Please wait, your request is processed...

sarainitaly

Recent comments by this user

Ed Rendell, Clinton Surrogate, Passionately Praised Farrakhan In 1997

I never heard Rendell praise Farrakhan. He praises the nation of islam, but unless I missed something, I didn't hear him praise Farrakhan?

Obama does have direct ties to Farrakhan, he helped him organize MMM. posted 04/21/2008 at 14:31:34

Obama helped Farrakhan organize the Million Man March. posted 04/21/2008 at 14:30:07

Bill Clinton Flashback: "All These Economically Insecure White People...Are Scared To Death"

Bravo! Perfectly stated. posted 04/14/2008 at 08:39:33

Clinton Hospital Story May Actually Be True

second part cont.

Almost three people a day die in North Carolina for lack of health insurance, a medical-consumer nonprofit group reported Friday.
http://www.news-record.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080405/NRSTAFF/980074266

An estimated 210 working-age West Virginians die prematurely each year because they don't have health insurance, according to a report released Tuesday.
http://wvgazette.com/News/200803180653

These are scary numbers when you consider that 47 million Americans don't have health insurance. That's 47 million people who are taking a chance, whether by circumstance or because they have no choice, that they won't become seriously ill; 47 million who may have to rely on emergency rooms if they do; 47 million who don't have the luxury of calling their family doctor to ask about a pain in their chest, or a lump in their breast. They just have to grin and bear it, or hope that it's nothing.
http://www.cnn.com/HEALTH/blogs/paging.dr.gupta/2008/02/without-insurance-cancer-often-found.html

A number of studies have shown that the uninsured are given less attention than those who have insurance.
http://www.enotes.com/everyday-law-encyclopedia/treatment-without-insurance

Lack of insurance kills five Nevadans every week
http://dailysparkstribune.com/pages/full_story?hash=comments_55716&page_label=news&article-Lack-of-insurance-kills-five-Nevadans-every-week%20=&id=55716&widget=push&instance=news_special%20_coverage_right_column&open=&#comments_55716 posted 04/07/2008 at 19:35:58

3rd part cont.

"I don't think my sister died because she had cancer," Vincent said. "She died because she didn't have insurance."
http://blog.mlive.com/annarbornews/2008/03/many_skip_medical_care_study_s.html

Three Connecticut residents die every week because they don't have health insurance and cannot afford to see doctors for regular checkups, screenings and other preventive care, according to a new report released Thursday.
http://theday.com/re.aspx?re=5846e4d9-e5b6-417a-9fba-63d6544ec5bd

And those are just a sample I pulled in five minutes...

So...what is more important? Nitpicking the specifics of a story that was recounted to Clinton, or solving the health care crisis in America? posted 04/07/2008 at 19:31:12

Brian Holman tells hospital story to Clinton
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2wqpEt_CdBk

However, you can read the whole story here, about Trina.
http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/07/the-real-trina-bachtel-story/

Regardless of whether this story is 100% true (which Hillary thought it was, since the sherrif sat on the couch with her and told it to her, and it is looking very much like it is 100% true), hundreds of people die every year because they do not have health insurance.

So, the media, instead of jumping at a chance to slam Clinton, could have done a story on the hundreds that DO die every year.

Like Manny Lanza who was denied a surgery because he didn't have health insurance. He died. Now they have Manny's law.
http://www.gothamgazette.com/article/issueoftheweek/20051205/200/1669

Or Delbert Davis, who incurred hundreds of thousands of dollars in medical debts, declared bankruptcy and ultimately died because he wasn't able to get insurance or self-pay for a liver transplant.
http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/story/uninsured-patient-dies-after-transplant-is-denied/2006-11-13

A new report has been released showing that on average one person dies every day in Oregon due to a lack of health insurance.
http://www.blueoregon.com/2008/03/one-oregonian-w.html posted 04/07/2008 at 19:25:23

Two Senior Advisors: We'll Tell Hillary To Resign If She Loses Indiana

i don't get it. posted 04/01/2008 at 06:40:28

rmetz74 - i very possibly missed news of the Supreme Courts decision regarding the re-votes. My, I thought internet, was down for three days, and after numerous calls to the helpline, i finally figured out (i thought) that it was my router. So, after buying a new one, and installing it, I realized it was our filter for the phone. So, all week, (except Friday, when I was at a funeral) I did not have access, or very minimum access all week.

