Sloane7

Recent comments by this user

West Virginia Primary: Good Morning America Meets An Uninformed Voter

This is ABC and they have been on a mission for a while. The debates, the infomercial, this is just ABC pushing the "as far as I know" message. posted 05/13/2008 at 23:24:27

McAuliffe Spars With Matthews, Calls Him 'Obama Campaign Chair'

I don't like Joe Scarborough so I avoid MSNBC in the a.m. but I'm sorry I missed this exchange, this is hysterical, thanks for the replay! posted 05/13/2008 at 14:53:29

New Group With Clinton Ties Pushes A 'Dream Ticket'

My eyes! My eyes! posted 05/11/2008 at 18:48:51

"Saturday Night Live's" Message From Hillary Clinton: "I Have No Ethical Standards" (VIDEO)

It sort of felt more true than sarcastic. posted 05/11/2008 at 13:10:34

Obama Enters Enemy Territory: West Virginia

Here is a list of local West Virginia newspapers if you want to make pro-Obama comments:
http://ironmyvote.com/comment-local-papers.htm#westvirginia posted 05/10/2008 at 16:14:12

E-Mail Shows Racial Jokes by Secret Service Supervisors

Wow this is depressing. I thought as a country we were so beyond this. No one I know ever talks like this and if they did, I would cease to know them. I wouldn't be able to look at them anymore. posted 05/10/2008 at 13:41:39

Clinton Supporters Send Last-Ditch Obama Attack Emails To Supers

Hey it's Zanti, who doesn't believe CA is switching to Obama. They've even done a news story on it now in CA. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385x130320

So much for Obama not winning the big states. The big CA. posted 05/11/2008 at 02:31:03
Hillaryis44 is not the only website behind this. On Taylor Marsh, a comment posted now says:

Write the SD really really nice letters, even though you can't stand some of them, pretend, maybe it will work to our advantage?
Hillary will be the next President of the United States.

http://www.taylormarsh.com/comments.php?postID=27649#209021 posted 05/11/2008 at 01:07:22
Then you better send Hillary all your money. She sure doesn't want to pay off all that debt with her own $100 Million. posted 05/10/2008 at 02:32:26
So you're one of the email writers. Got it. posted 05/10/2008 at 02:29:16
Actually the way the SDs are coming out a little at a time over the course of many days is pretty cool. posted 05/10/2008 at 01:06:34
It is! I love Ferragon added to all my pasta recipes. posted 05/10/2008 at 01:04:49
She has an Obama hate site where her posters write really terrible things. She also does podcasts and is trying to get people to help her get on radio. She reminds me of Ann Coulter, where her only target is Senator Obama and anyone who supports him. posted 05/09/2008 at 22:40:06
I know, I'm sorry, it's pretty bad there. You haven't seen the worst of it. There are sites dedicated to highlighting some of the worst posts from Taylor Marsh. That's how bad it is. Just a pure Obama hate site. posted 05/09/2008 at 22:36:46
At best. She's like Wayne and Garth doing podcasts in her basement. posted 05/09/2008 at 22:33:32
http://www.taylormarsh.com/comments.php?postID=27642#205449

Taylor Marsh's site has posted the email addresses again posted 05/09/2008 at 22:30:43
Taylor "I'm not responsible" Marsh's site has just posted the email addresses again
http://www.taylormarsh.com/comments.php?postID=27642#205449

