Please wait, your request is processed...

NicoleAnonymous

Recent comments by this user

JPMorgan Chase CEO: Recession Just Beginning

I hope you realize that nobody understands what you're talking about. posted 05/12/2008 at 19:33:07

Where does he put his pitchfork and tail so nobody sees it when they take a picture of him? posted 05/12/2008 at 17:57:26

CNN Gets Graphic In Myanmar With Footage Of Dead Bodies (GRAPHIC)

What about Americans who have been injured or killed in Iraq? I've never seen pictures of that after it happens.

After this and the earthquake it makes you have perspective - we're here fighting all day about the election but at least we're safe. posted 05/12/2008 at 18:24:41

Although I don't think people should hide pictures of the carnage, I feel as though HP is only putting this here to get more pageviews because people might click on it just to see the pictures. posted 05/12/2008 at 16:31:44

Schumer Changes His Mind, Says Unity Ticket Could Happen

You better get used to it - this place is very mis_gynistic and they actually encourage people to insult her in inappropriate ways. Last week after the primaries they said she should be burned at the stake with other witches and she should k_ll herself and nobody censured it.

They h_te women here - that is obvious. I just don't pay attention to those remarks anymore but I have notices that there are MANY less people here than there used to be. It's also really ironice that "mean girls" like AH and Maureen can't-say-her-fall-name-or-they-will-censure-this and say such nasty things about people but NOBODY is allowed to be critical of them. Some men here said he wanted to have sex with MO and I said that she seems like a black widow spider and I wouldn't risk it. They censured it.

But anyone can insult Clinton because apparently SOME women deserve it. posted 05/12/2008 at 16:43:16

I couldn't believe she said "all the hard working people, the white people" will vote for me.

She is implying black people don't work hard and she is also trying to make Obama into the "black" candidate. It was really disgusting. posted 05/12/2008 at 15:56:04

I thought the same thing until the end of the article - there was something about the last part of it that I thought was really negative. I can't remember exactly why but I think they were quoting people who used to know him who implied that he will say and do anything to get elected. posted 05/12/2008 at 15:53:37

Did anyone read the front page article about Obama in the NYT yesterday? It was really negative - they implied he would say and do anything to be elected but doesn't really have his own opinion.

And of course Maureen can't-say-her-full-name-or-they-will-censure-this had her usual "mean girl" remarks about Clinton - yesterday she said she had an "ice pick" which is obviously supposed to make people think about the crazy woman in that movie with Sharon Store but I'm not surprised. posted 05/12/2008 at 14:53:59

Obama Islam Smear Changes Stripes

I don't why people don't understand this - I was NOT condeming all Muslims or the religion. I'm responding to someone who refuses to mention that the terrorists were motivated by religion.

And I know people should respect other religions but I really do think Muslims need to really think about how their religion has changed compared to other religions. Something is very wrong in the Middle East right now - innocent women are being murdered, women are put in jail for sexual assault, they can't vote or drive, they have to cover their bodies, people are put in jail for talking about it and we're not to blame for this. Many Jews talk about what needs to be changed in the religion and people think about it and then they decide if something that was written thousands of years ago might not be appropriate for us now - that just is not happening in the middle east and that has to change. posted 05/12/2008 at 21:42:44

I'm kind of shocked that they did this - they're purposely trying to make people think he is Muslim because they know there are many racists in this country who wouldn't vote for a Muslim and there was also this op-ed today:

"In 2008, the defense of the state of Israel, and everything it stands for, requires a kind of courage very much out of accord with the perpetual click-clack of our politics."

Of course forget about all the people suffering under the occupation or the fact that it's inherently racist to deny people the same rights based on their race. I'm really sad about it because I feel as though I can never buy that paper again. They make ashamed to be Jewish and ashamed to be American. posted 05/12/2008 at 20:55:19

The truth is that Bin Laden doesn't really care about the people living under occupation - that is just an excuse. If he cared about them he would send them the money he spent planning the terroriist attacks in our country. He doesn't care about them - he wants to use them for his own purposes. He knows the occupation makes Arabs very angry so that is why talks about it. posted 05/12/2008 at 20:34:18

Although some members of that group might be religious, the group itself isn't a religion.

I'm not condemning all Muslims here - I'm responding to someone who refuses to admit religion played a part in terrorist attacks and instead of admiting that people want to change the topic by bringing up irrelevant groups. posted 05/12/2008 at 20:25:09

So the people who hijacked some planes and murdered thousands of Americans weren't religious? posted 05/12/2008 at 19:52:05

But Jews don't stone anyone now - that was thousands of years ago. Why are you making excuses for people murdering innocent women? posted 05/12/2008 at 19:47:07

I think it's horrible that people assume a Muslim couldn't be president but I also think that Muslims need to be much more outspoken about the danger of fundamentalism in their culture.