regardless of that decision, everything the week before said Obama was blocking all resolutions. So, i will try and find the links you said you posted, and read about it, but I think that you should also read all the links i provided that said Obama WAS in fact blocking any resolutions. posted 04/01/2008 at 06:37:41

i thought about this post when i went to bed last night. i did not mean when Obama dissed Italians, I meant now that his spiritual mentor has. (sorry for my mis-type, it was 3:30 in the morning, and I was tired, and I was trying to reply to about 10 different people).

white garlic nosed italians killing black jesus is probably not something that will bode well with the Italians. posted 04/01/2008 at 06:32:02

well, as usual, the rude asses have come out to attack anyone who speaks negatively about obama, so i am leaving. yes, i am sure you are all glad. it is also 3:30am.

all i have to say is if obama is the nominee, you obama supporters will have gotten exactly what you deserve. so many of you are so nasty, and deserve your hateful anti-american candidate.

i thought the discussion was going pretty well for a while, but then, as usual, attacks were aimed at me. i am not running for president. i am stating an opinion, and supporting my opinions. i do not deserve to be attacked for discussing a politician. serisously, you people scare me. you are so angry and hateful. posted 03/31/2008 at 21:39:44

i am not with any group.

i am a person, who was partaking in a political blog, giving my opinion. and as usual, end up attacked by obama supporters.

if i talk negatively about obama, i am not attacking his supporters. i am attacking or discussing HIM.

Obama supporters attack me! posted 03/31/2008 at 21:33:56

good god, i wasn't saying that i do not believe he was stopping the two states. i was making a joke. Everything i have read said he blocked those two states from either being seated or re-voted.

i was trying to be light, but you obama people are to fucking mean. posted 03/31/2008 at 21:25:52

well, since I am not a pollster I do not know.

they show them both on the news, and talk about the election. many people i know like the clintons, and liked the clinton presidency so they like hillary. but there is positive talk about obama as well.

however, now that he is dissing italians, that will change. posted 03/31/2008 at 21:20:42

i used to want an Clinton/Obama ticket, but I do not like him anymore. If he is teh candidate I will probably write in Hillary, vote McCain or sit it out.

I have never considered myself a dem or repub. i always vote on who supports my issues (usually dems) and who represents my beliefs.

i am new to taylor site, and found it very refreshing after getting beat up here for months. taylor marsh has said many times to posters there to not NOt vote for obama if he is the nominee.

i am not looking for appeasement. i feel there is no middle ground with obama supporters. supprt him, or you are a racist. a big part of the reason i do not and will not support him any longer is because of his supporters. posted 03/31/2008 at 21:17:26

oh, you mean *the rolling stone* that endorsed Obama?

are you saying that my response about caucasing was not true? posted 03/31/2008 at 21:11:48

a lot of her supporters are older, there were a lot of storms during the caucases. a lot of her supporters are blue collar and couldn't get out of their shifts to spend all day caucasing. a lot of her supporters are women, and maybe they were too busy working and running their households, and not able to find child care, to spend the night caucasing...

just a guess. posted 03/31/2008 at 20:56:49

what am i lying about?

why am i not allowed to make my opinion based on his actions and associations?

why can hillary haters/obama supporters talk crap about hillary till the cows come home, but i give my opinion about why i will not vote for obama, and now i am a racist? posted 03/31/2008 at 20:51:22

i understand that it is possible to disagree with someone. but obama lied about it over and over again. he has changed his story, lied, and changed it again. wright was his spiritual mentor for 20 years. you don't stay that close to someone and not know or not support what he preaches.

wright has insulted jews, women, whites, our coutry, italians, and the clintons. he is a bigot and a hater. obama spent a year telling us how important wright is to him. now that he was forced to, he condemend the remarks.

i do not like him for many reasons. i used to, but not anymore. i was not looking for justification. he did this all on his own. posted 03/31/2008 at 20:44:26

because when people are asked who is more qualified, and who will do a better job, they pick hillary. posted 03/31/2008 at 20:37:48

first of all, piss off for your comment calling hillary supporters uneducated.

