bobdob

Recent comments by this user

The Ho-Hum Obama Revolution

I was there. It was amazing. I was staying at the Marriot on the waterfront, and I had no idea there was going to be a rally. I heard the Decemberists playing outside, so I went out on the balcony to see what was going on. It was an unbelievable scene. The Willamette in front of the park was filled with boats, the park was jam-packed, and there was a line of pedestrians that I was told stretched for 20 blocks in every direction. Sharpshooters on the bridges and rooftops, and helicopters flying overhead. Like nothing I've ever seen in my life. I missed Obama when he was in Minneapolis (where I live), so it was great to finally see him. This has to go down as one of the greatest campaign rallies of all time. I feel enormously lucky to have witnessed it. posted 05/19/2008 at 20:04:08

Obama Responds To Bush, McCain Appeasement Attack

Hamas is a terrorist organization. posted 05/16/2008 at 18:34:09

McCain Predicts The Iraq War Will Be "Won" By 2013

Grampy McCain has a senior moment and indulges in a little fantasyland talk in public. No idea how he'll accomplish any of it, but he figured it was worth putting out there, nonetheless. posted 05/16/2008 at 08:00:42

A Victory for Equality: California Affirms the Freedom to Marry

A real victory for equality would be to get the State out of the marriage business altogether. Marriage is the province of the church. The State should have nothing to do with it. If the State started baptizing babies, would people put up with it? Of course not. So why indulge them when they perform marriages? posted 05/15/2008 at 16:01:22

Bush Uses Holy Land Pulpit to Launch Smear Campaign

Paul, you and I both know that this is precisely why Hillary's campaign has become a problem. The Democratic Party MUST provide a forceful, united front against this sort of attack. Instead, many of Hillary's supporters are unsure whether to support Obama or get behind Bush and McCain in a misguided and opportunistic attempt to push their own candidate's superiority. This is where we start losing them to the Republicans. This is where Hillary's candidacy becomes destructive. posted 05/15/2008 at 18:33:07

Massive Blowback To NARAL's Obama Endorsement

Again we see the divisiveness and destruction Hillary's continued campaigning brings to the Party. She should have dropped out a week ago at the very latest. Her campaign is quixotic, and there is no chance she'll win the nomination. All she's doing is hurting the Party. posted 05/15/2008 at 16:43:08

Union Leaders' Clash Over Dem Endorsements A Sign Of Racial Polarization

"The fact that the two leading candidates are a black and a woman has produced internal and external disputes involving civil rights, women's rights and a variety of other groups and leaders in the liberal wing of the party."

Your choice of words explains so much, Mr. Edsall. As a white, you probably don't even see it, but that's because you're a white and an old. You come from a generation and a mindset that no longer matters. You're quickly becoming obsolete. Do us all a favor and shut the hell up, OK? posted 05/15/2008 at 07:04:43

Hillary Chokes Up While Discussing Chelsea On CNN

Hillary chokes up after taking an aspirin. Hillary chokes up after eating a sandwich. Hillary chokes up talking about her new pantsuit. Hillary chokes up discussing ice cream. Hillary chokes up after using the restroom.

Jeez. Somebody get her a BIG bottle of whiskey and send her somewhere. posted 05/14/2008 at 18:03:25

Barack Obama and Israel: More GOP Lies

Thank you, Senator Kerry. I only wish you had reacted this quickly and this forcefully when they attacked you. Hillary and Barack would probably both be waiting their turns right now as you prepared to head into your second term.

Ah, well, water under the bridge. You're doing a great job, sir. posted 05/13/2008 at 18:35:33

West Virginia Primary: Good Morning America Meets An Uninformed Voter

Look--West Virginia is full of ignorant hillbillies. They found one and put her on TV. So what else is new? posted 05/14/2008 at 10:12:03

Superdelegates put Obama within mathematical reach

This Clinton argument is nonsense. Let's put this into sports terms. The game is nearly over. There's about a minute left to play, Obama is ahead by two touchdowns and he's got the ball. Suddenly, Hillary calls a time out and tells the referees that she thinks the team that carried the ball for the most yards should win the game--not the team that scored the most touchdowns.

