brantl

What, exactly, would be wrong with Zero Population Growth? Negative Population Growth would be even better. posted 05/16/2008 at 10:01:51

George may have backed the wrong person in this race, but he proves again that he is an honorable man, and by no means lacking in intelligence. posted 04/25/2008 at 15:02:09

I was working in the McGovern campaign at the time, and I don't think that's true. I think Nixon smeared McGovern and the same fear tactics were used. But I don't think that anybody 'let' them paint MdGovern as too far to the left, I think the country was willfully ignorant at that time. posted 04/25/2008 at 14:53:47

Find me a serious journalist, and I'll bet Obama has already been interviewed by them. Hell, I can name you a bunch of non-serious journalists he's been interviewed by, who pretend to be real journalists. posted 04/22/2008 at 12:36:23

Awfully bright clown, if that's all he is. posted 04/22/2008 at 12:33:28

He won Texas, though. posted 04/21/2008 at 13:12:39

BC did so wonderfully well, schilling to the right and screwing the party over. I forgot how great that was. posted 04/21/2008 at 13:08:43

What history of Hillary Clinton shows that she's "more than competant"? Because I haven't seen any of that. The only real history she's brought up is her trip to Bosnia, and if she wasn't doing hallucinogenic drugs at the time, there's a pretty good argument for her having early onset Alheimer's, in that case. posted 04/21/2008 at 13:04:19

I've seen Blowreally several times; after 4-5 fallacies (that I knew for a fact were fallacises) I have turned him off. He has seldom lasted more than 1-2 minutes and then, only when he had a guest. I don't have any good reason to listen/watch O'lielly. posted 04/16/2008 at 13:35:53

The Michigan Democratic Party bigwigs screwed Michigan democrats, I know, I am one. And the majority Republican congress in Florida screwed the Florida Democratic Party and the Florida democrats. If Hillary had had to stand up to Obama in a one on one primary, in MIchigan, I think she would have lost. I don't know that, but I suspect it. If she had had to come clean on the NAFTA crap, I'm sure of it. And I think it's crap that the parties stuck it to the people, but Hillary agreed to it, and should abide by her agreements. Doesn't that bother the Hillary supporters that she's flip-flopped on this, and the opportunism that represents? posted 04/08/2008 at 13:49:10

Please, stop writing in all caps. It's functional shouting.And use some punctuation, please. And then, please start making sentences that make sense in English. Voter is destroying your party? This would mean what, precisely? And leftist commmands have destroyed the party long ago, means what, exactly. If you're not deluded, you're certainly cryptic. posted 04/08/2008 at 12:28:49

"Obama the blank slate", did you just read that or did you actually check out his record. Did you know that he got a bill through the Illinois Congress that got a unanimous vote in the Senate for taping police interviews, and got police support for it as well? Bet you didn't. I frankly don't think you know much about Obama. I know a lot about Hillary, and I don't like it much. So, I'll take what you call "Obama's blank slate", both knowing it's not blank, and knowing it's good over Hillary's trash-filled slate, any day you like.

She voted for an anit-flag burning amendment. When this is anything other than pandering to the right, you let me know, OK? She voted to loose Bush's leash with the AUMF; stupid, but she was triangulating at the time, wasn't she? "I was mislead", she says; funny lot's of other people were better informed than her just by reading McClatchey newspapers, and if she doesn't have people on her staff that keep up with all the papers, then she's less competant or a hell of a lot less thorough than I'd like to elect president. And the NAFTA stuff that has supposedly besmirched Obama's honesty? It has come to light that the story was misreported from the outset, it was someone from the Clinton camp who was saying that the anti-Nafta rethoric was only campaigning, not anyone in the Obama camp. Hillary Clinton, hypocrit. posted 04/02/2008 at 08:17:32

Hallelujah! posted 04/01/2008 at 17:07:52

Wake up much, Dishwithdi? posted 04/02/2008 at 07:44:04

Yeah, that's the ticket, they were metaphorical bullets..........yeah, yeah, thats the ticket. posted 04/01/2008 at 16:34:48

Batshit, and Obama's ahead in the delegate count, too. Mr. Press needs to fact check himself. posted 04/01/2008 at 16:50:49

And if you're going to call him an anit-american preacher, you need more evidence than you've shown, or than anybody else has, Joe. I expected you to exercise your mind a little more thoroughly than you seem to have done. posted 03/26/2008 at 15:53:03

Joe Wilson: this just goes to show that you can respect one person's opinion on a lot of stuff, and they can be full of crap about something/someone else. Hillary's been lying (being shot at, made peace in Ireland, etc.) and Barak has only hit her with her actual positions, which she's tried to weasel out of. I wish you much luck and I commend your service, but I think you're clearly dead wrong here, Joe and the evidence agrees with me. posted 03/26/2008 at 15:51:27

Giving her the biggest benefit of the doubt, which would be that she misremembered this, you have the following problems. She hasn't been shot at before that so called remembrance, or since. Now, that being the case, do you want a person with this kind of memory in the White House? Sounds waaaay too much like the dry drunk we have now, to me........ posted 03/25/2008 at 09:53:25