tomcj

Recent comments by this user

Latest Gallup National Democratic Tracking Poll: Obama-Clinton Now in Dead Heat -- Will the Pundits and Media Analyze Why?

Poor Lanny!

The Gallup numbers today:

Obama 49
Hillary 42

You were saying Mr. Davis....? posted 04/21/2008 at 13:37:38
As others have noted, the numbers changed already.

Lanny Davis is a sad example of The Clinton's effect on our shared Political life.

Hillary is a known commodity. She is one half of The Clinton's. Too many Americans are like me, we used to vote for and reluctantly defend The Clinton's, but now we are sick of them.

Hillary never gets to 50% on National Polls; Bill Clinton never won anywhere near a 50% victory and probably only won because of Ross Perot.

Those are numbers Lanny won't show you because as a lawyer for The Clinton's, shading the truth comes easy for him and them. posted 04/21/2008 at 09:21:44

McCain in 2008 = Clinton in 2012

I agree with the scenario for 2008. However, I think Hillary is badly over-estimating how many of us who voted for The Clinton's (I did twice) now despise her

In 2012, McCain will have appointed at least two very right wing SCOTUS Justices, probably younger and more right wing than Roberts and Alito.

A majority of the Democratic Party will remember all of her endorsements of McCain.

For Hillary, it is this year or never. The Way of The Clinton's is to destroy, equivocate, and lie.

Karma willforce everyone to see Hillary and Bill for what they are:

The Clinton's, a money-making corrupt pair of poseurs whose minimal accomplishment per lie and compromise make me ashamed I ever voted for either of them one time, much less both twice each. posted 04/19/2008 at 17:28:52

Bill and Hillary's Biggest White House Stresses Were Self-Inflicted, and Obama Should Say So

This is a very good essay.

I would argue that HillaryCare was also a self-inflicted trouble. She ran the whole thing the way Cheney ran his Energy Initiatives in total secrecy and a contempt for real people, which is fine if the people you are trying to please ALREADY control so much power, like Oil Executives, and a disaster if they are uninsured Americans who sit at the bottom of our Power Scale.

And don't forget that Hillary's first Initiative for Better Government wasfiring the Travel Office staff and putting her own people in, getting caught, and then telling lie after lie about her involvement.

The Clinton's lie like moral people breathe.

But Bill wagged his ginger, pounded the podium and denounced Monica Lewinsky in Scarlet Letter terms: THAT WOMAN!!!

And Hillary chose that day to denounce the whole thing as "a vast Right Wing Conspiracy". There IS a Vast Right Wing Noise Machine and Power Base, if not Conspiracy, and Bill and Hillary let them off the hook.

Only Bill Hillbilly Elvis Clinton could actually literally get "caught with hios pants down."

The Clinton's should take their 100's of millions of dollars and go back to wherever it is people like them go back to. posted 04/20/2008 at 01:10:09

David Brooks Praises ABC, Debate, Because He Lacks The Good Sense God Gave A Box Of Tulip Bulbs, Apparently

Thank you for the essay, Jason Linkins. I tolerate David Brooks because he has unbridled & unknown intelligence.

What "unbridled intelligence" means is intelligence, and we have no idea how much or how little, that is not controlled or directed.

Brooks tries to be the Good Republican Hack, the Namer of Trends, the Serious Thinker, and an actual essayist.

David Brooks is great at the Capital Letter things, and terrible at being an essayist.

There are people like Hillary Clinton, whom one wonders "What would s/he have been if..."

With Hillary the if is "if she and her husband were not completely corrupt morally."

With Brooks, the if is "if Brooks were actually interested in the truth rather propaganda."

Brooks and Friedman are Our Age: The Mediocracy of The Well-Paid Flunkies. They are here to get rich, to get famous, and to serve the wealthy and powerful by dismissing the suffering and ugliness of their Master"s Voices. posted 04/17/2008 at 13:39:41

Bill Clinton Suggests Young Voters Too Easily Fooled

Bill Clinton should show some respect.

Like you, I blindly defended him when he attacked the women he used, when he lost both houses of congress, when he lied.

What did it get us?

Hillary, Marc Rich pardon, The Clinton's multi-millionaire status, the OTHER multi-millions Clinton raised for his library.

McCain is a senile fool, and W is the worst thing that ever happened to America's decency, economy, and standing in the world.

