May 13, 2008
Please wait, your request is processed...
ndolomar
Recent comments by this user
Clinton Supporters Send Last-Ditch Obama Attack Emails To Supers
Since when did democracy amount to a political "protection racket"? It's a self-fulfilling prophecy: If the hordes of Clinton's supporters who threaten to vote for McCain if Obama is the nominee will by default cause a McCain presidency. Same standard for some of Obama's lifelong Democratic supporters who threaten to vote Republican for the first time if he's not the nominee. Are you people on acid? The mere fact that these people are so wrapped up in a person rather than the bigger picture of a country's well-being is very disturbing. Either they are not familiar with the concept of "cutting one's nose off to spite his face," or they're sado-masochists hoping to drag the rest of us down with their delusional pursuit of self-punishment. posted 05/09/2008 at 19:27:04
Will Obama Win Enough White Votes to Beat McCain?
Funny, huh, ebb. The party that boasts the biggest support from African-Americans happens to have among its most-cherished elite people who are insulting that base more than Republicans ever have...at least, openly. posted 05/08/2008 at 20:12:14
The $3 Trillion Shopping Spree
That dollar figure frankly just is too high to comprehend for many people. It's one thing to hear that a CEO or celebrity or rare painting is worth a massive amount of money, because we're so disconnected from those things that it only generates a sense of awe (and perhaps jealousy) to know their worth. However, the devastation from the Iraq occupation and war in the Middle East -- not only in monetary terms, but also in lives lost -- approaches us on such a personal level that it's impossible to fathom, so instead we distance ourselves from it (much like a painful memory). It's sad we have to put in perspective the toll of the Iraq War essentially by "dumbing it down" to a consumer level: "Yes, but how many PlayStations does it equal?" Hopefully more people will visit 3trillion.org if that's the only way to make this plight more potable to those who'd rather wish it away. It's sad that it takes a site like this to get the message out; but, if it's the best we can do for now, well... posted 05/08/2008 at 18:52:54
Clinton: Obama Not Winning Over "Hard-Working Americans, White Americans"
Wow -- even before reading this I still was open to supporting her campaign just as strongly if she won the nomination. However, with these true colors revealed, I'm left with many questions: what open-minded and intelligent Democrat cannot find anything offensive in how she's saying what she is saying? Why aren't more people bugged by this? What the h**l is Maggie Williams getting for her soul?
The politics of division indeed. posted 05/08/2008 at 19:17:01
The politics of division indeed. posted 05/08/2008 at 19:17:01
Ed Koch: Obama Is A Sure Loser, Clinton Should Fight On
How's this for logic? The sermon in question weren't being made for 20 years, because Sept. 11 didn't happen 20 years ago -- it happened in 2001. For all we know, the Rev. Wright was lauding the American government and the Clinton Administration for how much it helped African-Americans achieve. Am I the only one who sees this refusal to do some critical thinking on the part of those who are bound and determined to crucify Sen. Obama because his former pastor said some heated things? Please also explain why there's not nearly the same amount of coverage for Hagee and Parsley? posted 05/07/2008 at 19:59:27
After the Festival, the Celebration
As if the damage to New Orleans has not been staggering enough, it now has been reported that the Corps is using newspaper to repair the levees. Engineers. Hurricane levees. Biodegradable newspaper. Pardon my incredulity, but that's un-effing-believable. posted 05/06/2008 at 17:20:44
Study: Media Covered Wright More Than Clinton Last Week
What's so incredibly funny and so alarmingly sad is that the Rev. Wright is a supporter of Sen. Clinton's. He has been since the beginning -- which, I'm sure in addition to the reverend's "fiery" speeches, is why he has not been a part of Obama's campaign. Wright has known the Clinton's (publicly) for about 10 years. He was invited by then-President Clinton to counsel the couple after the little "Lewinsky" incident, and he has been a strong advocate of the Clintons' ever since. For those of us who have taken the time to find this out, it was of no surprise when Wright made his harsh statements about Obama at the National Press Club and elsewhere, because we are aware of what the media aren't telling you. Wright has no problem saying anything negative about Obama, because he knows it will help his preferred candidate, Sen. Clinton. But, even as I type this, I'm certain you'll never find this out -- not from the mainstream media, at least -- because as soon as everyone is aware that Wright supports Clinton, a motive will be established, the public no longer will care, the issues will be forced to the front and center, and this race may end quickly. That would be a very bad thing for corporate media. posted 05/06/2008 at 16:07:50
North Carolina, Indiana Primaries: Full Results, Exit Polls
I'm more curious to see the media spin on this. When Clinton expectedly won PA and Ohio, she apparently "trounced" and "crushed" Obama -- when he closed her large percentage-point gaps (and with the case in Texas, actually won more delegates). Will tomorrow's headlines read: "Obama Deals Clinton Agonizing Blow, Comes Close in Indiana"? Or, and this likely is the case, will they read: "Obama Wins NC, Clinton Maintains Momentum in Indiana"?
And to think, I wanted to be a journalist. posted 05/06/2008 at 20:30:42
And to think, I wanted to be a journalist. posted 05/06/2008 at 20:30:42
Calling For Obama
People, if there's anything we leave this election year with, please let it be an understanding and newfound respect for community activism. While we read about it in our local weeklies or know a friend who knows a friend who participates or read the pamphlets in our stores and clinics --- this is empirical evidence of what happens when people take action. Giving money is great, as is spreading the word on message boards, but there's nothing more rewarding for any candidate or cause than the interaction on a personal level. Regardless who wins the nomination, we all should feel lucky to have witnessed the power of community activism, and we should find a way to exercise it whenever possible -- whether for a political candidate or for a nearby homeless shelter. This primary season's silver lining is that it gave those who donate a glimpse of what their dollars help do (and maybe makes them want to be more physically involved); for those of us already in community service, it just makes us smile to have shared with you what we do. posted 05/06/2008 at 19:44:53
Will Hillary Repeal the Clinton Gas Tax?
The passage of the bill in Illinois was much more likely, because the state does not have the Bush administration running it. There is no guarantee that a windfall-profits tax would work -- and Sens. Clinton and McCain know this, so does Sen. Obama. However, Obama is speaking from experience and from common sense: Of the myriad attempts to pass a tax on oil companies, Bush repeatedly has threatened to veto any legislation calling for such, and there's no way the bill would make it to his desk anyway. Sen. Clinton regrettably and quietly had to admit this earlier today, stating she knows it would be "very difficult" to pass such legislation, and we're not talking about something for next year -- we're talking about this summer. For all their denigrating of the concept of hope, she and her campaign certainly have a lot of it built up for the passage of a bill to tax oil companies' profits. So, if you're keeping score: Clinton hoped Al Gore would be president; she was wrong and NY jobs were lost. Clinton hoped Bush would not use military force in Iraq; she was wrong, and now over a million Iraqis and over 4,100 U.S. troops are dead. She hopes to tax oil profits in order to replace the funds she wants to use for a gas-tax holiday; the House effectively let the gas-tax holiday plan die. Pandering or no, her legislative track record should be scrutinized. posted 05/06/2008 at 20:49:04
Open Letter to Michael Moore
Dear Paul,
I share your sentiment and am torn at my wanting Obama (or his surrogates) to bring it up, but knowing the reason he doesn't (and they don't) is the exact reason I prefer his candidacy.
*On a side note, I loved copy editing your columns when I was at AVN, and it's good to see you here on HuffPo. posted 05/05/2008 at 19:47:42
I share your sentiment and am torn at my wanting Obama (or his surrogates) to bring it up, but knowing the reason he doesn't (and they don't) is the exact reason I prefer his candidacy.
*On a side note, I loved copy editing your columns when I was at AVN, and it's good to see you here on HuffPo. posted 05/05/2008 at 19:47:42
John And Elizabeth Edwards: What Do They Like (And Dislike) About Dem Candidates?
Former Sen. Edwards served one term, from 1999 - 2005, when he decided to run for president. Of all the candidates, he had the least amount of "experience," and not much of a Senate track record. Nevertheless, the media and some voters have been falling over themselves trying to get his "expert" opinion or nail him down on an endorsement. Since when does the least-experienced candidate suddenly have the nations pulse under his finger? Kucinich was oodles more populist than Edwards, Richardson has eons more diplomatic experience and both Sens. Clinton and Obama have more legislative experience than Edwards. Now, I have my own theory why he's suddenly been deemed the validator for this primary, but I'll let the other posters put forth their own suggestions. posted 05/05/2008 at 18:38:25
Clinton "Elite" Bashing A Shift For Campaign That Regularly Celebrates Experts
It's simple, Will: Experts don't poll well among the un-elite (read: uneducated, based on media standards). posted 05/05/2008 at 18:31:18
Gas Tax Holiday? Who's the Real Elitist?
Bloggers, pundits and posters alike should be asking the obvious: If it were such a great idea for consumers and such a bad idea for oil companies, why have we not heard a single peep from the oil companies about how this is a bad idea? Dig my ad hoc flowchart:
1. lower the tax
2.a. demand increases 2.b. funds siphoned from infrastructure savings
3.a. supplies decrease 3.b. infrastructure jobs lost because of lack of funds
4.a. lower supply leads to price increase above 18% 4.b. because of lost jobs and price increases, people unable to afford gas.
5. oil companies rake in profits of 18% and higher, thanks to the gas-tax holiday.