Many Jews are critical of our culture and speak out about the occupation but I never hear about Muslims speaking out about women being stoned to death in the middle east or not being allowed to drive or that Al Queda doesn't have any valid reason for what they did even if our foreign policy is unfair sometimes. And I apologize if you think this is offensive but it's how I feel and I can't lie. posted 05/12/2008 at 17:04:47

NBC anoints Fallon as Conan O'Brien successor

I just read the entire article. This is very funny.

"Besides being a personable character the audience enjoys, a prospective talk show host needs to commit to the hard work, the NBC executives said. At least for the first few months, Fallon will be working five nights a week because no reruns are built up."

I can't believe it! They have to work FIVE nights a week! That should be against the law - seriously nobody should be forced to work that many days in a week. It's a travesty. posted 05/12/2008 at 20:28:05

I know it might not seem like it but I don't hate all white men. posted 05/12/2008 at 19:12:19

This place is really strange today - you can respond to some people.

1) It was really insulting that they didn't acknowledge Whoopie and you know it.
2) She is hosting "The View" which is a show that makes women seem like idiots.
"The world isn't flat? Are you serious?"
3)Katie Couric will be replaced with a man soon.
4)You couldn't name any black or hispanic people with late night talk shows
5)I only metioned LD once today so I'm not sure how that makes me "obsessed" with him although I do admit his "women belong in the kitchen" metality and the way he accused Clinton of having multiple personalities made me angry and I don't let go of things easily.
6)I'm not saying the industry is controled by evil, white men but there is racism and I'm upset that Rosie can't have her own show but these men can. posted 05/12/2008 at 19:06:13

It's not racist for me to notice that the entertainment industry is racist.

Of course you might not agree but please give me examples of:

1) Any black/hispanic person or woman with a late night talk show on a major network
2)Any black/ hispanic person who runs a major network or studio
3) Any black/ hispanic person or woman who is the primary writer for any late night talk show
4)Any black/hispanic person who is in charge of a major news channel
5)Any black/hispanic anchor on a major news channel
6)Any black/hispanic person on Larry David's show who has the same econominc status as him instead of Hurrican Katrina victims. Apparently he is too lazy to write for his own show or write any plots for anyone who isn't rich and white.
7)Any black/hispanic person who has hosted the Oscars who they actually acknowledge along with all the white people instead of pretending they don't exist. posted 05/12/2008 at 16:27:04

Someone needs to give Rosie her own late night show! And Chelsea Handler is supposed to be really funny also. Her new book is a bestseller but maybe she is too talented because apparently only overpaid white men who are too lazy to actually write their own jokes are allowed to be successful in the entertainment industry. posted 05/12/2008 at 14:36:02

I can't believe this - another overrated, overpaid white man who isn't that funny. So what does it take to be successful in the entertainment industry besides being white and not having talent? Even the overpaid white men who are talented are too lazy to actually work for their money - maybe Larry David is too busy calling ambitious female politicians "crazy" to do any work on his shows.

"Which executive producer and creator of two hit TV comedy series doesn't do his own work? Laments one insider: 'He's content to sit back and let everyone do the writing for him when they're supposed to be his shows.'" [Rush & Molloy] posted 05/12/2008 at 14:19:57

NYT's Front Page Obama Profile: "The Ultimate Pragmatist"

But when I reading the article I thought it was highlighting his accomplishments and showing how he can work with two sides and bring people together but then towards the end it started to get negative and after I was done I thought "that article was actually negative" but I wasn't suprirsed.

Yesterday MO said Clinton had an "ice pick" so everyone would think she was like the Sharon Stone character in that movie. posted 05/12/2008 at 17:54:38

I thought the article was kind of negative - instead of "pragmatic" it made him just seem as if he will say or do anything to get elected. posted 05/12/2008 at 17:01:09

"Saturday Night Live's" Message From Hillary Clinton: "I Have No Ethical Standards" (VIDEO)

But there is a conspiracy! I can just see MO telling people at the NYT "I can't finish my column this week - I need to spend all my time on HP waiting to see if anyone insults me so I can have them censure it!" posted 05/12/2008 at 18:21:11

So all satire is comedy but is all comedy satire? posted 05/12/2008 at 17:41:50

So why is it that some "jokes" are allowed here but they are censuring my "joke" about Maureen O'Dowd?

Can you explain that? ANYTHING that insulting Clinton is allowed - absolutely ANYTHING.

But say something bad about MO although you're joking? THAT IS NOT ALLOWED! I'm going to continue to post it until they kick me out of here. Because having Arianna kick you out of her place means you must be doing something right. posted 05/12/2008 at 16:46:57

I didn't like the way she said "all the hard-working people, the white people" will vote for me.