The fact that Republicans are bad does not make The Clinton's good. posted 04/16/2008 at 08:42:21

Bill Clinton Flashback: "All These Economically Insecure White People...Are Scared To Death"

I cannot be the only person who is tired of the way The Clinton's actions, words, votes, and tactics are used against them to show how hypocritical they are.

The Clinton's get to define reality, not lowly reporters. If Hillary said she was under sniper fire, she was. The Battle of Tuzla Tarmac will be studied at Military schools forever BECAUSE of Hillary's "head down, run to the car" tactic. She pioneered the duck! here comes sniper fire response.

Next thing you will be telling me that Bill did sexually harass dozens of women and supporters of The Clinton's, even feminists attacked the women, whom The Clinton's allowed to become jokes.

For the record, Bill DID NOT HAVE SEX WITH THAT WOMEN!

How do I know? The Clinton's don't lie.

Chelsea in 2016! posted 04/13/2008 at 15:37:33

Pardon Me

Thank you for writing this column.

Please accept my prayers for you, my hope that ypour story stops other rapes, and my paryers for all those who have been raped and assaulted. posted 04/12/2008 at 22:54:34

Michelle Obama and the Poison of National Review

maggieb is so correct. Go to Talk Left or Taylor Marsh or other "liberal" Obama-hate sites. Sorry pro-Hillary sites.

"The Clinton's: you are either for them or against them; if you are for them, remember, everyone else is bad and worse than them."

Chelsea in 2016! posted 04/14/2008 at 08:40:28
One of the saddest things about America is Rage. The Rage takes many forms, but it is always stupid and self-defeating. When I (male catching up to 60) was growing up, there were many street fights. Usually, the kid with the rage LOST, even if he were stronger and the better fighter. Rage always seems to destroy who carries it.

Republican Rage, which is the rage of the wealthy and powerful against 95% of the people, is often expressed so pointedly that the 95% think they are part of the 5%.

I think the absurd word "Rethugican" is part of that same stupid rage, as is National Review. When Buckley was not Raging, he was hanging around with Liberals and devoting his life to Culture and Pleasure.

Our American Culture is so pointlessly stupid, and it is no surprise that so many of the Canadiens who do well here, like Pam Anderson and Mark Steyn and David Frum, master the stupidity first.

The Statue of Liberty should say, "Send me your stupid, your right wing Rage Boys, your pompous, longing to cancel out decency." posted 04/14/2008 at 08:37:40

Obama: No Surprise That Hard-Pressed Pennsylvanians Turn Bitter

Hillary is a night shift worker. She has worked in factories all her life.

Chelsea is a mine worker who has lost two of her legs and three of her artificial legs to cave-ins.

McCain, after his hard-scrabble childhood married a very poor gal and they live in a Trailer Park.

Of course Hillary and McCain have reacted harshly to these comments. When Hillary isn't firing her gun and thinking of The Battle of The Tuzla Tarmac, she is target practicing with McCain and his missus.

Chelsea in 2016! posted 04/11/2008 at 19:38:53

Misogyny, Momism and Militarism


Maribelle

"Irony in the hands of a Voltaire is a powerful weapon. In a lout, it is merely offensive." S.J. Perlman posted 04/10/2008 at 22:33:36
Ditto! Accountability!

Thank God for strong women like Hillary who stood up to George Bush and his NeoCon War!!!! posted 04/10/2008 at 22:32:13
Condi Rice IS running! Let's get behind her! posted 04/10/2008 at 22:30:21
One wonderful thing about The Clinton's is that they inspire so muchblind loyalty and blind hate.

Only in a dying empire would people seriously suggest that The Clinton's represent anything except corruption.

They do favors for people and people give them money. Lots and lots of money.

They think they are smarter than everyone, but George W. Bush accomplished more than them.

If The Clinton's were Republicans and had exactly the same biographies, views, and accomplishments, Feminists like Jong would be calling him a "rapist" and "serial sex abuser" and her a "pathetic 1950's dutiful wife".

The Clinton's are the Democratic Part's Trojan Horse. I wish they would take their fortune and their resume's and retire. Bill can go someplace where he alternately talks Big Ideas and puts his hand up waitresses skirts, and Hillary can work with Chelsea on Hedge Funds. posted 04/10/2008 at 19:17:57

Jon Stewart Awards Obama "Dick Move of the Week"

Whether Jon Stewart is for McCain or Hillary, he is funny.

SNL's sketch actively defended The Clinton's for making well over 110 million dollars just for being The Clinton's,

SNL attacked the messenger, the Media (or MSM as bloggers rail and rant against).