The MSM has equated "elite" with "educated," and some voters aren't keen enough to recognize that this dig at Sen. Obama's supporters actually insults the people who AREN'T voting for him, by insinuating they're not smart (the college vote). The same blue-collar workers voting for Sen. Clinton and saving their hard-earned money are hoping to send their kids to college. Is getting educated becoming "elite"? Isn't this the goal for everyone in America? Indiana and North Carolina, unlike mainstream media talking heads, we KNOW you're intelligent, and we hope you recognize just how you are being played by a media that want this primary to continue so you can continue to pay more to media's corporate owners. Prove us right; prove the media wrong. posted 05/05/2008 at 17:33:44
1. lower the tax
2.a. demand increases 2.b. funds siphoned from infrastructure savings
3.a. supplies decrease 3.b. infrastructure jobs lost because of lack of funds
4.a. lower supply leads to price increase above 18% 4.b. because of lost jobs and price increases, people unable to afford gas.
5. oil companies rake in profits of 18% and higher, thanks to the gas-tax holiday.
The MSM has equated "elite" with "educated," and some voters aren't keen enough to recognize that this dig at Sen. Obama's supporters actually insults the people who AREN'T voting for him, by insinuating they're not smart (the college vote). The same blue-collar workers voting for Sen. Clinton and saving their hard-earned money are hoping to send their kids to college. Is getting educated becoming "elite"? Isn't this the goal for everyone in America? Indiana and North Carolina, unlike mainstream media talking heads, we KNOW you're intelligent, and we hope you recognize just how you are being played by a media that want this primary to continue so you can continue to pay more to media's corporate owners. Prove us right; prove the media wrong. posted 05/05/2008 at 17:33:44
Obama Proposes Gas-bag Holiday
I went to college to get a good education and secure gainful employment. I guess, because of that and because I understand Sen. Obama's campaign, I'm an elitist. The MSM and Clinton's campaign have equated intelligence, and the pursuit of it and happiness (which, to most constitutional scholars would appear frighteningly constitutional) as an "elitist" characteristic. This, in turn, characterizes supporters of Clinton and McCain as non-elitist, or, unintelligent. I'm not sure when we turned the bus around for the race to the bottom, but if that's the case, perhaps we should just get rid of schools altogether. posted 05/05/2008 at 17:45:29
Overwhelming Majority See Gas Tax Suspension As Political Ploy
Here's the rub, and it's pretty simple: If the gas-tax holiday were such a great idea for consumers and such a bad idea for the oil companies, why haven't you heard so much as a peep of indifference about this from Shell, Mobile, Exxon, BP, et al? If the "bad guy" isn't screaming "it's not fair," that should be clue No. 1 for most levelheaded people. posted 05/05/2008 at 13:34:12
Clinton Camp Says It Will Use The Nuclear Option
Most women who've been cheated on get a new car, a diamond ring, perhaps even a European vacation... I don't know what Bill promised her, but Miss Lewinsky & Co. were highly undervalued 10 years ago. posted 05/05/2008 at 17:21:12
Why Oprah Left Reverend Jeremiah Wright's Church
So, will this constant news coverage of a FORMER -- RETIRED -- NO LONGER PREACHING pastor who chose poor words to tell what essentially is an opinion held by many people across the country do anything to lower our gas prices and bring my friend's brother (and others) back from Iraq? I don't think so -- and the more the media and some bloggers harp on this, I begin to fear we've dumbed down to irreconsilable levels. However, please don't start posting your anger when the media begins playing endless loops of Sen. McCain supporter Rev. Hagee's hate-filled speech, or Sen. Clinton's "misremembered" adventures in Bosnia. None of this "news" is helping with very real situations; it's just giving people excuses to post anti-Obama/pro-Clinton/pro-McCain talking points. When we return to discussing real, non-tabloid issues, please get back to me. posted 05/05/2008 at 16:23:15
Carville: If Hillary Gave Obama "One Of Her Cojones, They'd Both Have Two"
According to Carville, it's more like "testicular three-titude." posted 05/06/2008 at 13:52:04
I'm open to embracing all kinds of people, regardless of race, gender, orientation, education level and whatnot. However, I have to draw the line at a woman with three testicles, that's just a little too alien for even myself. < / snark> posted 05/06/2008 at 13:48:09
Actor Tom Hanks Endorses Barack Obama
You've just outed yourself as uninformed...sadly. As someone whose father abandoned him and his sister to be raised by, first, a single mother (on food stamps), then by his grandparents, only to be indebted to student loans until fewer than 10 years ago, Obama probably relates to your American experience a lot more than you think. However, if it's still easier to think of him as "elite" (read: uppity) when compared to someone who was raised in wealth and in the past seven years earned more than 10 times what Obama and his wife earned, or to to someone who married into a multi-billion-dollar beer inheritance, then by all means, consider Obama "elite." It's unfortunate you've bought this reversal attack line that was so successful when used by Bush against McCain and John Kerry, when heroism in Vietnam suddenly became a "bad" thing. It's more saddening than angering when people succumb to this, especially because these tactics are targeted toward people who likely believe whatever talking point is loudest, rather than correct. posted 05/05/2008 at 14:12:06
Operation Anti-Chaos: The Narrative on "White Voters" Is Fiction
Please enlighten me, father of Pete:
How does a biracial man quack? posted 05/05/2008 at 17:48:44
How does a biracial man quack? posted 05/05/2008 at 17:48:44
Barack Obama On Late Show With David Letterman: "Top 10 Surprising Things About Barack Obama"
Lol -- are you indicating that you want a one-dimensional president? Based on your post, it seems you want the equivalent of a non-speaking, primetime TV extra to run this country. Wow -- you just blew my mind. posted 05/02/2008 at 20:52:08
Sidney Blumenthal Uses Former Right-Wing Foes To Attack Obama
Wow. Take a good look, ladies and germs: This is the manifestation of the fear felt by those who have held power for so long and face the possibility of losing it. If I may be so nerdy as to show the correlation between the ending of "The Exorcist" and this election, it seems that the unrealistically energetic coverage and negative headlines about Obama mirror the stepped-up attacks and screams by the demons who see their fate. As they realize they're being exorcised, they lash out, doing whatever they can to prevent their demise. In no way do I think McCain, the Clintons or even the MSM are "evil," but it's gone beyond "coincidence" that there's little to no coverage of Hagee, Parsley this yahoo or the war. I guess their coverage of Wright is their version of a demonic attack. posted 05/01/2008 at 17:57:48
The Devil You Know
When did education become the equivalent of "elitism"? Furthermore, when did aspiring for greatness and the American dream become a bad thing? I very much would like for Sens. Clinton and McCain -- as well as the mainstream talking heads -- to explain why there seems to be a systematic goal to race to the bottom. It is beyond me why none of Clinton's or McCain's supporters has decried the media for broad-brushing them as inarticulate, ignorant, emotional dummies. It's basic science: You can't have an action without a positive and negative reaction; thus, you can't call one group "elitist" because its members are college-educated, without calling the "opposite" group dumb, which by media definitions is what the elitist among us aren't. If this is the case, if striving for knowledge and the pursuit of happiness makes us elite, then why are blue-collar workers even saving up to send their kids to college? Wouldn't that be making them potential "elitists"? The simplest answer is the correct one here. What seems more elitist: a person who trusts that you are intelligent enough to face an ugly truth and asks you to assume ownership of your and everyone else's futures, or the person who tells you he/she knows better than you and should be in charge? My own preference, I want someone who's a heckuva lot smarter than I, but still gives me some credit. posted 05/05/2008 at 19:20:53
Hagee: Abortions Easier To Get In Public School Than Aspirin (Video)
Dear mainstream media, while you beat to death the story of Clinton supporter Rev. Wright and conduct polls every two hours to see how the public is responding to your coverage (which, sadly, doesn't comprise real news), I've followed in the footsteps of another poster at The Swamp by using my much-courted wallet to let the sponsors of MSNBC, CNN and FOX know I'll be buying store-brand items instead of paying them to continue depriving me of objective, informative coverage on airwaves paid for by taxpayers. If the news organizations themselves continue to ignore the public (and decide the election for us), then perhaps they'll listen to their benefactors. posted 05/01/2008 at 17:46:32
Is the Corporate Media Deciding This Election For Us?