It's as though she was implying that black people aren't hard-working the way white people are. It was really offensive and I think she is trying to make Obama into the "black" candidate. She is starting to really make race an issue and she had better be careful about that - her campaign is run by imcompetant people. If they're telling her this strategy will work that are wrong. posted 05/12/2008 at 15:47:42

I also think the media is acting as though lots of people in this country watch SNL and they don't - the show hasn't been funny in years.

But even assuming a few million people watch it, that's a tiny percentage of our poplulation yet the media acts as though some really important event is occuring after each show and that it's really influential or something. posted 05/12/2008 at 15:38:49

Rahm Emanuel: Obama Is Our Presumptive Nominee

Time for me to go anyway. I was angry but then I went to the "living" section here because once a week they post pictures of animals which always cheers me up but today for some strange reason they chose a video of two cats trying to kill each other - they were seriously fighting. I can't believe they chose that video - it's so absurd that you have to laugh about it.

That is the funniest thing I've ever seen here. I just can't take this place seriously after watching that. It's like going to a mental institution and asking the patients there to explain Einstein's theory of relativity. posted 05/09/2008 at 22:41:23

Not to be a rhymes-with-witch about it but you know...I think people come here to have discussions, not to have campaign volunteers take up space on a discussion byi inundating the place with announcements that they should "get out and vote!" because I doubt people in those states are reading HP and suddenly they're going to say "I wasn't going to vote but some college student who is a volunteer for Obama told me it's important that I vote so now I'll make sure to vote!"

You already have the woman who runs HP providing us with 24-7 nonstop "vote for Obama but make sure you buy my new book first because that is more important!" coverage here. I really don't think Obama needs his volunteers here telling people to vote. posted 05/09/2008 at 22:30:18

At least this place is consistent - during every discussion someone will call Clinton "crazy" or "posessed" because as we all know, a man who is dishonest or corrupt might be a bad person but a woman must be "possessed" or have a serious mental disorder or have multiple personalities. This week people said she deserves to be burned at the stake like other witches or she should kill herself and nobody here censures it.

The misogyny here is just unbelieveable - especially when this is considered a "liberal" place. And the most ironic part of it is the woman who runs this place and her celebrity buddies all think they're so sophisticated and "liberal" and progressive but they hate women and beyond that they're just mean, spiteful petty, nasty people. posted 05/09/2008 at 21:56:58

Although I think everyone should be allowed to express their opinon here without being insulted for it and I try to respect that even when I don't agree with someone, the tone of your response was really disrespectful and if you write that way you better expect people to react in a simlar way.

She hasn't said anything that bad except for "this is the first time I'm proud of my country" and I think that is more about someone who isn't used to speaking in public and isn't careful about how she says something. Although I do think she should probably stop telling people personal things about him - we don't need to know he has bad breath in the morning. Some things in a relationship should remain private... posted 05/09/2008 at 21:44:43

You obviously have a problem with women who are smarter than you - don't insult Michelle just because of your issues.

Would you prefer that he was with a woman with "serial killer" eyes who steals recipies and drugs from charities? posted 05/09/2008 at 21:19:17

Please come back when you're sober... posted 05/09/2008 at 21:15:38

There isn't any possible way that Obama will win the election but people here can't handle reality. And I would prefer he win but I choose to live in reality. I also believe that Obama has made some mistakes that politicians with more experience would do.

The worse thing about this is that we're having a primary where people in MI and FL are being told their vote doesn't count. The people who are in charge of these primaries are either very incompetant or they didn't want those votes to count for a reason - this is not the way democracies are supposed to be. posted 05/09/2008 at 21:12:27

Some people here say Rahm used to be close to the Clintons so it's obvious what has happened in this situation - Ari has gotten to him.

The fact is that Ari is a bad influence on people and is trying to get people to gang up on Clinton any way he can. posted 05/09/2008 at 21:04:10

Study: "Daily Show" Very Similar To "O'Reilly Factor"

I have to go now but this isn't a simple issue. You're talking about most Muslims in the middle east but I was talking about the people who join Al Queda and that is a very tiny percentage of Muslims so I don't think changing our policies will do anything.

And I do understand lots of Muslims are upset with our support for oppressive regimes but we're not forcing Arabs to make women cover their entire bodies or telling them they can't drive or putting them in jail for being raped or threatening to execute a teacher who gives a stuffed animal a relgious name or torturing anyone who speaks out about any of this.

Sometimes it's easier to be angry at the enemy you don't know then the enemy living right inside your own home... posted 05/08/2008 at 21:55:59

Although I probably didn't need to bring up his personal life and make nasty insinuations about it - that doesn't have anything to do with his show and I try to save those insults for men who actually deserve it like Limbagh and McCain. posted 05/08/2008 at 21:41:43

I can sum up everything Bill Moyers has to say right here so you never have to watch his show again:

"All Catholics are bad people. All Catholic priests molest children. Catholiism is bad - very bad. Religion is for losers. The Pope is evil. I hate Republicans. Please tune in to my show tomorrow when I say something else shocking and controversial so I can get lots of attention and publicity."

