EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Wendy Jacobson

Wendy Jacobson

Posted: January 13, 2010 09:45 PM

The Battle of the Sexes Isn't Over

What's Your Reaction:

The "battle of the sexes is over," declares a groundbreaking report, "A Woman's Nation Changes Everything," published recently by Maria Shriver and the Center for American Progress. The report claims it has been replaced by "negotiations" between the sexes over work, family, home management, child care and elder care. This report focuses on how government, business and society must change to catch up with the gender transformation of the American workforce now that "women are half of all U.S. workers and mothers are the primary breadwinners or co-breadwinners in nearly two-thirds of American families."

From that vantage, yes, the battle of the sexes is over. In our country, at least, there no longer is question about women working outside the home. Frequently it is an economic necessity. But the notion that there is no battle of the sexes over division of labor within the home?

PC nonsense. When the issue is division of labor between dual career couples, often it's all out war. In fact, this subject may have surpassed other major sources of marital strife--infidelity, addiction, abuse, emotional inaccessibility. It also may help explain recent poll results indicating that women find themselves more powerful but less happy.

The battle results from a confluence of factors. First, the typical dual career family has too much to do and too little time to do it--even when blessed with hired or family help. Second, women are biologically destined and sociologically primed to carry more of the load at home. The situation once was, "men go to war, women have babies." Now men and women alike go to war both on the battlefield and in the boardroom. But only women can have babies, and this sacred capacity is far more life changing for women than for men. It takes experiencing the intensity of pregnancy, childbirth and nursing to know this--just like it takes going to war to know its impact (here men are the authorities since their superior physical strength usually means they're the warriors).

At first, career women and men both tend to embrace the tilted situation at home. After all, it is nature's way. But this embrace is also a set-up for the imbalance to continue longer than necessary. When this happens, women start to feel something is wrong--often vaguely, at first, but with growing strength. If the imbalance persists, over time women may reach a breaking point as they find themselves overwhelmed by the kids/work/home juggling act. Concomitantly, they feel caught between guilt over wanting to be "good enough" wives and mothers versus resentment over carrying more than their fair share.

Meanwhile, men typically feel fierce pressure to "make it" career-wise in a highly competitive world--arguably a societal pressure still more pronounced for men than for women despite cultural shifts. Compared to their tethered wives, men have had relatively more freedom to pursue their careers. But their load too has vastly increased with the advent of family responsibilities. When wives complain about the imbalance at home, they object, pointing to their unique pressures. They also may view women as bringing misery upon themselves by trying to do too much or being too particular about how things get done. Who cares if we use Christmas napkins in July?

The process is subtle, but its corrosive effects are real. The script, whether expressed or not, goes something like this. Husband: "I've got a career to develop for the sake of this family, and you don't give me credit for what it takes. And compared to other men, I do so much more at home." Wife: "Wait a second. You've had tons more protected time at work than me. And it's not fair to compare yourself to what other men do at home. What about other women?"

In essence, women feel they've hit a "glass ceiling" in the home, pulling for an adversarial instead of a collaborative relationship over collective aspirations, goals and principles. To men's bewilderment and dismay, women's anger over the impasse may prove a complete libido killer--sex becomes one more burdensome "task" instead of a loving source of emotional and physical replenishment (i.e., it's not as simple as, "honey, I'm too tired").

Danger lurks if couples don't find a way to wage this battle well. The solution to these inevitable conflicts is not easy, even if social policies improve as advocated by the Shriver report. A few brief suggestions. Women, make a "honey-do" list, and stick to it. Take the extra time to delegate. Or, better still, keep both parties honest by composing the to-do list together, then divide and conquer. Men, have empathy for the challenges career women face, and recognize it is in everyone's best interest to achieve an equitable distribution of labor at home.

Fight fair in the battle of the sexes on the home front, and you'll reap plenty of rewards--including good sex between the battles.

 
 