When Fox News (sic) had its pathetic anti-media 1/2 Hour News Hour, they chose similar targets.

Politically SNL comforts the comfortable. The Clinton's get 15 million dollar book deals, six figure speaking fees for a single talk, millions and millions of dollars from wealthy and powerful friends, and SNL makes fun of the Media for even reporting that all The Clinton's wealth came from their "Public Service" (which is a good one that many of our multi-millionaires from Biden to Gingrich to, some day, Obama, hide behind).

Our politicians and Media figures do loyal service to the wealthy and powerful and are well rewarded for doing so.

Jon Stewart, like The Daily Show itself, is funny and smart. The "Dick" Award was hardly a classic nor was it pro-Hillary

That is Ms. Sklar's point, but few readers see that.

SNL does carry water for The Clinton's and I wish SNL had even one ounce of political satire or concern for anything except protecting the feelings of the powerful. posted 04/10/2008 at 12:32:42

Obama's America

I am disappointed The Huffington Post carries taylor Marsh. She has her own pro-Hillary Blog and radio show.

It is my reading that she is a hater and exactly the kind of person Arianna stands against.

I am not calling for Taylor Marsh to be silenced. But why does she get a free ad here for her odious blog? posted 04/08/2008 at 13:05:13
Brooklyn is correct, as usual:

Taylor Marsh is a certifiable hate site.

It is depressing The Huff Post gives her mainstream credibility. posted 04/08/2008 at 12:58:20

Clinton Makes False Claim About Her Iraq Record Vs. Obama's

I must protest. Hillary cannot be judged on her words and actions; she must be judged on what SHE tells us are her words and actions.

Reality is what The Clinton's say it is, and any attempt to hold them to copncepts like "truth" are anti woman.

Chelsea in 2016! and The Clinton's as Tri-Presidents for life!

Amend the Constitution now! posted 04/06/2008 at 14:06:20

SNL Returns: Clintons, Dodd And Christopher Walken's Tongue

Please see Vincealy's post (4/7 @9:15 a.m.) and especially Truthguy's important distinction.

Satire cannot work when it is in service to the powerful. Fox News failed with its attempt. John Stewart defended Hillary's right to stay in the race by saying, "Yes, we cannot allow Democracy, can we."

SNL, which I will watch even if they run "Vote for Hillary!" messages in skits, makes a huge mistake by asserting the Clinton's "know how to make money" and that they can pass that skill on to the poor.

The Clinton's make their money from books about their public service (sic) and from doing favors for wealthy, powerful people.

The wealthy and powerful need people like The Clinton's and Obama and McCain: they do not need the middle class and they despise the losers on the bottom.

Steve Martin did an SNL bit on how to get rich: "First get a million dollars," he said.

Thomas Edsell has written about Bill Clinton's "ability to make money." He wrote:

"One big line item is missing from the press summary however: the $15 million paid to Bill Clinton between 2003 and 2007 by Ron Burkle's Yucaipa Global Opportunities Fund."

The story is NOT the press being mean to mom and pop Clinton and their lemonaid stand; the story is favors and power. posted 04/07/2008 at 12:52:18
bravo! Truthguy.

SNL thinks The Clinton's are some poor honest couple persecuted by the media. In fact, they have trafficked on their political connections since they arrived on the scene. So do most, if not all, our so-called "Leaders". That doesn't make it right. posted 04/07/2008 at 12:38:28
My wife & I watch SNL. We give Obama money. We don't begrudge Poelher's pro-Hillary ad because we used to like Amy when the show gave her roles (she and Armisen need new agents....)

The opening sketch was another Amy Poehler LOVES her newest bff Hillary, but Darrel Hammond always steals whatever laughs there are in Poehler's Hillary. One good thing about Amy's Hillary? It is funnier than Armisen's Obama, but so is trench mouth, or salt water, or a beer can.

The Walken show was great. Kristen Wiig has emerged as the best player. Walken read his lines so clumsily that he sank some of the sketches, but it was a good SNL.

Politically, SNL shot its bolt. Clinton-o-philes might like Amy's Hillary, but Hammond gets more laughs with one take ("Just Talking..."), reminding people that Bill is a liar and manipulator. posted 04/06/2008 at 21:52:04

Hillary Clinton: I Started Criticizing Iraq War Before Obama

Only haters of The Clinton's will deny Hillary the reward she deserves for telling the one millionth lie off The Clinton's: Presidency for Life!