I'd say her chances are about that good. posted 05/13/2008 at 09:31:15

Russert Watch 5-11-08: In Which Hillary Surrogates Get Got

I disagree. Hillary's conflation was intentional--not clumsy. posted 05/13/2008 at 09:28:01

Clinton Campaign In $20 Million Of Debt, Campaign Chair Says Clinton Could Lend More Money

Hillary is utterly insane. posted 05/12/2008 at 11:11:15

Why You Should Be Optimistic About November

And then there's Bob Barr. Not good news for McCain. posted 05/12/2008 at 15:43:07

Edwards: Clinton didn't choose words well on race

Every day Hillary stays in the race, she further damages the Democratic Party's chances in the fall. You can't keep attacking the presumptive nominee and avoid damage. Hillary is kidding herself if she thinks she has a chance to win the nomination, and if she thinks her candidacy is anything but destructive at this point. She should have dropped out long ago. At least Edwards had the decency and wisdom to know when to concede. posted 05/11/2008 at 15:35:25

Obama Suggests Offer Maybe Clinton Can't Refuse

David Axelrod was on Fox News Sunday just now. He said that it ain't gonna happen. He said it was a "misunderstanding." I'd say it was more of a huge lie by Thomas Edsall. posted 05/11/2008 at 09:29:41
It's time to put this goddamn lie of a story to rest, Mr. Edsall. posted 05/10/2008 at 21:24:57
Edsall is DELIBERATELY trying to create a false impression. It's no wonder people are pissed off. If Edsall began his story with the truth, it wouldn't be a story. posted 05/10/2008 at 10:26:17
What's Edsall's agenda? He launched this whole non-story with an enormous lie:

"One of the most inviting is the near certainty that the Obama campaign would agree to pay back the $11.4 million she has loaned her own bid, along with an estimated $10 million to $15 million in unpaid campaign expenses."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/07/big-rewards-await-clinton_n_100694.html

He clearly KNEW it was a lie. So why did he write it? Is he a McCain supporter? A Clinton supporter? A racist? Edsall is pushing this story for a reason--what's the reason? posted 05/10/2008 at 10:24:06
Thomas Edsall is a closet Republican. He created this story and he's driving it because he wants to help John McCain. posted 05/10/2008 at 09:39:47

McCain to Me in 1999: Bush "As Dumb as a Stump"

Ms. Meyerhoff has kind of a fancy haircut, but I'm pretty sure Al is a guy's name. posted 05/09/2008 at 19:28:34

Obama's Vice President: Who Will It Be? (POLL)

Ed Rendell. posted 05/09/2008 at 18:09:58

Edwards On His Candidate: I Already Voted For Him?

I'm from that part of the country, and I know the accent well. There is no doubt--he said "him." He voted for Obama. posted 05/09/2008 at 12:07:08

Obama Beats Hillary In Superdelegates For First Time, ABC Reports

It's over. It's over. It's over. Give it up, Hillary. posted 05/09/2008 at 10:29:30

Obama Camp Faces Major Obstacles In Plan To Help Clinton Pay Off Debt

"Under federal campaign finance law, the Obama campaign cannot directly pay off Clinton's debts, or the $11.43 million she has loaned the campaign, because that would violate campaign contribution limits."

This article is a lie. posted 05/09/2008 at 09:44:23
From the article:

"Under federal campaign finance law, the Obama campaign cannot directly pay off Clinton's debts, or the $11.43 million she has loaned the campaign, because that would violate campaign contribution limits." posted 05/09/2008 at 08:10:03
From the article:

"Under federal campaign finance law, the Obama campaign cannot directly pay off Clinton's debts, or the $11.43 million she has loaned the campaign, because that would violate campaign contribution limits." posted 05/09/2008 at 08:09:02
I think that was Edsall's goal. He clearly thinks a divided party will be good for Huffington Post. posted 05/09/2008 at 08:08:06
They're NOT going to pay off Hillary's debt. Edsall made this whole thing up. Read the article again. It's nothing but a massive digression. The truth is hidden somewhere in the middle of the garbage:

"Under federal campaign finance law, the Obama campaign cannot directly pay off Clinton's debts, or the $11.43 million she has loaned the campaign, because that would violate campaign contribution limits."

