iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Valerie Jarrett

GET UPDATES FROM Valerie Jarrett
 

Women's Issues Are America's Issues

Posted: 11/11/11 01:50 PM ET

On Wednesday evening, President Obama addressed a dinner hosted by the National Women's Law Center, and delivered a powerful speech on the importance of continuing the fight for equality for women and girls. The dinner honored women Freedom Riders, who put their own lives in jeopardy in order to fight for the end of segregation in the South.

It was an honor to spend an evening with these courageous women, and it was a moment when our nation's past and present were truly woven together. One Freedom Rider whispered to the President Obama that on the day he was born, August 4th, 1961, she was in jail in Mississippi.

The Freedom Riders' stories should remind us all that change is hard. Very hard. It takes time. But with conviction, determination, and sacrifice, change is always possible. And when it comes to securing equal rights and opportunities for America's women and girls, our country has made great progress in just a few short years.

Change is the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, the very first bill President Obama signed into law, which strengthens a woman's right to equal pay.

Change is health care reform that makes it illegal to deny coverage for women with pre-existing conditions such as breast cancer or being a victim of domestic violence, and requires insurance companies to cover preventive care, including mammograms and contraception.

Change is investing in STEM education for girls, so that America's women can be equally represented in the next generation of scientists, researchers, and engineers.

Change is nominating two women to the Supreme Court, so that for the first time in American history, three of the nine justices are women.

Change is creating the White House Council on Women and Girls, which focuses every federal department and agency on working together to improve the lives of women and girls, recognizing that the issues that primarily affect women are not just women's issues. When a woman is paid equally for equal work, her family is better off, her community is healthier, and our economy grows. When women succeed, America succeeds.

I could not be prouder to work on behalf of a leader who truly understands the importance of these issues. President Obama has worked tirelessly to make sure that women and girls live in a country where, as he put it, "there is no limit on how big they can dream or how high they can reach."

Yet, President Obama recognizes that we still have a long way to go. Women continue to trail men in science and math, subjects that will be absolutely critical for the jobs of the future. Women still earn only 77 cents for every dollar that men earn. And like every group of Americans, women have been hit hard by the economic crisis, and the recession that followed.

As President Obama pointed out, there are those in Congress who don't seem to understand the urgency of these challenges. Republicans in the Senate have blocked the American Jobs Act, which would cut taxes for nearly 80 million women. They voted down a measure that would have put hundreds of thousands teachers - about three-quarters of whom are women - back in front of the classroom, where they could help prepare our kids for the future.

The President will continue to urge Congress to put politics aside, and do the right thing for American families. And if Congress refuses to act, he will continue to take steps to improve the economy without them. Because if we harness the potential of every American, there is no question that we will out-compete the rest of the world for the jobs and industries of the future.

I was reminded of this a few weeks ago, when the winners of the Google Science Fair were announced. Over 10,000 young people submitted projects, from 90 different countries. In many ways, this competition was a metaphor for the global competition that will define the 21st century. Citizens and countries will compete for the jobs and industries of the future, and as they do, STEM skills will be absolutely critical. So President Obama was thrilled when he heard that this year's winners were three teenage girls from America.

After the announcement, President Obama invited all three girls to the White House, so he could personally congratulate them on their achievement. I had the chance to meet these young women, and they were extraordinary. Not only were they very smart, they were full of passion and enthusiasm about learning so that they could contribute to society.

As President Obama said on Wednesday, they demonstrate that America is still "a place where ideas are born, where dreams can grow, and where a student in a classroom or a passenger on a bus or a legal secretary in an office can stand up and decide to change the world."

Continuing our journey toward a more perfect union won't be easy. It never is. But as women throughout our country fight for change -- for equal rights and equal opportunity -- the White House will be a partner in their work.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 375
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lisa Solod Warren
08:16 PM on 11/16/2011
Lest anyone think feminism isn't important or the fight is over, it is NOT. Until women are not harassed, beaten, and until they receive equal treatment under the law, until they receive equal pay for equal work, and until men (and women) stop pretending that ugly jokes are just jokes and that feminists don't have a sense of humor, we will continue to fight for a place at the table.
08:51 PM on 11/15/2011
"If women got paid less than men, companies would hire women only."

