trickbunny

btw, notice that the article does not name any specific superdelegates for which wright is an issue. hmmmmm.... posted 04/01/2008 at 17:54:58

eyes rolling... posted 04/01/2008 at 14:28:44

imagine- a president with charisma, charm, intellect. a warm guy that people like being around. a pretty stark contrast to the cold, shrill, disapproving, alienating, other major dem candidate, huh? posted 04/01/2008 at 14:32:27

some people just don't care. hardcore hillary supporters are just like hardcore bushies- even though the evidence of lying, cheating, whatever, is undeniable and right in their faces, they refuse to grow up and admit their candidate is insulting their intelligence. they say, "uuuhhh... but YOUR candidate had an association with someone we don't like. obama must not have a mind of his own and will do whatever reverend wright tells him to once in office. can we please talk about wright some more? we have nothing else."

it all comes down to not wanting to admit embarrassment. "I supported this candidate vigorously, now my candidate got caught in a stupid, ridiculous lie (that she told 4 times, no less), everyone and their mother are coming out saying she's screwing up the entire party, and now I'm embarrassed to be supporting her... but I have to save face, so I will pretend like none of this matters and vote for her anyway. I must look strong in my convictions and am too small to admit I was wrong about hillary. candidate over integrity, party over the will of the people."

yep. posted 04/01/2008 at 15:33:08

there also hasn't been any president who's last name ended in a vowel (not including "y", as in kennedy)... however, it *also* has never come down to an african american man and a caucasian woman as the potential dem nominee, so.... things change. get used to it :) posted 04/01/2008 at 15:21:52

is it me, or has hillary clinton aged by about 15 years in the last 2 months? posted 04/01/2008 at 14:42:37

"surveyUSA". the notable, reliable survey site that everyone knows as the last word in polling.

not. posted 04/01/2008 at 14:41:00

as an american, I feel that his views are pretty much on-target :) -and he makes fun of his own country as well. posted 03/31/2008 at 16:50:37

if obama is not a professor, why doe the university say he's a professor? are they lying?

...and if you think they're lying and you have a problem with liars, then you won't be voting for hillary, right? posted 03/31/2008 at 15:33:29

seriously- it's coming to that. posted 03/31/2008 at 16:21:58

so people point out that she told a blatant, stupid, so-easily-disprovable LIE (one of many) in order to build her "foreign policy" experience, people call her out for it (as they should), and now that equals "disrespect"? puh-lease.

sorry, but you're not supposed to tell huge lies while asking to be elected leader of the free world- or at least you're sure as hell not supposed to get *caught* in telling those lies. gary hart, anyone?

I have news for you. you, her supporters, are the ones being disrespected by your candidate every time she gets on the stump. she and her campaign continue to insult your intelligence, counting on you to swallow BS stories on her exprerience and judgment (bosnia, ireland, NAFTA, claiming Obama was never a professor, etc. etc.), on a daily basis. she, her loudmouth finger wagging husband, and her campaign managers disrespect you and are counting on walking on your backs right into the white house.

wake up, grow a pair, and support the democratic candidate that basically has the same agenda as yours, but the class and intellect to get the job done right (without having to "trick" you to get there), Barack Obama. posted 03/31/2008 at 14:42:14

a litle frustrated? :) posted 03/28/2008 at 16:49:38

It will not shock me at all to find out that these oil company CEOs donated money on behalf of THEMSELVES, not their companies.

I work for the Discovery Channel as a low level technician. if I donate money to Obama's campaign, does that mean he took money from "big media"?

Don't put it past the Clinton Cramp-pain to twist a private individual's contribution into "big oil kickbacks" etc...

Too little too late. posted 03/28/2008 at 16:01:23

snarky, stupid, sour grapes comments are the only kind hillary's supporters have left. they can no longer argue facts or policy. it has devolved into whining. posted 03/28/2008 at 21:19:28

clintonites- when our candidate lies, all we can try to do is change the subject. posted 03/28/2008 at 16:43:57

at least PJay is supporting the candidate who is not resorting to ridiculous lies on a nearly-every-other-day basis at this point. posted 03/28/2008 at 16:42:19

after all the pre-bragging hillary's camp has done about how they're gonna blow obama away in pennsylvania, the leader of the state comes out and gives his support to obama.

lovin' it. posted 03/28/2008 at 16:08:10

see how a hillaryhead won't address the fact that she was caught in a big lie? they just scream "hater!" out of embarrassment and 'cause they have no defense for a liar.

when in doubt, change the subject. "well, I can't say she's not a liar, so I'll just accuse you of being hateful." posted 03/27/2008 at 20:35:01

a very mature, thoughtful, relevant post. kudos. posted 03/27/2008 at 20:30:46

I've begun to notice that a lot of Hillary supporters have nothing left except "shut up!" and "you obama supporters are losers".

