compares Obama To Nazi Appeasers

It's obvious you are either a McCain supporter or a Clinton supporter. Bush is currently on a mission to negotiate with terrorist. He's in Israel to get the piece process moving again. How do you do something like that without negotiating with the people that are fighting? posted 05/15/2008 at 12:44:53

Where do you people come from? When ever you start loosing an argument you throw in 9/11 as if you have some sort of trump card. Explain what exactly do you mean by "9/11". Do you actually feel people posting her feel 9/11 didn't actually happen. Or are you suggesting that talking to our enemies causes things like 9/11? Or are you suggesting we just kill everyone in case they might do something like 9/11. Please give some sort of intelligent response that people can understand. posted 05/15/2008 at 12:33:59

His purpose for going to Israel is to get the piece process back moving forward. But then he says history shows that talking with your enemies doesn't work and is a "foolish delusion".

I'm sorry, what was he there for again?

Why doesn't he just say what's really on his mind. The only way for piece is war. posted 05/15/2008 at 12:24:44

It's better policy to just go in and kill people rather than take a chance of them turning out like Hitler.

And really who's to say if that senator did talk with Hitler things might not have happened like they did. It never happened so there is no way of knowing. Just like there is no way of knowing if Bush tried a little more diplomacy in Iraq, many of our solders may not have died.

The thing Bush can not seem to grasp is, even if that senator did talked with Hitler and Hitler still chose the same path, the outcome would have been the same. It's not like we decided to go to war right when Hitler started invading Poland. We waited. We waited until Japan attacked us at Pearl Harbor. So basically the decision to not try to use diplomacy could have been the reason so many people died in world war II. posted 05/15/2008 at 11:59:28

Navy Denies Chelsea Clinton To Vieques, Puerto Rico

If Clintons campaign is so far in the hole, and she has an extremely low chance of winning the nomination, how does she pay for her daughter to travel to Puerto Rico. I guess she has no intention of paying her debts. I wonder how many of these places are getting stiffed by her campaign on top of everything? posted 05/14/2008 at 14:17:48

Rendell: Obama Should Pick Clinton As VP

Normally #2 doesn't have much power. But we are talking about the Clintons. posted 05/14/2008 at 14:31:14

Perhaps this is Clintons new plan. She is prepping to force the democratic party to make her Obama running mate. With her and Bill both in the White House, Obama will be overruled in every decision. posted 05/14/2008 at 14:25:01

Edwards: Clinton didn't choose words well on race

You are very right about this. I believe this is why Clinton is somewhat backing off. She continues to campaign while Obama is moving on. Obama supporters have nothing left to prove so many will stay home. Clinton supporters still do want to prove something. They will be out in full force.

This will give Clinton her argument that voters have changed their minds.
Clinton could care less for the will of the people. She will use trickery to insert doubt. posted 05/12/2008 at 08:41:26

You Clinton people seem to think when ever the press speaks about race, Obama is saying it.
Clinton, with her own mouth speaks of race and when she is called on it, all the sudden Obama is guilty of it.

Then you feel the press is easier on Obama after he was hit hard with rev Wright, the questions of his true religion, a flag pin, his middle name, etc etc etc.

It seems to be the opposite when it comes to sexism. Hillery can speak all she wants about how hard it is being a woman in a mans world but if Obama speaks of how hard it is to be a black man in a white mans world, he will be frowned upon. posted 05/12/2008 at 08:35:53

Obama Beats Hillary In Superdelegates For First Time, ABC Reports

I think many of the supers are trying to be cautious for the good of the party and not for themselves. They need to make sure they do not alienate the Clinton supporters during this process. And Clinton needs to accept she has lost (not publicly but in her head) and stop saying stupid things to the press. She needs to gradually back down so her supporters don't feel betrayed. The party is divided and needs to come back together to win in a general election. This is allot more delicate situation than some people realize. The primaries were very heated and many people feel very strongly where they stand. posted 05/09/2008 at 09:38:53

Florida Dems: Plan To Seat Delegates Almost Complete

Thanks for the link. posted 05/09/2008 at 09:17:43

Rules are made before the game starts. They are not made during the game. I learned that when I was six years old. Why is this so hard for everyone to understand? END OF STORY. Simple, isn't it. Why must we have to get all complicated to protect some state elected official that broke rules. I feel bad for the voters but thats between them and who they elect into their states office. posted 05/09/2008 at 08:36:06

Clinton: Obama Not Winning Over "Hard-Working Americans, White Americans"

1. She has not competed in a Republican style presidential election (Obama has been already TESTED by Hillery)
2. She has many issues that were not brought up during the primaries that can and will hurt her. (his issues are out in the open)
3. The McCain supporters will no longer be voting for her (most of which were hard working white Americans).
4. She has lost much of the black vote which accounts for 20% of the democratic base

I am a "hard working white American that didn't finish college" and I WILL vote for Obama in a general Election. posted 05/08/2008 at 11:11:36

Dianne Feinstein To Clinton: Show Me Your Plan

She's wasting Obamas money too. Money he needs in the primary. She is also wasting valuable campaigning time.