Now you never need to watch his show again. At least Jon Stewart seems like a regular guy who can maintain a normal relationship with a woman - not some guy who has to be with as many playmates as possible to make up for what he didn't have back in high shcool. posted 05/08/2008 at 21:17:16

I watched it and now I know McCain is even more of a jerk than I thought. Did he really make some tasteless joke about an IED under Jon's desk? Yeah right - that is really funny when Americans are coming home without arms or legs or most of their bodies burned.

I'm disappointed Stewart didn't give him a harder time about his "they take plastic here" joke. And it was very strange that he mentioned his "fondness" for him. Someone needs to tell Stewart to stop being such a wimp about it - he doesn't have to "soften" his criticism by telling us how he feels about McCain.

The only positive thing I can say about that interview is that I have the sense that Stewart was angrier than he seemed but was holding back because he was trying to be professional and not make guests uncomfortable to be on his show. posted 05/08/2008 at 20:59:17

People who talk about "root causes" aren't living in reality.

Anyone who joins Al Queda is a person with deeply rooted psychological problems - you can't talk to the man who killed John Lennon about the "root causes" why he killed him. He killed him because he is crazy - trying to figure out why crazy people make their decisions is a waste of time.

They attacked us - we have a right to fight back. The problem is that Iraq didn't have anything to do with the terrorist attacks or Al Queda - we just used that as an excuse. posted 05/08/2008 at 20:47:45

Actually Bin Laden didn't want to waste time and energy fighting Saddam - of course Bin Laden wants every country in the world to be an Islamist state but he was mostly concerned about the power and influence of "infidels" in the west and not fighting with Saddam.

He knew that strategically it diddn't make sense to fight with Saddam because his goal was to get Americans and Europeans in a "war" with him. He didn't want countries in the middle east fighting with each other. posted 05/08/2008 at 20:43:37

Now that has to be the most bizarre interview ever - have you ever seen another show where the person expresses his "fondness" for the person he is interviewing?

Clinton: I wasn't lying about Bosnia

Stewart: You know how much I care about you and your're almost like part of my family to me but you were lying about Bosnia... posted 05/08/2008 at 20:11:06

And just remember - Al Queda wasn't in Iraq until we got there.

I'm not sure why they even call the group "Al Queda in Iraq" because Al Queda wasn't really interested in Iraq or any of the issues there. It's probably some group associated with fundamentalists and our media calls them "Al Queda in Iraq" because they want Americans to associate Al Queda and Iraq. posted 05/08/2008 at 19:54:36

I've never seen his show but he can't be worse than Rush "I hate women and gay people" Limbaugh.

The problem with Stewart is he has McCain on his show so often that the guy probably pays half their rent. And he doesn't really ask him any difficult questions which is really lame considering the man doesn't even seem to know the difference between Iran and Iraq. posted 05/08/2008 at 19:44:44

I order my lunch every day from Katz deli - I might not talk about Jewish issues on my show but I can still eat Jewish food darn it!

Sincerely

Jon "I haven't read a book in years" Stewart posted 05/08/2008 at 19:28:26

You really think he takes the time to read the books before he has a guest on? What drugs are you taking?

The only thing Jon Stewart reads is the takeout menu before he calls in his order for lunch every day and sends his assistants to get it for him. posted 05/08/2008 at 19:11:29

5 Cutest Animal Videos Of The Week (WATCH)

I can't believe they actually sowed a video of cats almost killing each other! That is horrible.

This has to be the funniest thing I've ever seen here. And I mean funny in an absurd "how could the people here be so crazy?" but what can do but laugh about it way. posted 05/09/2008 at 22:22:19

10 Time-Hallowed, Recession-Proof Tips For Beautification

You said this:

"here is my silver-lining present to you: a list of simple, time-hallowed, recession-proof tips without the barrage of hideously pricey products to which we've become accustomed."

Maybe I'm just not that smart but when someone says they're not including "hideously pricy products" than I assume that won't include $1,000 shoes on the list.

I agree with you about having pumps in a neutral color but Aldo sells a pair of pumps that look exactly like those Christian Louboutin and they're less than $50. posted 05/12/2008 at 14:30:55

I hope you realize that the woman in the picture you have about buying cheap shoes is wearing a pair of $1000 Christian Louboutin pumps - you can tell by the red sole. I just thought you might want to know... posted 05/09/2008 at 21:05:34

Maureen Dowd Predicted Obama Over Hillary -- More Than Two Years Ago!