Sorry SDs it appears you are the target of Taylor Marsh and her followers. posted 05/09/2008 at 21:41:23
Thank you peaceplez, that's what I keep hearing and I just wondered if it was just the people I was talking to. Great to hear! posted 05/09/2008 at 21:11:32
But, I like to visit Florida in the winter. Can't we give them Clintaska instead? posted 05/09/2008 at 21:05:52
They're called voters. posted 05/09/2008 at 20:48:27
Poor Northeast, you still haven't calmed down. Have you tried yoga? posted 05/09/2008 at 20:47:09
Wow, thank you for such a great post! That's so great to hear, we are watching and really hoping for the best in Oregon! I'm in WA State and it was crazy, several primaries going on at once so we all didn't get to see him, you guys are so lucky! posted 05/09/2008 at 20:45:19
Bay Area, I travel to CA for work and the people I talk to say if the CA primary were held today, Obama would win no question. I am sincerely asking this - what is your sense in the Bay Area? Is it just the people I'm talking to? Or if the CA priimary were held today, would Obama likely win? posted 05/09/2008 at 20:37:39
And your mask just fell off. posted 05/09/2008 at 20:33:27
If there is so much at stake but you would vote for McCain, you clearly don't believe what you're saying. Either way, you're being very repetitive. posted 05/09/2008 at 20:17:20
How would you explain his winning Oregon? posted 05/09/2008 at 20:13:23
Then you should probably vote for McCain. Good luck with that. Go Obama Voter Registration Drive! posted 05/09/2008 at 20:10:54
You know what "Realisticrat"? Let's just see. And if Obama wins the GE, you have to buy us all Kool-Aid. posted 05/09/2008 at 20:08:14
I'm interested in that as well, I also travel to CA and if there was a revote in CA, I don't see how she would win, they really like him there. Let's see how Oregon does. posted 05/09/2008 at 20:04:05
No, by all means, keep harrassing the SDs. It sounds like it's working well. posted 05/09/2008 at 19:56:09
Hahah Democrats attacking sites for being too liberal? It's a Democratic site, get it? posted 05/09/2008 at 19:54:58
Don't think so. And Washington State voted for Obama 3:1. They couldn't fit us all in Key Arena. Huge Obama support in the West. posted 05/09/2008 at 19:51:25
Classic. She's trying so hard to get on radio, guess podcasts in the basement got old. And spot on about whipping these people up, she posts these Obama attacks several times a day, invites others to do so as well and is thinking of adding what sounds like an "Obama attack" poster to her site should he get the nom so she can say she's still a Dem and "not responsible" for what's on her site. That's Taylor Marsh. And you can see all of this, it's right there for the reading even as we speak. posted 05/09/2008 at 19:46:59
If your alternative to Hillary is McCain, it would appear you are a Lieberman Dem, just like Hillary. Not surprising and logical for what you and the Taylor Marsh crowd support. Taylor Marsh even has a McCain ad posted on her site now while readers on her site cheer it on. Lieberman now follows McCain around whispering in his ear and Hillary is equally supportive of McCain. This is not a loss to the Democratic Party. Go Obama Voter Registration Drive! posted 05/09/2008 at 19:42:27
She's always trying to get people to help her get on radio. She wants to be Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter combined. posted 05/09/2008 at 18:56:47
From one of her posters last night:
I suggest you guys set up 2 or 3 email acctn and write letters from those to these SDs....I work with some elderly people who have no computers...so I have 3 email acctns that I will writing these SDs from all 3 with diffrent letters....SUGGEST YOU ALL DO THE SAME
http://www.taylormarsh.com/comments.php?postID=27632#201995 posted 05/09/2008 at 18:20:55
I watched it unfold on their site too, how funny. I even copied a couple of the links, ones that said to make multiple email addresses and one of the many lists they posted. I might have even sent the two links to a couple of people so they could see what's unfolding. I doubt I was the only one. So they removed the lists? I should check the links. There were several email lists posted, the last one, really long. posted 05/09/2008 at 17:59:24
Taylor Marsh is nothing but an Obama hate site. She makes podcasts and tries to keep her followers worked up all the time. If she doesn't fill them with rage, she loses her little cottage industry. Sound familiar? Her own commenters were telling each other last night to create multiple email addresses to create the impression of greater numbers and giving each other email ideas. They listed massive email address lists on her site to send to. That's Taylor Marsh's site for you. And yes, they appear to be working closely with the Clinton campaign. posted 05/09/2008 at 17:40:54

McCain Camp Insists Obama Is Playing Age Card

McCain? Oh, right, I forgot he's even running. posted 05/09/2008 at 21:32:18

Nancy Pelosi Cuts Short Press Conference, Makes "Beeline" For Obama During His DC Visit

You like Clinton, I like Pelosi. And Democrats should not be against Democrats for being "too Liberal". Be a Republican then. posted 05/08/2008 at 23:20:03

Hillary Is John Cleese

John Cleese does support Obama... posted 05/07/2008 at 21:55:01
Any reason to view this clip is a good reason but the comparison is excellent! posted 05/07/2008 at 21:41:29