I think everyone has come to the realization this is a done deal. How can Hillery not understand this? If she really is this thick headed could you imagine how she would have been as a president?

Excuse me madame president, all our intelligence indicates Iran has stopped all nuclear development, are you really sure we should send in the nukes? posted 05/07/2008 at 17:01:25

Clinton lends her struggling campaign $6.4 million

Actually that did make me chuckle a bit. posted 05/07/2008 at 12:17:39

Thanks.... I guess. I just think it's a little screwy a candidate can actually loan their campaign money they don't have to pay back if they loose. And will there be a real investigation? And if she or McCain win and then ar e found guilty do they get impeached? Well I guess they wouldn't go that far. But if they cheated to win what difference does it make ? You still win. It's sounds to me like a pretty good gamble. posted 05/07/2008 at 11:19:42

I'm confused. So Bill can go to a huge contributors function, get paid huge amounts of money just to say a speech, and then give it to Hillery to loan to her campaign but the contributor can't just give her the money upfront.
Isn't that some sort of money laundering?
Then if she looses she doesn't have to pay herself back? If she wins then she pays for it with the money she makes as president (our tax money). posted 05/07/2008 at 10:56:49

Obama Victorious, Clinton On The Ropes

Simply because he's black?!?!?
faith didn't say that. You read the word black and right away you grab your hood and cape and start burning cross's. What Faith was saying was Obama being black was also sending a good message to people that do feel America is full of bigots that we are willing to look past race for a good president. . posted 05/07/2008 at 13:22:06

Well I would suggest that Hillery be the only one on the Canadian ballet. We can't be getting more votes for Obama!!!!

Do you think Obama would fall for that trick again (like in Michigan)? posted 05/07/2008 at 13:05:56

I forgot about the money thing. Maybe Bill can do a few more speeches for some unknown contributors and then Hillery could loan her campaign that too. posted 05/07/2008 at 13:02:24

You silly republican, Fox is for kids.

Do you actually feel posting your propaganda is going to sway democrats to vote for McCain?

McCain knows nothing of the economy or foreign policy (two of the major issues for our next leader). His unelected advisor's will be running this country if he's elected. Do you really think the democrats will let something like that happen? Do you actually think some of your fellow republicans will let that happen?

Please open your eyes to the real issues we are facing in the next 4 years and then ask yourself, is McCain really the right guy for this? Or are you a republican no matter what issues we face? posted 05/07/2008 at 12:53:27

Clinton has still got a really good chance of winning. What everyone is forgetting is the super duper delegates. And we can't forget the Canadian voters. Sure it's against the rules for them to vote but it's wrong not to count their votes. posted 05/07/2008 at 12:29:39

Are Hillery's supporters as delusional as she is? posted 05/07/2008 at 09:29:18

That's because all his supporters were voting for hillery. posted 05/07/2008 at 09:02:30

Did Hillery hurt Obama or help him? I think she may have helped him. I also think it's possible she and the democratic party intended to help him.
Hillery ran a Republican style contest. She brought out issues the democratic party had to know would be an issue going into a general election. When these candidates decide to run, everyone looks at ALL the little issues that may be used to hurt a candidate. The sooner these issues are brought out in the open, the less likely they will hurt the during the general election. She also made Obama a household name. If Hillery didn't stay in the race, Obama would not have been in the news nearly every night. His issues would still be unknown and waiting for the republicans to bring them out just before the election. It was in the parties best interest for Hillery to be the bad guy. How do we know for sure this wasn't all preplanned? Why else would the superdelegates wait to decide? posted 05/07/2008 at 08:57:30

Paul Kirk, Ex-DNC Chair And Superdelegate, To Endorse Obama

I think the superdelegates should wait until after NC and Indiana. If they all come out before these two primaries, Obama voters may decide to sit at home on election day figuring it's a done deal. Clinton supporters will come out in full force to prove a point. It might make these two primaries look like a landslide for Clinton and could further her argument she is more electable. posted 05/02/2008 at 11:42:36

DNC Chairman Under Bill Clinton: Unite Behind Obama

She's a mud slinger and nothing more. She has done more to to hurt the democratic party than she has done to help this country.