If those of you who are not with The Clinton's don't know, it is difficult to lie as much as Bill and Hillary lie. For one thing, after you lie so much and tell yourself so many stories, it is hard to think up new lies. Fortunately, with the sound of sniper fire and Bill's charitable work to give her deep solace, Hillary has years and years more lies in her.

P.S. Did you know Hillary is a woman? Plus she was co-president before and Bill needs the office to pay off all the favors he owes.

"The Clinton's:Earning Money The Old Fashioned Way By Sucking Up to the Wealthy since 1978!" (By the way, gals, Bill is single!) posted 04/05/2008 at 23:00:23

Chelsea Clinton Tells Press What She Will (And Won't) Answer

Chelsea, like her mom, is a woman and a Clinton, so she deserves Four Terms as President.

One hopes that with Bill's busy schedule speaking, he can amass a few billion dollars so The Clinton's can but The Presidency for Chelsea. One additionally hopes that Chelsea will hurry up and have babies, because decades of being ruled by The Clinton's are only a hanging chad of what we Americans want.

As aging white women say to her mom: you go girl! posted 04/05/2008 at 22:53:11

Hillary Clinton With Jay Leno On Tonight Show: Enters To "Rocky" Theme, Jokes About Sniper Fire

Hillary is a liar. Big Deal. Hillary is untrustworthy. Big Deal. Hillary and Bill are multimillionaires. Big Deal. Hillary's White House like Bill's will be for sale, with Sleepovers and Pardons. Big Deal

Hillary is hilarious. And di you know she is a woman? posted 04/04/2008 at 12:12:38

Bill Clinton Fires Back At Heckler: "You Want To Give The Speech?"

dear nicho

yes. you attend a speech to hear the speaker. Good Manners are in all our best interests. After the speech, you can stand and shout, or ask a rude question, or rent a hall and give your own speech. You can talk to the people around you. You can write about the event. You can do many things. But you cannot shout down a speaker. That is NOT Free Speech. At best it is rudeness/bad manners and at worst it is fascism.

Hecklers can drown out anybody for any reason. It was a well-used tactic by all totalitarians to shout down speakers and even attack them physically. posted 04/01/2008 at 17:08:23
That is stupid, ObamaEdwards. Nobody has the right to shout down someone.

I am an Obama fan & I could not disagree with you more..

This so obvious. A conservative could shout down John Edwards because he was a Plaintiff's lawyer; a McCain backer could shout down Obama because of Pastor Wright.

There are forums for people to speak.

Shouting people down is fascist, no matter who does it, with one exception: where a speaker is calling for acts of violence. posted 04/01/2008 at 14:01:23
Hecklers should be stopped. Most of us are sick of them. And I mean people who heckle the abominable Ann Coulter or Pope Benedict or you and I.

My brother is a stand-up comedian and most of his shows there are drunken hecklers.

Free Speech doesn't mean people in the audience get to shout while someone is talking. It is depressing that it takes one or two hecklers to mar an event. posted 04/01/2008 at 13:55:56

Carville, Coulter and the Others

I would like to see Carville's comment posted on the front page of every newspaper and blog.

If Carville keeps working hard enough, Hillary could reach 75% Unpopularity.

Carville announced that If Hillary gets elected, The Clinton's are back!

The White House is for sale, Pardons, Sleepovers, Secret Deals with dictators. Just two rules for The Clinton's:

1. You have to pay to play.

2. No Judas's. Tony Soprano had to get rid of Adrian and Christopher and Big Pussey. Carville is announcing:

If you liked The Clinton's One with its Tony Soprano Rules, especially Loyalty, you will love The Clinton's Two.

Why doesn't Carville announce that Vince Foster was murdered and that Bill Clinton did not have "Sex with THAT WOMAN!!!!"

Let's bring the whole gang back for a "Where Are They Now" Presidency. posted 03/30/2008 at 23:56:51

Should Obama Drop Out of the Race?

Note that RichLiberal's analogy means that Hillary is, like Carter in 1980, the sitting Democratic President. One thing that Hillary's supporters can not understand is that she has to Run For Office, the same as any non-Clinton.

And RichLiberal is telling a lie when he says "Obama's insults to her supporters by calling us racists for his own personal gain...."

There was no such Obama statement. It is disgraceful how low people will stoop to defend Hillary and The Clinton's. posted 04/01/2008 at 10:59:22
Let us hope Press is a very young man, because then he would have an excuse for not-remembering those wonderful Democratic fights in the 1980 and 1968 elections. Who would but the book of a guy like Press who writes so sloppily?