Exit Polls: Indiana, North Carolina Latest Information

Is Hillary really planning to stop but trying to get everyone to donate to pay off her debt? Just curious... posted 05/06/2008 at 22:49:07

It's Not About Hating Hillary

I voted for Bill twice. I defended his and her actions to friends and family and was so relieved when they were leaving because I felt like now, I could stop defending them. Now they're back like a virus. And the Clintons are uglier than ever, they really are. I have never been so thrilled to support a candidate as I have Senator Obama and I feel terrible for him that his own party has not rallied around him, instead, these same Clintons that I stupidly defended are now putting him through a meat grinder for daring to challenge the second Clinton coronation. Higher ups in the party let the Clintons do it because, well, no one ever tells the Clintons no. And the media supports the Clintons because they know how sleazy the Clintons are and the battle drives ratings. I have done my time with the Clintons and will not defend them again nor will I vote for them again. posted 05/05/2008 at 16:53:30
I'm sorry, but I disagree. Obama could have really gone after Hillary for her Bosnia gaffes and he didn't. He could have dragged a very long history of Clinton embarrassments to the stage and he didn't. Hillary has done every possible hateful thing she can do. So she is to be rewarded for this? I cannot, I'm sorry. And I agree with Pelosi, they should not feel compelled to be on the same ticket. I do not think for one second that Hillary can win the GE, I believe nothing will motivate GOP and anti-Clinton voters more than having her on the ticket. So if she steals the nom, let her run alone. Let her lose alone. She wants to spend these months attacking Obama then be friends when it benefits her? She wants to position McCain higher than members of her own party time and again? Let her lose. On her own. Has someone taken the name NoDreamTicket? posted 05/05/2008 at 16:46:36
In Washington State we have a mail in ballot. We can write in Obama no problem. posted 05/05/2008 at 16:39:17

On an Obama/Clinton Ticket: A Response to Andrew Sullivan

And Hillary will be forgotten.

From your lips... posted 05/05/2008 at 18:18:07
Excellent post. posted 05/05/2008 at 18:12:47

Democrats Propose New Whites-Only Primary

A white only lower income demographic sounds like the only votes Clinton wants to count. This article would be satirical if it weren't for Clinton and her campaign where it seems to be exactly what they want. posted 05/05/2008 at 16:37:49

With Donors Tapped Out, Clinton Turns To Internet

Ann...fancy "technology" in CA, I was alive in '92 as well. Voted for Bill twice. Defended all his extremely embarrassing actions, and Hillary's too, for eight years. Was relieved to get them out by the skin of our embarrassed teeth. It was not all sweetness and light. It was one long, lawsuit-infested, lie-filled (he admitted his lies), rent the Lincoln bedroom, pardon criminals fiesta. The Clintons are NOTHING like you portray them and now, I cannot stand the sight of them. Oh, and we really did land on the moon. All that fancy "technology" that's been around for a while now. posted 05/05/2008 at 14:56:36
"You Obamabots may have your fancy "technology" and "innovation" of the "Internet Age" (which we wouldn't have if not for Bill Clinton)"

Wow. I mean, WOW. These supporters sound like they use cans and string to communicate. And, Bill Clinton invented the internet?