The question isn't "What are we going to do about it?"; it's "When?" posted 04/30/2008 at 19:19:37
Why the Press Likes Obama Again
I'd like to agree with ghop, but Paula Jones and Gennifer Flowers are much easier on mainstream eyes and dispositions than an "angry black man" -- a black man who, oddly enough, is a supporter of Sen. Clinton's. What the MSM won't tell you is that Wright stopped backing Obama a while ago, and the details over the "dis-invitation" are that he wasn't an Obama supporter. Nevertheless, Obama had an opportunity to get even by throwing Wright under the bus after the initial kerfuffle -- as a way to enact payback for non-support. Instead, Obama stood up for him, respected their differences and told the world we can and need to confront our pasts, but that we can do it without being confrontational. Of course, Wright struck back, but as we continue to press the MSM to show parity -- to show Bill Clinton receiving counseling from Wright following the Lewinsky scandal, to do stories about Norman Hsu -- perhaps this time those types of "shiny" distractions will go ignored. Let's hope they do. posted 04/30/2008 at 18:53:04
Expert Support For Gas Tax Holiday Appears Nonexistent
Listening to Rachel Maddow yesterday -- she made a great point (without favoring either candidate). This is a clear example of new politics versus old politics. The old is "I'll promise you the world and tell you everything you want to hear, which happens to fit nicely on a bumper sticker"; the new is "you're not going to want to hear this or sacrifice, but this is the reality, and I believe the American people are intelligent enough to hear the truth." So, the choice is ours, while also unfortunately belonging by proxy to the idiots among us: Do we vote for a candidate who promises us the perfect health-care plan, a "gas holiday" (or, "reality holiday," as I call it) and more jobs? Sorry, I've had that candidate...for about 17 years, now. And, no matter how great it makes me feel when I think about getting a free tank of gas this summer, it's hard to stomach the potentially 300,000 jobs that could be lost because the infrastructure fund evaporates -- it's even harder to stomach the possibility that gas prices would increase even more afterward because the high demand brought about by an $.18 discount/gallon created an inevitable shortage. So, are we really the iPod Generation gone wild -- wanting immediate gratification, screw the consequences? Or, are we more intelligent than we give ourselves credit for -- wanting to know the bitter, ugly truth...AND consequences? posted 04/30/2008 at 17:39:42
ABC Digs Into Clinton Trade Hypocrisy - Clinton Campaign Responds With More Deception
Hate to be the wet blanket, but if Ohio and Pennsylvania weren't smart enough (or developed a rampant and virile amnesia) to recognize this pandering and lying -- and dumb enough to be scared into voting "against" someone who refuses to lie to them about the economic situation -- then, frankly, we deserve what we get. I've written, I've protested, I've boycotted and I've forwarded objective news articles to friends and family. You know what they say? "Doesn't matter." "No one's going to do anything about it." "But that's the way the world is." "So, it's not going to change." See, I didn't have a choice in being born in the 1970s. I didn't have the clairvoyance to say, "Hey, ma, things are looking a little murky about 20 years from now. Oh, by the way, can we visit New York City before the year 2001? It may not be as feasible later" I had a friend threaten suicide because she didn't want to see how much worse it could get. As someone who's survived domestic abuse, she recognizes when people become hopeless and actively participate in their own demise, and she didn't want to be a part of a world where people complain AND accept their fates. People are losing jobs, people are dying, people AREN'T happy, and I'm not sure very many of them want to be around for when we ALL hit rock bottom. That's not going to be pretty...not pretty at all. posted 04/30/2008 at 19:31:24
Hillary Clinton On O'Reilly Factor: Wright's Statements Are Offensive And Outrageous (VIDEO)
Hillary: "Well, I take offense. I think it's offensive and outrageous. I'm going to express my opinion, others can express theirs. It is part of just, you know, an atmosphere we're in today. And I thought the exact same things about Rev. Wright when my husband and I invited Rev. Wright to counsel us after he embarrassed our family by having an affair with an intern."
*OK, I confess: That last sentence I wrote. posted 04/30/2008 at 19:48:43
*OK, I confess: That last sentence I wrote. posted 04/30/2008 at 19:48:43
Wrighteous Indignation
You're proving you didn't hear the speech, because nowhere in it is there racism or anti-Semitism. I'll give you the anti-Americanism for the sake of argument. However, it's clear you only listened to what the pundits on MSM said, because quite the contrary is true: Trinity Church and its former pastor have been outspoken advocates for gays, lesbians, the Jewish community and poor. In fact, that particular church has white members in its congregation. I think what happened was, the MSM pundits and Obama's opponents' camps heard the "N" word, and instantly it became a "racist" speech in a militant, black church -- which is actually kind of funny, because that term usually indicates racism against blacks. Not to mention that Sept. 11 didn't happen 20 years ago, Katrina wasn't 20 years ago -- so, enlighten me: What exactly was so hateful that the reverend was preaching from 1987 to Sept. 10, 2001? I mean, after all, he could have loved and lauded his government up until that time. But we'll never know, will we? Sadly, those sermons aren't on YouTube. posted 04/30/2008 at 18:42:53
I love how some posters slide the "Black Power" references in there as much as they can, taking careful measures not to sound "racist." Still, these same people are quick to express exactly what John Stewart had the chochkis to do on TDS when he asked Obama point blank if he would enslave the white race. That's really what it's all about, and people hope that by focusing on the Rev. Wright and his "anger" that they somehow can tangentially suspend any notion of (self-inflicted) "payback" for the sins of their forbears. Heck, it doesn't even matter that Obama's half-white. It's the same reason AAs weren't allowed to own guns after the 14th Amendment passed: People fear retribution, whether just or otherwise. And now that Obama is nudging closer to getting the nomination, the people who largely have remained in power are afraid if he achieves it, he'll use it to "get even" for all the crimes committed against half his descendants. I have a feeling they'd be greatly surprised if they are able to let go of their fear long enough to understand his politics and issues. However, if Clinton manages to win the nomination and the presidency, I have a feeling "payback" would be a very real concept for Republicans. posted 04/30/2008 at 18:35:24
As a rabid Steely Dan fan, it's saddening to see you latch on to superficial non-issues, and yet you don't seem to have any discomfort with the lack of parity. It's fine if you want the Rev. Wright to play a role in your vote, but I recommend you ask yourself if your reason for voting "against" Obama is because he said the American government's policies brought about 9/11? If so, are you as forthright to hold McCain to the same standard because an endorser he sought blamed gays, liberals, women, poor and blacks for the destruction caused by Hurricane Katrina? Better yet, will you hold fellow McCain supporter Pat Robertson to task for saying the same thing about 9/11? See, this is why people get fed up: It's one thing to be ignorant and biased when it doesn't affect anyone accept you. However, when by one's exercising of the democratic right to vote he/she forces the rest of us to deal with his/her ignorance (or pedestrian political view), that person becomes a burden to democracy. And when gas prices keep going up, life gets more expensive, jobs are lost, wars continue and the environment becomes vestigial, we're reminded that we have on our collective backs a monkey comprised of the ignorant and lazy populace that wants to drag the rest of us down. posted 04/30/2008 at 17:53:15
Obama vs. Wright: A Silver Lining For Democrats?
Michael Moore said it wonderfully on "Larry King" when King asked him, "When will the Rev. Wright 'thing' go away?" Moore simply stated, "It will go away with the 24-hour news stops harping on it and trying to create a story." (all paraphrasing). I believe many supporters of McCain and Clinton feel this is the strongest weapon they have against Obama, and seeing as how all those "issues" the mainstream media kept badgering him about actually have become Obama's strongest selling point, his opponents and their supporters refuse to let this non-story have its rightful place in the tabloids. When you have 8,000 polls being conducted a week -- probably right after a "story" has aired -- it's hard to see this as an exercise in real journalism, rather than the tail wagging the dog. If some of you have noticed, as Obama's supporters began to question the media's motives and why no equal coverage has been paid to pastors Hagee and Parsley, the overwhelming and nauseous coverage of Rev. Wright has died down. These organizations and Obama's opponents' supporters have been caught in hiding behind this hypocrisy. However, the silver lining really is that the majority of the public is seeing the media for what they truly are, not through the facade of "liberal" and otherwise -- and if we continue to call them (and their sponsors) on it, we can ensure a closer step to parity. posted 05/05/2008 at 13:21:44
OPEC: Oil Could Hit $200 A Barrel
Protest every weekend in Downtown Los Angeles with Code Pink; volunteer for AIDS Foundation Services, Orange County; vote; write my congressmen and -women; spread knowledge to as many people as I can with my posts. That's what I've done -- judge it as you must. posted 04/29/2008 at 19:57:17
OK, everybody, take a good, long, painful look at this just before you enter the voting booth in November and continue to vote against your own interests. Keep saying and writing things like, "Someone ought to do something about it" and "We need to boycott the oil industry" and "Corporate America is evil" ad infinitum. Then, after you've voted for the politician who will guarantee that you can go on complaining, make sure to come right back here to HuffPo and write how awful and un-American the person you voted for is, and how he or she needs to be out of office. Americans like being powerless -- just look at how misguided they are in retrieving their inherent political and economic power. What will it take for you to wake up? Remember the gentleman who some time ago in California shot himself on the 110 Freeway in protest of HMOs? Remember Oklahoma City? Those tactics seem to be emerging as viable reactions, because people who complain are becoming inactive and breeding desperation, which breeds acts like these. If we are proactive and elect those who represent us, we won't have to see others resorting to such horrific displays because they resent the people they've put in control of their lives. Or, are we going to meet each other here again, in a few months, when oil is $250 a barrel? posted 04/28/2008 at 19:59:11
Exclusive -- Obama in 1995: "We Live in a Land of Strangers"
