More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Vivian Glyck

GET UPDATES FROM Vivian Glyck

Why Women Are the Key to Ending Hunger

Posted: 01/24/11 04:38 PM ET

Can the solution to hunger be attributed to one sex over the other? Is it really that cut and dry? If so, how do we maximize our efforts to support the findings?

According to the Hunger Project, "Women are the key to ending hunger in Africa."

This is a powerful statement. Is it just a headline to grab attention?

No matter what your economic level you have a budget in place and how well you manage it affects your family. The same is true all around the world. In the U.S. and in Uganda is getting out of poverty simply a matter of managing money?

As explained in a NewYorkTimes.com article by Nicholas Kristof :

"In many poor countries, the greatest unexploited resource isn't oil fields or veins of gold; it is the women and girls who aren't educated and never become a major presence in the formal economy. With education and with help starting businesses, impoverished women can earn money and support their countries as well as their families. They represent perhaps the best hope for fighting global poverty."


"A series of studies has found that when women hold assets or gain incomes, family money is more likely to be spent on nutrition, medicine and housing, and consequently children are healthier." Is this due to a maternal instinct or is there more to it? As the article suggests, "everyone benefits when women enter the work force and bring home regular pay checks. One reason involves the dirty little secret of global poverty: some of the most wretched suffering is caused not just by low incomes but also by unwise spending by the poor -- especially by men. Surprisingly frequently, we've come across a mother mourning a child who has just died of malaria for want of a $5 mosquito bed net; the mother says that the family couldn't afford a bed net and she means it, but then we find the father at a nearby bar. He goes three evenings a week to the bar, spending $5 each week."


The solution may seem simple, but the efforts needed are widespread. The quickest and most long-lasting solution to poverty in Uganda is through empowering women and girls.

"Investment in girls' education may well be the highest-return investment available in the developing world," Larry Summers wrote when he was chief economist of the World Bank.

It is critical that women become self-reliant as there is much evidence to prove that putting women in charge of household spending provides greater financial stability. There is tremendous benefit to teaching life skills coaching on topics such as women's rights and responsibilities, social survival skills, safety and security, health and hygiene. Through this type of awareness the girls can become leaders and role models to others in their community. Taking vulnerable girls and empowering them for life is a priceless education!

To learn about mentoring, empowerment and micro-enterprise programs being conducted in Uganda, please visit Just Like My Child.

To read more about the findings mentioned in this blog, read "The Woman's Crusade" from NewYorkTimes.com.


 

Follow Vivian Glyck on Twitter: www.twitter.com/justlikemychild

 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:26 PM on 01/25/2011
I couldn't agree more (even as a guy). You should look into partnering with Daraja Academy in Kenya; they are providing free secondary education to girls in a positive environment with free housing - daraja-academy.org
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Vivian Glyck
03:00 PM on 01/25/2011
We've witnessed the results of empowerment first hand. We've got one mother who is on AIDS treatment and has lost one little boy to the disease. We've invested in her and she's now building a craft business and is eagerly using her small earnings to send her remaining son to school. It all sounds so theoretical until you see this mom crying with pride at the turn her life has taken, you see the intelligence in the little boy's eyes that now won't go to waste, and you see an entire family in tact where the mother can truly be the "head of the household" -- empowered and able to provide for her loved ones.
11:37 PM on 01/24/2011
I am not thinking of Kiva grants but Grimeen micro-financing on the dowry system.
11:35 PM on 01/24/2011
True...lots of good projects to think about for women...I don't think you want to totally exclude the men however...some sort of balance and even competition would be good. You don't want the women good men bad equation because it is just unhealthy, and many men break their backs working for their families..think of the ratcatchers in India etc. Another huge and related problem is the dowry system..people getting Kiva grants for example have to reject this, and I imagine it is culturally a hard thing to do. Another problem is spending large amounts of money on funerals..there should be respectful, beautiful, meaningful funerals without a family having to go terribly into debt. mg
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Vivian Glyck
02:07 PM on 01/25/2011
Great points! The dowry issues are not as severe in Uganda, East Africa as they are in India where bride burning is still a scourge on the nation. Including men in the equation is important, but raising girls to become women who are NOT submissive and economically independent engages men in a different way that I've seen to be very successful.
02:10 PM on 01/25/2011
I don't think the point here is to exclude men, but to include women. To equip women and girls so that they can effectively enter the economic arena, as fair game. Cross culturally, they haven't been included as economic competitors. Kristof's article points out one difference where a woman, committed to successfully providing for and raising her children, would invest her earnings. Paying for her children to go to school is also an investment in her community- in her country- in hers and her children's future.
02:13 PM on 01/25/2011
And just the same that every man is not going to spend all of his earnings at the bar, and that every woman also has the ability to make the same sort of debilitating decision, it's unnecessary to interpret Kristof's comment as universal. It does, however, make sense when he says that "In many poor countries, the greatest unexploited resource .. is the women and girls who aren't educated and never become a major presence in the formal economy. With education and help starting business .. women can .. support their countries as well as their families." - Because women and children in impoverished areas cannot possibly be expected to participate in fostering the local economy, let alone a global one, when women are expected to raise children and run the household, and children are to contribute to a barely subsistent lifestyle because their parents can barely afford to feed them, let alone pay school fees. We couldn't possibly expect impoverished populations to be able to transform their lives and rise above a deadly cycle to transform their future, and the future of generations to come, without educating and empowering them first- women and men, girls and boys, alike.