While on the surface this seems to make sense, it assumes that all employers act based on the principle that they will hire whoever they can pay less money to. But this is not always true. If an employer is motivated by sexism (and isn't this part of the claim?) then he will pay the women less and still hire men.
12:53 PM on 11/16/2011
Then why are there more women than men managers in this country ? Why do women dominate the healthcare and education fields ?
02:09 PM on 11/16/2011
“Then why are there more women than men managers in this country ?"

This is another "statistic" the MRAs throw around. Where does it come from? In 2007, the GAO pegged the figure of female managers at 40%, with only 14% of those women being mothers with children under 18.

http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-10-1064T

I know MRAs are creative at manufacturing the stats they're looking for, but since this is an increasingly popular one, I'd love to see where it originates. Are they counting night shift managers at McDonalds in that number? Where does it come from?
05:54 AM on 11/17/2011
"It's a feminist talking point."

Chuckle. Not all of us are as obsessed with feminism as you. Never read that piece.

I disagree with almost all of that article's conclusions. It's very sloppily written and just recycles the usual nonsense that today's boys are somehow geneticall­y damaged and can no longer learn in the exact kind of verbal, sit still, female teacher classrooms that boys have been learning in for over a hundred years.

HOwever, its comment that "more women are managers" is perhaps the most ignorant. If you follow the bouncing ball over to BLS, you see that this 51% figure comes from a grouping called "manageria­l, profession­al and related profession­s" which includes management occupation­s, business and finance, computer & mathematic­al profession­s, community and social services,e­ducation, training & library jobs, arts, design and media, law and health care.

So you see - not the same thing as "more women are managers". It's always better to question such countierintuitive claims, rather than just ingest them because they're ideologically convenient.
photo
Otherday
Chief Imperial Sage, Earth, Milky Way Quadrant
03:02 PM on 11/15/2011
Then again, what of our boys?
06:50 PM on 11/14/2011
Good job ladies! I support your fight for equality.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
trthsetsfree2
04:49 PM on 11/14/2011
Obama does all he can to help women go from having the advantage to having a greater advantage. Are black women trying to recover some of the ground they have lost to black men with regard to employment, business ownership, household headship, education, heritage rights, respect, etc? If so they can stop trying. The majority of black women already have the advantages or are equal in those regards. And our communities are replete with examples of a lack of men. Black women should IMO try to learn to work with men instead of trying to get additional advantages. Black women should be the first to accept polgyny as an option so more women and children can have access to the shortage of men who are responsible. Black women should be first in line to support Shared Parenting to reduce the predatory practices against the men which makes black women less desirable mates. Obama did not have a father in his life and that is most likely the reason he has no respect for manhood. But we do, don't we?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EdCorey1971
08:58 AM on 11/14/2011
What Father, worth his salt, can bear the thought of his daughters being second class citizens? Not many in my opinion. On that note, I applaud President Obama. With that being said, what mother worth her salt can bear the thought of her sons achieving less than her daughters? Well, it seems that some of the extremist believe that girls need a head start. That their boys...because they grow into men won't need any advantage. Especially considering they will inherit a seat at the table of the privileged. Being a man in their mind will make-up for any disadvantage their son's might encounter in this game we call life. I feel sorry for their sons.