I think she is trying way too hard to be the acerbic, sarcastic, smart woman who can talk about politics the way men do but in reality she just makes women look really bad. She also offers some really bizarre psychological explanations for the way candidates act that are way too simplistic.

And beyond that, she seems to hate women. Last week she compared Clinton to a vampire and she and her male co-workers were brutal to Clinton when she appeared to cry but they didn't seem to have any problems with John Kerry when he did it during his campaign. But of course the NYT has to have a bitter, angry woman for their op-ed pieces. They want to perpetuaate the myth that sucessful ambitious women have to be like her. posted 05/08/2008 at 18:30:17

AP Interview: Paulson says credit crisis may be fading

Maybe they will take him back if a Democrat wins the election because I'm sure they are going to want to appoint their own person. I actually don't think Paulson is such a bad guy but he thinks about these problems from the perspective of a banker and he doesn't want much regulation because he thinks the business will just go to other countries. He was probably trying to send bankers a message with BS that they might be bailed out but their stock will be almost worthless. posted 05/07/2008 at 22:01:45

Please repeat in simple english - thank you. posted 05/07/2008 at 21:19:04

Please shut up Henry and go back to work at Conman Sachs. posted 05/07/2008 at 17:40:17

Star Jones Slams Barbara Walters As An "Adulterer" In The "Sunset Of Her Life;" Barbara "Will Not Dignify" Comment With Response

What is with all the "whore" accusations? What is this - 2008 or 1908? You can disagree with BW but leave the self-righteous, judgemental insults out of it. Unless of course you use that word for a man who commits adultery - but we all know "whores" are only female.

And "whores" actually serve a useful purpose - if it weren't for "whores" there would be many more divorces and ruined relationships. posted 05/07/2008 at 22:08:54

That was so funny! You must be a comedien or something - seriously, have you thought about becoming a writer on a sitcom show?

But seriously has anyone else noticed that HP has been taken over by children lately? posted 05/07/2008 at 21:54:57

Why would you repeat a rumor about her medical history here? That is really lame. posted 05/07/2008 at 21:25:21

I don't think the issue is that she didn't warn him she would be telling everyone about their affair - the issue is more that this is such a blatant attempt for publicity.

Although the people calling her a "homewrecker" do seem a little judgemental, it's a really emotional topic for lots of people because it hurts so many people, often including children if there is a divorce and they really are the only innocent victims of affairs. Usually it's just a tragic situation for everyone involved - the person who is cheated on and also the people cheating. Often people are repeating patterns from early in life without realizing it and they almost can't stop acting in a self-destructive way and sometimes when you really start getting deep into the issues, you realize the person who was cheated on chose someone who at some level they knew would cheat on them.

A more important question is how much is BW and The View paying HP for this constant publicity? They have at least two stories on The View every day, today they have a story on Elizabeth Hasselbeck posting for a magazine although nobody really cares. So how is this a "newspaper" when you can just pay them to write about you? I know BW is VERY close to AH but this is really excessive. posted 05/07/2008 at 21:17:32

I've never watched it either but I have watched some the clips with Rosie on it. I thought it was funny when she went off on Donald Trump and said "Why is this guy who cheated on all these women suddenly acting like he has a right to preach about morality to anyone?" and when she had Danny Devito on her lap when he showed up tipsy from drinking too much. posted 05/07/2008 at 18:09:53

So you have "nothing against" powerful and successful women yet you assume the only reason BW is a powerful and successful woman is because she did it in a way "that wasn't honorable" yet you don't offer any proof - you just "have this feeling" about it. Do you also feel that way about all the ambitious career driven men who have become successful in news or is it just her? posted 05/07/2008 at 16:41:21

Can someone just get both these women to shut up already?

And nobody cares about that she had an affair with a married man many years ago but she obviously wants attention/publicity for her new book. Between this and James Frey saying the worse thing about being caught lying is that he was "traumatized" that his child might not get into an elite pre-school in NYC I'm beginning to think NOBODY wrtites books anymore except narcissists with an entitlement complex. I miss the days when people actually kept some things in thier life private. posted 05/07/2008 at 16:30:29

How Will Hillary End Her Campaign?

A little bit of both actually but I try not to bring my personal life into this.

And I didn't say I was leaving HP for good - I said I wasn't going to have discussions about politics here for awhile. There are lots of other interesting pieces here in the living section today like "how the book The Secret helped me get a dinner reservation" so I'll just go over there.

I'm not that thrilled with either Clinton or Obama but Obama would clearly be a better president - she wants to bring Greenscam back to help the econmy and thinks the gas tax idea would help and she would have the white house filled with women who are loyal to her but not the best qualified for the job. But the Democrats here are really acting like emasculated misogynists. posted 05/07/2008 at 14:51:52

Of course you're right - a presidential election is all about math and figuring out a smart way to get more delegates.