This entire story is a non-story. posted 05/09/2008 at 08:05:56
http://www.slate.com/id/2190880/ posted 05/09/2008 at 08:02:02
Edsall has created this entire story out of whole cloth. And if you read the piece, you'll see that he admits it:

"Under federal campaign finance law, the Obama campaign cannot directly pay off Clinton's debts, or the $11.43 million she has loaned the campaign, because that would violate campaign contribution limits. But if Obama is the nominee, he and his donor base could provide invaluable help to her in raising money through signed appeals, joint fundraisers and by other methods."

In other words, "Ignore every word I've written. There is no story." posted 05/09/2008 at 07:56:05
That's correct. I'd say that's probably the MAIN reason Hillary is still in the race. She's trying to find a few fresh fish to help her pay off her debt before she drops out. You're a sucker if you give her a dime. posted 05/09/2008 at 07:17:53
Edsall is a goddamn liar. posted 05/09/2008 at 06:56:35
Agreed. This is a fucked-up attempt by Edsall to hurt Obama's fundraising. He's in the tank for Hillary. posted 05/09/2008 at 06:55:37

Will Obama Win Enough White Votes to Beat McCain?

Obama a brown man. Pink people won't vote for a brown man.

Perhaps we could all grow the hell up. posted 05/09/2008 at 10:30:54

Clinton's Open Letter To Obama On MI and FL

Oh, man, she's nuts. Nuts as hell. Driven nuts by her loss, and getting nutser every day. Nuts, nuts, nuts. Nuts. posted 05/08/2008 at 20:54:00
What in the hell is WRONG with this woman? She is INSANE. posted 05/08/2008 at 19:02:29
What a load of crap. Give it up, Hillary--you're in no position to be making demands.

"I have consistently said that the votes cast in Florida and Michigan in January should be counted."

One last lie on your way out the door. You supported the original plan along with everyone else. posted 05/08/2008 at 18:23:27

Obama Hits Hamas "Smear": McCain Is "Losing His Bearings"

The McCain camp has hit back, claiming that Obama was taking a cheap shot by making a reference to McCain's age. Apparently, McCain thought Obama said that he was losing his BALL bearings. Old people are like that.

http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/05/08/obama-accuses-mccain-of-losing-his-bearings-over-hamas-comments/ posted 05/09/2008 at 07:42:14

Obama's Consolidation of the Party

"The Fox News situation, where Obama went on Fox News and mismanaged communications, drew criticism from Moveon."

How incredibly arrogant, Matt. He didn't "mismanage" communications. He did precisely what he meant to do. If you don't like the way he's running his campaign, jump in the race and beat him. But don't sit on the sidelines and make stupid statements like that. MoveOn members need to grow the hell up. posted 05/09/2008 at 10:33:04

Cindy McCain: I Will Never Release My Tax Returns

Cindy McCain is a total MILF, by the way. I'd totally bump her. Except that she's a fuckin' Republican. posted 05/08/2008 at 20:52:49
Oh yes you will, honey. If you want your husband to be president you will. posted 05/08/2008 at 20:50:04

Big Rewards Await Clinton If She Ends Campaign Now

Note how Edsall used this original lie to launch this whole non-story he's now flogging:

"One of the most inviting is the near certainty that the Obama campaign would agree to pay back the $11.4 million she has loaned her own bid, along with an estimated $10 million to $15 million in unpaid campaign expenses."

We all know from subsequent posts that Edsall knew this was a lie when he wrote it. So what's he up to? What's his agenda? posted 05/10/2008 at 10:10:04
"a prompt withdrawal from the contest for the Democratic nomination offers Sen. Hillary Clinton the prospect of major rewards.

