YeWeCanForFree

You can pay $5.00 at pump and change history but I want FREE OIL from Iraq. posted 07/14/2008 at 19:34:48

JUST PUMP OIL IN IRAQ BABY!

I could care or less if surge is working or not in Iraq.

There are many theories why we went to Iraq. American people will argue until last cow come home for many years. We all know America lost war in Iraq long time ago. Let us just "squeeze a few lemons into a pitcher" in Iraq.

Obama and McCain will offer bunch energy policies depending upon their political strips. It will not have any immediate effect at the gas pump.

If you like to see immediate collapse of oil prices in the world market, America has very few options at their finger tips.

Only viable option is to pump oil 24/7 in Iraq. After all, we still occupy Iraq. We can still do whatever we want in Iraq.

http://www.brookings.edu/papers/2003/0512globalenvironment_luft.aspx

If Malaki can distribute $8,000 to his people (mostly our tax payers dollars), least Bush can do is pump oil in Iraq and give us FREE IRAQ OIL at the pump in the US.

Obama slogan should be JUST PUMP OIL IN IRAQ BABY!
Anything less than that is meaningless in today's context. posted 07/14/2008 at 17:36:41

Jury is still out on Hispanic (registered and unregistered) voters supports for McCain or Obama.

It is hard to trust polls taken in June to predict what will happen in Novembers. Most of the polls are very unreliable at this time.

"Fast Eddie" Obama is still big myth for Hispanic voters in California, New Jersey, Texas and Florida. posted 07/02/2008 at 17:36:02

Democratic Party has lost 7 out 10 presidential elections in last 40 years.

These are the people who lost elections to Republicans:

Humphrey (1968), McGovern (1972), Carter (1980), Mondale (1984), Dukakis (1988), Gore (2000) and Kerry (2004).

Why do you think these people lost elections and Obama will win? American people have never elected liberal candidates in modern American history. Obama is more liberal than six of the above candidates, except Carter. Thanks to Obama mentor, Senator Kennedy who gave away whole election in 1980 to some Republican actor.

Can you even name two democratic candidates who won presidential elections over last 40 years?

If you have said: Carter in 1976 and Clinton in 1992-1996. Yes, you are correct!

If you are true democrat voter who wants to win in November, stay with Clinton.
Clinton wins! posted 04/02/2008 at 20:27:35

Who is really better candidate clearly depends upon who can win 270 out of 538 electoral votes needed in the general election. Let do the math. Since FL & MI are not counted (although Clinton won both states with 44 electoral votes), revised electoral votes needed-to-win in this example would be 247 out of 494 electoral votes in the general election.

Obama won (probable win also included) the following states with 241 electoral votes:

AL, AK, CO, CT, DL, DC, GA, HI, ID, IL, IN (toss-up), IA, KS, LA, ME, MD, MN, MS, MI, MO, NB, NC, ND, OR, SC, SD, UT, VT, VA, WA, WI, WY.

Clinton won (probable win also included) the following states with 253 electoral votes:

AZ, AR, CA, KY, MA, NV, NH, NJ, NM, NY, OH, OK, PA, RI, TN, TX, WV.

Senator Clinton has earned more Electoral College votes than Obama. So, no doubt Clinton will definitely be a better candidate to defeat Senator McCain in the general election.

If nominee is other than Senator Clinton, there is no need to wonder why once again democrats have lost 8 out of 10 presidential elections lased 44 years. Democrats are guilty of picking wrong horse every four years.

Pick Obama and join LOSERS CLUB members with Humphrey (1968), McGovern (72), Carter (80), Mondale (84), Dukakis (88), Gore (00) Kerry (04) and Obama (08).

Pick Clinton and join EXCLUSIVE WINNERS CLUB members with Carter (76), Clinton (92-96) and Clinton (08-12).

Clinton wins! posted 04/02/2008 at 11:24:11

Who is really better candidate clearly depends upon who can win 270 out of 538 electoral votes needed in the general election. Let do the math. Since FL & MI are not counted (although Clinton won both states with 44 electoral votes), revised electoral votes needed-to-win in this example would be 247 out of 494 electoral votes in the general election.

Obama won (will win also included) the following states with 241 electoral votes:

Alabama, Alaska, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin, Wyoming.

Clinton won (will win also included) the following states with 253 electoral votes:

Arizona, Arkansas, California, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, West Virginia.

Senator Hillary Clinton will definitely be a better candidate to defeat Senator John McCain in the general election.

If nominee is other than Senator Clinton, there is no need to wonder why once again democrats have lost 8 out 10 elections in last 40 years. Democrats are guilty of picking wrong horse for the general election race every four years.

Pick Obama and join LOSER'S CLUB with Humphrey (1968), McGovern (1972), Carter (80), Mondale (84), Dukakis (88), Gore (2000) Kerry (04) and Obama (2008).

Pick Clinton and join EXCLUSIVE WINNERS CLUB members with Carter (76), Clinton (92,96) and Clinton (2008, 2012), posted 04/02/2008 at 07:14:42