Just sell your house and give Hillary all your money. Her $100M isn't enough, she needs all your money too. Send her every cent you have. You could try Western Union since you seem uncomfortable with all that fancy "technology". posted 05/05/2008 at 14:49:16
Just send Hillary all your money. Her $100M isn't enough, she needs to blow yours before she blows her own. posted 05/05/2008 at 12:31:49
This, according to the NY Times, a paper on the ropes, who endorsed their own NY Senator in their own state, talks up an infomercial hosted by a former Clinton staff employee. Wow, shocker it was positioned that way. I thought Barack was excellent and positioned Hillarys gas tax myth quite well to be the calculating lie that we all know it is. posted 05/05/2008 at 12:04:31
Exactly and what's weird is, on these big states, not many went overwhelmingly for Clinton and some like TX were very small margins. So how does that say they the difference means anything? In CA, I know many that would like to redo their vote from Clinton to Obama. In WA, we are all Obama. Of course, we don't count. posted 05/05/2008 at 02:34:26
We don't say that, the pollsters do. More Kool-Aid for everyone, dajay's buying! posted 05/05/2008 at 02:29:24
Come on now, you're supporting Hillary, send her all your money! We support Obama and he seems to be fiscally responsible and doesn't make fake gas tax promises. You're a believer, Hillary's broke except her $100 Million, send her your money. posted 05/05/2008 at 02:27:44
Ha! By volunteering your credit card to Hillary?! More Kool-Aid please! posted 05/05/2008 at 02:24:37
Don't you get it? Even those that donate $20. are elitist! Everyone is elitist if they don't support Hillary, they're all elitist! It's a vast left wing conspiracy! posted 05/05/2008 at 01:40:02
Obama isn't asking for your money. Hillary is. Send her everything you've got, her campaign depends on you. posted 05/05/2008 at 01:26:37
Give the bank dajay's card. posted 05/05/2008 at 01:24:42
The point I made in my original comment is that Hillary herself (and Bill) trash huge segments of the population that don't support her. Interesting approach which leaves a very small segment to fill the piggy bank. That's her choice to do, not ours. Can't say it's a smart move if she thinks it would help her in the GE. Trash these people then ask for their money and their vote? posted 05/05/2008 at 01:23:03
Will do! And he pays his bills! And spends wisely! And his campaign isn't in the RED! Glad you're having so much fun on this blog! posted 05/05/2008 at 00:40:55
That story is very true, she fought to get her money back and quit Hillary's campaign. Of course, you want to elect the wife of an impeached president and both Clintons are admittedly dishonest. Just send Hillary your money. All of it. Her $100 Million isn't enough. She needs your money too. posted 05/05/2008 at 00:36:08
She has $100 Million. She can pay for it herself along with all the vendors she owes and still hasn't paid. posted 05/05/2008 at 00:31:37
Since Clinton has called half the country elitist and 40 states "don't matter", she better hope the small segment left is willing to send her all their money. posted 05/05/2008 at 00:13:00
Don't yell at us, just send Clinton all your money. posted 05/05/2008 at 00:11:01

Clinton Camp Says It Will Use The Nuclear Option

Don't let the door hit you on the way out then posted 05/04/2008 at 20:50:47
It would be a short term win. If you think this woman is hated now... posted 05/04/2008 at 20:47:14
We don't have to buy the sludge you're selling and we don't have to elect Hillary. Sorry. If she loses, she loses on her own. And that would be a beautiful sight. posted 05/04/2008 at 20:46:15
Yeah, right. Would Hillary champion to cause to seat delegates to benefit Obama if she wasn't even on the ballot? Not in a million trillion years. The Clintons absolutely disgust me. I cannot believe I ever voted for Bill Clinton and worse, that I defended him. posted 05/04/2008 at 19:58:30

Clinton Gas Tax Holiday: Hillary Attacks Economists

Point, clap, clap "and you're elite and you're elite and you're elite, you're all elite!" Point, clap, clap! posted 05/05/2008 at 01:36:47

Actor Tom Hanks Endorses Barack Obama

Way to go Tom Hanks! And do you collect old typewriters? Pretty cool. posted 05/03/2008 at 23:45:53

Are You Taking Notes Now, George?

Did you get lost on your way to Taylor Marsh? posted 05/05/2008 at 15:35:15
Just as long as it isn't as her VP. Giving a couple of speeches on her behalf (the ones she insults) is a lot different than bringing in the half of the country she's insulted for supporting him. Too late now, a lot of people will just wait to support him in a later election should she get the nomination by her rule or ruin methods. posted 05/05/2008 at 00:23:16
Everyone knew ABC and Georgie were hosting an infomercial for Hillary. I saw Obama's interview with Russert and he did a brilliant job, serious, smart and the gas tax discussion was especially excellent. That this country could lose Obama is as good a demonstration of bad choices as electing Bush twice and considering bringing in the wife of an impeached president who admits "misremembering" the same way her husband did. posted 05/04/2008 at 20:13:06
That poor little Hillary has been mistreated by the media is the biggest myth of this campaign. The second is that she is more electable. BUT, a teeny weeny part of me, as much as I like Obama, would love to see her run and LOSE. To see that look on her face would be unbelievably satisfying. And the ripping by the GOP, that are chomping at the bit to use the material they have against her will be months of entertainment. Take heart everyone, eventually the Clintons will be gone and their legacy is DESTROYED. Obama is young! posted 05/04/2008 at 20:08:29