obama claims to be the politics of new and he is as dirty as they come, if not more so.

hillary haters have been trying to bring her down with those same scandals for years. Obama has just begun to be vetted. and based on what we have discovered so far, there are MANY who will not vote for him. posted 03/31/2008 at 20:31:37

i am not going to have an aneurism over this. i have read numerous articles and seen news reports that said that Obama would not agree to the re-vote or on how to seat the delegates. he has even stammered and stuttered when asked about it.

i a not a troll. i am person with an opinion. posted 03/31/2008 at 20:21:05

so, we can argue delegates all day, but bootom line - i do not like him any more. i do not believe he is capable of winning in Nov. and I don't relish turning over my country to a guy like Obama and his buddies like Wright and Ayers.

All those associations and comments make it very clear now what the Obama's think about our country. And it is not for me.

Sorry. I am not attacking Obama supporters. I am just not blinded by him and I do not like him. (and it has nothing to do with race!) posted 03/31/2008 at 20:17:40

can you explain to me why Obama said that the Superdelegates should vote for the candidate with most votes and states, but yet Kerry, Kennedy and Richardson all endorsed Obama, and Hillary won their states? And by them endorsing him, I assume that means they will vote for him. posted 03/31/2008 at 20:13:21

just because the media is choosing to not cover it now, besides FOX, does not mean it did not piss people off, and it does not mean it will not remerge if Obama is the nominee. posted 03/31/2008 at 20:10:48

i am always honest, unlike your candidate. ;O) posted 03/31/2008 at 20:09:06

i am an american. i am not a traitor. i am proud of my country. unlike SOME people. posted 03/31/2008 at 20:06:19

oh my god, that was stupid. I live in italy. i am not a paid blogger. i read news and blogs besides huffpo, so i get an alternate view besides just hill bashing.

i have the same friggin right to comment and give my opinion that you do. posted 03/31/2008 at 20:03:18

dude, i am not ok with a guy like obama, who has been exposed for all his ugly associations, and his hypocrisy and his arrogance running our country. i do not approve of his lies regarding wright, his assoc. with Ayers, Rezco, Said, and others. i don't approve of the comments his wife has made, the comments he has made, and his spritual mentor.

if obama is the nominee, i do not believe he will win. i think many many dems will prefer mccain over anti-american, anti-white obama.

he is a fabricated candidate and that began when he was in the state senate, and he was *made* a US senator. He has done virtually nothing but run for office, and take credit for bills he did not write or have anything to do with.

his big claims to fame are his speech he gave in a blue district before he even announced he was running for US senator, that wasn't even news worthy at the time.

and now people like him because he is inspiring.

he has too many negatives, too many potential swift boating opportunities, and i absolutely do not approve of him bing bff's with Wright, who is anti-white, anti-american, anti-italian, anti-white women.

obama lied to us, repeatedly about his knowledge of what he knew, when he knew it. he hangs with known terrorists, and anti-semites. posted 03/31/2008 at 19:56:08

they couldn't agree because obama wanted caucases or mail in ballots. posted 03/31/2008 at 19:40:00

no, i am not ann.

yes, dear, we all knew the rules. but now the race is very close. and now we have a candidate (obama) who is beginning to be vetted, and what america is seeing is not pretty.

he does not have good judgment at all, in his friends, and his associates, and his voting abilities, and his arrogance, and his substance.

it is not just hillary who is saying that we need to resolve MI and FL. posted 03/31/2008 at 19:33:31

i prefer to blame obama... hahaa posted 03/31/2008 at 19:27:21

hehehe

My mama doesn't smoke the dope. posted 03/31/2008 at 19:25:00

I would not be calling for him to drop out, I think everyone should have a chance to vote, in a race this tight.

However, obviously we would be happier if she was ahead. it is a competition. And Obama and his supporters are acting like little babies, wanting her to drop out. It is a competition!