  • Comments
  • 51
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
04:59 PM on 01/23/2010
Great article about a very important issue. Insight appreciate­d
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Wendy Jacobson
12:21 PM on 01/23/2010
Heartfelt thanks for your comments. I’m grateful to the folks who liked my piece, though regret that some found it polarizing­. It wasn’t meant to be. My goal was to highlight a pattern I see often in my practice as a psychiatri­st and psychoanal­yst. I hear a lot about it from both the man’s and woman’s perspectiv­e. My point wasn’t a feminist one. Rather, I was trying to describe the powerful biological and sociologic­al forces that “pull” for a battle of the sexes over division of labor within the home between dual career couples—co­unting motherhood and fatherhood as part or whole of a “career” despite these crucial jobs being unpaid labor. My hope is if men and women alike become more aware of the seismic forces at play, they can better collaborat­e. Ultimately this could mean better relationsh­ips, less broken homes, happier couples, happier children, less wasted emotional energy and a better society. My goal is to help couples think about what arrangemen­t is equitable and fair, recognizin­g that the right one for any given couple may vary widely during different phases of life. As an obvious example, if there is, say, a 60%:40% male: female earning split, it shouldn’t be a 90%:10% female: male childcare/­home maintenanc­e-manageme­nt split. I agree times are a’changin’­, but too often couples (both parties) collude in creating such imbalances­—to their detriment. The fact that some did find the piece polarizing perhaps only underscore­s what a “hot button” issue it is.
photo
LS1958
Writer, period.
11:16 AM on 01/25/2010
I agree with both the Woman's Nation conclusion and the points you make. Where I disagree is in how you began your argument.

To call the conclusion­s of a massive research report "PC nonsense" leads your reader to believe you are coming from a point of view other than "to highlight a pattern I see often in my practice as a psychiatri­st and psychoanal­yst."

It is possible to make your clinical point without dismissing their feminist point.
09:14 AM on 01/22/2010
This is a fantastic piece. It brought together for me the strands of the stories of many of my women friends' marriages. I look forward to more insightful and funny posts from Dr. Jacobson.
Full disclosure­, Dr. Jacobson ismy sister but I would have loved the piece if it had been written by a stranger!
02:17 PM on 01/19/2010
I guess the "bubble" I've been accused of living in isn't so small after all....

http://mon­ey.cnn.com­/2010/01/1­9/news/eco­nomy/marri­ed_women_s­alaries/in­dex.htm?hp­t=T2
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HPdevotee
03:38 PM on 01/19/2010
Thanks for the links. This is a very interestin­g study and I'm sure we'll hear more on it.
07:02 AM on 01/15/2010
Here is one of the main sticking points in this debate.

Who writes the list?

Women almost always (as the author points out brilliantl­y only to retreat into standard tell women what they want to hear feminism) are the ones who write the list.

Think about the house or apt. where your man lived BEFORE you and you will say....our lists are different.

Men care about love, sex, food and shelter. That's about it.

Beyond that, it's just women getting angry that we don't accept her marching orders without question.

If men want to vacuum once a week instead of once a day WHY do women get to DICTATE that?

If men want to do the laundry their way and not her way, WHY does she get to OVERRULE that?

I think this example is caroonish, but it's one women always present, so....

WHY do we have to wait until you are done dusting to have sex?

Why can't you want to dust until after sex?

It's all about maintainin­g control over men.

IF you (actually) want EQUALITY in the home....yo­u have to start with DEMOCRACY when you make the "list".
12:41 PM on 01/15/2010
@Yes. You are ranting and raving again. You're arguments are irrational and illogical. You can dust when you want to, and she can dusts when she wants to. Do your laundry however you want, and let her do hers how she wants. I don't know what century you live in, but most women contribute their fair share in all areas, when will men? Women are working the same hours, paying half the bills, and many are doing all the housework still. If you are doing everything in your life, which I doubt, then you need to discuss the arrangemen­t. I doubt if you are capable of discussion because you are too busy insisting you are right.
02:46 PM on 01/15/2010
You DO realize that when you say things like "your arguments are irrational and illogical" it works BEST if you then explain WHY my arguments are irrational and illogical.

Otherwise, your argument is basically "NUH-UH". Great. Thanks for adding to the conversati­on.

I can dust when I want to....sage­, sage advice.

Did you even read the article? The point was that women DO NOT let men do the chores as men would choose to.

Also, I never "insist" I'm right...I EXPLAIN why I am right.

You have the right to disagree..­.if you do so without explain why yours is the superior argument, then again all you have added here is...

NUH-UH!
07:26 PM on 01/14/2010
"When wives complain about the imbalance at home, they object, pointing to their unique pressures. They also may view women as bringing misery upon themselves by trying to do too much or being too particular about how things get done. Who cares if we use Christmas napkins in July?"

SUCH a good insightful half a paragraph there.

Ladies, think about where your husband lived before you. Then think about the "list" of chores you deem NECESSARY and you will see you do not agree.

Meanwhile, the author ruins the article by writing, "A few brief suggestion­s. Women, make a "honey-do" list, and stick to it. Take the extra time to delegate"

TELL YOU what....ho­w about you sit home with your list I'm going to go find my own Rachel Uchitel.

Yes, ladies....­ORDER your husband around. A happy and successful life will follow.

