Trinidad707

I doubt HRC wants the Vp slot...under MR No experience Obama, she'd probably rather wait at the sidlines and watch him lose to McCain.......as with No White blue collar vote, no women, no jewish or catholic vote, no elderly or hispanic vote...No swing states except caucus Colorado. No Ca,Ny,TX, or Fl No Ohio, No PA no West Va ..The guy simply can't win.(It's like the dems are throwing the race) All you see is spin on tv......the other states Obama was strong in are Notoriously Red state wins come November ...and this time each state is winner gets all electorals none of the crazy unprecedented delegate split rigged things)He's toast. The delegates would be smarter to give Hillary the delegates at the convention at least she can beat McCain posted 07/20/2008 at 21:05:35

what about all the straight people that are divorced..or one parent goes to jail or one parent dies...or whatever else. Since when does it take two parents to raise a child...what it takes is love and committment and stability......I don't see with the divorce rates what they are in the straight world about 50% or better ...how does this stance even make sense posted 07/14/2008 at 20:33:28

If they give this guy the delegates at the convention it is ALL OVER MCCAIN WILL BE THE NEXT PRESIDENT. SEN OBAMA HAS TOO MANY WEAKNESSES...HE WILL NEVER WIN. I think the DNC is throwing the race, hence getting rid of the strong candidate and going with the weak one.....delegates won't help this guy win in NOV.....I was a dem..and McCain will slaughter this guy.....looks like some of these people want to stay in war no matter what they say!..it's what they do that matters...and putting in a guy who didn't win any swing states..Colo was a caucus...doesn't count....Didn't win Ca,TX,Fl or NY ..he didn't win WV, Ohio or PA....he won the teeny states dems never win against republicans like S Carolina...and Alabama,Miss forget it those are republican states. .they had to eliminate Fl and Mi in order for him to win.....what a fix...This guy can't pull the hispanics, the elderly the white blue collar workers, women,50% of liberals the jews, the catholics.....this is all a big joke......He cannot win! posted 07/13/2008 at 03:58:13

If the Obamabots are so sure their presumpive candidate will win, why do they fight and say the awful things about Hillary; they must be worried about something posted 07/17/2008 at 18:38:55

Wow How many soldiers have died since 2003...when Pelosi said Impeachment was off the table....and now in 2008 4 months before Bush & Cheney leave office ...and however many deaths later ...she is saying it is on the table......I think Ms Pelosi has been reading the low poll #s 9% think congress doing a good job...she is more worried about losing fellow democrats that are coming up for re-election. Doesn't it make you sick how nothing is ever done for the good of anything, but only to be so self serving!...It's sickening! Oh and then there is the fact that Pelosi is second in line to be president after Cheney...so if both were impeached ...she would be president of the United States til 2009 when we would have a new president, maybe this was her plan! posted 07/11/2008 at 03:58:39

Even Jackson is noticing "change"...no pun intended. They tout obama as liberal.pandered to get the liberal vote, the black vote was a given....and just as he pandered at an anti war rally in 2002 in a very liberal area that wouldn't have accepted anything but anti-war...to get re-elected to the state senate in Illinois¦ the guy lies..don"t you get it. He is as liberal as Joe Lieberman is! He has been playing us all. He got half the liberal vote, by talking anti-war¦..... Obama panders¦he has all along been more pro-palestine¦now he is flip flopping for the jewish vote¦claiming to be pro-isreal¦all the while he and Michelle.(there are pics)dining with the Said"s a pro-palestine political political couple. He goes whichever way the wind blows..and has nothing really to say, except to give lofty yes we can speeches with no yes I have to go
along with it. ¦.more likely he won"t ..he flip flopped on some part of the abortion bills, he"s changed his stance on Iraq and Iran¦..he is the flim flam man¦just watch¦he will change like a chameleon before your very eyes.....pretty soon, if you were one of the stooges that did vote for him, you won't even recognize him ; after he's done flip flopping and changing what he's really all about. posted 07/16/2008 at 20:52:59