any kind of rational or relevant argument is pretty much gone at this point.

it must be driving them up a wall how everyone and their mother is coming out of the woodwork against hillary. posted 03/27/2008 at 20:29:15

uh yeah- the problem with your view is that if Hillary was in Obama's position and Obama was in Hillary's place, you'd be saying exactly the opposite. Fact. posted 03/27/2008 at 20:23:28

SILLY RABBIT! don't you know hillary doesn't give a rat's ass about what this is doing to the democratic party and is interested only in sniping and lying her way into the presidency? posted 03/27/2008 at 20:19:42

"just give us a little time to make a few small alterations, and we'll release them." posted 03/27/2008 at 17:03:59

duh. aren't you all sick of having your intelligence insulted?

karl rove's words, translated into reality: "if obama asks for the FL and MI delegates to be seated, his supporters will be a little disillusioned with his decision making abilities as it puts him a great risk at the convention- so we create the seed of doubt in some of his own supporters. then, if those states' delegates *are* seated and barack is only ahead by 50 votes, hillary will now have less work to do to try to get superdelgates to change their minds. the reason I, karl rove a.k.a. baby huey, am actually recommending this "strategery" to obama is because I know it is actually more likely to backfire on him then work to his advantage- and this is all because THE REPUBLICAN PARTY WANTS TO FACE HILLARY CLINTON IN THE GENERAL ELECTION BECAUSE THEY FEEL THEY HAVE A MUCH BETTER CHANCE AGAINST HER."

duh, duh, duh. posted 03/27/2008 at 15:29:21

archie bunker would be rolling in his grave... ha ha ha ha... posted 03/27/2008 at 17:18:12

seriously, man- some of the hillary supporters who say they'll vote for mccain if hillary doesn't get the nomination are the biggest bunch of malcontent, sour-grape-eating, petulant 2 year olds I've ever seen. "waaaahhh!! if hillary isn't the dem nominee, I'll vote for a senile warmonger!!!" what kind of IDIOCY dictates that behavior? keep it up and I'll have no choice but to see it for what it may very well be for some of these folks: "I'd rather vote for an old establishment fool than a black person."

I just do not buy that, with 95% of hillary's and obama's platforms being the same, hillary's minions will defect to the other party? GOOD. WHO NEEDS YOU THEN? please clear the retards out so we can begin a new age of respect and tolerance in america.

as is probably obvious but what I'm writing here, I am a proud and steadfast supporter of barack obama. but I'm not such a crybaby child that I'll abndon my party's ideals 'cause I'm all mad at the other dem candidate. if hillary does manage to steal the nomination and it's she vs. mccain, you better be damn sure I'll be behind hillary 200% 'cause *anything* is better than another 4 years of the same shit we've been going through for the last 8!

hey sore loser types- grow the fuck up and support the democratic party whether the nominee is hillary or obama. jeez. posted 03/26/2008 at 19:20:24

I thought the clinton campaign had already determined bill's big, whiny, argumentative mouth and stinky wagging finger to be a liability?

I guess when things are going south anything is worth another try. posted 03/26/2008 at 17:23:05

be sure to come back and post about what stupid morons we all are after november when a democrat takes the white house.

yeah, I'm pretty sure we won't be hearing from you then, too. posted 03/27/2008 at 15:08:39

you know what's *really* funny? (not really)- the fact that there's probably literaly *millions* of people who are fervent hillary supporters who ACTUALLY AGREE WITH rev. wright's statements about how america has gone overseas, tried to police the world, muscled our way into occupations, made people sick and tired of the bully that is the USA, and how our "chickens have come home to roost". ...after all, there are huge numbers of democrats who would agree that america *was* attacked because of our treatment of the middle east and our occupation of saudi arabia. however, since the person who made these comments is connected to barack obama instead of *their* candidate, these folks who probably agree with the comments, at least to some degree, want to get all indignant and pretend like it was the most offensive thing they've ever heard.

meanwhile, it's perfectly acceptable that hillary clinton was dumb enough to tell several bold-faced lies about her bosnia trip when there was videotape to immediately dispute her claim and make her look stupid? oh yeah- and how about her claim that she was sent to bosnia because the trip was "too dangerous" for the president himself to make. I guess that's why she brought her only child, a teenager, with her onto the tarmac. puh-lease.

and btw, hillary fans, please let us know when you come up with videotape of barack obama sitting in the church while pastor wright made those remarks... *crickets*... posted 03/26/2008 at 19:58:12

correct. posted 03/26/2008 at 19:28:25

yeah. whatever. two words: bosnia. liar. posted 03/26/2008 at 19:27:34

didn't we already have a president named harding? oh yeah- it was warren g. harding. now it looks like tonya harding- oops- I mean hillary cinton, wants to be president.

