Please wait, your request is processed...

kbrown

Recent comments by this user

NAFTA-Gate Probe To Be Made Public

In fact, the story was corrected weeks ago that it was not Clinton.

http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5gNMJKvj5eQRQBNSeQj3bTyETSagQ

And, Obama admited that the conversation with Canadian officals took place (after he denied it 3-4 times), so what is everyone griping about? This report is just detailing the nature of the leak. posted 03/27/2008 at 22:34:10

Clinton Campaign Stands By Harsh Letter To Pelosi

Excellent point, dibby. If the superdelegates are just suppose to rubber stamp the pledged delegate the rule would be "whoever gets the more pledged delegates, wins." In fact, no one even heard of this "follow the pledged delegate" standard for supers until Obama started winning the pledged delegates. All of a sudden that has become a democratic standard for validity of a nominee. The Democrats have had this superdelegate system since 1984 and the supers ALWAYS go with their own best judgment. Suggesting that it should be otherwise is completely breaking the rules, and interestingly, most of the time its touted by the same people who claim that Hillary "will steal the election" by trying to get FL and MI a fair re-vote. Such hypocrisy. posted 03/27/2008 at 22:52:47

Reuters: "Somebody Forgot To Tell Hillary Clinton The Democratic Presidential Race Is Over And Barack Obama Won"

Comments like this are insulting to all the millions of voters that haven't voted yet. And, its also extremely dismissive to the choice of millions of voters that have already voted for Senator Clinton. Everyone insists that Hillary staying in the race is about her "need to win at all costs" - well, in fact, there are millions of people who want her to stay in. Out of 27 million voters, there only 700,000 more people who want Senator Obama to win. That is not a big difference. And, if you count FL and MI in that number (because even though their delegates don't count, people's individual votes can be used for this purpose), there are only 94,000 people more who want Senator Obama to win. I guess it just so happens that those 94,000 all seem to be employed by all the media and to be the regular bloggers. So, let the rest of the folks have their say and back off!! posted 03/27/2008 at 22:47:09

What Can You Ask Chelsea Clinton? Rachel Sklar on MSNBC's "Verdict" With Dan Abrams

Hillary has addressed this Lewinsky issue a million times. She's written about it, she's talked about it. What does every one want from her? Even if the debates, she addressed this as one of most challenging times. Even on the Tyra Banks interview, she talked about it and responded to how she deals with women who talk to her about their husbands cheating on them. Why can't everyone just move on. posted 03/27/2008 at 22:56:08

Time for Superdelegates to Ratify Obama's Insurmountable Pledged Delegate Lead and Settle the Democratic Nomination

Hillary did not provoke racist animosity. She was asked a question about Rev. Wright. She originally took the high road and did not exploit the situation UNTIL the Obama campaign released a photo of Rev. Wright and Bill Clinton. After that, she had every right to respond that Wright would not be her personal pastor. Obama has played politics just as much as Clinton has. If anyone doesn't see that, you have blinders on for your "messiah." Since last year, he has made the following personal attacks against her: "disingenuous," "divisive," "untruthful," "dishonest," "polarizing," "calculating," "saying whatever it takes to win," "attempting to deceive the American people," "one of the most secretive in America," "deliberately misleading," "literally willing to do anything to win," and "playing politics with war." For all of you who think its Hillary tearing the party apart, I think you should look at your own candidate. Unlike her, he's claiming to be "above Washington politics" and not wanting "to tear people down." Yeah, right. posted 03/26/2008 at 18:15:15

Popular Stories on HuffPost