I think that more mothers should be offended that the White House don't have a Office of Boys and Men.
02:19 PM on 11/15/2011
Don't you see.....the fact that the 1% that control the country are men, the other 99% of us must pay !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kirkland
08:40 AM on 11/14/2011
A segment of women in our country are terribly neglected and unadvocated *for*. They are unSEEN. They are disabled women who endure Domestic Violence. Change would be a Federal Mandate that in all 50 states , disabled battered women move to the top of Sect. 8 subsidies , housing lists. To be disabled, a woman, a battered woman in America is to experience complete powerless to CHANGE your circumstance. Disabled women stay in DV situations. To leave is to try to survive ( after the time in a womens shelter, if they're lucky enough to have access to them , expires ) with their disabilities on the streets. Homeless. Perhaps 1% of disabled women can now afford housing in most markets of the USA. The states, by and large , are woefully inadequate in advocating for and giving a hand up to this most vulnerable population. Change would be enacting legislation that forces society to SAVE these women.
02:20 PM on 11/15/2011
How are they worse off than disabled men ? Certainly you realize that homelessness is a mostly male problem.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kirkland
04:42 PM on 11/15/2011
If there is agreement that women and men are inherently different; which I believe to be true , homelessness is much harder on women. This said- my comment realted primarily to the double trauma of being a victim of domestic violence *and* disabled . I can't think of a more powerless scenario. ( domestic violence occurs to men also but much more rarely, DV is always about power and control (and) men are unlikely to hand over their power to women in the way which makes them vulnerable to battery )
06:20 AM on 11/17/2011
So you understand: Hotrod is referencing a CDC report that allegedly shows that men and women commit equal amounts of domestic violence. It is pretty much the only report on domestic violence that mens rights fanatics will cite, but they will never explain why it's not considered a useful or meaningful study. Here are the reasons:

1. It merely totes up any incident of physical altercation between a cohabitating couple. A slap gets exactly the same weight as a fatal gunshot, no more, no less.

2. It makes no distinction between offensive and defensive violence. A woman pushing a man off her gets exactly as much weight as a man knocking a woman to the ground.

3. It does not account for the vastly different amounts of injury and death that women sustain. That is irrelevant to this study, which is basically nothing but a list of physical interactions.

4. It completely disregards the period after a couple breaks up, or a woman leaves a man. Since this is when the majority of truly deadly violence happens to women, this is a glaring omissiion.

The study is meaningless, but you can expect to see it referenced ad nauseum by MRAs in these discussions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kirkland
12:19 PM on 11/17/2011
You need to understand that I'm familiar with the CDC report . Every DV violence professional would disagree that Domestic Violence is equally perpetrated and equally represented/ reported by being inflicted by both sexes. The Fed criteria is *very* different from the Clinical criteria.The study is regarded as hyperbole and inadequate in too many ways to issue it with ANY credibility. Family violence is a larger issue which contains Domestic Abuse. It is propraganda to suggest that men are abused by women in equal numbers. *IF* you are using the medical and clinical construct of what the substate of abuse *is*. Just like rape has nothing to do with sex and everything to do with POWER and CONTROL ; the same may be said for DV. This said ...the topic is about women. Regardless- our society is insanely violent. In both public and private arenas.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
William50
09:36 PM on 11/13/2011
A woman's rights to be equal to males. WOW what woman would want to sink that low just to be equal! Equal pay for equal work, is correct but when equality is sex basis and not job basis something is wrong.
The one other fact in this down turn is, if you want equality many woman will give up jobs so those unemployed is equal.
09:06 PM on 11/13/2011
Ms. Jarrett, there is no way in God's earth that you could write anything this literate - but you certainly could write something this foolish. I don't want equality for women ( I am a man ). I want women put back on the pedestal that you knot-heads have pulled them from. I firmly believe that women, the carriers of the future of our human race, should be protected and revered as such. Do I want them to have equal political opportunity, social opportunity and economic opportunity - absolutely!! But NOT at the cost of making them "Men-Lite". I enjoy opening car doors, regular doors, holding their chairs while they sit, giving them flowers, and paying for a date that we have agreed to, with no expectation of immediate "return on investment". I love women - ALL women (well, there are a few exceptions). I'm a throwback to a gentler social age when the word "Gentleman" meant something. There certainly were inequities in that system. But the way we've tried to fix them has seen the pendulum swing too far - IMHO.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SmileAndActNice
Utilitarianism, the -ism that works.
09:38 PM on 11/13/2011
But do you love us enough to give us equal pay for equal work ...

The only thing remotely in danger of making us "men lite" is allowing practices that punish us for being ourselves to persist. If I get paid less for the same work simply for being a woman while performing it then I am being told with crystal clarity that femininity is something to despise in myself.