I encourage all of you, regardless of whom you support, to read "The Audacity of Hope." Simply taken as an academic exercise, this book displays the wealth of knowledge of its writer, and it also conveys a striking -- if not disturbing -- bit of prescience by Sen. Obama. Written prior to his announcing his candidacy, the correlation between what he wrote then and what currently is happening on the campaign trail is quite profound, if not indicative that even he knew the mainstream media and Washington power-players get used to the comforts afforded them by the establishment -- and their giving it up (or conceding it) even a little won't be smooth. Obama even wrote that people often look at him as a blank sheet to imprint whatever misconceptions they have about him -- good or bad. I don't think America is used to this kind of honesty from a politician, and when it's difficult to digest, it's much easier to label it "bad." Even if you prefer Sen. Clinton or Sen. McCain, you will do yourself well to read this book. It's the impetus to the much-needed "shock to the system" for which this country is long overdue. posted 04/28/2008 at 18:07:07
Chuck Todd Slams Bill Clinton: "Woefully Unprepared For 21st Century Media"
(Part 2)We're at the precipice, people, and we have a choice to continue letting corporate America and its paid-for politicians dictate how much and how well we can live. While the mainstream news ignore the highly anti-American words of McCain supporter the Rev. Hagee or Norman Hsu (Sen. Clinton's little fundraising "problem") or Clinton Administration trade policies or the Keating Five (McCain's little "economic" blind spot), they'll make sure you focus all your attention on fearing a politician who's trying to give you back your government. In nature, when an animal is on the verge of dying, it lashes out with more force and energy than ever. In the next few weeks, possibly through November, you're going to see about as much coverage on Wright, William Ayers, race and politics, flag pins and more until the corporate media think they've succeeded at convincing you that Obama is "wrong" for America. If you buy into their ploy, then frankly, you deserve the government you get; however, as someone who doesn't think this is an ideal way to live, I'm opting for the guy who respects the Constitution and wants America to be back in the hands of Americans --- not groups who profit on our ignorance and divisiveness. posted 04/28/2008 at 18:55:39
Clinton's Battering of Obama Is Brutal, Bloody -- But Fair
What I've gathered from this campaign and the blogosphere is this: People love to complain. The periphery notwithstanding, most of you like being in a situation you don't like, and rather than doing something about it, you complain that something should be done. Everyone was up in arms with gas went above $2 a gallon, and everyone started talking about boycotts. And you kept talking about boycotts after it went above $3, and you probably just finished posting a comment on another blog about boycotting now that it's near $4 a gallon. Now, people are upset with our economy. People complained that all politicians want power and money and that we need to clean the whole lot out. So, what do we do? Well, the only politicians who addressed our complaints dropped out of the primaries because we didn't vote for them: Kucinich, Paul, Richardson -- Edwards. So, really, what do you people want? Based on the past, oh, 230-odd years, I'd say you want the same situation repeated with different players, so that you can have a sense of purpose. And that sense of purpose is complaining. Because, if you're going to let the media and your 89-year-old grandmother (who probably doesn't care about the color the handbasket we go to hell in) tell you whom to support -- even if it's against your own interests -- then you get what you deserve. However, if complaining is your only goal of existence, then congratulations for a world well earned. posted 04/28/2008 at 19:27:55
When Hillary Clinton Saber Rattles, America Loses
The media have been champing at the bit to run the headline "Clinton Rebounds to Snag Nomination," and the distractions of the Rev. Wright, Ayers, lapel pins and the like are no more than efforts to mar Sen. Obama's campaign in the eyes of superdelegates and supporters. Look at some of the headlines here on HuffPo: "The Media Jump Ship From Obama to Clinton"? If the public won't make it so, by gosh the media sure will try to do it. Funny thing is, everyone is walking a careful line: Clinton's campaign can't appear too "racist or biased" (well, originally) out of fear of losing the traditional black Democratic voters; the media -- and by extension their corporate owners -- can't come right out and refer to Obama's race, so they have to allude to "unAmericanism," "elitism (uppitiness)" and the "scary, over-blackness of his church's former pastor; and Obama knows he's laying the foundation for future African-American presidential candidates (who the public will take seriously), so everything he does not only is under a powerful microscope and subject to (deliberate) misinterpretation -- it's being given 150% percent effort. The media purposely lauded him, even when he suggested they shouldn't, for headlines like the aforementioned ones. Good luck, Sen. Obama, you're going to need it, no matter how much you probably already prepared for this, you'll need all the help you can get. posted 04/25/2008 at 19:19:41
Hillary Clinton Supporters -- The Global Warming Deniers of Democratic Politics?
"This is like saying we're counting only touchdowns in the middle of a basketball game. Well if I knew that was the game we were playing I would have put on a helmet and tackled you a long time ago. Why did I bother scoring all these baskets?"
Readers, I give you the truth: forthright, simple, succinct and hilariously on point. posted 04/25/2008 at 20:05:54
Readers, I give you the truth: forthright, simple, succinct and hilariously on point. posted 04/25/2008 at 20:05:54
James Carville: Barack Obama "Hides Under The New York Times Editorialists' Skirt"
It just makes me so sad to think I used to like this guy, but it's almost like this election has brought out the ugly sides of all my favorite Democrats from the 1990s. Even if Sen. Obama doesn't get the nomination or (if he does) the presidency, I'm very glad he ran. His candidacy exposed a lot of "bleeding heart," "open-minded" progressives for what they always truly have been: closeted, classist, patriarchal bigots who'd much rather use their energy chiding someone who dares try to get the public to realize they hold much more power than they realize -- to get them actively to take back their government and stop letting division control our minds and our money. Wow, between politicians like Carville and Rendell, and celebrities like Roseanne Barr and Jack Nicholson, it's gonig to be a very hard time spending time or money to support their careers after seeing their "underbellies." posted 04/24/2008 at 18:52:27
Philly: Ugly Clinton Victory Rally
Not really -- especially because a lot of the people who previously supported John Edwards and now support Sen. Clinton cite "experience" as a reason. However, a fact that seems to fall through the MSM sifting: John Edwards was a one-term senator who didn't hold elected office until he was elected to the U.S. Senate in 1998 and served from Jan. 6, 1999 to Jan. 3, 2005. That's it. No previous elected-official experience, no legislative work. He was a lawyer -- just like Sens. Obama and Clinton. So, perhaps some of you "Obama-haters" can understand why sometimes the only reason we can conclude from some of your posts is that race is a factor. posted 04/24/2008 at 17:40:52
""I will vote for McCain," said M.G. who came to Philadelphia from Georgia to volunteer for Clinton with her sister. Her sister agreed."
McCain DOES NOTE support the Equal Pay Bill, in fact, skipping the vote to campaign and telling supporters that it could "encourage" other discrimination lawsuits. These women, who I'm sure include Clinton's gender among their reasons for supporting her, vow to vote for a man who openly states that he has no concern for women's rights (abortion) or women's equality. Whatever planet I accidentally ended up on -- I want off. posted 04/24/2008 at 17:28:44
McCain DOES NOTE support the Equal Pay Bill, in fact, skipping the vote to campaign and telling supporters that it could "encourage" other discrimination lawsuits. These women, who I'm sure include Clinton's gender among their reasons for supporting her, vow to vote for a man who openly states that he has no concern for women's rights (abortion) or women's equality. Whatever planet I accidentally ended up on -- I want off. posted 04/24/2008 at 17:28:44
Whoopi: "Part Of Me Wants Mccain To Win"
"Clearly, the surgeon who left the sponge in my stomach the first time is the best man to repair all the internal damage it's caused..."
Whoopi -- please tell us you're just being a "comedian" with that statement. You have no idea how influential you are (and how broke most of HuffPo's readers don't want to bein the next 4 years). posted 04/23/2008 at 19:27:41
Whoopi -- please tell us you're just being a "comedian" with that statement. You have no idea how influential you are (and how broke most of HuffPo's readers don't want to bein the next 4 years). posted 04/23/2008 at 19:27:41
Ignoring our Better Angels
Sens. Clinton and McCain are betting that most American voters have the memories of goldfish. Regrettably, it appears their odds are pretty good. posted 04/23/2008 at 17:17:43
Whole Wide World Wants Obama
I know you're not that uninformed, bauersox, but please allow me to retort.
Your statement would be 100% correct if the following were true:
1. Our president never meets with leaders of other countries.
2. We were not at war (and never go to war with any other country).
3. We don't have any international trade policies -- any whatsoever.
4. Americans live in a tightly sealed, closed-off, detached continent...a la Antarctica.
5. My friend's brother isn't possibly going off to his death in Iraq.
So, provided the above list is true, then you're very much accurate in stating that U.S. elections aren't important to other countries. However, I have a feeling that you may want to rethink your statement after a quick read of this reply. posted 04/24/2008 at 16:20:18
Your statement would be 100% correct if the following were true:
1. Our president never meets with leaders of other countries.
2. We were not at war (and never go to war with any other country).
3. We don't have any international trade policies -- any whatsoever.
4. Americans live in a tightly sealed, closed-off, detached continent...a la Antarctica.
5. My friend's brother isn't possibly going off to his death in Iraq.
So, provided the above list is true, then you're very much accurate in stating that U.S. elections aren't important to other countries. However, I have a feeling that you may want to rethink your statement after a quick read of this reply. posted 04/24/2008 at 16:20:18
Last Night Clinton Won the Pennsylvania Primary, but Lost the War for the Nomination
Tell me, people, is this it? Is this the world I've got to tell my daughter she's inheriting? A world where an elected Democratic governor openly says that whites won't vote for a black man -- a man who happens to be of the race that's been most loyal to Democrats? A country where within the span of two months someone can go from being too white to too black? A society where a candidate must worry about how innate characteristics attributed to her gender play a role? A place in which we bust our backs doing as much as we can in our worst interests? A country where people who claim to be Democrats state that they hate the current milieu, but they actively will vote for someone who could make situations WORSE -- just because their first choice didn't make it? I've got to stop being polite: What the hell is wrong with people? Ever heard "don't cut off your nose to spite your face"? Do you see no hypocrisy in someone defaming and exploiting the EXACT SAME controversial figures that she and her supporters have lauded publicly as great leaders? How much longer must we be forced to live with problems like these because of backward thinking? We're just a loving family that's having to cut back on living life in order to afford it. Sadly, we didn't have the choice of being born many years in the future...when hopefully the human race will have evolved. posted 04/23/2008 at 17:14:48
Who is Hillary Clinton?
