k8k9

i'm so very happy for Keith to have received the finest Billo fodder of his career. i bet that long-saved bottle of Dom he put aside for a special occasion was tapped last night. congratulations Keith. may you live long and prosper. posted 05/16/2008 at 14:57:41

like my ex too posted 05/14/2008 at 17:55:14

hast thou nothing else to say gorillaman? thou art starting to sound like the missing link! posted 05/14/2008 at 17:52:50

what the flock? posted 05/14/2008 at 17:48:07

thank you! posted 05/14/2008 at 17:46:06

please o please don't even utter those thoughts about Obama's safety. stay positive. if we dwell on the negative, it has a far better chance of happening. i don't mean to sound all woo-woo or anything, but being "enlightenedly" positive never hurt a thing. and besides, security today is vastly improved over the "olden" days.

Obama - rah rah. he's as good as elected. posted 05/14/2008 at 17:42:53

o god say it ain't so. we would scarcely handle that. posted 05/14/2008 at 17:31:39

and you are . . .? posted 05/14/2008 at 17:24:27

just a quick question . . . . what on earth are you doing here on this chest-beating-joke site? posted 05/14/2008 at 16:51:19

OK, now I get it.

But if it didn't say "Hillary '08", the humor would have been a little more detectable posted 05/14/2008 at 16:21:53

Obama has won more popular, delegate, and now superdelagate votes. you might want to check either your math or your sources. posted 05/14/2008 at 15:34:33

too bad about her dishonesty. her "efforts" are for herself. posted 05/14/2008 at 15:30:19

and who are the Americans who do not matter? posted 05/14/2008 at 15:29:11

so well said. i share your perspective. posted 05/14/2008 at 15:28:04

She may be saying to herself that if she doesn't win the nomination it won't be because she didn't try everything in the book. Only problem is that the book is missing a few chapters, including "How to Be Successful in Life Without Selling Out Your Own Party." posted 05/08/2008 at 22:23:36

then what r u doing here? posted 05/06/2008 at 22:08:24

u just crack me the hell up, Bob Cesca posted 05/06/2008 at 19:51:40

would somone PLEASE tell beedy eyes joe to get the hell off my tv screen? i mean when was the last time you saw a person's mouth only as wide as his nose is wide? he creeps me out anymore. plus, i'm still waiting for that on-air apology from him to Rachel for his on-air temper tantrum last week.

how is MSNBC declaring a PA winner when only 12% of the vote is counted? posted 04/22/2008 at 21:20:01

yeah. i hope Tom doesn't have to break in again to tell the drooling boy to keep his mouth shut about declaring a winner. posted 04/22/2008 at 21:03:29

is it just me or is it odd that Keith let HRC's non-answer answers go unchallenged in tonight's interview? odder still was that he waited until afterward, while speaking with Richard Wolfe to scrutinize her answers. hm-m-m-m-m. posted 04/22/2008 at 00:10:11

how do you figure you have facts at your disposal but Dan does not? posted 04/21/2008 at 19:00:38

and you are? posted 04/21/2008 at 18:59:09

i'll 2nd, 3rd, and 4th that notion. if they'd check egos at the door (hosts and guests) and share ideas as Keith and Russert do, I'd be far more inclined to watch the others. glad i'm not the only one noticing this. posted 04/21/2008 at 18:56:15

then is it still true that what goes around comes around? posted 04/21/2008 at 18:49:36

2nd thought - if rove isn't convicted until one minute past bush's departure he can't be pardoned, right? posted 04/21/2008 at 16:39:13

ditto posted 04/21/2008 at 16:36:15

lol posted 04/21/2008 at 16:32:13

Bravo!!!!!!! Great job, Buddy!!!!!!!!! He made a big mistake writing to you - his arrogance has driven him to prick a hole in his executive power bubble and left the door open for you to stay on this until every single disgraceful DOJ travesty, not the least of which, the firing of those attorneys, has been answered and the guilty are in jail . . . for a long ass time. Dan, don't fail me now. Promise you'll stay on this!! Tell us tonight on your show that you'll stay all over it? posted 04/21/2008 at 16:30:28

here here posted 04/21/2008 at 15:40:47

Enjoyed reading your post.