Now, that said, I would not be asking him to drop out because of the delegate count BUT I would be insisting he drop out because of the Wright stuff and his other lies, and his lack of experience, and accomplishments. posted 03/31/2008 at 19:23:55

looking at the delegate counter at mydd.com posted 03/31/2008 at 19:10:55

how do you know i don't have a crystal ball?

haha jk

I have a pretty good idea. Kerry and Gore were swiftboated and lockboxed out. Obama will be anti-americaned and anti-whited out. I do not believe he will be able to carry 51% of the country. He pissed off a lot of middle of the road dems. And it will only get worse. posted 03/31/2008 at 19:08:31

Obama killed the chances for a re-vote in MI. posted 03/31/2008 at 19:05:23

neither of them have a chance to win enough delegates.

they are tied (Hillary up one) if MI and FL are counted (which matters because those votes were cast)

She is down only like 130 without MI and FL. Not a big margin. posted 03/31/2008 at 19:04:07

oh please. posted 03/31/2008 at 18:58:27

I have my facts straight. I am just not drunk on koolaid.

I used to like Obama. I used to want an Clinton/Obama ticket.

Now, no way, no how. posted 03/31/2008 at 18:57:56

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/03/18/michigan_revote_plan_up_in_the.html

I am posting artciles all over in here. They were waiting for Obama to agree. He is saying no. Obviously he is saying no because he doesn't want to lose.

Obviously she wants the FL seated and re-vote in MI because she will win.

duh. haha

That said, I think they should be re-voted because it is so close, and every person who wants, can have a choice, and a vote. posted 03/31/2008 at 18:54:51

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/03/18/michigan_revote_plan_up_in_the.html posted 03/31/2008 at 18:52:38

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/17/michigan-primary-revote-i_n_91874.html posted 03/31/2008 at 18:51:10

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/14/769247.aspx posted 03/31/2008 at 18:50:22

what are you talking about? posted 03/31/2008 at 18:49:28

I hardly think I am whining.

I will not get behind Obama. I see him for what he truly is. He will never get my vote.

With a race this close, why should there not be a re-vote in both states, or at least seat FL and re-vote MI?

Especially since many of those voters would probably take their vote away from Obama after all this stuff has been uncovered about him.

He is a con man, a liar, a crooked politician, who associates with very questionable people. posted 03/31/2008 at 18:46:19

had obama agreed, they would have allowed it. posted 03/31/2008 at 18:40:17

Had Obama not blocked MI, it would have been allowed. FL is not being seated because Obama blocked it.

http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/03/florida_michigan_revotes_forge.html posted 03/31/2008 at 18:37:00

Yes, we all want our own cadidate to win. However, wrt Obama blocking votes, I am pretty confident in my sources.

Here is a new one:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/wayne-barrett/could-the-republicans-pic_b_94158.html posted 03/31/2008 at 18:31:20

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/wayne-barrett/could-the-republicans-pic_b_94158.html

Well, isn't this exactly what I am talking about? posted 03/31/2008 at 18:26:33

I am not repeating a Hillary talking point. I am reacting with my gut feeling, after spending HOURS and HOURS reading about him, his wife, and their friends and associates.

If you spend all of your time here, you probably have no idea what I am talking about. But if you rad what is out there on the web, you would agree.

Kerry and Gore were disgraced and ruined for FAAAAAAAAAAR less then what is out there on Obama.

I don't care what they polling data says. I absolutely believe he will not win in Nov. posted 03/31/2008 at 18:09:18

The states said yes, Obama said no. posted 03/31/2008 at 18:06:47

many people inthe DNC are wanting the delegates counted because the race is so close.

I don't think at the time, anyone thought the race would be as close as it is.

wrt Bosnia, I think we have just as many, if not MORE examples of Obama exagerrating his life experiences.... Selma, AL.... the Kennedys bring his dad here...his accomplishments in the Ill and US senate. Just to name a few. posted 03/31/2008 at 18:05:46

well, counting MI and Fl, she is ahead. Not counting them, she is behind like 130? Not very big margin.

Obviously we both believe our candidate to be the victor in Nov, but I just know that Obama will not win.

He has waaaaaaaay too many negatives: Ayers, Rezco, Wright, Farrakhan, NAFTA, and all of his little lies that we have seen a long the way. He will be portrayed as the biggest un-American bigot we have ever seen.