And I'm sure Democrats are enjoying this but after McCain wins they will realize all the mistakes they made. But right now Obama's supporters feel very good saying things like "Change is coming!" and "There is always hope!" and he is all about a "grassroots campaign!"

Yeah right - the only grass thing about Obama is what he has been smoking. Almost everyone with a major position on his campaign used to work for the Clintons and he doesn't have any problem taking money from people representing corporations. Only Edwards would have changed this country.

Anyway I'm through discussing politics at HP for awhile. This place should just let TMZ buy it because I can't really tell the difference anymore except maybe the immature misogyny here is worse than over there. posted 05/07/2008 at 13:48:27

I meant Indiana which everyone knows is really a crucial, important state to win. I can't even think of a major city there.

But I just can't keep up with the brilliant political ananlysis on HP anyway. posted 05/07/2008 at 13:28:21

I want to make sure I understand this. A few weeks ago Obama had a substantial lead over her in Illinois but they wound up with about the same number of votes. And Obama spent almost three times as much money as her on his campaign there.

She has won CA,PA,NY,NJ and probably would have won FL and MI with substantial leads.

And the brilliant political commentary at HP post yesteday was "Ding Dong the witch is dead!" and "We got rid of Glenn Close before she boiled the bunny!"

I know that the Democrats will lose the election and actually they deserve to lose. This was the best chance they had but they have a bunch of incompetant, biased journalists covering the election and HP/TMZ (they're really the same thing - this place is the same quality as TMZ with a little political reporting mixed in) had the usual immature, emasulated, impotent, latent homosexual misogynists with their "let's get the bi_ch!" and "Obama is going to but that punkass bi_ch on a leash!" responses.

The Democrats deserve to lose the election. posted 05/07/2008 at 13:25:53

Exit Polls: Indiana, North Carolina Latest Information

Yeah right - I believe that the way I believe in the tooth fairy. posted 05/06/2008 at 21:06:44

You are such a badass - ooohhhh, a man talking about putting a woman on a leash like a b_itch.ooohhh I'm just turning red with shame.

Where did all these studs come from?They are soooooo tough and macho. posted 05/06/2008 at 20:59:48

How The Secret Got Me A Dinner Reservation

Can someone send this book to the people in Iraq and Africa? They're really suffering but if they only read "The Secret" and used positive thinking and just "believe" that their lives will be better than their lives really will improve! posted 05/07/2008 at 21:22:41

How to Lose an Election 101

Kelli is the best writer they have at this place. posted 05/06/2008 at 21:24:45

Al Gore On The Democratic Race: "I Haven't Been Moved To" Endorse

The people on this site don't represent most Democrats - it's mostly college students or people living with their parents who think acting "tough" online is thrilling. You have to remember that.

In fact they're so lame that you almost have to believe they're actually Republicans trying to make Democrats look bad.I'm not sure anyone who works on Obama's campaign reads anything here but I have some advice for them during the next election because their candidate won't win this time:

Be VERY careful about relying on places like HP or other online political "newspapers" for support. Be VERY careful about relying on lots of college students for support - they have a tendency to act like immature bullies who only make your candidate look bad. Give them a few years out in the world and they will realize manners are important. Be VERY careful about having ANY association with HP or any online political "newspaper" or ANY online site - have your people do it the way people used to. Go door to door and talk to people.

And this is coming from someone who wanted Obama to get the nomination. He isn't going to be President and all his online fans do is make his supporters seem like immature brats with a cultish mentality. So best of luck to you in the future - don't give up hope. posted 05/06/2008 at 21:17:30

So you think global warming fanatics are responsible for food riots and starvation? That's kind of stupid. posted 05/06/2008 at 20:15:20

The expression on his face makes him look like an idiot. posted 05/06/2008 at 19:54:31

Shame on you Huffington Post! You could have used a better picture than that but it's funny... posted 05/06/2008 at 19:30:10

Vanessa Williams To Graduate From College This Weekend

She is an inspiration to lots of people - and she is also really talented in so many ways.She can act and sing and has great fashion sense. Her skin tone and features are perfect - everything about her is perfect. And she also doesn't lie about having work done on her wrinkles - something hardly any actress with admit. posted 05/06/2008 at 15:21:57

Sex and the City - Will it be the Biggest Women's Movie Ever?

I'm not sure it's really about a movie that "celebrates" women - the characters are so self-absorbed that they only talk about themselves or their relationships. It's appropriate they never mentioned the terrorist attacks on the show because those women would be out shopping for shoes. They aren't interested in politics or history or the environment or any most of the world. I once watched it just to keep track of the non-caucasian charcters on the show. Apparently, just like "The Hills" only white women are interesting.