One of the most inviting is the near certainty that the Obama campaign would agree to pay back the $11.4 million she has loaned her own bid, along with an estimated $10 million to $15 million in unpaid campaign expenses."

This is a seriously offensive idea. We donated money in increments of 25 and 50 dollars to DEFEAT the Clintons--not to enrich them. Some of us could barely afford it. If the Obama campaign turns our hard-earned dollars over to those multi-millionaires, there will be a SERIOUS backlash. posted 05/08/2008 at 08:19:29
Why the hell would Obama pay off the loans Hillary made to her campaign? That's the stupidest idea I've ever heard in my life. Most of us have donated to 25 or 50 bucks to him whenever we could afford it. You think we'd be happy to see that money go into the bank account of multi-millionaire who is the REASON we've had to keep donating?

What a moronic idea. posted 05/07/2008 at 18:48:13

Another "The Hillary I Know"

The Hillary I know is cost Obama's supporters millions of dollars in campaign donations. The money Obama has been forced to spend (and will be forced to spend over the coming weeks) is coming from people like me, who can barely afford it. I would much rather be donating to a less pointless cause. posted 05/08/2008 at 18:12:03

Hillary Will Drop Out by June 15

Meanwhile, small donors who can hardly afford it donate 25 or 50 bucks at a time to the Obama campaign to hold this woman off. And for what? Her own vain refusal to see the truth. God, how I hate her. posted 05/07/2008 at 19:13:29
Relax. Another bong hit or two should take the edge off. posted 05/07/2008 at 14:25:32
One would think that if she dropped out, the superdelegates would move in to put Obama over the top before KY and WV. posted 05/07/2008 at 14:23:37
What is the frikking point? She's insane. Why would drag this out? It's just absurd. posted 05/07/2008 at 14:21:10

George McGovern Switches To Obama, Urges Clinton To Drop Out

The ushers are showing Hillary where the exits are. I hope she takes the hint. posted 05/07/2008 at 11:32:46

Hillary Clinton's Campaign Strategy: Are Harsh Attacks Over

On May 6, 1937 at 7:25 PM, the Hindenburg crashed and burned. 71 years later, Hillary Rodham Clinton did her best impression of the event. Most observers report that it was a very convincing recreation. posted 05/07/2008 at 11:43:02
I think he's likely to go with Casey. posted 05/07/2008 at 11:38:55
It's the warrior's way: you must always give your opponent fair warning. It's the one decent thing she's done in this campaign. posted 05/07/2008 at 11:38:11
I think Hillary will surprise everyone when she finally concedes. I think she'll be graceful and her concession speech will bring a tear to everyone's eye. Let's just hope she does it soon. posted 05/07/2008 at 11:36:40

Obama Victorious, Clinton On The Ropes

According to Drudge, Hillary can't get a meeting today:

"CONGRESSIONAL SOURCE: Hillary having trouble finding superdelegates who will meet with her... 'No one wants to see her today'... Developing..."

If this is true, it's very bad news for Hillary. posted 05/07/2008 at 12:39:05

Obama's Clinton Dilemma

It wouldn't work. They're just not compatible at all. And Bill would be a constant problem for Obama. I just can't see it happening. posted 05/07/2008 at 10:34:41

Exit Polls: Indiana, North Carolina Latest Information

Hillary needs to blow it out tonight in Indiana. If she loses, or if she wins by 5 or less points there, I'm guessing she'll be out of this race before June. posted 05/06/2008 at 18:52:36

Paul Krugman: Obama Ad Distorts My Column, He Should Retract It

Krugman should pull his head out of Hillary's ass. She's a loser and he knows it. posted 05/06/2008 at 05:13:22

Indiana, North Carolina Primaries Have Potential To Reshape Competition

Let's keep one extremely important point in mind: both of these states are red states. Indiana has not gone for a Democrat in a national election since 1964. That's why Clinton is campaigning there as a Republican. Neither Democrat will win it in the fall. North Carolina is the same--it's a red state. With its high African-American population, however, there's a slight possibility Obama could make it a swing state in November. Hillary would almost certainly lose there. posted 05/06/2008 at 05:36:46