Why? would it not alarm progressives, he has never been what he claims to be....he tells the jews I'll protect Israel...and dines with the Pro Palestinian "Saids" , he goes to church but never hears anything, he says he was against the war in 2002 but he never voted...he said he didn't know Farrakhan but bought the home he is living in from him.......He talks out of both sides of his mouth posted 07/09/2008 at 03:14:42

Wow and I was set to think that the DNC and the democratic party had thrown the race entirely having nominated the weakest candidate in history.....the only vote he can carry are 1/2 of the liberal vote and the black vote 99.9%. As Hillary carries the huge states, all but one of the swing states, Ohio,West Virginia...she carried the Reagan dems, the elderly, the white blue collar workers, 50% of liberals, womens vote, jewish vote, hispanic vote...the only way Obama even won Iowa was a caucus of party insiders..not the voters.....and speaking of votes...leaving out some people had they been counted Hillary would also have the poular vote.....so what the hell are the democrats thinking...He can't win! so that means they are throwing the race on purpose! posted 07/09/2008 at 03:11:06

Rev Wright was a muslim and converted...Louis Farrakhan the person Obama purchased his home from that Obama now lives in is muslim, Michelle has been seen in pics with Farrakhans wife....dispite that they keep denying he knows Farrakhan.....this is all for political reasons posted 06/28/2008 at 22:51:19

Gee his dad was muslim..his step brother just came out and said Barack was muslim , but in spite of that wuld make a good president....why did he lie about it? posted 06/28/2008 at 22:49:18

The same people that run trhe oil companies are in on the ethanol thing as well. When we all convert over it will be exxon ,mobil and all the rest that will be still in charge.. posted 06/24/2008 at 03:48:33

Wasted chatter on peronal things rather than things that concern our country not intervening in peoples lives, he should be more concerned about how weak he is in the polls.
Corporate press spins that McCain has little chance of winning all the while he is anihilating Obama in the straw polls Obama only leads slightly in 14 states....While McCain has wide margin leads in important states. I am not a McCain fan nor am I for the republicans....but I hope Obama loses big time...and it looks like he will....Those that finagled him into the nomination by way of wierd delegation apportioning, are gonna be asking themselves where's Hillary we should have nominated her. Obama doesn't have a prayer without her as VP, and I dearly hope she doesn't want that position. She should run independent and screw all that screwed her.....he can't pull it off...he can't win posted 06/15/2008 at 22:01:27

Corporate press spins that McCain has little chance of winning all the while he is anihilating Obama in the straw polls Obama only leads slightly in 14 states....While McCain has wide margin leads in important states. I am not a McCain fan nor am I for the republicans....but I hope Obama loses big time...and it looks like he will....Those that finagled him into the nomination by way of wierd delegation apportioning, are gonna be asking themselves where's Hillary we should have nominated her. Obama doesn't have a prayer without her as VP, and I dearly hope she doesn't want that position. She should run independent and screw all that screwed her posted 06/15/2008 at 22:00:22

soft power, more like...no big deal. Corporate press spins that McCain has little chance of winning all the while he is anihilating Obama in the straw polls Obama only leads slightly in 14 states....While McCain has wide margin leads in important states. I am not a McCain fan nor am I for the republicans....but I hope Obama loses big time...and it looks like he will....Those that finagled him into the nomination by way of wierd delegation apportioning, are gonna be asking themselves where's Hillary we should have nominated her. Obama doesn't have a prayer of winning without Hillary as VP, and I dearly hope she DOES NOT want that position. She should run independent and screw all that screwed her...I have had it with the democratic party....We shoudl have a three party system or more posted 06/15/2008 at 22:04:50

What happened tothe pupular vote, don't US citizen vote matter anymore . 2166 washington insider delegates choose nominee posted 06/06/2008 at 15:43:05

Amazing and right in the people's faces Obama steals election without popular vote having 2166 Washington Insider delegates pick the nominee. We the people don't count! Just months ago when Clinton had delegates and he had popular vote he decried foul if she won by way of delegates posted 06/06/2008 at 15:50:16