Wake up!!!!!!!!!! Our congress is broken. Politicians from both sides are are bickering about whose plan is better. Hillery is good a butting heads but is this really what we need? posted 05/01/2008 at 12:32:53

Labor Leader Says Clinton Has "Testicular Fortitude"

Give me one example of Clinton cleaning up after the Bushes. In actuality she has supported the Bushes to make the mess we are in.
Where was Hillery's tuffness when she tried to get her healthcare plan passed in the 90's. That's right. She ran into a brick wall. You can blame the republicans all you want but the truth is she doesn't know enough about politics to get things done.
Where was Clintons tuffness to stand up against the war in Iraq.
The problem is people think being able to sling dirt makes you tuff. But I think we should have learned from Bush that acting like the tuff kid on the block doesn't mean he's the best man for the job.

Tuff isn't being able to fight dirty. Tuff is winning the fight. Hillery didn't win the fight on healthcare, her biggest goal in her political career. posted 05/01/2008 at 09:16:50

Clinton-Linked Group Behind Deceptive North Carolina Robo-Calls

These politicians can break laws and mislead voters without any worry of getting caught.

I get so tired of this. And then they think Clinton is TUFF because she and her campaign uses tactics like this. I just don't get it.

Now I realize this is not Clinton or her campaign which makes this even worse. Clinton can just sit back a benefit from all this and not have to answer to any of it. posted 04/30/2008 at 15:30:11

Krugman Hits Obama Over Working-Class Voters

What have you been watching? I guess you didn't see the debate where clinton complained she always got the first question. I guess you didn't here her complain about the media picking on her. You must have blinders on. Stop and actually listen to what Obama is saying.
You think we are all goofy drinking the Obama Kool-Aid. I am not so much an Obama supporter as I am a supporter of a Government overhaul. This is what the difference between Obama and Clinton. And if Obama is too new and inexperienced to do it, at least I voted for the chance to fix our government. posted 04/25/2008 at 11:38:11

So we have determined Obama has some issues the republicans can exploit. How does this make Clinton a better candidate? She has issues too. If Obama's campaign exploited every issue, her numbers would have come down too. I'm not saying Obama's campaign hasn't brought some of these issues up, but in his effort to keep his campaign "Clean" (the whole premises of his campaign), many issues have not been exploited enough. With the money he has spent in this campaign, it would have been easy to make Clinton look bad. The GOP WILL exploit everything she does or did. They WILL bring up her past. They WILL play over and over again her public lies (mistakes). And the media will do as they always do and jump on these issues the GOP brings up.

Clinton has had to make Obama look bad to even compete. Obama has had only to bring up some issues to be leading. Clinton brings up the issues of electability yet nobody every questions her electability. It will be a big mistake to go into the general election thinking Clinton will have it as easy as she has had in the primary. posted 04/25/2008 at 11:20:18

Defining Obama

Rev. Jeremiah Wright: My Words Were Twisted

This is to paciere,
Have you ever told a black joke? Have you ever looked at a black man and felt he was probably a thief? Have you ever used the "N" word? I am a white male and I feel that I am very open to race. Yet I know I am guilty of all the above. Allot of us want to be free of racism but it's still there.
I'm not saying it's like it was in the 60's but it is still there.
If it wasn't for these preachers like rev. Wright or Al Sharpton, it would be easier to express these feelings. My neighbor down the street who is extremely racist would be heard allot more than he does. He would be influencing many more young people to follow the same path. I'm not an Al Sharpton fan. In fact I get pissed too when ever every little situation between a black and white gets blown way out of proportion.
The difference between you saying something like what Rev. Wright said and Rev. Wright saying it is, you don't have people looking down at you when you walk through their neighborhood. You don't have to worry about your children not getting the same sort of opportunities based on the color of their skin. posted 04/24/2008 at 16:20:04

White Men

If what you say about white men is true, then why is it we have a black male and a white female left as our candidates in the primaries. Edwards should have won by a landslide.

If Hillery looses it will be because people don't trust her. Not because she is a woman. If they hid the fact that she was a woman she would have never made it this far. She would have lost all the woman votes too.

I back Obama (a black man). I voted for a woman to be mayor of my home town. I am a white male. posted 04/21/2008 at 13:58:44

Obama Praises McCain, Clinton Responds

You suggest he doesn't back hope with actions. You then need to look at his short term in the senate and compare it to Clinton's. You will find he is more aggressive. He works harder to include other senators unlike Clinton. Go to the Library of Congress. In his first year he has done just as much as Clinton if not more than her last year. posted 04/21/2008 at 14:22:49

Debate Analysis: ABC Asked Most Scandal Questions, Obama Was Clear Target

During the 2nd debate Clinton whinned. She actually asked why she gets asked questions first all the time. After the debates she whinned about how everything was so bias.