It also seemed like it was about gay men - none of the women I know talk the way those women do. I would be shocked if most of the writers on the show weren't gay men.

And why do we have to classify movies as "women's" movies anyway? I want to see Iron Man more than SATC. posted 05/07/2008 at 17:02:52

Fox Anchor Jodi Applegate Set To Announce Shocking Family Secret ON AIR

What are you talking about? The Catholic church provided a settlement but I'm responding to someone who is making assumptions about regular people who go to Church.

Anyway why do I bother - people here only see what they want to see. posted 05/06/2008 at 20:48:12

And of course your conclusion that Catholics will stay in a parish even after they know the Priest is molesting children is based on study published in a respected magazine or journal. posted 05/06/2008 at 20:32:58

I'm curious about something - can people pay HP to post stories about them or their clients here? Does anyone really know for sure that isn't being done? Has their financial records ever been made public?

They have about a thousand stories about the new SATC movie and they have a story about "The View" every day and they constantly have stories like this. The only way it makes sense is if people are being paid for this. posted 05/06/2008 at 20:21:46

I will be "shocked" when narcissists stop trying to "shock" people by telling people stories about their life that aren't shocking just for the attention/publicity.

And this might be off-topic but does anyone think it's strange that nobody here is talking about that woman who was kept hidden in a basement by her father for almost her entire life and the children had never been outside and her mother lived upstairs but claims she didn't know anything about it? That story is really shocking to me so I'm surprised more women aren't talking about it. I want to understand why the mother is lying because I know she knew what was going on. I've been thinking about this story often - it really is shocking. posted 05/06/2008 at 16:11:34

My Response to Richard Dawkins Comparing Me to Hitler

How can you talk to a Rabbi that way? There is something seriously wrong with you. posted 05/06/2008 at 21:21:36

I mentioned here once that the Rabbi wasn't using G-d the way we're supposed to and now he is so maybe he reads our responses. But I feel as though it's self-righteous and silly to care about that anyway. If there is a G-d he probably doesn't care. posted 05/06/2008 at 19:25:37

Tom Brokaw: Jon Stewart's Role Is "Important"

In this country our coverage of foreign affairs isn't very good but the BBC is excellent and I think they do have Arab journalists working for them. There are also Arab reporters working for the AP reporting from the West Bank, Gaza and Iraq. posted 05/06/2008 at 19:14:06

But we admitted that we did something bad to the American Indians and we have compensated them for that land although obviously not very fairly. The Israelis haven't done that.

But this is the reason Jon Stewart probably doesn't want to talk about it. Some families have a "secret" that everyone knows but nobody wants to talk because talking about it makes it real and it's the same way for Jews and the occupation. posted 05/06/2008 at 18:51:58

What are you talking about? Didn't Bob Woodruf almost die in Iraq? You really think some overpaid comedien deserves more admiration than him? There are LOTS of journalists who risk their lives to bring people stories from all over the world and they don't get paid much for it.

I understand Jon's fan club is here but this all-mainstream-news-is-beneath-us-they're-not-smart-or-sophisticated-the-way-Stewart-and-Colbert attitude is lame. And apparently the "corporate hacks" don't have ANY problems paying smart white guys to have talk shows but smart women are just too "dangerous" for them. posted 05/06/2008 at 15:28:12

It looks like I was wrong - he doesn't really talk about the occupation though. posted 05/06/2008 at 14:45:24

But many Jews don't have any problem making jokes about the Holocaust so apparentlly they do find humor in tragedy.

Anyway if you can't laugh about some things in life then you will go crazy and have to be locked up in a mental institution. posted 05/06/2008 at 14:34:04

I agree that they seem really elitist and condescending. I don't think the three stooges are funny but I've seen Faulty Towers before and thought it was funny but I like british humor. I think the funniest thing is making fun of people and how absurd they are.

Once when I was shopping on Melrose Avenue we say Fabio drive by in a car - we were laughing about it all day. The best humor is simple. posted 05/06/2008 at 14:25:46

What is the difference between satire and just plain regular political jokes? Isn't all comedy satirical in some sense?

I think it's very scary that people would get their news from Jon Stewart considering he has never publically mentioned the Israel and the occupation on his show although that is really an important issue for this country. Although I don't blame him for being scared because it's very scary to talk about that - maybe if someone held his hand while he did it and gave him a little blankie to hold, Jon might be able to actually talk about it. Rosie would talk about it but she isn't scared of anyone. posted 05/06/2008 at 14:20:07

CNN's John Roberts Declares "Wright-Free Zone" For Obama Interview

How did that get past the cesures here! This place is different than the "biased" MSM! This is an online "newspaper" with serious political reporting! And the people who write here are so impressive! Lots of celebrities! posted 05/05/2008 at 20:39:38

An example of why the narcissist who runs this place is really just a "mean girl" whose pretends this is a respected politicial "newspaper" when in reality it's a nasty, misogynistic cesspool.