I'm stumped by somthing of late. I'm not clear why Obama's approval rating in the last debate is so low. He participated, as always, from a place of integrity. He was respectful of his opponent and tried to steer TOWARD the issues - apples to apples - instead of engaging in the negative volleyball of classic politics. Clinton just attacks. Instead of selling her positions in their own rite, not one sentence comes out of her mouth that doesn't slam Obama - including twisting at least one fact to suit her point. She's been doing this for so long he now has to respond in kind just to show he still has a pulse. How did he answer the "tough" questions poorly? He explained that ABC's line of questioning, which has been criticized now by many, is exactly the kind of time-wasting he's been discouraging throughout his campaign. Clinton wanted to stay negative and ABC helped her do just that - not that it was their intention, they"re just as entrenched in politics-as-usual. The media wants a dog fight, but Obama just doesn"t play that. The Democrats want honesty and integrity in a president this time around, but they want to see blood before they"ll vote. posted 04/21/2008 at 15:23:43

your post is kind, but i believe a little naïve. someone with hillary's intellect, knowledge of the system, and "experience to take over day-one and at 3:00 AM thereafter" should be far more clear-headed during her campaign. going into this "knowing" she would win was foolish. tantruming and playing dirty pool throughout is not the level of integrity or wisdom we need to take over as president. after 8 years of the deceitful, ruthless bush admin, what we need is a high level of integrity to take over. posted 04/19/2008 at 14:55:42

you sure don't give voters much credit posted 04/19/2008 at 14:40:32

yo phro, i don't know what color glasses you're looking through, but MoveOn is not a government organizations. It should and does represent who and what its donors favor. posted 04/19/2008 at 14:33:59

so well said! posted 04/19/2008 at 14:29:13

nope! she won't stop at anything and we aren't at the convention yet. she should be ashamed and hopefully this country is at least starting to see her for what she is. posted 04/19/2008 at 14:24:29

you're not posted 04/18/2008 at 19:32:05

i wish she'd just haul off and smack him upside the head. posted 04/18/2008 at 19:29:03

yeah, but then i can't watch because i go to work too early. wouldn't it be even better if she was on in the evening? she's pretty dang cool!!!!!!!!!!! she's earned her own show on MSNBC posted 04/18/2008 at 19:23:44

Joe's a spoiled brat. Mika was hired because of her willingness to allow him to walk all over her and at times to make a fool of her. Rachel is a bright and classy commentor. She doesn't stoop to Joe's level. Imagine!!! A grown man. Stomping off the show becuase someone wouldn't allow him to walk all over her. Silly, silly boy. posted 04/18/2008 at 19:17:15

well said posted 04/09/2008 at 14:33:56

this time it might be something . . . . .oh, i don't know . . . maybe something like the sun was in her eyes? yeah, that's the ticket. posted 04/05/2008 at 22:27:23

wow we need all the clintonistas to see this posted 04/05/2008 at 22:25:44

it's a disaster alright - but it is illegal to turn down care for anyone who shows up at an emergency room. plain and simple. and of course as it turned out, ms. bachtel was indeed treated. if hrc had done her homework (which I'd foolishly assumed she'd done when she worked on the entire healthcare system) she'd have known that what she was told and what she subsequently relayed publicly was a "misspeak," as she is known to call her lies. posted 04/05/2008 at 22:13:02

oh my god whoever you are.................wake up, smell the coffee, smack yourself on the cheek - make sure you're awake.

there is a distinct and moral difference between rising again to a place of integrity by your own merit and stepping all over people to reach a place where you THINK you deserve to be despite whom it hurts. i have a strong suspicion that Maya Angelou would not have appreicated the use of her poem in support of such a woman who does not brand herself with integrity. posted 04/04/2008 at 14:21:48

Had her "landing under sniper fire" recount been a one-time "misspeak," (instead she was videoed "misspeaking" the same thing 3 times during this campaign) and had she not prefaced each "misstatement" with, "I remember when . . .," I may have given her the benefit of the doubt, albeit begrudgingly. However, it is clear that she attempted to get away with her Bosnia "misstatement" while attempting to shore up her claim to a multitude of 3:00 AM experience. Had she encountered a number of (or any) sniper-embroiled events - with her daughter in tow - I dare say she'd remember quite clearly.

Now to come on television with one goal, to joke her way out of her "misspeak," while potentially offending America's intelligence, is proof that her judgment, experience, and integrity are quite lacking. I can't say, "shame on ya, Hillary," anymore - now I'm just embarrassed for her and the people who will continue to support her anyway. This is precisely how America continues to vote into presidential office amoral people like Bush. It's just blind, ignorant loyalty. I never was for Hillary; tolerating her husband's infidelity all of these years, thus allowing her daughter to grow up believing that she too is not worth more than tolerating a husband"s emotional abuse is proof enough of a lack of judgment and loyalty. It's still Obama all the way. We just have to hope there are more voters out there who esteem integrity over blind loyalty! posted 04/04/2008 at 07:59:31