Clinton has been whinning about the press since this whole thing started. This article shows ABC was bias and the others weren't. And Obama brushed this one off. It's the PRESS that say this was a bias debate.

Where do you get off calling Obama a whinner. He did no such thing. posted 04/21/2008 at 14:48:18

Krugman: Obama Clinging To A Stereotype

You are WRONG.

What you fail to comprehend is, when people loose there jobs because the jobs are shipped overseas, they blame the government. After all it was the government that that made it easier for these companies to go. And as far as Billy and the economy during his presidency, sometimes the actions of our presidents are not seen until long after they are out of office. So Billy is not free and clear of the situation we are in today.

When people do not trust their government to look out for them, they do turn to other leadership. They look for groups of people that feel the same as they do. Religion is one of those groups people turn to. How can you argue that? And then when the same government that lost your job wants to take your ability to own a gun, then these people feel the government is slowly taking away their ability to dictate what direction our government goes in. posted 04/18/2008 at 12:49:56

John McCain Should Go on Vacation, Hillary Clinton is Doing His Job for Him

It appears to me you are bias to a woman president. It's doesn't matter who would do a better job but who is a female. I too agree it's time to brake the presidential stereo type of a white male (being a white male myself). Clinton and Obama are the ones to do that. But since we have a choice, shouldn't we choose the best one for the job. Especially with the situation this country is in right now.
Clinton has shown she reads from the same book as the old politicians. She uses deceit and trickery to sway people. Is this what we need right now. I woman president would be good for our country. But I think Americans have grown tired of this type of politics. Clinton wouldn't be much different from a white male. She uses the same tactics. posted 04/15/2008 at 13:57:07

Watch: Obama On Annie Oakley

Where do you people come from? Obamas a street thug? After the way Hillery has been running this campaign thinking she could pressure not only super delegates but already pledge delegates to vote for her despite the vote of the people I would have to say she has my vote for thug of the year. Not to mention the kitchen sink tactics. You must watch cartoons while the news is on. posted 04/14/2008 at 08:34:38

When will you Clinton supports start to get it? She tells you what she thinks you want to hear for your vote. I realize all politicians do this but Hillery is so over the top I'm amazed you still drink all this crap up. Obama has to call her on some of this or the next thing Hillery will be saying is, Chelsie wasn't Bills and the only reason she decided to have her was she didn't want to have an abortion just to get the Pro Life voters. posted 04/14/2008 at 08:07:42

Compassion Forum On CNN: Clinton, Obama Square Off

The journalist are doing just fine. They report the truth. The numbers prove it. You just can't see it because you support a losing candidate. I realize you put everything into your support for Clinton, but look at the writing on the wall. posted 04/14/2008 at 08:17:40

Axelrod On Penn: 'You Can Use The Word Hypocrisy'

Except for the candidate we expect to run our country. Obamas campaign contributors and voters seem to be one in the same. Promises made are easier to keep if your not doing allot of double talk. Clinton is too intertwined with lobbyist and special interest. She makes promises she can not keep. Usually the promises broken are the ones to the voters.

I believe Clinton would do her best to help Americans but I feel most of her choices would not be her own. posted 04/07/2008 at 14:33:35

Obama and Clinton BOTH agree Nafta is in need of an overhaul. The funny thing, Hillery says what she thinks voters want to hear regardless of what it means. Obama suggested Clinton liked NAFTA in it's present state, which most politicians did when it was first presented. With hind sight it's easy to see there were some flaws. Clinton couldn't say she EVER liked it or she would be considered to have bad judgment. So instead she says she NEVER liked it. Now her campaign is caught trying to cushion some of what she says to the voters to keep some of promises she made to her campaign contributors. It's a balancing act she can't seem to handle very well. posted 04/07/2008 at 12:13:09

Obama: No Need For Foreign Policy Help From V.P.

And if he did then she would be critical of that. It's a loose loose situation. posted 04/07/2008 at 16:31:12

Mark Penn Resigns As Chief Strategist For Clinton Campaign

Hillery was pro-NAFTA until someone made it a bad word. And in reality I think most politicians are pro NAFTA. It just needs allot of tweeking in many minds.
But when you need to rely on states that were most effected in a negative way because of the problems in NAFTA, you do and say what you need to get votes.