Rove's Next Trick -- If Obama Must Answer For His Minister Now, Just Wait to See What the Republicans Will Do To Clinton Inc. in October

You mean...the Republicans don't genuinely love Hillary now? They have her on Fox, Joe Scarborough LOVES her, Rove talks her up, even Pat Buchanan loves her. Are you saying they don't mean it? posted 05/05/2008 at 14:17:32

John Gibson Mocks Rachel Maddow's Sexuality: "Ooh, Lesbians! Yummy!"

Rachel Maddow does a great job. Perhaps you would rather watch Faux, I don't think women are allowed to wear pants there. posted 05/02/2008 at 20:10:17

What Will A Clinton "Victory" Feel Like?

I have wondered about this too. Clinton seems to think the only voters she needs to cater to are blue collars in rural areas and Latinos. And shockingly, she trashes those that do not support her. Does she really think if she were to get the nom, that all these other groups will rush to support her? Or does she say, I know I trashed you before but I was lying to get the nom? posted 05/04/2008 at 15:19:19
Did you just say Hillary and lying? Hmm. posted 05/04/2008 at 01:35:36
Are you saying if Hillary got the nomination and Obama didn't take the VP slot, her loss would be his fault? Now I've heard everything. I do not want him to be her VP, I would want her to lose on her own. posted 05/03/2008 at 23:58:30
Hillary supporting this gas tax plan is a perfect example of her lack of integrity. Try to buy the votes and don't tell the voters what it really will mean for them. posted 05/03/2008 at 23:51:52
You think Obama supporters are really Republicans? And a poster further down thinks Obama is too Democratic, i.e. "Left"? Make up your minds people. But no, Obama supporters are firm Democrats. Many of them voted for Bill Clinton. But the Clintons have changed and so have we. If it's hard to accept that strong Democrats support Senator Obama and do not support Clinton, it might be best if you didn't read this post. posted 05/03/2008 at 23:50:24
As a woman who voted for Bill Clinton twice, I have the right to decide I am sick of them and to be filled with disgust and disappointment for who they appear to be now. As a woman young enough not to feel like I have to vote by gender, my not supporting Clinton has nothing to do with disliking women, it's just a convenient excuse Clinton supporters like to use. And liking Rachel Maddow is supposed to, what, imply that I am a lesbian? So all people that like Rachel Maddow are lesbians? Keith Olbermann seems to get a kick out of her, how does one explain that? Or is it only woman who like Rachel Maddow that are lesbians? Even married with children women are apparently lesbian because they like Rachel Maddow? She's a woman who perhaps likes women (don't know, don't care) but doesn't appear to like Clinton much. How do you explain that? The lack of intelligence demonstrated by Clnton supporters continues. posted 05/03/2008 at 05:14:05
No one answers your posts because the questions are phrased in a way as to misrepresent, to parse statements in a way as to deceive and to create fear like Hillary and the GOP have done for years. So people read and ignore you as they do to many with posts such as yours. posted 05/03/2008 at 03:02:38
Destroy Hillary's life? You mean poor $100 Million dollar Hillary? Are you joking??? Poor tragic two mansion $100 million dollar Hillary doesn't have enough power, didn't feel like her eight year "co-presidency" as she seems to regard it, was enough? Poor Hillary who has more scandals in her closet than half of DC is suffering how? And it's the fault of Obama supporters? What a joke. posted 05/03/2008 at 02:52:33
As Pelosi said, the candidates should not feel they have to deliver a "Dream ticket". And that works for Obama too. If Hillary steals the nomination, he should not feel pressure to clean up the big pile she has made, he should run as Governor of IL and wait. The country will then see what a ridiculous mistake they made. Again, he should NOT feel like he has to help her fix the anger she has created. She thinks she's so electable? The truth of that is as clear as Bosnia. posted 05/03/2008 at 02:47:26
She is not even a centrist, she voted for the war and supported Bush and the GOP on everything they wanted. If you mean give Dems a fighting chance by electing a Republican, why don't you just work to get Lieberman elected? The idea that we shouldn't nominate a Democrat because he's too Democrat is beyond ridiculous. posted 05/03/2008 at 02:40:36
So Hillary cured epilepsy? Was she dodging sniper fire at the same time? No one is impressed with Hillary and her "I was for the Iraq war until it became politically beneficial to be against it" and "I didn't read the NIE" positions. Remember how she was solving world peace until we saw her schedules? She would still be ducking sniper fire if it hadn't been on video. The woman is full of it and lies all of the time. That is why polls show that 6 in 10 consider her to be dishonest and untrustworthy. posted 05/03/2008 at 02:37:19
I have thought this primary is generational more than anything else, with younger voters not looking at gender or race while older voters whisper things to stupid to type. So say, in November, the country wakes up and Clinton has won. The older voters will cheer and say "Good! The stupid young people are still stupid, we won anyway and they better not ever challenge us again." The younger voters, who would have felt so invested in this country will be revolted by American politics, disgusted by Clintons and the Democrats will be a weak party with a lost generation. Clinton and McCain love the anger and divisive politics, it's all they've known, and the uglier they can make it, especially Hillary Clinton, the better she likes it. And while she makes a list of every enemy she plans to avenge, she is filled with rage that Senator Obama dared to challenge her and he will be the greatest target for her, don't doubt it for a second. A Clinton presidency will be a very ugly one. posted 05/02/2008 at 20:24:06