Amazing and right in the people's faces Obama steals election without popular vote having 2166 Washington Insider delegates pick the nominee. We the people don't count! posted 06/06/2008 at 15:49:02

I guess we know now what CHANGE represents to Obama campaign....which is change your mind!..some time back on this blog when obama carried popular vote and C;linton had delegates ,Obama campaign complained the it would be wrong for cigar chomping washington insiders to decide the nominee, but now that it is reversed , it seems to be perfectly fine! 2166 of 4000 some odd pledged delegates are deciding who is the presidential nominee, not the popular vote...which Clinton has.....the "CHANGE" Obama speaks of is the elimination of democracy and counting the nations votes, and merely allowing Washington Insiders to choose him as the nominee.......does that represent the nation NO IT DOES NOT!!! posted 06/04/2008 at 19:10:31

I guess we know now what CHANGE represents to Obama campaign....which is change your mind!..some time back on this blog when obama carried popular vote and C;linton had delegates ,Obama campaign complained the it would be wrong for cigar chomping washington insiders to decide the nominee, but now that it is reversed , it seems to be perfectly fine! 2166 of 4000 some odd pledged delegates are deciding who is the presidential nominee, not the popular vote...which Clinton has.....the "CHANGE" Obama speaks of is the elimination of democracy and counting the nations votes, and merely allowing Washington Insiders to choose him as the nominee.......does that represent the nation NO IT DOES NOT!!! posted 06/04/2008 at 18:44:58

oh boy!! two people with no experience. posted 06/04/2008 at 18:35:41

I guess we know now what CHANGE represents to Obama campaign....which is change your mind!..some time back on this blog when obama carried popular vote and C;linton had delegates ,Obama campaign complained the it would be wrong for cigar chomping washington insiders to decide the nominee, but now that it is reversed , it seems to be perfectly fine! 2166 of 4000 some odd pledged delegates are deciding who is the presidential nominee, not the popular vote...which Clinton has.....the "CHANGE" Obama speaks of is the elimination of democracy and counting the nations votes, and merely allowing Washington Insiders to choose him as the nominee.......does that represent the nation NO IT DOES NOT!!! posted 06/04/2008 at 18:44:14

Yes especially if all $%^&* hits the fan after Rezko trial begins. That must have been why Obama supporters wanted to rush Clinton to quit the race, as once this stuff gets out there Barrack Obama may not look so pure and may not seem like the candidate of change they thought he would be. He would seem like a corrupt politician instead. This is a corruption trial and Obama had been close with and had business dealings with the Syrian born Tony Rezko for over 17 years. This could cost him the nomination af all is revealed posted 03/30/2008 at 17:24:06

Only after he saw all the flack about it and it could cost him the election. That says nothing about Obama's judgement or his agenda, as if he really had minded, or hated what was said, he would have quit the church 20 years ago.......as the stuff that was said long ago, and even in a soundbyte , the fact that it was said at all is troublesome. If some white pastor talked like that, he wouldn't be around and you could bet african americans would want his head on a stick..............lets face facts Obama just did what he had to do to move things along......as his speech was empty; as he spoke about opening the doors to communication about race problems, and the moment Clinton spoke about it, Obama said to his rally that just because people make stupid comments I hope it won't interfere with the issues. Well the issues is something Obama doesn't stick to, as he has no experience on the issues to defer to, so he tears down the other candidate. Thats like an old trick If you don't really have anything to say about ourself , merely denegrade the opponent that has past experience posted 03/28/2008 at 13:31:32

Only after he saw all the flack about it and it could cost him the election. That says nothing about Obama's judgement or his agenda, as if he really had minded, or hated what was said, he would have quit the church 20 years ago.......as the stuff that was said long ago, and even in a soundbyte , the fact that it was said at all is troublesome. If some white pastor talked like that, he wouldn't be around and you could bet african americans would want his head on a stick..............lets face facts Obama just did what he had to do to move things along......as his speech was empty; as he spoke about opening the doors to communication about race problems, and the moment Clinton spoke about it, Obama said to his rally that just because people make stupid comments I hope it won't interfere with the issues. Well the issues is something Obama doesn't stick to, as he has no experience on the issues to defer to, so he tears down the other candidate. Thats like an old trick If you don't really have anything to say about ourself , merely denegrade the opponent that has past experience posted 03/28/2008 at 13:24:07