I mustn't begrudge you your sense of duty as a Sen. Clinton supporter; however, you're not exactly being as forthright as your readers deserve:
1. "But if you want to know what Hillary Clinton believes in, what she stands for, and what's in her heart, then look at what she's been fighting for her whole life: she's been fighting for people who need help."
- Perhaps not her "whole" life. The carefully chosen "35" years conveniently eliminates her Republican past. That number barely misses the time she worked as a "Goldwater" girl campaigning for presidential candidate Barry Goldwater, who was anti-Civil Rights, which fought "for people who need help."
2. "Here's a woman who, when she graduated, went to work for the Children's Defense Fund, rather than for a fancy law firm with a big salary."
- Clinton only served on the CDF for less than a year -- after which she DID go to work for a fancy law firm.
3. "Let's see the inspiration in being able to show our daughters that there is nothing they can't do, nothing they can't achieve in this new century of ours... "
- Now, let's replace every reference to a female with the words "African-American." Would we be giving a two-term, white, male, U.S. senator with standard legislative accomplishments the same idolotry?
Don't minimize her accomplishments condensing your support into "because she's a woman..." That's a disservice to her efforts and to Sen. Clinton herself. posted 04/21/2008 at 16:35:53
1. "But if you want to know what Hillary Clinton believes in, what she stands for, and what's in her heart, then look at what she's been fighting for her whole life: she's been fighting for people who need help."
- Perhaps not her "whole" life. The carefully chosen "35" years conveniently eliminates her Republican past. That number barely misses the time she worked as a "Goldwater" girl campaigning for presidential candidate Barry Goldwater, who was anti-Civil Rights, which fought "for people who need help."
2. "Here's a woman who, when she graduated, went to work for the Children's Defense Fund, rather than for a fancy law firm with a big salary."
- Clinton only served on the CDF for less than a year -- after which she DID go to work for a fancy law firm.
3. "Let's see the inspiration in being able to show our daughters that there is nothing they can't do, nothing they can't achieve in this new century of ours... "
- Now, let's replace every reference to a female with the words "African-American." Would we be giving a two-term, white, male, U.S. senator with standard legislative accomplishments the same idolotry?
Don't minimize her accomplishments condensing your support into "because she's a woman..." That's a disservice to her efforts and to Sen. Clinton herself. posted 04/21/2008 at 16:35:53
Ed Rendell, Clinton Surrogate, Passionately Praised Farrakhan In 1997
Hehehehe...hehe...
rule No. 1 in the "Rovian" playbook is: You accuse your opponent of the very things you do and put him/her on the defensive, in the interim deflecting any possible attention for you own similar actions.
Well, that's just funny... posted 04/21/2008 at 16:47:37
rule No. 1 in the "Rovian" playbook is: You accuse your opponent of the very things you do and put him/her on the defensive, in the interim deflecting any possible attention for you own similar actions.
Well, that's just funny... posted 04/21/2008 at 16:47:37
Jon Stewart Rips ABC Debate
I think Sen. Obama sadly overestimated the maturity and integrity of the media -- after his speech on race. I guess he was wrong: we're NOT ready to move forward as a country and address issues -- something of which Sen. Clinton actually has a strong command. Yet, instead, we had to waddle through an hours' worth of substance-free questions about lapel pins (asked by people not wearing any), associations with former radicals (who also associated with Sen. Clinton's husband) and the Rev. Wright (who, aside from being asked to counsel former President Clinton after his faux pas, was deconstructed ad nauseam in the media and Obama's speech weeks before). I'm paying nearly $45 to fill up my manual-transmission, 4-speed Corolla -- I could give a New York rat's ginormous ass about whether or not someone knows a guy who knows a guy who said some things in his youth and doesn't wear an "American flag" lapel pin. When my friend no longer has to fear that one day she'll hear that her brother was killed in Iraq, when my parents don't have to worry about my dad finding work now that most of the industries in which he's worked have all moved overseas, and when I no longer have to work hard so that oil company executives can retain the lifestyle to which they're accustomed -- then, but most likely later on, will I care about a presidential candidate's wardrobe or 38-year-old non-controversies. posted 04/21/2008 at 16:06:45
ABC News Discusses The "Debate Over The Debate"
After their display last night, it's difficult not to see Gibson as a wealthy man afraid his investments' tax will increase and Stephanopolous as someone who's still attached to the Clintons like a newborn calf. My friend and I began playing a drinking game: Every time Obama was interrupted, he drank tequila; when Clinton was; I drank whiskey. Every time the Rev. Wright was brought up, I drank whiskey; when Bosnia was, he drank tequila. When "bitter" was mentioned, we both chugged beer. Although we hadn't accounted for Ayers, Farrakhan or lapel pins, we sorely underestimated the "moving forward" of media in this debate, and wished we'd wagered on real issues -- like gas prices, housing and health care. So, nearly a full bottle of Jack Daniels, half a bottle of Patron and four bottles of Heineken later, I must admit, I'm surprised I was sober enough to post (or remember) this. posted 04/17/2008 at 19:48:36
Obama Campaign Won't Say Whether Tax Returns From 1997-1999 Will Be Released
Uh... when all this "tax" stuff is out of the way, how about returning to discussion of some real issues? Actually, perhaps the news wouldn't mind taking a few minutes away from Britney, Paris or Hollywood babies' coverage to tell me why oil profits skyrocketed, and the price of gasoline at the pump in Southern California is more than $4 per gallon. I don't care about any candidates' tax returns; please just make it affordable to live. posted 04/16/2008 at 16:59:09
Hunters and Shooters Support Obama: He "Gets It"
The media often betray Sen. Obama's appreciation for and knowledge of the U.S. Constitution. His voting record and his stance on the 2nd Amendment reflect an ideology that although the interpretation of the document considerably is flawed, its content is less bending, and the civil liberties to which all Americans are entitled should not carelessly be stifled or removed by a suspect government. He by no means is the "perfect" candidate; however, it's clear that he's one of the few in Washington who still believes the government belongs to the people -- and not the other way around. posted 04/16/2008 at 16:03:30
Letter to Hillary: Remember When John McCain Slimed Your Daughter?
I not only encourage Sen. Clinton's supporters to read this and remember, but it would be a good idea for the senator herself to read it before she again compliments Sen. McCain at the expense of Sen. Obama. posted 04/16/2008 at 16:49:19
Hill, You've Got $100 Million; Show Some Class
Since you seem pretty well versed about the situation, then I'm sure you're mad as hell at Clinton campaign member Harold Ickes for approving the "disenfranchisement" of Florida and Michigan delegates when -- as a member of the Democratic committee that approved the ruling -- he supported the unseating of delegates for those states. Funny, it's the same Harold Ickes who now claims Sen. Obama is "disenfranchising" voters because of a decision not he -- but Ickes -- made. Funny, huh? But, I'm sure you've already expressed your anger at Ickes, right? posted 04/16/2008 at 17:11:45
Debate Over Obama's 'Bitter' Remark Swamped By Media Distortion
In the latest "gate" to hit the political campaign, it appears the general public this time actually is "getting it." The media are being exposed for the genuine right-wing spin they have, and in the fundamental sense, we're all understanding full well that those in power will fight tooth and nail to keep it -- even if it means obfuscating the truth and relying on our laziness not to research it. However refreshing it is to have a candidate speak to voters as if we were adults, it's still a scary notion that he may become a victim of his own forthright approach: Clearly, we're still somewhat trapped in primordial electoral-college ooze. posted 04/15/2008 at 20:48:16
Frank: Trailing Democrat Should Drop Out
Do any of you get the feeling that this Democratic primary is reminiscent of the "Twilight Zone" episode "The Shelter"? One cursory look at the blogosphere, and you're inundated with venomous vitriol, biased insults and outright sexism/racism from people who claim to be members of the same political party. Yet, when all the electing is finished and Denver is overrun with delegates, how many of you will find yourselves eager to dismiss, forget (or suppress) the negative and untrue things your fellow Democrats may have said about you or inferred by degrading the candidate you support? How many of you magically will find yourselves holding hands across the convention floor and chanting "unity...down with McCain...Dems forever" while rallying behind a singular candidate? Will all those insults be "water under the bridge"? Will you still flock to the theater or Netflix or Blockbuster to patronize that celebrity who said or wrote awful, biased things about Sen. Clinton or Sen. Obama? Perhaps it's just my cynicism, but I don't believe even goldfish have the ability to forget that well. posted 04/15/2008 at 21:29:40
Much Worse Than Bitter!
I'm beginning to believe the American voting public is hell-bent on voting against its better interests -- especially when it allows the media to deride a candidate for having the "cajones" to speak to American voters as if they were adults: tres risky, utterly unheard of and sadly discouraged. posted 04/15/2008 at 16:44:20
Norma Rae Clinton: Hillary's Middle Class Hypocrisy
I'm from a small town in Middle America. Before moving to California, I was a small-town voter, and I can state here point of fact: When we lose jobs, when gas prices skyrocket, and when we watch people who already are incredibly wealthy earn even more money, we DO feel bitter. And anyone who feels the need to chastise Sen. Obama for telling the truth needs to stop suckling at the MSM teat. NAFTA, the Bush tax cuts, and the wars in the Middle East have contributed to the 9% unemployment rate in Pennsylvania. I can't believe that a slow news day has obfuscated just how accurate his statement was -- and is. And, frankly, as a "small-town" constituent, I don't in the least feel offended by his remark, nor do I find it elitist. If anything, it perhaps contains a bit more honesty than most of us are used to. posted 04/14/2008 at 19:17:01
AP Chief Asks Barack About "Obama bin Laden"
So, that's your best and biggest contribution to society? I suppose it's much more effective than enlisting in the military and helping our soldiers fight terrorism. posted 04/14/2008 at 19:19:32
"Snob-ama Is Not Just Out of Touch, He's From Another Planet"
Acting against our own self-interest is part and parcel for Americans. We eat foods we know will kill us; we smoke; we drink and drive; we knowingly vote for politicians who systematically have reduced our security, increased our debt and made it tougher to get by. However, the rub is, the same people who complain we need to change this world for the better are the first ones who rebuke a candidate who uncharacteristically is speaking the truth -- not some skillful soundbyte that makes people feel warm and fuzzy inside.