Press should also correct these sentences: "True, Obama leads in delegates, the number of states won, and popular vote. But Clinton leads in electoral votes."

If Press wrote accurately, the argument would at least be honest. Here is an example of that sentence written with truth: "True, Obama leads in delegates, the number of states won, and popular vote. But Hillary leads in those states that have more Electoral College votes in the General Election (if the Democratic Candidate were to win those states)."

It is depressing that this slip-shod thinker has no editorial guidance but continues to write (type) articles and books. posted 03/31/2008 at 18:41:06
Sorry Taylor Marsh dittoheads, you are the ones who are wrong here, as is Press.

Press writes "True, Obama leads in delegates, the number of states won, and popular vote. But Clinton leads in electoral votes."

These sentences are a lie.

Press COULD have written: " Hillary holds the lead in states where there Electoral votes, if the Democratic candidate carried the state, add up to more electoral votes." That would be an argument and true. It would have reminded people of how their Constitution and our Presidential Elections actually work.

The reason Press is claiming "Clinton won more electoral votes" is because The Clinton's make things up. "The Commander-in-Chief Threshold" sounds so formal, but is nonsense. And her experience in The Battle of Tuzla "I don't recall anyone offering me a cup of tea," Hillary said and then just got so carried away with her bravery that she finally did encounter sniper fire, from her against her chances.

As a college teacher, I KNOW even so-called "educated Americans" are unaware of what their nation and its constitution say.

Press wants to campaign for Hillary, fine. Don't invent "Electoral Votes". Look at what Press gave to Obama, what Obama actually won. Look at what he gave to Hillary, a slippery, meaningless Creation of The Clinton's designed to make Americans more stupid. posted 03/31/2008 at 18:25:53
Please Note: Press made up a category (like "The Commander-in-Chief Threshold") that is as anti-DEMOCRACY as it is stupid.

Electoral Votes are cast by The Electoral College. If Hillary has ANY right now than she is subverting the Constitution of the USA and Press is abetting her.

It is no wonder my beloved Democratic Party, PRESS' beloved Democratic Party does not win even when we have all the issues in our favor. Press writes:

"True, Obama leads in delegates, the number of states won, and popular vote. But Clinton leads in electoral votes."

At best, Press is telling just a stupid lie. And Americans are already un-informed enough about The Electoral College, The Constitution, etc.

I wish Huffington Post had editors who would say "Mr. Press is pressing an absurd Clinton Talking Point. Hillary Clinton has NO Electoral College lead and Mr. Press knows that. He is trying to save Hillary Clinton by inventing a new Constitution which exists only in Propaganda and Focus Groups. Huffington Post has to carry articles like this because Senator Clinton is desperate and has no actual issues. We regret that we are contributing to the dumbing down of America." posted 03/31/2008 at 14:08:29
Press argues (can you call a lie an argument?):

"But Clinton leads in electoral votes."

The Electoral College meets after the Election in November, 2008. How exactly does Clinton have more electoral votes? Should we hold the General Election? Will Hillary be President even of she is not the Democratic Party nominee? Are The Clintons tired of having to run and will now invent a new constitution, complete with "Commander-in-Chief Threshold Passing"?

Is that why Hillary already has "Electoral Votes"?

Under Press' theory of the Constitution, isn't Hillary already President?

Chelsea in 2016! Bill for pope! What utter jackasses Make up The Clinton's Mayberyy RFD Mafia, from Thug Carville to Propaganda Minister Press! Heil Clintons! posted 03/31/2008 at 03:51:16

Obama's Anger--Redux

Sorry to echo the Thank you's, but Thank You!

I am probably your age. No blacks in my Catholic Prep School until 1967. No Blacks in my neighborhood.

One thing that still shocks me, 2008: how often people will make racists remarks when it is an all white gathering. We can do better and need to do better.

I cannot actually believe when my fellow non-colored friends say that "I have never heard any white people say anything prejudiced about blacks." Or, "Well blacks are prejudiced, too."

The great thing about Obama's speech was he acknowledged the complexity of racial fears and hopes. Bobby kennedy used to say over and over, we can do better; we can. posted 03/29/2008 at 00:45:09

If Hillary Loses - Will She Blame it on "The Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy?"

Ha! KDH. That was funny, and unlike my remarks brief. Thank you for the laugh.

I wish you knew me. For almost 17 years I defended Bill and Hillary (voted for each twice) and then I watched her twist Obama's words about Reagan out of all sense.