well out Cynde! posted 04/04/2008 at 07:13:15

lol posted 04/01/2008 at 21:29:32

i'll second that posted 04/01/2008 at 21:31:48

sorry, but i can't hear anyone (much less us "short-sighted persons") asking you for any of your time. why are you here? posted 04/01/2008 at 21:56:23

love your name! posted 04/01/2008 at 21:52:54

lol posted 04/01/2008 at 21:49:38

jerk posted 04/01/2008 at 21:40:05

Nice job, Mr. Olbermann! And I love how you snuck in there at the end that walmart should also pay her for her and her husband's emotional trauma from all of this. You rock, Dude! posted 04/01/2008 at 21:37:12

don't stop now, Keith! walmart could have picked up the tab and paid back the insurance company FOR Ms. Shank - if for no other reason than her son lost his life in Iraq to protect employees of walmart and the insurnace company. keep at 'em. posted 04/01/2008 at 16:11:17

my very thought posted 03/31/2008 at 20:57:09

hello? anybody in there? posted 03/31/2008 at 20:46:01

! posted 03/31/2008 at 20:42:34

but, liz, you're assuming that the 2004 election was actually won by repubs! i still doubt that katherine harris was entirely honest about the true voting results. here in sarasota, florida, from whence she came, she has a reputation for slithering up the ladder.

the american people were pretty slow to realize just how amoral bush et al could be, but a sad lot lot we are not. posted 03/31/2008 at 20:40:49

Shame on you, MSNBC!!!! I heard the first version and the boos were unmistakable. In this version, the boos are barely audible. Who took that phone call? Shame on you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And Chris, despite your moronic views on some stuff, you'd be a lot more respected if you'd stop drooling. Doesn't anyone ever tell this guy what these posts say? posted 03/31/2008 at 20:02:54

lol posted 03/31/2008 at 19:52:55

a little projection there, Chris? posted 03/31/2008 at 19:48:05

well said

we oughta be voting for the best human for the job - the one who displays integrity even when it isn't popular. she's not the one, folks. posted 04/03/2008 at 10:28:01

i look at it as yet another means to an end . . . becoming president . . . she figured she needed him as a prop in her campaign. posted 03/26/2008 at 17:04:10

oh god how i wish that were so. i've certainly had enough practice. but it takes both barrels to work. posted 03/26/2008 at 15:36:10

here here posted 03/26/2008 at 15:33:16

touche posted 03/26/2008 at 15:23:00

bob, that lit another much-needed flame under me and by-george. . . .er. . . . bob, as soon as i get my allowance i'm making another obama contribution. anyone care to join me? posted 03/26/2008 at 16:45:37

i'll 2nd that Trini! i used to respect the woman, even though I knew I wouldn"t vote for her. But her true colors have come through in spades now. she's a wombat going after her prey (those vying for the coveted presidentship)! for her, it may be more about principle now. she just can't handle the idea of losing - without regard for whom it hurts or whether she, herself, is best suited to successfully bring the US back to being a respectable entity in this world. she's had a 30+ year plan and by god . . . nothing is going to stand in her way of reaching it. a dangerous brew!!!!!!! posted 03/26/2008 at 16:38:11

no. i don't think race relations is the most important issue in this election. but the thing is. . . neith does obama. but his competition - you know . . .hrc? she keeps kicking up racial dust in his face and he has to respond, lest people assume she is right. kind of a catch-22, eh? posted 03/26/2008 at 16:13:51

yeah!!!!!!!! really!!!!!!!!!!!!!! posted 03/26/2008 at 15:57:57

that's a ReasonableThought? i think not. posted 03/26/2008 at 15:55:31

lovely, well done. thank you! posted 03/26/2008 at 15:51:57

you're just not seeing the whole picture, N. obama is not the rev. the rev is not obama. he's slammed the rev's comments. what else can he do? i for one am impressed that obama didn't throw out the baby (the rev) with the bath water. that is integrity. that is what we need in a leader of this country. not someone (hrc) who will do anything it takes to be president (like aligning herself with the "enemy" - mccain), even if it lacks integrity. she is missing the point here. it's about what the american people want, not what she wants - aren't you sick to death of that yet? she keeps trying to change the rules mid-stream in order to grab more votes instead of allowing the votes to speak for themselves. that's not integrity and it shows just what kind of president she would be - doing what she wants, not necessarily what the american people want. and if that isnt enough, her husband scares the shit out of me. don't kid yourself, it would be a hillbill preseidency and he's also shown his true self - a philanderer who will lie to the world in order to save his own butt. that's not integrity and that's not we need. posted 03/22/2008 at 10:21:23

i agree posted 03/22/2008 at 10:06:08

excellent. now do a positive one about obama, please? posted 03/21/2008 at 13:42:29