More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Wayne Pacelle

Wayne Pacelle

Posted: January 7, 2011 04:15 PM

Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland issued a sweeping executive order today banning private citizens from acquiring certain dangerous wild animals as pets and requiring current owners to register the animals and microchip them. The new rule prohibits exotic animal owners who have previously had their local, state, or federal licenses revoked from holding onto such animals, so we expect this to mean that notorious animal owner Sam Mazzola will not be able to keep his menagerie of big cats and bears. One of Mazzola's bears killed 24-year-old Brent Kendra in Lorain County in August 2010.

Prior to today's order, Ohio was one of about 10 states with virtually no rules on private ownership of dangerous exotics, and it now leapfrogs just about all of the states with these comprehensive new standards to protect animal welfare and public health and safety.

Tiger

iStockphoto

It's a fulfillment of one of the eight points in the landmark animal welfare agreement The Humane Society of the United States negotiated last summer with Gov. Strickland and the leaders of eight agriculture commodity organizations in Ohio, including the Ohio Farm Bureau Federation.

I passed the word on to Deirdre Herbert about the issuance of the rule this morning and she was elated. She is the mother of Brent Kendra, whose death came less than two months after we negotiated the agreement.

Deirdre gave us the following statement: "I want to sincerely thank Governor Ted Strickland for signing the executive order banning exotic animal ownership by private citizens in the state of Ohio. I believe that this valuable executive order will not only prevent other families from suffering the tragedy and loss as my family has experienced, but is also a humane act towards these majestic animals."

There is just no reason for people to keep large predators as pets. There's almost always a bad outcome, especially for the animals, who either languish in cages or on chains, often with their teeth or claws removed in an effort to make them less dangerous, or are relinquished to someone else or released illegally into the wild. Animal sanctuaries, including those run by The HSUS, spend millions a year cleaning up the messes of the people who make the impulsive and irrational decisions to acquire a dangerous wild animal as a pet.

And as Brett Kendra's terrible fate makes plain, the potential costs to humans are also of the very worst order. In recent years, several children and adults have been injured or killed by exotic animals being kept as pets in Ohio, including a 10-year-old girl bitten by a mountain lion in 2009, a man killed by his pet python in 2006, and a boy losing part of his finger to a caged bear in 2006.

I should add that the Ohio Livestock Care Standards Board has also been considering the five agriculture reforms called for in the June 30 agreement. One of the farm animal welfare provisions had been enacted (humane euthanasia standards), and we hope to see the board enact the remaining four provisions (banning the transport or sale of downer cows, phasing out veal crates and gestation crates, and barring new battery cage facilities from being established in the state) before the end of the month.

The Legislature started its work this week, and we expect to see anti-cockfighting and anti-puppy mill legislation introduced. Those are the final two elements of the agreement, and we'll keep you updated.

But today, there's cause for celebration with this tremendously important new rule to protect wild animals and the public.

This post originally appeared on Pacelle's blog, A Humane Nation.
 
Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland issued a sweeping executive order today banning private citizens from acquiring certain dangerous wild animals as pets and requiring current owners to register the animals and...
Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland issued a sweeping executive order today banning private citizens from acquiring certain dangerous wild animals as pets and requiring current owners to register the animals and...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:47 AM on 02/02/2011
You do notice that it prohibits new ownership of exotic animals, not taking them away from those who already own them. It is called 'Grandfathering' and is a result of the ban on ex post facto laws. There should be limits on said ownership, including housing, medical care, feeding, etc..
11:38 AM on 01/09/2011
The exotics ban Strickland just got in can expire in 90 days and we need your help to keep it from becoming a permanent bill. The exotics industry is a huge industry in Ohio that will be destroyed with this bill. Banning animals is insane, the HSUS is behind this bill and their ultimate goal is complete animal liberation - which means they will be coming after our dogs and cats next - which by the way, dogs kill more people a year than any exotics, probably combined. Responsible people should not be punished for a few irresponsible person's mistakes. This law is an example of government over-stepping it's bounds. Stop this law! Read more here:

http://www.faunaclassifieds.com/forums/showthread.php?t=220294

I agree that there should be some regulation such as permits to keep them out of irresponsible hands, but a complete ban on keeping, selling, breeding etc is outrageous. Once all the exotics are gone, your dogs and cats are next.
02:16 PM on 01/10/2011
what utter nonsense, the HSUS IS NOT behind taking away anyone's dogs or cats.

this is more of the same misinformation that puppymiller's and other animal exploitation industries use to demagogue animal protection legislation.

Bears, Chimps and big Cats don't belong in cages imprisoned for life subject to substandard care and filthy living conditions so some human can profit from their misery.

the only thing that shocks me is that it happened in OHIO first, of all places...who would have thunk!

next thing they need to shutdown are the roadside animal auctions.
12:38 PM on 01/11/2011
Who said anything about cages and poor care? I agree that there needs to be tougher regulation to make sure these animals aren't in the wrong hands, but an outright ban is WRONG. Not all keepers/breeders are abusive. That is the kind of misinformation HSUS and PeTA wants you to believe. HSUS & PeTA both have agendas that are not good... I urge anyone to do some solid research before blindly believing they have the animal's best interest in mind. They are quick to criticize breeders for "making money" on animals (which BTW, any reputable breeder will tell you that you're lucky to even break even) even though that is exactly what those organizations are doing - making money off of good-hearted people who believe their donations are going to a good cause. If you want to help animals, donate to local shelters, not these groups.

http://humanewatch.org/
11:47 PM on 01/22/2011
HSUS and PETA have as a part of their AGENDA that they are both opposed to ANY breeding of dogs and cats. Theoretically, this would lead to the complete annilation of dogs and cats. They lump the money-hungry and abusive puppy millers and the ignorant backyard breeders in together with the reputable breeders which shows their absolute lack of sense and knowledge of the situation. Too bad we aren't more like Germany where the breeding of dogs is controlled by breed wardens of the national breed organizations who help the breeder determine which dogs should be bred to further the development and improvement of the breeds. Of course, something like this just wouldn't fly in America. But, some kind of controls ae needed. Just not from PETA or HSUS. Getting back to exotics, perhaps even wolf hybrids should be included in the law. They're not wolves, but they're not dogs, either. There have been some serious incidents involving hybrids.
08:51 PM on 01/14/2011
There is no reason to keep a wild animal as a pet. Get a cat or dog.
11:02 AM on 01/15/2011
Yea? and I'm sure your an exotics expert too. Have you ever seen/interacted with an exotic animal other than the zoo? I bet not. I doubt you have any knowledge. I've been working with exotics for 10 years. If it weren't for handlers/enthusiasts/breeders we would know nothing of these animals. If you feel throwing a 1.3 billion dollar industry in the trash is a good idea, go for it. I'm all for tighter regulation for keeping regular people (who thinks it's just "cool" to have something instead of being passionate) from keeping them, but true enthusiasts have every right to pursue these animals. BTW, dogs and horses kill more animals than anything else. I guess we should ban them, cos they pose more of a risk than exotics do according to all statistics.
11:36 PM on 01/08/2011
Go Ohio! I'm so happy Governor Strickland was able to pass this piece of legislation before Kasich took office! Hopefully he's able to push the remaining points through with little resistance.