Words are wind. Actions speak far louder.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matthew Blaine
09:58 PM on 11/13/2011
You are not being paid less for the same work! That 77 cents figure is an aggregate across the entire economy. Doesn't take into account women leaving and re-entering the work force. Doesn't take into account that men traditionally do more hazardous work. It's just an aggregate! Where I work, all the managers are female, and all the other females earn all the other males, except one. Where is the groundswell of rage against THAT discrimination?
08:12 AM on 11/14/2011
If women actualy where paid less then men, employers would hire women to max there profits. The work fource would be 99 % women and 1 % men.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JuniperSunshine
Libertarian Homeschooling Mom
10:54 PM on 11/13/2011
Amen to that, cupcake. Women and men are equal in value - this does not make us interchangeable. I make a much better woman than a second rate man.
05:57 PM on 11/15/2011
Wrong - in the Macro-cosmic world, women are far superior to men, because one man can inseminate many women, but women can only be impregnated one at a time. The carriers of the eggs are far more important than the carriers of the sperm. And, in the word of Robert Heinlein, any culture that doesn't put women and children first is doomed to extinction.
06:41 PM on 11/13/2011
It's not about equality, it's about equity. We all know that the shoe will not fit everyone. Lets focus on women as they make leaps and bound in this ever changing world and give them the recognition they deserve as women and as individuals. At the same time lets not let our boys fall behind and become an afterthought as is the trend these days.
05:50 PM on 11/13/2011
Ms. Jarrett,

Please ask President Obama to STOP the illegal reinstatement of FBI's Cointelpro program that harms so many innocent U.S. citizens esp Activists, Whistleblowers, Minorities and Single Women. When Obama signed to extend the Patriot Act, it allowed for this form of Organized Staking & Electronic Harassment to continue and this form of domestic terrorism and stalking is especially detrimental to Single Women given that military energy weapons are often used on such targeted victims....use your imagination to consider what these FBI agents and their informants are able to do to Single Women via military energy weapons and why is FBI using military weapons on U.S. citizens anyway? Shame on Obama Administration!
04:16 PM on 11/13/2011
Women need to judge Obama by his Actions over the last 3 years not what he says on the campaign trail.

Society is based on the social contract and The Rule of Law which this administration has not evenly enforced against The TBTF Banks and Wall Street.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Watcher from outside
01:18 PM on 11/13/2011
Well said

I know he is speaking for all women, we know he is yet reading some paid post here they use all these sites to twist. spin and spread bs facts

Who this information IS NOT reaching are the ones without access to real information , in those red states, all they have is CON views.....that is sad

Did it ever show up when the repubs tried to pass the personhood bill

Thank goodness it got NATIONAL attention otherwise women in Mississippi would have voted against all women's best interests....low educated voters amass in the red states..PERIOD
03:14 PM on 11/13/2011
so, if they were bussed to the polls and given notecards from ACORN on who to vote for they might fall back into your good graces?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Watcher from outside
08:43 PM on 11/13/2011
What the hell IS wrong with repubcons...was there ANY articles and any references to the now defunked Acorn

That is such old news...try to keep up please

Watch at next election when women everywhere fight to get to polls on bus or running...
12:45 PM on 11/13/2011
Ladies please pay attention. If women made less money then men for the same job, greedy employees would only hire women so they can max there profits and the work fource would be 99% female and 1% male. The payscale is a myth and has been debunked over and over again. Believe what you want to believe, but my statement is true and free clear thinkers all know the Feminist are just blowing smoke into mirrors
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wltdnfaded
02:35 PM on 11/13/2011
Wow, wish I lived in your little utopia.
07:40 PM on 11/13/2011
F&F
02:26 PM on 11/15/2011
This is a study that support mdipary2004's contention. This was commissioned by the Bureau of Labor and removed from their website when Obama took over.

http://www.consad.com/content/reports/Gender%20Wage%20Gap%20Final%20Report.pdf

When I called and asked the B of L why they removed the report, they told me I needed to request that information through the Freedom of Information Act.