So, by Penn stepping down, Hillery shows how serious she is about being against NAFTA. When in actuality he really isn't stepping down. It's really another Clinton lie. posted 04/07/2008 at 09:36:39

Clinton: I "Raised A Big Yellow Caution Flag" On Nafta

Do you actually think the press is against Clinton when they call her on these lies. It's a huge conspiracy against Clinton I guess. They use computer graphics I guess to supper impose her face on these videos that prove she lies.

During the last debate Hillery said she support NAFTA when it first came out but has changed her position. Now she says she never approved of it. Haven't you been listening to her?

I would really like to here more from these Clinton supporters that actually feel Clinton is running a clean but tuff race and that feel it's Obama that is throwing cheap shots. I really need to understand what your reasoning is and where your information comes from. I watch MSNBC, FOX NEWS, CNN and what ever else I can get my hands on. I just don't see it.

Please, try to convert me to Clintonism. Give me some reason to consider her other than this vast amount of experience she says she has that she really can't prove. posted 04/02/2008 at 11:02:50

A president needs to be able to lie. Clinton and Bush just suck at it. posted 04/02/2008 at 09:46:47

She figures the more lies she can tell, the more she can say the press is picking on her when they call her on it.

Hillery needs to stay the victim in order for her supports to feel the need to defend her. After all, she is sensitive and the press and Obama are mean. posted 04/02/2008 at 08:56:59

Clinton Compares Herself To Rocky Balboa: We "Have A Lot In Common"

Rocky was an unknown..... Hillery was well known.
Rocky fought a clean fight.... Hillery fights dirty.

But it's true, like Hillery, he didn't know when to quit. He ended up loosing after he got beat to a pulp and lost vision in one eye. posted 04/01/2008 at 16:24:14

A Few Unanswered Questions About Bill Richardson's Obama Endorsement

The way the system is set up there are really no rules for the super delegates. And really there are no rules to who they select for their nominee. After all is said and done the democratic party could, if they wanted, decide to go with Edwards. The thing is they need to look at who they feel gives them the best possibility of winning a general election. Because this race is so tight between Obama and Clinton they could go either way. Edwards states that he feels this system is a bit flawed but he still has the right to select who ever he feels would best fit, in his opinion. Edwards has been a long time friend of the Clintons but he apparently was impressed with Obama in the short time he's dealt with him. I think this says more than just another delegate for Obama. This choice must have been hard for him to make. posted 03/21/2008 at 13:59:36

Obama Endorsed By Bill Richardson

He has gotten my vote. And he has gotten many white, blue collar voters or he would never be in the position he is in today.

And why is it you feel Clinton would have done SO much better against McCaine? She couldn't beat a freshman senator from Illinois even with the kitchen sink. Between the two it seems quite obvious who would do better against McCaine.

Even the republicans fear Obama more. Why would they attack him before Clinton was totally out of the race? If they wanted to go against him, the logical thing to do would be to make Clinton look bad to get her out of the picture. So since you seem to be so smart, explain how the republicans have this better chance facing Obama. posted 03/21/2008 at 11:11:44

Obamas opponents are trying to brain wash people by playing Wright every 15 min. Obama has to continue to defend himself as long as this continues.

But you listen to every speech of every candidate in every new city, of coarse you will hear the same thing over and over. Obama is the hot media topic so they are playing every one of his speeches. posted 03/21/2008 at 11:00:48

Richardson dance around the subject because of his close ties to the Clintons. For him to step up now is really saying allot.
But I have a theory. The Democratic party could have ended this along time ago by pressuring their super delegates to commit. They didn't because they want the main focus on them as long as possible. With Obama being a new face, it's important for him to be a household name by the general election. And with Clinton being the bad guy and playing like a republican might, she not only is prepping Obama, but she is bringing these bad issues into light well before the election so the public has time to get numb about it. There wont be some surprise scandal released a week before election where Obama doesn't have time to clear it up. posted 03/21/2008 at 10:20:15

It's possible you are correct about the republicans using those tactics. And it is possible you are right Obama could loose. But there is no way Clinton would do better against McCain. There are many tactics they would use against Clinton that Obama elected not to use. Clinton had it easy with Obama. Besides there wasn't as much contrast between McCain and Clinton other than the basic party positions.

We have yet to see a debate between Obama and McCain. McCain seems to slip up allot on war issues. Obama has the chance to hit him hard on this. And if the press favors Obama, as the Clinton supporters suggest, Obama will look like a super star compared to McCain. posted 03/21/2008 at 10:06:11

Fans of this user

pbjwaffle

Log in to become a fan of this user.

Fan of

Aleka
bitterbrew
flyfysher
JPV

Bloggers I Like

This user isn't a fan of anybody yet!

Micaanab

Recent comments by this user

Fans of this user

Fan of

Bloggers I Like

Posts this user has commented on