iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Van Jones

Van Jones

GET UPDATES FROM Van Jones

Obama and GOP Should Cut Red Tape Blocking Tribe's Green Energy

Posted: 01/31/11 12:44 PM ET

President Obama's second State of the Union address set forward a bipartisan framework aimed at unleashing a clean energy revolution in America. Touching on everything from solar and wind power (hooray!), to nuclear power, to "clean" coal (sigh), the president seemed to leave no stone unturned in his quest for actionable solutions.

But ironically, he did omit one major point of potential bipartisan cooperation -- one that could greatly accelerate our nation's transition to a clean energy economy. The Department of Energy estimates that wind power from tribal lands could satisfy 14 percent of total U.S. electricity demand, and the tribal solar resources could generate 4.5 times the total amount of energy needed to power the entire country.

Remarkably, however, as of today, only one commercial-scale renewable energy project operates in all of Indian country. This is because of the incredible amount of federal red tape choking off the green energy opportunities on tribal lands. Many tribes are eager to partner with private sector developers to build large-scale clean energy projects. Such enterprises could be profitable, while respecting tribal values of environmental stewardship. They could also help keep families together by providing good jobs on the reservations.

Unfortunately, many of these sorely-needed investments never come to fruition. A long-standing backlog of catch-22 requirements, crazy-making rules and outdated laws cause projects to stall in Indian country. Policy barriers slow development and make financing cost-ineffective.

Obama and the GOP should join forces to remove the bureaucratic barriers to rapid renewable energy deployment on Native American lands. Each party has a major incentive to act decisively -- and enthusiastically. Democrats love renewable energy and lament Native American poverty. Republicans hate federal bureaucracy and love entrepreneurship. A united effort could boost clean energy; create jobs on reservations; open the door to new investment and entrepreneurial opportunities; reduce federal bureaucracy; and move America closer to energy independence.

The tribes are ready to be full partners in this effort. Last week, the National Congress of American Indians delivered its response to the State of the Union, a report on the State of Indian Affairs. Critical among the strategies proposed by the NCAI is the commitment to pursue greater economic self-sufficiency and reduce crippling tribal unemployment, as well as a "concerted effort to unleash the potential of Indian energy resources throughout the nation."

The goals put forth by both President Obama and the leaders of the tribal nations are therefore complementary and mutually beneficial. They deserve special consideration as the nation comes together across regions and party lines to take on the next phase of our economic recovery.

In recent weeks President Obama has boldly called for a 21st-Century Regulatory System that removes outdated government regulations that would otherwise stifle private sector innovation and slow job growth, making our economy less competitive. Part of this commitment is a government-wide audit of all the rules on the books, and an order to cut where reasonable and necessary. This sentiment is strongly echoed in both chambers of the newly elected 112th Congress, and in both political parties.

Now is the time to apply this logic to Indian country. The administration and policymakers on both sides of the aisle can draw a game plan for reaching multiple goals. By fixing our current policies and offering appropriate incentives, we can streamline government processes, stimulate a new wave of investment in clean energy, and activate the economic potential of tribal lands.

Moreover, these projects have sizable benefits for everyone concerned. Here are a few ideas to start with:

· Promote interagency and federal tribal coordination -- Immediate efficiency can be achieved by the White House designating one lead agency to oversee renewable energy projects on tribal lands. Overlapping responsibilities and potential conflicts between the Department of Interior and the Department of Energy, in particular, need to be resolved. Existing processes could then be greatly streamlined and duplicative ones eliminated, mitigating a slow and costly process for development. In addition, agencies should establish a tribal advisory body to ensure meaningful participation of Native American stakeholders in this work.

· Ensure tribal access to the national electricity grid -- Tribes must be included in the planning and expansion of our national electricity grid so their project can "plug in" without unfair added expenses. Tribes should be explicitly represented in national, regional and state planning processes.

· Enable tribes to develop their energy resources -- By providing them access to production and investment tax credits already on the books and available to all other states and local governments. Agencies should also eliminate fees that apply only to projects undertaken on tribal lands. These two relatively easy fixes would go a long way toward jumpstarting a renewable energy renaissance in the Native American community.

· Empower tribes to conduct preliminary clean energy feasibility studies on their lands either internally or through a third party -- Presently all preliminary clean energy work, such as land appraisals, needs to be done through the Department of the Interior, creating substantial backlog. Allowing tribes to conduct their own studies either internally or through a third party would expedite this process substantially.