He also lied about taking oil company money posted 03/29/2008 at 03:12:39

He also lied about taking Iol co money posted 03/29/2008 at 03:11:58

OBAMA claims he has never taken money from Oil companies...Caught in yet another lie. A Deputy Communications Director: "It's unfortunate that Sen Obama is using false advertising to explain why he can be trusted to do something about energy prices. Sen Obama says he doesn?t take campaign contributions from oil companies but the reality is that ExxonMobil, Shell and others are among his donors. A new ad by Sen. Obama running in Pennsylvania falsely claims that Sen. Obama does not accept money from the oil industry. In the ad, Sen. Obama says, "I'm Barack Obama and I don't take money from oil companies or lobbyists and I won?t let them block change anymore." According to the Center for Responsive Politics, Sen. Obama has received over $160,000 from the oil and gas companies. Two major bundlers for his campaign -- George Kaiser and Robert Cavnar ? are oil company CEOs. Sen. Obama has accepted money from Exxon, Shell, BP, Chevron and just about every other major oil company. Just last month, Sen. Obama accepted another $8,400 from ExxonMobil, $12,370 from Chevron and $6,500 from British Petroleum. In 2005, Sen. Obama voted for the Dick Cheney energy bill, which was written in secret with the oil industry. Hillary Clinton opposed Cheney's energy bill, has a plan to eliminate oil industry tax breaks, and would require oil companies to contribute to a $50 billion strategic energy fund to jumpstart research and investment in clean energy technologies. posted 03/29/2008 at 03:07:36

It would seem Senators Leahy and Dodd & Obama camp want Hillary to quit so they can sew up the nomination using excuses about ruining the party.....more like D for dis-enfranchising any other state voters and Florida and Michigan..........or maybe afterall it is R R is for REZKO the indicted one Rezko, 52, is accused of shaking down companies seeking state pension business for millions of dollars in kickbacks and campaign contributions. OBAMA was the buiggest recipient of campaign money perhaps it is the fact that They"re getting closer to having a jury in the corruption trial of political fund-raiser and businessman Tony Rezko.....so they figure they better hurry up before Rezko says something damaging about Obama posted 03/28/2008 at 13:09:41

Dean also said the Michigan and Florida delegates will be seated at the convention. posted 03/28/2008 at 13:13:14

I find it strange for Obama to say "If Pastor Wright hadn't retired I wouldn't feel comfortable staying at the church" the reverend said those comments long ago, and even Obama admits hearing things that he felt uneasy about in the past...and then added the old uncle thing. My question is he didn't really decide to quit the church or say something to the reverend until it might mess up his presidential race....and that seems like pandering to the public for his convenience posted 03/28/2008 at 12:31:24

What Carville didn't say , but you can witness on many Richardson speeches; is that he said that superdelegates should vote the will of the people in their states.....he said this even on the eve he gave his endorsement! New Mexicoans voted for Hillary, so that makes Richardson , not only a Judas for his promises, but a hypocrit for his actions posted 03/28/2008 at 03:31:57

Not only does Obama have a hatred filled anti -american preacher for 20 years , but also has a 17 year history with an indicted felon Sen. Obama will not disclose what cases he worked on that involved Tony Rezko or his companies: Obama campaign has not released which cases Obama worked on involving Rezko/Rezmar. "Asked what Rezko cases Obama worked on, Miner (a firm partner) told the Sun-Times, 'We"ll put together a list of the cases he worked on involving Rezko/Rezmar in the next day or two.' That was March 13 [2007]. He never provided the information." [Chicago Sun-Times, 4/23/07] Sen. Obama has not released his tax returns, except for 2006: Sen. Barack Obama"s ties to indicted dealmaker Antoin "Tony" Rezko include an internship senator Obama provided the son of a contributor at the request of Rezko.Rezko was indicted in October for allegedly trying to collect nearly $6 million in kickbacks from government deals and trying to shake down a Hollywood producer for $1.5 million in campaign contributions to Gov. Blagojevich. Obama and Rezko have been friends since 1990, and the Wilmette businessman has raised as much as $60,000 in campaign contributions for him. posted 03/28/2008 at 05:38:44