The Firewall: Obama Wins NC primary

Haven't you heard? Howard Wolfson just declared that North Carolina doesn't count. posted 05/06/2008 at 15:18:58

Questioning Hillary Clinton's 'Victory' in Pennsylvania: The Rush Limbaugh Effect

Indianans haven't gone for a Democrat in a national election since 1964. It's an important state for Hillary, but it's meaningless for the Party. Same with Texas. Hillary is running as a Republican now because it's the only way she can beat Obama. But it's no way to beat McCain. Hillary is a fool and she will lose. And she will deserve to. posted 05/06/2008 at 05:09:30

Memo to Tom Hanks: Barack Obama Is No Harry Truman

A quarter of a million killed. Hillary would beat that by a huge amount. She's shooting for 71 million in Iran. posted 05/06/2008 at 05:11:25

It's Not About Hating Hillary

One other point: I don't think she'd have a chance of winning in the general election anyway. If the superdelegates foolishly give her the nomination, I think we'd be looking at a massive defeat in November. And I believe we'd be looking at protests and marches straight through the convention. posted 05/05/2008 at 18:03:52
"She won't get my vote just because she's the lesser of two evils (and I'm not so sure she is)."

That's my problem too. I don't trust her and I don't believe her. And I'm not convinced that she wouldn't be the worse of two evils. I can't possibly know which things she's said during this campaign are things she means and which are simple pandering. So all I have to go on is what she's done. And what she's done is divide the party and create a lot of rancor among Democrats. And she voted to invade Iraq.

I don't trust her. I don't believe her. I don't like her. And I think she's the greater of two evils. And I can't, under any circumstance, imagine voting for her in November. I can't even stand to hear the sound of her voice. posted 05/05/2008 at 18:00:10
Hillary, however, is not "less than ideal". She is a Republican. She is trying to destroy our party from within. Anyone who believes she has the slightest intention of making good on a single one of her campaign promises hasn't been paying attention. I believe she will make good on one promise, however. I believe she will attack Iran. posted 05/05/2008 at 17:49:48
But it's not just about Barack and Hillary, Seth. It's about an insurgency. It's about taking the power back from those who have done so much damage for so long. It's about taking back the Party from the Clinton/DLC farce that has worked so hard to turn us into something we can no longer believe in. Look at Hillary happily running as a Republican in Indiana, talking about obliterating Iran and writing off economic experts as clueless "elitists" in order to win over Limbaugh's Republicans. I could no more vote for her than I could vote for Joe Lieberman. And she is no more of a Democrat than he is.

The fact is, there is only one alternative in this race, and it is Barack Obama. Personally, if he were to lose the nomination, I would consider my time better spent trying to get him elected as a write-in candidate. There is very little difference between Hillary and John McCain, and whatever difference there is is mostly cosmetic.

Obama MUST be the nominee. If he is not, the Democrats have no nominee this year. posted 05/05/2008 at 17:45:03

GOP Gleeful at Obama rocky period

Obama isn't losing "Reagan Democrats". Hillary is winning Limbaugh Republicans. They won't vote for either Democrat in the fall. Anyone who thinks Indiana is going blue this November is seriously nuts. posted 05/05/2008 at 17:34:00

Spinning? Fine. Spinning AND Lying? Not Cool.