An Army of Women

As a woman who DOES NOT SUPPORT CLINTON, I do not feel I need to vote based on gender, I feel the need to vote based on preference. I prefer Senator Obama for endless reasons. To say not every woman agrees with this poster is a great understatement. posted 05/03/2008 at 03:22:43

Democratic Party's Patience For Clinton Wears Thin

That is such a great picture, I am so sick of the Clintons I get queasy just thinking of them shriekingly returning to the WH while they flip off everyone. Sickening.

There are all these articles saying Democrats should vote for her regardless if she gets the nomination. Are we supposed to reward Hillary with our vote after all she has done? The message we are supposed to send is ripping the party to shreds, destroying the opposing candidate is good and we should vote for her? I don't know what to do with that. I would want to see her lose so she and future Dem candidates see it is unacceptable. So we throw the GE? And this is what the Clintons have wrought in this primary. The damage they have done is long term. posted 05/02/2008 at 13:55:59

Black-Issues Group: Price To Pay If Clinton Wins Through Superdelegates

Not just black people, not just young people, many many voters of all demographics. posted 05/02/2008 at 15:52:45

Clinton: Base "Broader And Deeper" Than Obama's

No, she's from Indiana this week, her parents had ANOTHER summer home there, where while they had all these summer homes, they churned their own butter in order to demonstrate their blue collar cred. posted 05/01/2008 at 21:53:29
We sympathize Lisa, we in the West don't matter either, we're "elitist". We only matter when she wants money. And we say good luck with that! I've never seen a politician so consistently trash the voters that didn't vote for her, then expect they will support her later. What a joke Hillary is. posted 05/01/2008 at 21:28:48
Exactly. She is a legend in her own mind. And in the bars of rural PA. posted 05/01/2008 at 21:25:38
If Hillary gets the nomination by whatever means, she better hope she can get elected with the blue collar and older voters. While she and her husband call progressive voters "elitist" they are saying, good, you don't need my vote. She'll have lost young voters, a large percentage of the black vote and those "lattes" in the West that she loves to trash. So much for "broad and deep". Must say, seeing her lose would be incredibly satisfying. posted 05/01/2008 at 21:24:12

Clinton-Backing Senator Bemoans Media's Scandal Coverage

I agree, I haven't watched MSNBC or CNN since PA. But I do have a weakness for Richard Wolffe. posted 05/01/2008 at 23:14:26
Your post has nothing to do with the topic. posted 05/01/2008 at 22:49:31
He was but Zanti got bored on the Taylor Marsh site and decided to come over here and barf on every post. He doesn't read them first. posted 05/01/2008 at 22:30:48

Fans of this user

shchartley
JaegerBaeger
offred

Log in to become a fan of this user.

Bloggers I Like

This user isn't a fan of anybody yet!

Posts this user has commented on

 

 Site  Web ask.com