While using the Waco, Texas, tragedy may not be the best, it does parallel this whole "bitter" nonsense: Extremely devout Christians will tell you they're awaiting the second coming of Jesus Christ; yet, those same people will denounce anyone who comes along and says he's the Second Coming. When seen through a political perspective, this means most people will complain about their stratified economy and out-of-touch government that doesn't understand how they really feel -- and when the politician of their "dreams" does come along and not mince words, and not placate, but says point-blank what that feeling truly is -- well...those same people deride him or her (Kucinich, anyone?).
What do you people really want? Is it easier just to complain and reject those people who truly wish to help: Kucinich, Obama, Edwards? Let's not cast our votes to spite our country any more. posted 04/14/2008 at 19:58:10
While using the Waco, Texas, tragedy may not be the best, it does parallel this whole "bitter" nonsense: Extremely devout Christians will tell you they're awaiting the second coming of Jesus Christ; yet, those same people will denounce anyone who comes along and says he's the Second Coming. When seen through a political perspective, this means most people will complain about their stratified economy and out-of-touch government that doesn't understand how they really feel -- and when the politician of their "dreams" does come along and not mince words, and not placate, but says point-blank what that feeling truly is -- well...those same people deride him or her (Kucinich, anyone?).
What do you people really want? Is it easier just to complain and reject those people who truly wish to help: Kucinich, Obama, Edwards? Let's not cast our votes to spite our country any more. posted 04/14/2008 at 19:58:10
Obama 'Small Town' Comments Draw Fire, Support
At every opportunity, they'll parse his words and do their best to muddy what he's said. He's about the straightest shooter there is on the campaign, and the people who have benefitted from being in control for so long in Washington are reeling at the fact this man has had such a successful campaign without resorting to the usual negativity. You can't really blame Sen. Clinton or McCain; this is all they know -- politically, at least. People are bitter, and it's only pandering when a candidate says they're not. It's pandering when a candidate promises a near-utopian health-care program that even a can of cling peaches knows has a snowball's chance in hell of getting through the House (pardon my many cliches). This campaign is proving that people don't like realism, they don't like biting truth. There are those who are afraid, and they're towing the party line faithfully, or they're excusing the significant gaffes of their preferred candidate and distorting "non-gaffes" to distract people who actually are thinking for the first time in eight years. While I believe Obama is more an impetus to progress than a catalyst, I no doubt still believe his kind of fortitude is a bitter pill for many to swallow. posted 04/11/2008 at 19:30:52
Begala: "Nothing But Contempt" For Penn, Compares Him To Rumsfeld
I think snruB may mean it as in "Here, here -- over here, Mr. Begala -- look at Mark Penn...yes, yes, the shiny, shiny Mark Penn over here."
Maybe the Clinton campaign thinks enough people will fall for it and forget who's the person in charge. posted 04/11/2008 at 17:41:54
Maybe the Clinton campaign thinks enough people will fall for it and forget who's the person in charge. posted 04/11/2008 at 17:41:54
McCain Won't Apologize For Vote Against Civil Rights Act
"If ____________________ doesn't win, I'm voting for John McCain."
I sure hope you people will be happy if this regrettably comes to pass. posted 04/11/2008 at 18:30:50
I sure hope you people will be happy if this regrettably comes to pass. posted 04/11/2008 at 18:30:50
Obama Delegate Purge -- Slash and Burn in California
Let the backlash begin-gin-gin-gin-gin-gin-gin... posted 04/10/2008 at 19:56:10
On Obama Not Going to Memphis
May I be so bold as to suggest there is an undercurrent of professional and political jealousy going on with the "traditional" African-American scholars and activists? In the tradition of the institutionalized racism that exists and permeates through the black culture itself, West, Tavis Smiley and others of their ilk continue to hold Obama not only to a higher standard of "whiteness," but also a higher standard of "blackness" when it comes to the public display of his values. When he began his campaign, he was "too black" -- in fact, most notable activists were supporting Sen. Clinton, because they did not see viability in Obama's campaign. However, after he was "validated" -- in the eyes of older-generation blacks -- he became a commodity, inadvertently causing his shift from "too black" to "not black enough." The people who earlier believed (if only tacitly) he could not win over non-black Americans now are finding consistent opportunities to assail him when he doesn't prove his "blackness." Perhaps he's thinking outside the box by talking to people in Indiana, people who likely are so far removed from the civil rights movement -- let alone black America. Perhaps he and his campaign see the value in not preaching to the choir. The fundamental element of community organization is gathering groups not likely to meet to achieve a universal goal. Did he need to go to Memphis to enlighten its residents on something in which they've been immersed for 40 years? I think not. posted 04/04/2008 at 20:54:01
Clinton Says Obama Wants to Stop Votes
Clinton campaign member Harold Ickes was on the committee that voted to strip the delegates from Florida and Michigan. Her campaign had almost a year to contest that and demand the delegates be seated. All the Democratic candidates signed pledges that they would honor the DNC's decision and not campaign in the states. They also agreed that the delegates would not count toward their accrual during the primary season. So, tell me again, how is this Obama's fault? posted 04/01/2008 at 20:53:59
Lou Dobbs Says Anti-Clinton Media Bias "Worsening"
Oh, by all means, Obama knew the only proven way to secure the Democratic Party nomination would be to amass the universal support of that all-powerful 12% of the population -- even the ones who aren't Democrats.
Perhaps there was no acknowledgement that the "Obama campaign" played the race card because there's nothing to acknowledge. posted 04/01/2008 at 21:01:14
Perhaps there was no acknowledgement that the "Obama campaign" played the race card because there's nothing to acknowledge. posted 04/01/2008 at 21:01:14
Clinton Surrogate Ed Rendell Praises Fox News For "Most Objective," "Balanced" Coverage
Mattie,
It wasn't a "big tax break," although it's much easier to dislike Sen. Obama if you mischaracterize something he's supported (and, oddly enough, what Sen. Clinton supported in its first incarnation). The bill actually amounted to a 3% tax INCREASE on oil companies -- with the majority of funding going to alternative-fuel research. A little while back, Dan Abrams did an in-depth investigation into the bill -- I'd advise you to check out MSNBC.com for any video of his segment. Or, if you prefer another source of truth, you can visit senate.gov. Fact of the matter is, Obama is more a pragmatist than a liberal, and he's recognized that while it's good and dandy to promise mandated universal health care and huge pieces of government cheese to aid the little guy, along with a promise to end the war in 60 days, it's more platitude than truth-telling. Simply put: there's no way even a slightly tipped Democratic Congress will have a chance at passing expensive legislation or bills that may "piss off" their fundraisers -- nor can any candidate see the future to predict that Iraq will be a bastion of peace in 9 months. He's a fan of pay-go, and unfortunately in this country of credit cards, too many people are willing to live on borrowed money and leave a tab for their children and their grandchildren to pay. posted 03/31/2008 at 20:59:33
It wasn't a "big tax break," although it's much easier to dislike Sen. Obama if you mischaracterize something he's supported (and, oddly enough, what Sen. Clinton supported in its first incarnation). The bill actually amounted to a 3% tax INCREASE on oil companies -- with the majority of funding going to alternative-fuel research. A little while back, Dan Abrams did an in-depth investigation into the bill -- I'd advise you to check out MSNBC.com for any video of his segment. Or, if you prefer another source of truth, you can visit senate.gov. Fact of the matter is, Obama is more a pragmatist than a liberal, and he's recognized that while it's good and dandy to promise mandated universal health care and huge pieces of government cheese to aid the little guy, along with a promise to end the war in 60 days, it's more platitude than truth-telling. Simply put: there's no way even a slightly tipped Democratic Congress will have a chance at passing expensive legislation or bills that may "piss off" their fundraisers -- nor can any candidate see the future to predict that Iraq will be a bastion of peace in 9 months. He's a fan of pay-go, and unfortunately in this country of credit cards, too many people are willing to live on borrowed money and leave a tab for their children and their grandchildren to pay. posted 03/31/2008 at 20:59:33
Obama Is Right: Words Matter When You Want Your Opponent to Leave the Race
"Perhaps Obama should live up to his gallantry, throw down his cloak Sir Walter Raleigh-esque so the lady can walk over the latest mud slung against her, and into the nomination gracefully. After all, she is the elder, she is the senior of the two senators, she was in this race first, and she has an enormous constituency. In all other aspects of life, the etiquette would be to let her go first."
Entitlement much?
While I'm used to the myriad double standards coming from Sen. Clinton's campaign, it strikes my funny bone every time a "quasi-journalist" sees no problem in the candidate he/she supports saying something akin to "although I'm in second place, my first-place-ranking opponent would make a great vice president, because he's less qualified than i." That tone seems even more condescending, because for many of us if screams of "he's being uppity if he thinks he can best yours truly." Read into it what you will, but neither Sen. Obama nor Sen. Clinton should have a free ride to the nomination simply because of gender/race identifiers. The parsing on the part of Sen. Clinton's supporters borders on ridiculous -- especially when they're so quick to dismiss her similar "offenses." They're giving feminists a bad name (and justifying some statements by chauvinistic pigs, to an extent). posted 03/31/2008 at 15:53:02
Entitlement much?