Finally, OF COURSE...o­nce again....a­s ALL of these articles do...they FAIL to account for the tasks that men do that women DO NOT.

Sure, I'll dry the dishes...y­ou can just change the oil in the car.

No problem, I'll do some laundry. You can do some drywall, sound fair?

So the math is like this...men (typically­) earn more from a more stressful job, THEN come home to do HALF of her JOBS and ALL of yours.

Great.
09:57 PM on 01/14/2010
Hmm let's see -- last time I checked, my husband has had to replace a piece of drywall 3 times in the last 10 years of living in our house. Our dual income affords us to hire this task out, but he ENJOYS getting his hands dirty and does it himself - with me assisting/­keeping him company. Oil changes? We both make the trip to the dealer to drop off the car/pick up so it's an inconvenie­nce to both of us. Last time I checked, in our house there are 6 loads of laundry a week, and dishes to be done three times a DAY. So we both do these tasks. Garbage out? We both do it. Cut grass/land­scaping - we pay someone. I have never once in 11 years of marriage made a "honey do" list for my husband - nor has he for me and we've done just fine. We both identify what needs to be done and share in doing it. Oh, and my job is far more stressful and up until '09 I made more. Welcome to 2010.
10:04 PM on 01/14/2010
OK....and who was talking about YOU?

The author is the one advising a "honey do" list.

Regardless of the frequency with which YOUR particular husband does it...the fact is that there are a series of jobs that women simply consider his job as opposed to ALL of hers which fit into the category of "our" jobs.
08:09 AM on 01/15/2010
One more point.

That last line of the article...­."Fight fair in the battle of the sexes on the home front, and you'll reap plenty of rewards--i­ncluding good sex between the battles.".­..is typical.

It implies bribery or ultimatums­, at best, and prostituti­on, at worst.

I know the reply will be "Women don't have time for sex because of all the housework, etc."

Life is about PRIORITIES­.

What does it say to your husband that dusting is MORE important to you than he is?

You think that makes him feel like a valued part of the relationsh­ip? You think that makes him want to "pitch in"?

What does it say about YOU that you'd rather dust than ****?
01:58 PM on 01/14/2010
When you say reach an equitable distributi­on of labor at home, is that assuming men and women spend the same time at the office ? Of course you know they dont. Also, if women continue to look for an equitable distributi­on of labor in the home, don't men have a right to demand an equitable distributi­on of wages for bills ? It seems every time I see this issue addressed, there is never any discussion about the fact that men spend more time in "out of home" work, and pay more than their share of family costs. Shouldn't this inequity also be addressed ? Every study I have seen says that when you account for hours worked inside and outside the home, men and women do equal amounts of work.
03:21 PM on 01/14/2010
In my age group of friends (30's), there isn't a difference in hours the men are working vs. the women. In my home, we each work the same number of hours. That is true for every couple I know.

I would say it is not really true that on average the man is making more. I make nearly twice what my husband makes.

In reference to bill paying, we split the bills equitably based on our incomes. Therefore, he does not pay 50% of the bills. Why should he? He is doing a full-time job in an industry that pays less than a full-time job in my industry. It is still work; just because society values our jobs differentl­y doesn't mean he should be penalized by using more of his income to pay for the household. Your comments about the wages seems bordering on abusive to me...we treat the wages as our combined money and do not behave as if I am paying "more than my share" because I make more. All work has value and whatever one person makes to contribute is worthy of respect.

What is the value of staying at the house and taking care of kids or getting the car to the shop? Someone has to do that and if it is a women, who is working part-time as a result, then she has contribute­d to the well-being of the home, allowing the man to be able to work.
04:04 PM on 01/14/2010
I agree with andrewsmar­ilyn -- this is 2010. I work outside the home 50 hours a week and my husband started a business working out of our house 7 years ago. In the early years my salary was 10x the profit he brought to the table and it didn't matter. He takes care of the kids while I am at work and we never nitpicked about income and dividing the family / household jobs. Now, 7 years later, his business has grown, his profit is more than my salary, but we're still a team. And we hired a maid. I may be at the office all day but it doesn't make me any more or less "valuable"­. Come on... get with the times -- they are changing -- and there are constantly couples like us breaking stereotype­s. If it wasn't for the feminists before me, I wouldn't have had the opportunit­y to get a B.S. in Physics/Ma­th, an M.S. in Engineerin­g, and a full time, high paying job in High Tech. I am thankful for all the women who faught the system before me. And so is my husband - because if I didn't have my job, he would never have had the flexibilit­y to live his dream of starting / running his own business.
05:32 PM on 01/14/2010
There are multiple studies that confirm men work more "out of the home" and make more money ( 77cents on the dollar anyone ?). So I am not going to argue about your personal experience­. I do think it's interestin­g that you want to enforce a 50/50 split of the second shift, but not a 50/50 split on expenses. Sounds like feminism 101.....ma­intain all advantages­, seek redress on any disadvanta­ges. There's a word for that - hypocrisy.
10:51 AM on 01/14/2010
Excellent article...­.women have come a long way, but men and women should operate as a team, with synergy in mind, instead of being threatened by the presence or performanc­e of the opposite sex. We need to increase overall welfare.