I remembered how Bill made Reagan seem like Thomas Jefferson at Reagan's funeral, and I wondered why she couldn't be honest; and then, something snapped. I just thought, "Why do I defend these people? They just lie and lie. And WE defend them over and over. Why? What do we get?"

Since that Debate, my WIFE has turned against Hillary and The Clintons, also. Not only didn't Hillary expand her base, she shrunk it. And we are real peole with jobs that have nothing to do with politics. Living in New York State, we have defended Bill and Hillary thousands of times. People here often hate her and him. posted 03/29/2008 at 12:15:34
Hillary's supporters make me feel guilty. They sound so pathetic: "thank you for keeping me motivated!"

Clinton Supporters have no REAL motivation, just life-has-passed-me-by spunky sadness. The Clinton's are such corrupt, lying, manipulative people, and The Clinton Army turns out in the rain to cheer as The Clinton's drive by in their (separate) limousines to be with their beloved wealthy sponsors.

Then The Clinton supporters head over to Talk Left and Taylor Marsh because "someone has attacked their imagination (Dylan)."

The Clinton's are soooo squalid. Ozamerican provided the context for Hillary's "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy" quote, Clinton used a white house intern as a concubine, including making her and her Blue Dress a prop in his sex addiction/exploitation. When discovered, he gets angry and wags his finger and denounces the girl, a silly/young/powerless intern as "THAT WOMAN!!!!" How Presidential/moral/decent.

Hillary rushesd out to defend him.

The Clinton's have contempt for everyone. When you factor in how blind the Taylor Marsh ditto-heads are, it is no wonder they do. Pitiful, sad, lonely people worshiping Hillary and Bill, and in return they get nothing. At least Clinton's wealthy friends get favors, pardons, white house bedrooms.

Hurry over to Taylor Marsh or Talk Left. Don't bother to think or pass go. posted 03/29/2008 at 01:38:04

Chris Matthews Really Plays Hardball, Demands New Guest Name Sources For Obama Claim

Thank you for The Update. You should learn two things:

1. Do not publish stories that put the onus on the interviewer to source wild charges because "The Blogosphere" knows what rumors the guest is referring to.

2. Understand what Joe Conanson wrote about in Salon today: No Democratic Campaign should use deliberately mis-leading, fringe articles from attack dog conservatives to "raise a legitimate issue here about Obama being anti Israel".

The internet means careless journalism in its current Publish First, Think Later" format. posted 03/29/2008 at 12:03:28

Clinton Camp: Obama Falsely Claims He Doesn't Take Oil Money

yotinzepol I also love Hillary and fell in love with her when she fought and won the Battle oF Tuzla. My God that woman can tell the truth.

No wonder she settled the Northern Ireland Conflict. No wonder she lost her records and then they turned up in her office. No wonder an independent counsel said she lied about firing the Travel Office Staff (Poor Hillary didn't even know their was such a staff until she put her own people in).

Despite all those bullets she dodged, no thanks to the careless Armed Forces who claim that there were no "Corkscrew maneuvers", no "sitting on Flak Jackets during the landing" and no danger on the Tarmac...The nerve of those poeple in the Armed Forces to claim they "protected" Hillary during that trip!, Hillary still doesn't get the credit she deserves for either passing or opposing NAFTA (ddepnding on whether you think it is a good deal or bad deal: Hillary has the flexibilty learned in long nights sleeeping alone waiting for Bill to finish working.

Maybe it would serve America right for rejecting her if she had stayed in her beloved Cattle Trading where she was averaging 100 thousand a deal per afternoon in 1970's money.

Too bad she had to restrict her genius to one afternoon.

As her namesake Sir Edmund would say, Hillary Climbs the Mountain of truth every day. posted 03/29/2008 at 13:01:44

Western Activism Won't Help Tibet

Sure Pakiman. There are discussions and Civil Rights in China and elsewhere. It is the evil west that doesn't get it.

But most of us will fight for democracy, despite your absurd conflation of human rights abuses in the west vs. the total lack of civil rights and legal standing in China and elsewhere.

Take your argument to a Web Site in China. And remember: they are sensitive killers, so don't hurt their feelings by raising any issues of freedom. posted 03/29/2008 at 13:30:51
Finally! I join you in saluting Harold. And if the Chinese attack us, I for one will try not to hurt their feelings.

Why doesn't Tibet just die the way Parmington wants them to? Answer: the evil west:

"So far, these hopes have been for naught. Tibetans have gained no rights in the past three decades of Western enthrallment. "

Western enthrallment versus Chinese Freedom. No contest! posted 03/29/2008 at 13:26:39
TakeSake

Parmington and China won't like that link. How dare you not follow his happy lead! posted 03/29/2008 at 13:23:40

Run, Hillary, Run. Ralph, Too.