It seems that Obama's white hatred anti-semite pastor isn't his only problems..
Obama refuses to name the UBS broker that purchased the stocks in his 'quasi-blind' trust. "Obama had about $100,000 he wanted to invest in 2005.
The money was a portion of the $1.2 million he got from a book contract. He said Wednesday he decided the $100,000 could be put into something
"more high risk" and asked a friend to recommend a stock broker. That friend was donor George W. Haywood, who held what the New York Times
called "major" positions in the two stocks Obama ended up owning, Skyterra and AVI BioPharma¦. Obama declined to name the UBS broker." [Sweet
column, Chicago Sun-Times, 3/8/07] posted 03/28/2008 at 05:31:11

If she and Clinton are friends who needs friends like that.......she hasn't been so nice to Clinton that I can see I assumed she was an Obama girl posted 03/28/2008 at 03:13:13

Just about every newspaper,televisoon cable news show, all are run on entertainment value now. No longer does anyone merely report news without giving their nasty opinions except maybe Anderson Cooper who is a real reporter. Todays news shows are merely paid pundits, who slant their opinion in whichever direction the owner of the paper or tv shows want. Wall St Journal now another Rupert Murdoch property, polls are biased as well. The only way to get real news is don't believe anything you hear, and use your own brain to formulate an opinion not some pundit. It is hard to do , we have all been conditioned to listen. They all take soundbytes to emphasize their points for whosever side they are on. As far as Reverend Wright, maybe he is a good man, but the fact that he said any of those things whether in a soundbyte or not, was enough to wonder what a senator who was so close to the Rev for 20 years would be hanging around or still going to services if he didn't agree with the Reverends mindset. even got the name for his book audacity of hope from Wright .. which means they collaborated, that is very close.! So as much as the Reverend may have said good things, it makes us all wonder how many more anti-white-anti-semite anti rich and white anti-american remarks other than, that the reverend may have said in other sermons throughout the years. posted 03/28/2008 at 02:26:02

Actually Obama is an "Apostate" one who has foresaken islam and their birth from a muslim father. Islamic law doesn't recognize the changing of religions as we do freely here. Islamic law dictates once a muslim always a muslim, doesn't matter that youcall yourself a christian. Islamic men ther could face exxecution for foresaking their original faith posted 03/28/2008 at 15:47:38

It would seem Chris Dodd and Obama camp want Hillary to quit so they can sew up the nomination using excuses about ruining the party.....more like D for dis-enfranchising any other state voters and Florida and Michigan..........or maybe afterall it is R R is for REZKO the indicted one Rezko, 52, is accused of shaking down companies seeking state pension business for millions of dollars in kickbacks and campaign contributions. OBAMA was the buiggest recipient of campaign money perhaps it is the fact that They"re getting closer to having a jury in the corruption trial of political fund-raiser and businessman Tony Rezko.....so they figure they better hurry up before Rezko says something damaging about Obama posted 03/28/2008 at 12:50:57

why should the primary end ? Dodd voted just as Hillary did in 2002 war vote on Iraq...whoops so did John Kerry, Tom Daschle, Ben Nelson, all Obama endorsers..--....only pundits, and biased politicians from the Obama camp say it is bad for the party..as they don't want Florida or Mich counted as they are ahead . There are 50 states people...do we just forget about some states and just count the ones Obama has won??....what about Ca, Ny , Texas, Florida all the big states that went fo Clinton....Obama would be hapy if we only had caucuses as all the people don't vote in caucuses....Dis-enfranchising ANY voters would make the nominee just as illegitimate as George Bush's appointment to president was in 2000. I know Obama wouldn't really care as the point is just getting in office any way you can, but let the people vote Obama, stop listening to corp talking head pundits paid for their slanted opinions MSNBC owned by GE (govt contractor) (usually republican) think about that for a moment, as now they are pushing Obama, wonder why???....and stop listening to politicians with abias..................just let the people vote........ if the DNC wants superdelegates to vote with the voter they wouldn't have given them the option not to....so if the dnc changes their mind then Obama supporter Richardson will have to give his vote back to Clinton, as his state voted for Clinton.. posted 03/28/2008 at 03:40:51