While I'm used to the myriad double standards coming from Sen. Clinton's campaign, it strikes my funny bone every time a "quasi-journalist" sees no problem in the candidate he/she supports saying something akin to "although I'm in second place, my first-place-ranking opponent would make a great vice president, because he's less qualified than i." That tone seems even more condescending, because for many of us if screams of "he's being uppity if he thinks he can best yours truly." Read into it what you will, but neither Sen. Obama nor Sen. Clinton should have a free ride to the nomination simply because of gender/race identifiers. The parsing on the part of Sen. Clinton's supporters borders on ridiculous -- especially when they're so quick to dismiss her similar "offenses." They're giving feminists a bad name (and justifying some statements by chauvinistic pigs, to an extent). posted 03/31/2008 at 15:53:02
Chris Matthews Really Plays Hardball, Demands New Guest Name Sources For Obama Claim
It wasn't "Jewish groups"; it was one GOP-supporting Jewish group. And the Rev. Wright retired some time ago. It'd be nice if even the progressive journalists could stop referring to his being pastor in the present tense. For all the outcry from the media and voters that we focus on the issues (which, I assumed, was to show how little Sen. Obama knows of them), the non-issue coverage has been in overdrive despite the candidates' attempts to address them. posted 03/28/2008 at 20:47:16
Clinton Democracy
These types of "strongarm" -- sorry, it's the only word I could think of to describe them -- tactics are what propel some of us to think perhaps the Clinton camp approached Canadian officials about the "superficiality" of the anti-NAFTA remarks on the campaign trail. Add to it the Quixotic recount of Sen. Clinton's Bosnia adventure, and the series of incidents begins to build doubt in just how reliable an administration she would lead. What would we be asked to believe, and what would be later be told was a "misstatement"? When it's padding your resume so you can work at Hewlett Packard, it's one thing. If it's negotiating military action and trade deals with strong foreign governments, well, there's not a lot of room for "suspension of disbelief." posted 03/28/2008 at 17:26:31
Beyond Jeremiah: A New Kind of Media for Obama's New Kind of Politics
One of the most cogent blogs I've read today. I think Thorn illustrated your point. posted 03/28/2008 at 19:59:37
Obama Suggests Ex-Pastor Is Contrite
"Obama had 20 years to walk out when Rev. Wright spoke about the atrocities of Sept. 11 and Katrina. "
Do some of posters even know how stupid that is? Other than the fact it shows you have zero grasp of continuity, because you're willing to believe those events happened 20 years ago, it shows how willing you are to believe that 30 seconds of a compilation of 20 years' worth of sermons equates to someone's lifetime of feelings for 20 years. What's worse is the person isn't even the one who said them.
Let's try that game with every one of your friends whose told a racist or bigoted joke. Let's compile 30 seconds of clips of all the "Two ___s are on their way to..." and "Why do ____ always..." jokes and have the media play it repeatedly.
Let's make sure the clips omit when rvme's friend says, "I heard this joke the other day and thought it was tasteless..." or "A black friend of mine told me..."
And although your buddy, garnetwood -- who donates to charities and has Jewish or gay friends -- is a good guy who doesn't believe or support these "jokes," everyone who sees those clips immediately decries he's a a bigot, a homophobe, anti-American.
Better yet, let's admit you never would have liked Sen. Obama, and because you couldn't find anything concrete to base that on, you latched onto this Rev. Wright nonsense like a calf on a teat. posted 03/28/2008 at 19:37:51
Do some of posters even know how stupid that is? Other than the fact it shows you have zero grasp of continuity, because you're willing to believe those events happened 20 years ago, it shows how willing you are to believe that 30 seconds of a compilation of 20 years' worth of sermons equates to someone's lifetime of feelings for 20 years. What's worse is the person isn't even the one who said them.
Let's try that game with every one of your friends whose told a racist or bigoted joke. Let's compile 30 seconds of clips of all the "Two ___s are on their way to..." and "Why do ____ always..." jokes and have the media play it repeatedly.
Let's make sure the clips omit when rvme's friend says, "I heard this joke the other day and thought it was tasteless..." or "A black friend of mine told me..."
And although your buddy, garnetwood -- who donates to charities and has Jewish or gay friends -- is a good guy who doesn't believe or support these "jokes," everyone who sees those clips immediately decries he's a a bigot, a homophobe, anti-American.
Better yet, let's admit you never would have liked Sen. Obama, and because you couldn't find anything concrete to base that on, you latched onto this Rev. Wright nonsense like a calf on a teat. posted 03/28/2008 at 19:37:51
NAFTA-Gate Probe To Be Made Public
In protest, I'm calling this one: "This election campaign started out so well and has devolved into some surreal nightmare in which every stupid utterance by a candidate's supporter or ignorant talking head has garnered more gravity than serious issues -- such as a drowning economy and dwindling middle class -- slowly making me thankful for the day the world finally ends, because it seems the finite satisfactions derived from high Nielsen ratings and corporate wealth have made many people afraid of discussing real issues and moving this country forward, so I think I'll just go eat worms"...gate. posted 03/27/2008 at 16:56:12
Reuters: "Somebody Forgot To Tell Hillary Clinton The Democratic Presidential Race Is Over And Barack Obama Won"
this made me laugh out loud at work. posted 03/27/2008 at 20:11:08
Rove Offers Obama Some Dubious Advice
I think you may be missing the point, Momorune. Sen. Obama can't "do" anything. Despite what Sen. Clinton's camp, Rove and the media are trying to insinuate, Obama's not responsible for the unseating of the delegates, nor is he in a position to declare suddenly that they will be seated. If you're bound to assign this fault to him regardless how accurate it is, then at least be aware that two of Sen. Clinton's own campaign advisers were among those DNC members who agreed not to seat the Florida and Michigan delegates after the primaries were moved up. Sen. Clinton is on record saying those election results and delegates "won't count," and she -- along with Sen. Edwards and Rep. Kucinich and Sen. Obama -- signed written agreements to abide by the DNC's rules. Furthermore, Sen. Obama has stated, on record, that he will go along with "whatever the DNC decides to do" regarding the delegates' seating at the convention. So, while I know some of Sen. Clinton's supporters are hard-pressed to find whatever they can as reasons to dislike or blame Sen. Obama -- well, that dog don't hunt. posted 03/27/2008 at 16:02:35
Reverend Wright: Raw and Un-Cut
Thank you, Steven.
Sincerely, a disenchanted journalist. posted 03/28/2008 at 20:20:05
Sincerely, a disenchanted journalist. posted 03/28/2008 at 20:20:05
Man Who Inspired Wright Sermon: I Would Have Walked Out Of His Church
Dear God in Heaven -- thank you, Sam!!! I've been wearing my fingers to the nub posting this on every blog I possibly can find -- conservative, liberal and in between. Seems only a few people are willing to research the Ed Peck involvement, and the mainstream media would rather cover the drying of a celebutante's nail polish than sooner let the Internet-non-savvy public find this out. Thank you, from the bottom of my tired gut. posted 03/26/2008 at 20:41:30
Video Disputes "Black Separatist" Tag On Obama's Church
OK, RealMac, before this inaccuracy goes any further, I'm sure you and all the people who want to hang Obama are fully aware that the "America's Chicken have come home to roost" comments were quoted from former Ambassador Ed Peck, who stated those words in 2001 on FOX News? I'm sure you know that, because on the YouTube video Wright begins that particular clip by saying that what he's about to say was said by "a white man..." Oh, that's right -- the media aren't letting that little nugget out in all their reports, and I guess it's up to people who look beyond the headline to find the unedited version of that sermon. Just say it: You needed a reason not to vote for or like Obama, and this was the best you could do. posted 03/26/2008 at 19:26:48
Smears and Tears: How Obama's National Security Week Turned Into the Mendacity of Hype
While it's very noble of you to support Sen. Clinton and boast of her experience and judgment, it is a little confusing that she voted for the use of force in Iraq -- against YOUR recommendations, Ambassador. So, in addition to questioning her judgment for supporting the invasion, I'm now questioning your judgment for supporting her... posted 03/26/2008 at 20:35:21
Parker Posey's Sitcom Canceled After Just Two Airings
My husband and I are big fans of Posey, Ambrose and independent film (in which both actresses soar), but we struggled hard to sit through one episode. I wouldn't say, "awful" -- but I'm for darn sure thinking it. posted 03/25/2008 at 18:42:11
Hillary's "Audacity of Hopelessness"
The Sept. 11 statements Rev. Wright made were quotations from former Republican Ambassador Edward Peck, who said them on FOX News in 2001 -- anyone who likes truth can find the un-edited and much less sexy version of the full sermon. While I don't agree with everything the reverend said, it's sad that so many people don't know this, considering it's just as accessible on the same "YouTubes." Apparently, the media don't trust the public to make decisions based on truth, so this fact just gets buried and ignored and the people keep believing Wright originated those words. Utterly sad and telling. posted 03/25/2008 at 20:02:39
Include the Invisible Americans in Race Debates
Dear God, when will the blogosphere and the msm wake up? The "Chickens coming home to roost" comment was a quoted statement originally made by Republican Ambassador Ed Peck -- who said those words on FOX News in 2001. Although the YouTube clip of the Rev. Wright so conveniently begins after he said what he was about to read was said by Peck (it also conveniently leaves out that he said after those words that he disagreed with them), the media and many anti-Obama bloggers refuse to publish this fact, and it's a sad testament to just how much Democrats and the media "care" about the public -- so much so that they deliberately perpetuate something to the chagrin of those of us who actually want to truth. The Internet has the power to make liars out of a lot of people on all sides, and I'd like to think none of the bloggers here at HuffPo would liken themselves to members of a lying majority. posted 03/24/2008 at 18:11:15
Bill Clinton: No Revotes Deliberate Attempt To Disenfranchise Voters
What some of us understand is that this is Sen. Clinton's campaign's way of transferring the blame from the DNC -- whom she wants to impress -- to Obama, who is NOT (I repeat -- NOT) responsible for the loss of delegates in either state. It's ridiculous and downright illogical to deny that if a poll conducted next week suddenly showed Obama pulling way ahead of Sen. Clinton in either of those states, you could bet the bank her campaign no longer would be so adamant about a revote. However, it also doesn't matter to some of her supporters that Obama is on record and on tape saying he would abide by whatever rules the DNC sets regarding a revote or seating of the delegates. So, stop blaming him and focus your ire on the Republican and Democratic leadership in Florida and Michigan -- they're the ones who caused this, not Obama. (You may also want to focus your attention on Sen. Clinton's on-air statement that the delegates in both states would not count, and ask her why her sudden change of heart came AFTER she no longer held frontrunner status.) posted 03/24/2008 at 16:46:51
Who's Paying Maggie Williams?