This argument does suffer, as previous posters have noted, from the flaw that Mr. Cooper's main argument is that Hillary should run to the end and then the Democrats lose. Cooper does not say so, but in his analogy, Hillary/Reagan wins the next time out.

That outcome is good for Cooper's wife and her boss Hillary. It might be bad for Democrats and issues the Democratic Party has championed.

Two examples: no offense to Mrs. Cooper, but Hillary has extremely high negatives, which realistically never really go down. The way people hate her is part of who she is and who the Clinton's are. People hate them; they fight back; they survive; their supporters get more entrenched in their defense and the rest of the country gets fatigued. The Clinton's even brought back that word: The Clinton Fatigue. They should trademark it like Paris Hilton wants to with "That's hot."

Young people are turned off by The Clinton's and excited by Obama. Her 2012 run, which will happen, will have to be minus the young voters.

Second, for issues Democrats care about, Hillary's "scorched earth" politics could destroy.

If McCain picks two or three more Alito's, there is no reason why the SCOTUS could not follow the logic of pregnancy and declare the fetus a legal entity with a Right to Life. The states would not be able to pass separate laws if the fetus is a person. posted 03/27/2008 at 13:56:27

Clinton In Bosnia: New Video Of First Lady Under Sniper Attack

.This is the worst case scenario for a candidate. A wonderful, charming anecdote about how escaping sniper fire "isn't exactly a Tea Party" followed by a routine Meet and Greet with a little girl reading a poem.

Lovers of The Clinton's have had to defend ourselves/themselves (I got off The Clinton Express this year, after voting for each twice) from these lies for over 16 years.

By the way, funny story: it turned out that although there was "A vast right wing conspiracy" as Hillary said in her attempt to tear down Monica Lewinsky, Bill Clinton DID have sex with that woman!

Well, who can keep track?

Remember The Clinton's-o-philes that The Clinton's Playbook calls for "Attack! when caught Telling Lies!!!" So poor Hillary is running against Pastor Wright.

"The Clinton's. We are Bad, sure, but everyone else is worse." Nationally known since 1991, The Clinton's is a trademark of Pacs, Hedge Funds, Lobbyists, and simple Billionaires. posted 03/27/2008 at 12:31:37

The Price of Loyalty

pabarabara1969 is a perfect example of some who supports The Clinton's. Attack! Attack! Attack! Uh-oh, someone is saying that Hillary lied about Bosnia just because there is a film of what happened and her endless description is shown to be a lie. Break out the attacks! Battle Stations everyone! Pastor Wright! Everyone is a liar!

The Clinton's, and those unlucky enough to support them, constantly attack. They cannot win arguments so they attack anyone who opposes them. Richardson is a "Judas", other senators have nefarious reasons. Meanwhile evryone who supports The Clinton's does so because their hearts are pure and innocent.

It is crazy, but that is the whole Philosophy of The Clinton's: everyone who opposes them is bad and must be attacked. Lies are truth, is as a word has so many meanings, their lies are misstatements. Bill did not have sex with that woman because Hillary was dodging sniper fire at the time and the vast conspiracy against them is to blame.

The dog, by the way, ate Hillary's files and she had no idea Bush was going to war. Who could have guessed.

The amount of pure deception supporters of The Clinton's put up with is sad. posted 03/27/2008 at 17:06:12

What Hillary Really Learned in the White House

Purple Girl

Wonderful comment!! (Which means I agree...) None of our politicians have anything to brag about. The Middle Class has been slipping, shrinking and disappearing since we stopped being an Indutrial Economy, 1972 or so.

All of the politicians need to offer us something better, not ask us to admire how long his opr her resume is. posted 03/27/2008 at 12:39:33
What a measured and referenced comment, Zozo'smom. Very convincing and forceful, a real reflection of the quality people Hillary attracts. posted 03/26/2008 at 17:47:38
are some of the supposedly pro-Hillary postings real? Look at what Ginnypoo (yuck, btw) says here and below. Is that really a SUPPORTER of Hillary? No offense, but how idiotic can a person get.

Does backing The Clinton's rot one's brain? Alternate Theory: does no brain=Pro-Hillary? posted 03/26/2008 at 17:44:32

Clinton Owes Obama An Apology

This column is so unfair. Poor Hillary.