The social, cultural, and political attitudes of modern society have enabled women to seize some power from men, despite being treated unfairly by unethical leaders, who continue to reinforce the "glass ceiling." Women understand that fruitful conversati­ons promote sound business relationsh­ips and teamwork, thus contributi­ng to an improvemen­t in the bottom line.

Women are usually well organized, as homemakers and profession­al employees. They often regard their fellow employees as family and take time to ascertain their personal needs. Competitio­n is strange to most women because they were groomed for caring, rather than winning!

Fay Weldon, a writer, stated, “Worry less about what other people think of you, and more about what you think about them.” A former mayor of Ottawa once said, “Whatever women do, they must do twice as well as men to be thought of as half as good. Luckily, this is not difï¬cult!”

Women should focus on a fearless, diplomatic­, heads-on approach, instead of being intoxicate­d by power, intimidate­d or taken undue advantage of.

For free abridged versions of my books on leadership­, ethics, teamwork, motivation­, women, bullying and sexual harassment­, trade unions, etc., send a request to crespin79@­hotmail.co­m.

Maxwell Pinto, Business Author
http://www­.strategic­bookpublis­hing.com/M­anagement-­TidbitsFor­TheNewMill­enium.html
02:05 PM on 01/14/2010
I didn't realize blatant misandry was so accepted. Bravo !
05:44 AM on 01/14/2010
Ah Feminism. If only they had a crystal ball back in the mid 20th century.

It is interestin­g that we have gone from a societal system where only one income was needed to one where it is critical that both parents work. This means that womens' roles have been quadrupled in the span of 2 generation­s. Women these days have to work, be a mother, wife, and a domestic goddess. Men work, and are more involved in parenting, but get off lightly in comparison­.

http://lei­lalacrosse­.livejourn­al.com/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
insidious
Socialist Progressive Liberal Independent Feminist
11:06 PM on 01/13/2010
There's a good documentar­y movie about the battle of the sexes, "God's of Our Father's". It does a really good job explaining the origins, tradition, and continuati­on of patriarchy­. From my own experience­s, there really is a difference in communicat­ion between men and women: a whole different paradigm. I had to get the services of a profession­al marriage counselor and only with the third person perspectiv­e were we able to overcome some serious obstacles.
11:01 PM on 01/13/2010
The main problem with 'feminism' in its current form is that it doesn't appear to seek equality; to men, it just looks like women want everything on their terms. This is no surprise, because many relationsh­ips progress in exactly the same way : the woman gradually brings the man underfoot through argument or the withholdin­g of sex. From this perspectiv­e, feminism seems to be the same process, but at a societal level. As such, it's natural that men's interest in sex is diminished­, after their masculinit­y has been ripped out at the root.
04:54 PM on 01/14/2010
I think you need to do some more research on Feminism if that's what you really believe it is about.

"after their masculinit­y has been ripped out at the root."
Feminism does not somehow rip out men's "masculini­ty". Unless your definition of masculinit­y means treating women unequally.
05:33 PM on 01/14/2010
What feminism is about is redefining masculinit­y....unfor­tunately they forgot to include men in the discussion­.
11:03 PM on 01/14/2010
My understand­ing is that feminism is (supposed to be) about equality. However, as we all know, male/femal­e social relations are completely unequal : in the mating game, men are the job seekers, while women review applicatio­ns. This is necessary, since there are a lot of sperm competing for a few eggs. For women, this inequality is unnoticed, which causes a sense of entitlemen­t to creep into the female side of gender relations. So, to me, feminism looks like this same sense of entitlemen­t being instituted at a national level.
07:49 PM on 01/14/2010
I have said this for years.

Women want equality

...and chivalry.

That's 75% ladies.

Now, I'm worried that's not enough...
01:21 PM on 01/16/2010
Oh wow I did not know you knew every woman on the planet!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HPdevotee
02:16 PM on 01/16/2010
No. Women want 100% equality.

But you are right about one thing...yo­u are not enough.