It would seem Chris Dodd and Obama camp want Hillary to quit so they can sew up the nomination using excuses about ruining the party.....more like D for dis-enfranchising any other state voters and Florida and Michigan..........or maybe afterall it is R R is for REZKO the indicted one Rezko, 52, is accused of shaking down companies seeking state pension business for millions of dollars in kickbacks and campaign contributions. OBAMA was the buiggest recipient of campaign money perhaps it is the fact that They"re getting closer to having a jury in the corruption trial of political fund-raiser and businessman Tony Rezko.....so they figure they better hurry up before Rezko says something damaging about Obama posted 03/28/2008 at 05:45:46

Obama has taken $1,180,103 from the top issuers of subprime loans. [cq.com]
Obama received $266,907 from Lehman. [Cq.com]
Obama received $5395 from GMAC. [Cq.com]
Obama received $150,850 from CS First Boston. [Cq.com]
Obama received $11,250 from Countrywide. [Cq.com]
Obama received $9052 from Washington Mutual. [Cq.com]
Obama received $161,850 from Citigroup. [Cq.com]
Obama received $4600 from CBASS. [Cq.com]
Obama received $170,050 from Morgan Stanley. [Cq.com]
Obama received $1150 from Centex. [Cq.com]
Obama received $351,900 from Goldman Sachs. [Cq.com]

Sen. Obama has taken more money from the top 10 issuers of subprime loans than Hillary. Sen. Obama has received $434,420 from the top 10 issuers of subprime loans. Hillary has received $364,950. [Cq.com; USA Today] posted 03/28/2008 at 05:13:10

This guy Obama misrepresents everything WHY? Obama has nothing to say about himself thats why. It's hard to attack someone if they haven't done anything in the past. Obama attacks Hillary though even when he knows he's wrong! His endorser Kennedy is proof (below) Hillary is right! The memo the Obama campaign released today is full of blatantly inaccurate information and false innuendo, intended to denigrate Hillary's critical role in the passage of SCHIP and the Family and Medical Leave Act. Clearly, they believe that the media will overlook the facts and follow another false, trivial story line of their creation.On SCHIP,
Sen. Ted Kennedy said, "The children's health program wouldn't be in existence today if we didn't have Hillary pushing for it from the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue." At the time of passage in 1997, Sen. Kennedy said, "we pay tribute to Mrs. Clinton. Mrs. Clinton has made the issue of children's health and well-being her really first priority in this country, and she was of invaluable help, both in the fashioning and the shaping of the program, and also as a clear advocate, in terms of having an effective outcome, during the discussion and the debate on the children's health issue." posted 03/28/2008 at 04:59:18

On FMLA, Debra Ness, President of the National Partnership for Women and Families, the organization that worked for years on the issue, said "Hillary was instrumental in getting the Family and Medical Leave Act signed into law...Hillary brought her work and experience on behalf of children and working families to the campaign trail in 1991 and 1992 and knew the importance of getting this legislation passed immediately." posted 03/28/2008 at 05:19:55

I'm sort of tired hearing how predjudice white people are. I was probably the most unpredjudiced person around, but after watching the OJ trial something in me said this is wrong, this is a judgement as a group not an individual judgement. It would seem from Rev Wright's soundbytes imagine if we had heard more..my god, I never knew black people hated white people so much??? One of the black talking heads on a news show was attempting to defend Obama"s pastor by saying that the way he is preaching is not unlike most black churches, so I guess this is across the board ..........african american people are very predjudice....................and we haven't had slavery for hundreds of years posted 03/28/2008 at 13:06:14