· Provide smart financing incentives for tribal projects -- Energy Secretary Steven Chu has already begun championing a process to promote tribal energy development. One idea is to finance the evaluation, development and deployment of energy efficiency and renewable energy projects on tribal lands through the Tribal Energy Program. These programs should be enhanced to provide valuable start-up funds for projects that will have multiple co-benefits and pay dividends many times over.

Lest we forget, perhaps no part of American society needs new avenues of economic advance more than the Native American population. Many tribal nations lack basic access to jobs, economic opportunity, and even electricity. More than 14 percent of American Indian households in reservations do not have electricity access, and energy on reservations can cost as much as 10 percent above the national average due to a lack of adequate transmission lines. On Indian reservations of the American West, bitter winters force many families to spend up to 70 percent of their total income to heat their homes. Poverty rates on Indian country hover between 27 and 37 percent, and unemployment can reach as high as 48 percent in some tribes.

Clean energy deployment in Indian country can help address many of these woes. Today, the tribes are ready and willing to be key contributors to this nation's "sputnik moment." Our economic recovery will depend on how well we utilize our domestic resources and activate the full potential of our human capital -- especially those communities that have been hit hardest by the recession. A bipartisan initiative to create "green scissors for the red tape" would clear the way for them to thrive and strengthen their people, and make America as a whole even stronger.

 
 
 

Follow Van Jones on Twitter: www.twitter.com/VanJones68

 
 
  • Comments
  • 106
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
09:26 AM on 02/26/2011
The problem isn't the existence of the rules, the problem is the creation of processes to justify the bloated government workforce. Why do something in one year with 10 people when the same thing can be accomplished in twice the time with four times as many people?

Nobody ever made it to the Senior Executive Service by shrinking their budget or reducing the number of people who work for them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Mann
Nuclear Educator
08:26 AM on 02/26/2011
Prairie Island NPP provides clean, reliable power on tribal lands.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
swancj
02:21 PM on 02/02/2011
What makes Van Jones think that "Republicans hate federal bureaucracy and love entrepreneurship."?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gamoonbat
07:04 AM on 02/02/2011
I am suspicious of demands to lift "red tape" for development projects. The Bush administration gutted all of the environmental law enforcement on military bases with similar claims, for example. Indian reservations due have vast areas of ideal habitat for endangered species as well as prehistoric archaeological sites which have not even been identified much less adequately investigated to make way for construction projects. Tribal, state, and federal authorities may act inefficiently but there is no easy workaround that will not do more damage than good.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:24 PM on 02/01/2011
Van Jones I agree that pesky constitution sure gets in the way of an awful progress so while you're at it why not burn it to.
10:08 PM on 02/01/2011
Those impediments were put there by the dems, as usaul Van your going after the wrong party
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gamoonbat
07:06 AM on 02/02/2011
Many Republicans also advocate for conservation of natural resources and protection of archaeological sites. Barry Goldwater would be one shinng example, and this is one of many respects in which he set a standard that today's conservatives fall short of.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
swancj
02:22 PM on 02/02/2011
Which BIA regulations regarding land use are you specifically saying were emplaced by Democrats?
photo
niko73
Dem belly full but we hungry
02:32 PM on 02/01/2011
How about streamlining permitting on ALL federal lands? There are many more federal lands than just tribal lands.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bllnsinchnge
peace, markets, freedom
11:26 AM on 02/01/2011
Cut the red tape then, and the loopholes, and the subsidies that displace value. Get rid of the EPA and the Dept of Energy and give that money back to the citizens for energy savings.