And after all I have learned and seen lately, I am not so sure he isn't. posted 03/31/2008 at 18:02:13

Thank you. posted 03/31/2008 at 17:57:02

See all my liks above. You can also see it talked about onthe news. And there are many other stoies on the web about it.

regarding your link - wow, that was a really convincing arguement. haha All it was alluding to is that Obama was trying to make a deal that he could have 50% of CLintons delegates. posted 03/31/2008 at 17:54:33

right. so now that the race is so close, and both states approved a re-vote, why is Obama blocking it? posted 03/31/2008 at 17:52:52

Exactly. I agree. That is why there should be a re-vote. But Obama is blocking it.

Fl, they were both on the ballot - they could easily seat those delegates as they were won. Obama wants 50% of them???

so, they could do a re-vote, but Obama is blocking it. posted 03/31/2008 at 17:51:01

smearing across huff po? I posted this, what? twice? I do believe it is my right to comment.

and according to everything i have read, Obama is blocking the votes.

and I hardly think it is a crazed arguement. what is crazy is Obama supporters calling for her to drop out. posted 03/31/2008 at 17:47:01

how can holding re-votes favor her, and not favor Obama?

A vote is a vote. posted 03/31/2008 at 17:43:30

Nope, sorry.

The MSM ignores the Obama negatives, except for Fox, and trust me, if Obama is the nominee, he will be swift boated down the river, wihtout a paddle, life jacket or compass.

he will not win. The only clinton negatives are the ridiculous talking points that have been used and reused over and over again for 15 years.

If Obama is so great, and Hillary is so evil, why are they virtually tied?

Obama will not win in Nov.

hillary 08! posted 03/31/2008 at 17:41:56

Sure sounds like he is blocking the revotes to me... :O)

http://www.talkleft.com/story/2008/3/31/14552/3136

http://www.talkleft.com/story/2008/3/19/13023/4122

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/18/michigan-revote-unlikely_n_92240.html

http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/3/8/114740/0049

http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/03/obamas_memo_on_michigan.php

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0308/DNC_on_the_record_for_Michigan.html posted 03/31/2008 at 17:34:37

It is ridiculous to ask her to quit. They are virtually tied.

Obama will not win in November.

I don't know what is important to you, but I want a nominee that will win in Nov. posted 03/31/2008 at 17:21:44

Are you talking to Obama? posted 03/31/2008 at 17:19:37

why should they allocate them 60/40? They should allocate them as they were won.

You can see the count here:
http://www.mydd.com/

Hillary - 1686
Obama - 1685 posted 03/31/2008 at 17:19:09

They exist, they are just not being counted yet. The Republicans moved up the vote, not the DNC. The voters were punished because the republicans broke the rules.

The people STILL voted, and Hillary still WON...

All they need to do is have a re-vote, but Obama won't allow it, because he knows he will lose.

(bene, grazie! tu?) posted 03/31/2008 at 17:09:25

And that said, why is Obama so afraid of a revote? If he wants to be on the ballot now, why is he fighting the re-vote? posted 03/31/2008 at 17:06:15

he was on the ballot in florida.

and he choose to take himself off in MI.

And Edwards and Obama were *the undecided* and she more then beat them!

So... posted 03/31/2008 at 17:04:31

I think that is more due to all the corruption and dirty tactics going on at the caucases. And Obama camp trying to steal Clinton delegates.

http://www.youtube.com/kimfrederi posted 03/31/2008 at 16:57:57

Including the delegates from Michigan and Florida, CLINTON is ahead by one delegate.

There is ABSOLUTELy no reason why she should drop out.

Just because Obama is fighitng to keep those delegates counted doesn't mean they don't exist, and it doesn't mean she isn't ahead or tied with him.

She beat him in those states, and many other big states. He will not win in November. NO how, no way.

He will be destroyed by the republicans, and proud americans. posted 03/31/2008 at 16:53:36

Fans of this user

TiffShelton
dawlishgal
shockmagog
PortiaElizabeth
democraticjack
HeraOxEyes
LeftLeanWing
accountability
lexicoscott
Heidfeld
Roshi98
BigBen
deminfla
tdbach
midtown

Log in to become a fan of this user.

Bloggers I Like

Bill Maher
Bob Cesca
David Fiderer
Joe Biden
Lanny Davis
Joseph A. Palermo
Taylor Marsh
Evan Handler
Dan Abrams
Kristen Breitweiser