Today, The New York Times covers two of the pitched debates in our society about animals -- reporter Dan Frosch covers the controversy over the use of chimpanzees in biomedical research and Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Nicholas Kristof offers an indictment of the industrial confinement of laying hens in cages for egg production.
The HSUS
Earlier this week, I provided a link to the column of Times editorial writer Verlyn Klinkenborg on egg-producing factory farms, and he like Kristof had a harsh view of these operations. What's notable about both writers is that they both grew up on family farms and hold close their rural values. They both know animals, and they know farming, since that's been a dominant feature of both mens' lives. What they see now on factory farms is alien to them. There's no farming -- just mass confinement of animals too numerous to count with dead animals among the living. These overcrowded, squalid environments are bad for the animals, bad for our health, and bad for rural communities. I urge you to read Kristof's powerful piece, which at the end concludes: "we can overhaul our agriculture system so that it is both safer and more humane -- starting with a move toward cage-free eggs."
Animal Protection of New Mexico
Frosch's piece is a sad one about our betrayal of chimps. The chimps he writes about now live at the Alamogordo Primate Facility in New Mexico. Most of these creatures, with so much intelligence and awareness, have not known freedom for their lives. Many have felt the sting of invasive research, been conscripted for us in circuses, or had some other ignominious treatment. After a lifetime of use by people, now the National Institutes of Health wants to transfer them from their reasonably safe settings at Alamogordo to Texas for more invasive research.
The Humane Society of the United States has been supporting the Great Ape Protection Act, in order to retire these chimps and to have the United States join the rest of the world in ending the use of chimpanzees in biomedical research. Frosch's piece is worthy of your attention, too.
This post originally appeared on Pacelle's blog, A Humane Nation.
Loading comments… 
Heck, we use humans for medical research. It's obvious that we can gain valuable scientific informatio
A blanket ban on research is a really bad idea. The goal of saving human lives remains the most important issue.
There are viable alternativ
We know so much more now.
We are acutely aware of the physiology of these animals.
We are aware of their social interactio
We should be evolving and realizing that we can do better.
We do not have to cause such shockingly cruel pain and suffering on those animals caught in our "civilizat
Chimpanzee
These poor beings are tortured, traumatize
We are so much better than this.
I completely agree that the rights of animals are important and that they should be treated humanely. This is a reasonable position backed by factual informatio
However, it is unreasonab
Animal experiment
People who claim otherwise are just flat wrong. They undermine the efforts of animal rights activists who prefer to tell the truth.
My family raised chickens when I was a child. They had a nice size coop plus a fenced yard to run around in freely. We had more than enough eggs and sold the surplus at a local market. Some of the roosters were used for our own food. When they were slaughtere
We need to move away from the process of big agri-busin
these places exist and continue to expand because gov't rewards them with our $$$$$$$.
the agricultur
Are your opinions based on actual facts, or propaganda