Indiana is a red state. They haven't elected a Democrat in a national election there since 1964. OF COURSE Hillary will win. Obama is a Democrat. posted 05/05/2008 at 15:53:02

Latest Indiana And North Carolina Polling Averages

You realize, of course, that in order to pull off the "nuclear option" Hillary would need to convince the rules committee--the people who WROTE the rules--to allow her to break the rules. Doesn't sound too likely to me either. Thanks for playing, though... posted 05/05/2008 at 02:12:44

Clinton Defections Should Raise Eyebrows

I heard three, but it's good news anyway.

http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/05/obama_picks_up_3_more_illinois.html posted 05/05/2008 at 02:43:50
Take it from me, there's nothing false about my hatred for the Clintons. They're Arkansas scum. posted 05/05/2008 at 02:41:25
You are hallucinating. posted 05/05/2008 at 02:39:35
Not to mention MoveOn.org, which was specifically formed to defend Bill Clinton. posted 05/05/2008 at 02:38:51

Clinton Camp Says It Will Use The Nuclear Option

I agree. No matter who they support, the superdelegates should commit. June will be too late. posted 05/05/2008 at 13:14:22
This is where a little leadership would come in handy. Unfortunately, it's a rare commodity in the Democratic Party these days. The superdelegates should be ashamed of themselves for allowing a red state like Indiana to control what happens in our party. Indiana hasn't gone with a Democratic candidate in a national election since 1964. Who the hell cares what they think? posted 05/05/2008 at 13:03:54
Hillary lies like a man. She's got big, fat lying cojones. Obama? Too reasonable. Too intelligent. We need a lying dumbass in office. Otherwise things would change too much. posted 05/05/2008 at 09:55:20
You really need to educate yourself a bit before you post stuff like this. You have no idea what you're talking about. posted 05/05/2008 at 07:57:26
I just heard Hillary on CNN, lashing out at commodities traders, saying that investors legally trading oil on the open market was somehow similar to Enron traders (in a closed market) manipulating energy prices. This is an incredible statement coming from a presidential candidate, demonstrating a fundamental misunderstanding of the way a free market economy works. Amazing. posted 05/05/2008 at 07:56:05
Let's think about this for a moment, shall we? The Rules and Bylaws Committee are the people who WROTE the rules. And Hillary is going to convince them to allow her to break the rules they came up with? Yeah. Riiigghhht. posted 05/05/2008 at 02:16:50
She has lost my vote. Her irresponsible, hawkish position on Iran makes it impossible for me to vote for her.

She can invoke the nuclear option if she likes. I won't vote for McCain, but if she gets the nomination, I will work very hard to make certain she loses. I refuse to allow another bullet-headed hawk in office. posted 05/04/2008 at 16:07:12

Clinton Defends 'Obliterate Iran' Comment, Obama Calls It Bush-Style 'Cowboy Diplomacy'

Hillary is a hawk. She voted to invade Iraq, and the reason she's never apologized is because she thinks invading was the right decision. If elected, she would most likely launch a military action against Iran. If you want more war, she is a better choice than McCain. McCain is LESS of a hawk than Hillary. posted 05/04/2008 at 14:30:39
Clinton's response was stupid, dangerous and outrageous. As Obama rightly pointed out, the point is moot, since Iran doesn't have nuclear weapons. So Hillary was responding to a hypothetical.

Obama's response is the correct one: he will work to make certain Iran is never in a position to launch a nuclear attack on anyone.

Hillary is Bush with boobs. posted 05/04/2008 at 12:49:35

Clinton Gas Tax Holiday: Hillary Attacks Economists

Is it any wonder they only have one kid, and he went looking elsewhere for his nookie? posted 05/04/2008 at 16:32:47
You're a moron. Exactly the kind of voter Hillary and McCain are fighting over. posted 05/04/2008 at 16:25:19
Clinton is dumpster diving for votes. It's typically a Republican strategy, but she clearly has decided that this is her path to the nomination. Politicians know that a vote is a vote--it doesn't matter if the person voting for you is as dumb as a rock as long as they vote for you.

She's fighting with McCain to see who can be the most hawkish and the most Republican in an effort to lure the lunchbucket crowd into her camp. And when I say lunchbucket crowd, I'm talking about their heads--not the things they use to take their lunch to work. posted 05/04/2008 at 16:23:35

Rove's Next Trick -- If Obama Must Answer For His Minister Now, Just Wait to See What the Republicans Will Do To Clinton Inc. in October

Hillary has already made McCain's case for him and undermined any possibility she had of winning. Not only has he verified his commander-in-chief credentials, she's joined him in the gas tax holiday pander and doubled down on his plan for Iran. While he would merely "bomb, bomb, bomb" she would "obliterate" them. Nice. Real Democratic. Let's burn 65 million innocent men, women and children alive. OK, Hillary--whatever you want. You're the boss. You're always the boss.