Look at the post about Misha Barton for example. Another lovely day of the "online newspaper," encouraging people to insult a woman for cellulite.

And don't forget! Make sure you go out and buy Aria__a's new book damn it! posted 05/05/2008 at 20:22:41

Obama, Clinton Air Last Minute Ads In North Carolina And Indiana

I'm going to keep posting this until you revoke my posting privileges.

I consider it an honor to be kicked out of this hypocritical place. posted 05/05/2008 at 20:27:00

Are they "censuring" this discussion also? I'm never sure which discussion is being "censured" at this "liberal" online "newspaper." posted 05/05/2008 at 20:08:46

Laura Bush Discusses Jenna's Wedding During Myanmar Press Conference

I'm probably the only person who feels this way but I'm really disappointed there isn't going to be a ceremony in the White House. posted 05/05/2008 at 22:42:24

Who Are You Calling a Tabloid?

I might not be very smart but I'm smart enough to know that:

1) journalists are supposed to be objective and allow both sides of an issue

2) this is not a newspaper

3) if you make your dog wear Juciy Couture dog outfits, then you should expect your pet to experience stress and anxiety posted 05/05/2008 at 22:28:18

Have you noticed that suddenly she "remembers" that McCain told her he didn't vote for Bush?Is it a coincidence that she is telling everyone about that now when she just happens to have a book to promote? Obviously it will get attention and publicity so the timing isn't a coincidence.

And I'm not denying her right to write a book or to promote her book or to make money from her book, not when I had to read how James Frey has been "traumatized" by the scandal because his child might not get accepted to the fancy pre-school he prefers with all the other trendy parents while he accepts millions for his new book deal, but just please don't call this place a respected "online newspaper" because it's not. posted 05/05/2008 at 22:12:50

I agree with you - in fact, I was just looking at the picture of Misha Barton's cellulite in the NYT today. And yesterday I read an article in The Washington Post called "your dogs and stress - are the clothes you're buying them creating anxiety? How to alleviate their stress in ten easy steps" and tomorrow Time magazine is going to have an editor from a gossib tabloid explain the exit polls in the primary. posted 05/05/2008 at 21:50:15

You must be joking - I think people have lost any sense of perspective. Of course there are problems with the MSM but online journalism is really not a good place to get your news because it's also very biased here. A fair, balanced reporter gives both sides of a story. They simply don't do that here. They want celebrities to keep coming back, although I've never really figured out why since they obviously don't sit around reading the responses and I doubt they ever write the pieces on their own, so they make sure it's "safe" here for them by censuring anyone who disagrees or offers an alternate opinion.

When was the last time a Republican wrote anything here? When was the last time someone wrote something positive about Bush here? When was the last time ANYONE offered an opinion from a different perspective? And I'm not a Republican and Bush is a horrible president but I like hearing a variety of opinions so I can't think about how other people approach issues. This is just celebrity worshiping sycophants.

Although I do appreciate the opportunity to use the word "sycophant" which makes me feel smart. posted 05/05/2008 at 21:41:05

As opposed to the bias of say...for example...Huffington Post? Where the-woman-whose-name-we-won't-mention-so-they-don't-cesure-this posts a story about "The View" EVERY DAY because she is "close" to Barbara Walters? As opposed to the bias of a place where the narcissist-whose-name-we-won't-mentoin-so-they-don't-censure-this inserts pictures and stores of HERSELF for the PUBLICITY on the main page EVERY DAY because she needs publicity for her book? As opposed to the bias of a place where publicists are clearly paying people here to post stories about their movies/books/shows?

Yeah right - the MSM is really biased compared to the integrity of online journalism. posted 05/05/2008 at 19:22:38

Mischa Barton Snapped Sunbathing In Australia

You're supposed to go to the original story so you can see all the pictures. The point of the story is that she has cellulite and we're supposed to insult her for it but HP didn't want to come right out and say that so some people can't understand why the story is here.

It would be much better for them to just say "We're the same as TMZ - here is a picture of a woman with cellulite. Please laugh at her and insult her" instead of being subtle about it. posted 05/06/2008 at 15:00:01

This is really bad - I'm just really surprised more people aren't speaking out about it. If they're going to show Misha in her swimsuit then they should also show Arianna and all the female employees here in a swimsuit so everyone can criticize their bodies. Too bad nobody had a camera when Arianna was on her vacation with those google studs in the carribean but I'm sure she wouldn't appreciate someone invading her privacy that way.

I don't care what anyone says - this place is nothing but "mean girls" with a little journalism thrown it. It's disgusting. posted 05/05/2008 at 23:07:11