Until last month, Jason Burnett was a high-ranking political appointee at...
The Hill reports that Democratic Congressman Henry Waxman is considering legislation that would...
Jenny McCarthy struts her stuff in a sexy black swimsuit...
NEW YORK - Sex crime has a telltale signature, even when those directing the outrages are some...
Barack Obama should not move, or even appear to be moving, toward right-wing views...
John McCain, aided and abetted by his loving protectors in...
Verne Troyer's ex-girlfriend and sex tape co-star Ranae Shrider spoke to News Of The World about...
Lara Logan is pregnant and will marry the father of her baby, Joe Burkett, the...
For months, a sense of dread has been percolating within Republican circles over potentially...
"Gracefulness has been defined as the outward expression of the inward harmony of the soul," wrote...
In the wake of Barack Obama's recent perceived move to the center,...
One coffee drinker's bad news is another coffee drinker's good news,...
Back in the day, a band spent someone else's money - to record, to live on - so yes, nothing was given without a hitch. Nowadays the advances in technology (recording, internet, manufacturing and otherwise) have made it truly possible for anyone to create music, does that give us "better' music? Is "more" really a better option in this case?
Don't get me wrong, The Major Record Label is as much a dinosaur as a Tyrannosaurus Rex, or Emerson Lake and Palmer. But the sheer volume of music being produced and now available is the death of Rock-n-Roll. It's not elitist, it's overwhelming. It's incomprehensible, and it won't get heard. Does anyone really think this could go on forever?
Rock is Dead. Long Live Rock! posted 03/31/2008 at 11:46:29