I don't understand why people try to hold Hillary Clinton to any kind of moral standard. The Clinton's decide what is right and what is wrong.

If Obama had merely acknowledged that Hillary was Valedictorian at Wellesley and gotten out of the race, she would not have to play the demagogue role. Just give them what they want and they promise not to hurt us.

Hillary may indeed be a national disgrace, but compared to her husband Bill, she is not even the most megalomaniacal person alive today. Plus, if you had seen as much active duty combat as Hillary, you would be a mean and nasty and spiteful and hateful piece of work too.

You brought Hillary's Meanness on yourself America! She wanted to be the warm, almost jovial, front-runner, but you had to go and like someone else. Some of you joined the 52 % of people who hate her and thinks she is a vicious enabler of the most profligate waste of talent (Bill) in our lifetimes.

At least Hillary has a lower libido and probably won't have any blue dresses in her closet. (You know the dresses there are not hers, because like Mao and other great feminists of her era, she wears a pantsuit.) posted 03/26/2008 at 17:09:30

The Latest Clinton Canard

I think Cenk Uygur makes a Big Mistake here: For The Clinton's and the Cult of The Clinton"s, facts are nettlesome things. The truth is what The Clinton's say it is. Even "is" needs to be defined and divided. If America is going to live with itself, Hillary deserves to be President Hillary. It might be that Chelsea also deserves to be President.

Facts? Hillary doesn't need no stinking facts. Facts are like sniper fire to the Hillary Express Combat-tested Air Force One. Now duck everyone!!!! Incoming!!!

Hillary answer that red phone as you duck the incoming fire and climb Mt. everest with your namesake!!!!

As even you say of yourself Hillary, You have "Crossed the Commander-in-Chief Threshold"!!!

Lead us into The Clinton morphine dream that allows anyone to take Hillary Clinton and The Clinton's seriously! posted 03/26/2008 at 13:28:51

Clinton's "Sniper Fire" Trip To Bosnia: More Video

The pro-Hillary comments here are an example of why I finally shed my Clinton-Addiction. One cannot be FOR The Clinton's. One has to be AGAINST THE CLINTON'S ENEMIES!

The Clinton's train people to reflexively defend them by saying, "Other people are worse! Other people are worse!"

So Hillary completely mis-represents her Combat Mission Experiences and The Clinton Supporters, knee-jerk and reflexively lash out at Obama and Wright. If this fight were with Edwards, The Clinton O'Files would be lashing out at his haircuts, his house.

"Just Attack, Baby!" That is the motto of The Clinton's and their supporters. I voted for each of them twice. I finally got fed up with excusing her and him. I urge all you Clinton-heads to try looking at her. As Hillary once said of why she lied about being named about being named after Sir Edmund Hillary: "I am Hillary Clinton and I am better than you. I didn't think I would be caught."

And after all, when it comes to telling lies and then attacking people who question them, The Clinton's answer, "We treat America like a certain Blue Dress because it is there."

posted 03/24/2008 at 13:41:37

Three Myths About the Democratic Race

TexasDemocrat2008 is always good for a laugh. It is my great hope that s/he is kidding: Bush and both Clinton's were "divisive". That is why people dislike Hillary so much. And attacking Obama is the Clinton Defense: Poor Hillary! Everyone Else is Worse! posted 03/24/2008 at 16:22:55
This is an important column. Even a Hillary Clinton Adviser supports her.

I am impressed. The way Hillary landed on that Aircraft Carrier in Bosnia, the way she dodged those bombs and bullets....The way she looked in her flight jacket as she unfurled her "Mission Accomplished!" Banner (which she had previously used when she unveiled the HillaryCare Program that people embraced because they knew that she must have done a good job because like Cheney, she works better in secrecy....

She is one macho woman.

And just as Hillary's character is unimpeccable, a support from one of her campaign workers is the detail that seals the deal.

Peter Daou is not a fool. I really respect him. Those Clinton's are two honest son of a guns and it is a shame that they have to even seek election. We should appoint them co-presidents for life.

'Chelsea in 2016!!!!!' posted 03/24/2008 at 14:00:27

My Take

I think Ms. Walker has great points. I am surprised, but should not be, that Hillary has supporters who feel so sorry for Hillary that they see the Primary through a screen of self-pity and outrage that anyone could dislike Hillary. posted 03/24/2008 at 16:14:22

Fans of this user

Micah616
Petey
beebopper

Log in to become a fan of this user.

Posts this user has commented on

 

 Site  Web ask.com