hey obama! watch out for the fat guy with the baton! posted 03/26/2008 at 19:26:15

I know this is shallow, but seriously: bill clinton is a good-lookin' man and, while hillary is no beauty queen, she could certainly be considered attractive by some.

so my question in regard to chelsea is.. wtf happened? :)

genes are a funny thing... posted 03/25/2008 at 18:37:25

nope. wrong. the only thing in the media (and I watch and read everything I can get my hands on- not just the huff post) relating to the wright controversy is basically about hillary's campaign trying to beat it to death 'cause they have nothing else left.

no stories about the wright controversy in and of itself. just stories on the hillary campaign doing anything they can to keep it alive. posted 03/25/2008 at 21:56:50

wow- you put a lot of faith into an AOL poll, yet you probably think that every poll that shows obama on top of the race is wrong. do I have that right? :) ...gotta love that selective reasoning. posted 03/25/2008 at 21:52:42

funny how when she's proven beyond a shadow of a doubt as a liar, all the HillBilliies can come up with is "you're crazy". instead of calling obama supporters crazy, howzabout you come up with a suitable explanation of why your candidate tried to BS everyone? posted 03/25/2008 at 18:30:34

zing! :) posted 03/25/2008 at 18:28:39

wow- a new low: hillary was "sleep deprived" and "misspoke" about her trip to bosnia. apparently, she misspoke about sniper fire occuring during her plane's landing. *then* she misspoke about the tarmac ceremony having to be skipped. *then* she misspoke about having to duck her head and run to a waiting car. wow- that's a LOT of facts to not remember correctly. then there's the lying about her support of NAFTA. then there's the lie about bringing peace to ireland. then there's the lie about her "spearheading" the S-chip program for children. when is she going to mention that that whole program was the brainchild of senators kennedy and hatch?

lies. lies. lies, lies, lies. and the anti-obama folks wag their finger and whine that "obama lied about having been in church when his pastor made controversial remarks." ok, fine- I'd still rather have a president that perhaps fibbed one time (and then quickly came clean about it) than a president who seems to tell a different lie every other day.

hillary's fervent supporters must be absolute masochists to have their intelligence insulted day after day after day. it's disgusting. posted 03/25/2008 at 14:41:53

Not only does Hillary's campaign continue to insult the intelligence of it's supporters on a daily basis, but have now begun to insult the intelligence of the superdelegates with this "you're free to vote this way or that way " stuff.

Believe me, the superdelegates are 100% aware of what their options are and do not need nudging or instruction form the Clintons. posted 03/25/2008 at 14:27:34

especially steve douchey.. er, I mean- doocy. posted 03/24/2008 at 15:26:33

exactly. and btw, I love it (not) how all these people think they have to do is say "it was a joke" and we're supposed to buy it. posted 03/24/2008 at 15:24:18

bill clinton: once a great man... now pretty much a dick. posted 03/21/2008 at 20:15:15

oops- pardon me. an "ambassador", not military man. whateverer- someone representing the USA, in any event. posted 03/21/2008 at 18:35:47

I can't wait to see all the anti-obama folks spin this. let me guess, "obama attended the church of a PLAGIARIST for 20 years!"

so it looks like the pastor was just paraphrasing some words originally used by a white military man.

oh, what will you folks do now? maybe you can come up with some new, damning BS like "obama visits restaurant and leaves too-small tip" or something. good luck with that (eyes rolling...) posted 03/21/2008 at 18:34:24

and yet if richardson had endorsed hillary, her camp would probably be calling it the most significant endorsement of her campaign.

can we say "pissed because a member of the clinton cabinet didn't endorse a clinton?"

I swear- the clinton campaign is like a bunch of spurned, pouting 15 year old high school girls. posted 03/21/2008 at 17:37:34

grabbing on to anything you can and holding on for dear life, I see. everybody and their mother KNOWS, looking at the statement he made in context and looking at it objectively, that he was not saying "I, Barack Obama, in the year 2008, see some whites (of which I am 50%) as having "typical" behavior" YOU KNOW THIS. you know that he was referring to someone who grew up in segregated times and had what was THEN very much a "typical" attitude by white people. all you obama bashers KNOW this, yet you pretend to be so thin-skinned and so offended. what a joke.

the point is- you're a "typical homer" for your candidate and you will latch on like a jellyfish to any comment or action that could be construed or taken out of context as something you find "offensive" about the opposition. what a joke. posted 03/21/2008 at 17:31:41