Couldn't have written it better myself. Something definitely is wrong with this. posted 03/24/2008 at 18:14:25
Barack Obama's Test...And Ours
Sorry, Tarry, the media aren't about to touch that part of the Rev. Wright controversy. No one cares that he in part was quoting Ed Peck, a white man who once served under Reagan. All that matters is that many people needed a concrete reason other than race not to like Obama, and this incident gave it to them while preserving their liberal, Democratic "open-mindedness." Point of fact, these people probably wouldn't have voted for him anyway, but now they're happy as kittens that they can point to Wright as a reason for their choice. Sadly, I'd think they'd want to point to McCain's or Sen. Clinton's positives instead of looking for a perceived "negative" in Obama. Let's hope the majority of American's are more intelligent and adult than that, though. posted 03/24/2008 at 16:23:50
What fascinated and surprised me is that shortly after Obama's speech, my boss came to me and asked if I would mind talking about the black/white divide (I'm the former of the two). It was completely unexpected; however, it was at that moment I appreciated the gravity of this potentially negative Wright situation. Had those statements not been made, she probably would never have approached me and asked if this was something all blacks feel. While I don't qualify myself as the chosen representative for all black people, our nearly two-hour discussion exposed her to things with which I was familiar, but also had a disconnected relationship with because they were experiences and feelings of my mother's and probably the Rev. Wright's generation. Strange, however, that the frequently called-for "vetting" of Obama basically translated into "tell the world he's black." That's really all that happened -- as if there were some perceived mask of "whiteness" that clouded the judgment of his supporters and prevented Sen. Clinton a rightful position in first place. At least, that's what I see it as, and it's up to the voters to see if "blackness" (or gender) indeed is a campaign liability, asset or just something that happens. If it proves to be a liability or an asset, then voters need to assess just what their priorities are. The message should be the main and only focus -- and if you like the message of any candidate, his or her race should not be the "vetted" material that sways you one way or the other. Despite the sickening feeling this race has given me, I forever will be thankful for Sen. Obama's reaction to the Wright flap, because I personally can attest to the fact it resulted in a very engrossing, informative and positive discussion between two people who otherwise probably never would have spoken in such raw and honest terms about race. It's a discussion that needed an icebreaker -- and perhaps this was the best one we could find. posted 03/24/2008 at 14:55:49
Gallup: Obama Retakes Lead Over Clinton
well, it actually proves something very telling: posted 03/24/2008 at 18:33:57
How Will Hillary's Bosnia "Whopper" Play in the Media?
Reactions to a Tough Decision
i must agree with you, kato. i have a feeling that many liberal democrats have been aching for a reason not to like or to justify not voting for obama, should he become the nominee. this wright issue for many has brought about that justification, while others previously just reiterated the untruth that he doesn't have any experience -- even when clearly pointed out to them that he's served longer in an elected, legislative position. the past week was necessary because it follows in line with many things obama consistently has been saying: we need transparency if we're to work together, regardless how painful our revelations may be and likely will be. most impressive and telling is how he refused to throw him under the bus, despite how politically expedient that would have been. in fact, more than any other politician in modern history, he was practicing precisely what his christian faith encourages him to do: love the sinner; hate the sin. and this belief, yes, can extend past your co-worker and to your friend, your cousin, your parents and even your pastor -- the person who's indoctrinated you with that principle. it's much more sexy for the media and the public to view his relationship with wright as some conspiratorial, hypocritical bond, because looking at it as "here is a man who's thankful for a friend who led him and his family to God. but here also is a man who wants that friend to join him fully on that path." in short, "do as you say i should do." sadly, obama's speech didn't reach everyone, because not everyone is ready for that kind of honesty from a politician -- and certainly not that kind of raw, unashamed truth about a subject many americans would rather fall to the wayside. to deny the existence of racism is useless, because it has existed and still exists; however, to bemoan rampant racism is just as foolish, because it denies us the ability to embrace how much of it we've overcome. if anything, the comments from people who unfortunately aren't able to like obama (prior or after the wright incident came to light) show perhaps obama wasn't off in saying that there are inherent biases and learned stereotypes that even the best people fail to recognize in themselves. but he's so much more right on another thing: we never will be able to move forward if we're still so busy trying to stay back. posted 03/21/2008 at 15:45:59
Poll: Majority Doesn't Believe Obama Shares Wright's Views
there's no "hate" in his speeches, which i have a sneaking suspicion you've never attended). not to mention nearly a third of the evidence you've quoted or referenced never happened in the first place. why are you lyin g? you're not forced to vote for him, but you don't have to post made-up statements and events. posted 03/21/2008 at 16:35:53
i'm right there with you in trying to get this more attention, but unfortunately, the truth just isn't as sexy as great media fodder. "more chum for the publc." posted 03/21/2008 at 16:32:40
A Few Unanswered Questions About Bill Richardson's Obama Endorsement
would this blog even have been written if richardson had endorsed sen. clinton but still held the same beliefs about superdelegates? i think sen. clinton's supporters sometimes show truer colors than they probably would like. posted 03/21/2008 at 16:45:34
Obama Campaign Responds With Kitchen Sink Conference Call
like the phrase: "i never supported nafta"? posted 03/21/2008 at 16:06:40
This Good Friday Let Us Not Crucify Barack Obama
let he who is without the good friend who tells "n---er," "ch--k' and "sp-c" jokes cast the first vote. posted 03/21/2008 at 16:18:38
i have a feeling that many liberal democrats have been aching for a reason not to like or to justify not voting for obama, should he become the nominee. this wright issue for many has brought about that justification, while others previously just reiterated the untruth that he doesn't have any experience -- even when clearly pointed out to them that he's served longer in an elected, legislative position. the past week was necessary because it follows in line with many things obama consistently has been saying: we need transparency if we're to work together, regardless how painful our revelations may be and likely will be. most impressive and telling is how he refused to throw him under the bus, despite how politically expedient that would have been. in fact, more than any other politician in modern history, he was practicing precisely what his christian faith encourages him to do: love the sinner; hate the sin. and this belief, yes, can extend past your co-worker and to your friend, your cousin, your parents and even your pastor -- the person who's indoctrinated you with that principle. it's much more sexy for the media and the public to view his relationship with wright as some conspiratorial, hypocritical bond, because looking at it as "here is a man who's thankful for a friend who led him and his family to God. but here also is a man who wants that friend to join him fully on that path." in short, "do as you say i should do." sadly, obama's speech didn't reach everyone, because not everyone is ready for that kind of honesty from a politician -- and certainly not that kind of raw, unashamed truth about a subject many americans would rather fall to the wayside. to deny the existence of racism is useless, because it has existed and still exists; however, to bemoan rampant racism is just as foolish, because it denies us the ability to embrace how much of it we've overcome. if anything, the comments from people who unfortunately aren't able to like obama (prior or after the wright incident came to light) show perhaps obama wasn't off in saying that there are inherent biases and learned stereotypes that even the best people fail to recognize in themselves. but he's so much more right on another thing: we never will be able to move forward if we're still so busy trying to stay back. posted 03/21/2008 at 16:11:48
Popular Stories on HuffPost
Michael Dudley is the son of a preacher man. He's a born-again Christian with two family...
Last night's all new "Saturday Night Live"
With the Democratic nomination now in its endgame, it's time to speculate on...
On Friday, Barack Obama publicly raised the possibility of helping Hillary Clinton pay...
It should come as no surprise that Bill O'Reilly has always been a screamer, but...
Today, May 10, marks the first day of what the Obama campaign is calling its "Vote For...
You may have thought your prom night went badly, but Marche Taylor,...
Now that the outcome of the battle for the Democratic nomination...
Leave it to the tone deaf GOP to find a way of attaching themselves to this election...
As a lawyer might say (OK, I am one), I have no personal knowledge of whether John or...
At the same time that former West Wingers...
First of all, you moms are already Hot Chicks! We want you to embrace...