"hell, there are no rules here, we are trying to accomplish something"
Thomas Edison
01:25 PM on 02/01/2011
Right. EPA doesn't accomplish anything. Unless you breathe. Or drink water.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bllnsinchnge
peace, markets, freedom
04:12 PM on 02/01/2011
The EPA didn't accomplish anything before 1970, right.
09:24 AM on 02/01/2011
"Indian" country? Isn't it native american land?
photo
niko73
Dem belly full but we hungry
02:21 PM on 02/01/2011
If you're trying to call foul on political correctness grounds, I'd like to let you know that most Native Americans I work with prefer to be called "Indians" or "American Indians," but not "Native Americans." Maybe Van Jones' experience is the same, so he choose to use the term more acceptable to Indians themselves (you know, as opposed to the white people who think they should make decisions for them).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
swancj
02:27 PM on 02/02/2011
I can only speak for myself, and my family - we are a mixture of lumbee, nanticoke, and cherokee [along with african american and european ancestries] and we don't mind 'Indian Country' at all. No one I know who is indigenous feels any strong affinity for the term 'Native American' Some are rallying around the term 'First American' instead. My aunties and great grandmothers were American Indians or just Indians, and the terms don't bother me. But they also aren't very accurate either - Call me mixed, or nanticoke - I am a woman of color - brown and round and not too concerned with labels.
10:09 AM on 02/03/2011
Swan, did you & your folks object to the College of Wm & Mary's use of "The Tribe" nickname, or some of the other monikers/mascots that the NCAA "corrected"?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
moonflowerjewelry
Buy American made, no excuses.
09:15 AM on 02/01/2011
A couple of things at work here: if it interferes with corporate energy entities (coal, petroleum), it won't happen. If Americans have an interest in any struggling domestic population, Native Americans are at the bottom of the list. They are truly forgotten until some New Age charlatan decides to get rich off calling him/herself a master and leading pay-for-play sweat lodge "ceremonies".
05:30 AM on 02/01/2011
I believe that Native Americans need employment, like the rest of us, but why do the wind power turbines have to be on tribal lands? Is this kindness, or is it another way to stick Reservations with our unwanted stuff (many wind power plants have been voted down, like Martha's Vineyard, for being unsightly)?
10:11 AM on 02/01/2011
Green energy is good money, combats climate change, is clean, and would be permanent.

It's not exactly dumping.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
swancj
02:28 PM on 02/02/2011
Lots of open land in high wind places. Isn't hard on the landscape, and the issues some people seem to have [as you noted] are not considered big issues on those parcels.
01:59 PM on 02/07/2011
I guess we are just dumping, then. Interesting how no one else wants them, but hey, you figure it's just great on tribal lands.

They don't have anything else there anyway!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WARHUKKER
“My country, right or wrong
02:02 AM on 02/01/2011
Hey Van wind power does not work in freezing tempartures!!!!
socialtalker
this micro-bio is a great idea!
02:39 AM on 02/01/2011
germany gets 7% of its energy from wind.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
05:46 AM on 02/01/2011
It certainly doesn't work if there's no wind, but there is no issue with temperature.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WARHUKKER
“My country, right or wrong
09:49 PM on 02/01/2011
Wind turbines fail in Minnesota's cold weather - Washington Times
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
GoldwaterKid
Vote Person, Not Party
12:32 AM on 02/01/2011
Let's start with changing the 'Red Tape' to speed up changes in all areas.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gamoonbat
07:19 AM on 02/02/2011
Having seen first hand what happened with coal mining I would not recommend making this a rush job. Indian societies need to come to unanimous consent about these sorts of things. You cannot rely on their politicians and they are not individual landowners.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
swancj
02:31 PM on 02/02/2011
There have been activists from the nations trying to get this done for a while. The consent is a done deal for those tribal groups in question. The Anishenabe [or Ojibway] have at least one turbine up and running but it took an enormous amount of time and effort. Research White Earth Reservation for information.
12:19 AM on 02/01/2011
This is popycock. To replace our nations energy with wind power would require us to blanket an are the size of oklahoma with windmills.

It is fantasy.

Its a little like the government setting CAFE standards at 1000 miles/gal starting next week.

It isn't technically feasible.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
ErnestineBass
No longer a cog in The Machine.
12:55 AM on 02/01/2011
Didn't read the article, did you?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gamoonbat
07:21 AM on 02/02/2011
No one is talking about replacing the entire energy infrastructure with wind. It will be one of many renewable technologies that we will need increasingly now that we have passed the peak in the extraction of hydrocarbon resources which were our staple  throughout the 20th century.
luckybear
Coffee Drinker
11:34 PM on 01/31/2011
Aren't the Kennedys dead set against wind energy in their backyard?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gamoonbat
07:22 AM on 02/02/2011
John Kerry also opposed putting wind farms out in the Atlantic where they would be visible from Cape Cod and other seaside communities. Robert Kennedy is probably the most politically active one at this point, and his stance on this certainly seems hypocritical.