Hillary is insane. Certifiably. Insane. posted 05/05/2008 at 01:59:45

Obama wins close race, beats Clinton in Guam

Bill Clinton to the superdelegates: "Hey guys, my wife Hillary would really, really like to be president. See if you can set something up for her, OK? Even though Obama is ahead right now, I think she can still beat him if we just keep hammering away at him. Give her a few more contests, alright? Just let her run until she's destroyed him. Then, if he still wins, she'll concede fair and square. But let her see if she can ruin his chances first. Now that we have the help of the Republicans, I really think we can beat this guy. Thanks a bunch. See ya at the Country Club." posted 05/03/2008 at 14:14:35
That video was doctored and the story is completely untrue. There are legitimate issues to criticize Hillary on, but that isn't one of them. If we lie about her or her campaign, we're no better than they are. posted 05/03/2008 at 14:09:23
Oh, jeez. You're kidding, right? posted 05/03/2008 at 14:08:06
Don't forget--Bayh's Magnaquench memo was just release. This is going to hurt both him and Hillary in Indiana. By Tuesday, I'm hoping the damage will be critical. posted 05/03/2008 at 13:59:41
Hillary is a Trojan Horse for the Republicans. The reason they're not attacking her is because she's doing their work for them. She can't possibly defeat McCain and they know it. But they're happy to let her weaken Obama. posted 05/03/2008 at 13:56:24
In all fairness to Hillary, Obama has said the same thing. The difference, of course, is that he means it. posted 05/03/2008 at 13:54:25
And if she doesn't concede, the superdelegates will begin driving her out. The only person she's helping at this point is McCain. posted 05/03/2008 at 13:51:28
If Hillary loses Indiana, she'll concede on Wednesday. posted 05/03/2008 at 13:48:52
According to Hillary, a win is a win. posted 05/03/2008 at 13:46:45
"Long lines of voters were reported in schools, community centers and other caucus sites that were open for voting all day Saturday."

I heard it was mayhem. 27 people showed up at one caucus site, totally swamping workers. Officials say it may be weeks before all the ballots are counted. posted 05/03/2008 at 13:45:59

Early Indiana turnout heavy in strong Obama counties

"Obama has been on the defensive because of comments by his former pastor, Jeremiah Wright, and his own comments about people in small towns growing bitter."

That's not why Obama is on the defensive. He's on the defensive because he's under full-scale, round-the-clock assault from:

- Hillary Clinton
- Former President Bill Clinton
- John McCain
- The RNC
- The NRCC
- State-level Republicans
- State-level Democrats
- Republican 527s
- Democratic 527s

The fact that he's still standing and holding his own in the face of the millions upon millions of dollars the Clintons and the Republicans are spending to defeat him is a testament to his message and his skill as a candidate. It's too late to beat him now. All Hillary can do is damage him. posted 05/03/2008 at 14:38:37

A Point of Clarification

The thing is, this isn't the first time WVWV has been involved in this. If it was a one-time deal, I'd accept their explanation. As it is, they've got a lot more convincing to do. posted 05/04/2008 at 12:47:28

The Question of Hillary Clinton's Guilt-By-Association Tactics

One point: if we can hold off this massive Clinton/Republican assault against Obama, he will have a very powerful grassroots movement behind him going into the general election. Hillary will have nothing of the sort. She will have her Big Money donors and her "Hillary44" loonies. But NOTHING like the support that Obama has. posted 05/03/2008 at 09:35:23

Fan of

This user isn't a fan of anybody yet!

Bloggers I Like

This user isn't a fan of anybody yet!

Posts this user has commented on

 

 Site  Web ask.com