iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Wenonah Hauter

GET UPDATES FROM Wenonah Hauter
 

A Real Hero in the Chesapeake Bay

Posted: 10/11/2012 5:35 pm

Kathy Phillips is a real heroine. She's standing up to Perdue, a company responsible for a large percentage of the pollution pouring into the Chesapeake Bay and surrounding waterways. Kathy is braving the anger and malice of a powerful corporation that wields power in her community. While all Maryland agriculture combined contributes only 0.35 percent to the state's Gross Domestic Product, with chicken contributing only a fraction of that number, the poultry industry in particular wreaks havoc not only on the environment, but also on its contract growers. Contract growers earn on average less than $20,000 a year.

A single Perdue farm generates hundreds of tons of animal manure a year, far beyond what can ever be properly and responsibly used by contract growers to fertilize crops. As a result of all this excess waste, damaging amounts of nutrients and other pollutants are impacting the Bay and other waterways around the country.

Enter Kathy Philips. Kathy and her husband, Jeff, who has taught in Worcester County, Md., for more than 30 years, moved to the Eastern Shore from Silver Spring, Md., in the late 1970s. They were both surfers and wanted to spend their lives near the ocean that they love. Kathy directed the Eastern Surfing Association for 15 years. During this time she and Jeff, who is still an enthusiastic surfer, saw the Bay, as well as their local waterways, continue to deteriorate. As watersport enthusiasts, they spend much of their free time on waterways in Maryland, and they have seen first hand how the Chesapeake Bay, the largest and most productive estuary in the United States, is impacted by the onslaught of factory farm waste. Kathy's particular focus has been on the Pocomoke River and water quality there. She's worked tirelessly with the Assateague Coastal Trust (ACT) to protect the Coastal Bays and the Pocomoke from agricultural pollution.

In 2010, Kathy stepped forward to be a plaintiff in the case brought by Waterkeeper Alliance against Perdue and one of its contract growers, Alan and Kristin Hudson. The suit seeks to put a stop to the pollution found pouring off the farm and hold Perdue liable for the discharges. For several decades, Perdue and other poultry industry integrators have been hiding behind the men and women who accept all of the risk for growing chickens, while Perdue sucks up the profits.

Unfortunately, throughout the nearly three years of litigation, Perdue has been using the contract grower involved in the suit as a "human shield." Rather than taking responsibility for the chicken waste their business produces, they suck up the profits and hide behind their contract growers. Poultry-processing companies, known as integrators, ruthlessly control every step of chicken production from providing the chicks and feed to monitoring them on an almost daily basis. Contract abuses abound for the growers -- Perdue, Tyson and the other integrators use production contracts to keep the cost of raising chickens low and to manage the supply of birds needed in the slaughter plants they own. The integrators don't invest any capital in the factory farm facilities or equipment necessary for growing birds. Growers assume all of the debt and financial risk for building the warehouse-like barns, while Perdue walks away with the profits.

Perdue's abuse of contract farmers goes beyond their refusal to take responsibility for their own waste. It goes to unconscionable contracts, economic inequity, inappropriate uses of drugs and horrendous working conditions. Perdue, and the other mega-meat companies like it, is the biggest threat to family farming in the United States and around the world.

When this case was filed in 2010 Perdue was enjoying $4.6 billion in sales while Alan Hudson, the contract grower involved in the litigation, was driving a school bus to make ends meet. If Perdue really cared about contract growers like the Hudsons, they've had the opportunity for almost three years now to stand up and say, "This is our waste and our problem." Instead, they've chosen to once more hide behind the false guise of the family farmer and hold the Hudsons out as the only ones responsible for the mess created by Perdue's own industrial chicken empire. Perdue owns the chickens, the feed, and the profits. The Hudsons, apparently, own Perdue's waste -- and Perdue is fighting hard to keep it that way.

We should all thank Kathy Philips for being brave enough to call Perdue out for their pollution of our waterways.

This post originally appeared at Food & Water Watch's blog.

 

Follow Wenonah Hauter on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@WenonahHauter

FOLLOW GREEN
Kathy Phillips is a real heroine. She's standing up to Perdue, a company responsible for a large percentage of the pollution pouring into the Chesapeake Bay and surrounding waterways. Kathy is braving...
Kathy Phillips is a real heroine. She's standing up to Perdue, a company responsible for a large percentage of the pollution pouring into the Chesapeake Bay and surrounding waterways. Kathy is braving...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 17
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Oginikwe
I think therefore I'm dangerous
02:12 PM on 10/13/2012
This is one of the best documentaries ever on this subject:

A River of Waste: The Hazardous Truth About Factory Farms (2009): Available on Netflix, YouTube and Top Documentary Films. http://www.youtube.com/movie?v=c-WAGf-4gC8&ob=av1e&feature=mv_sr and http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/river-waste/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alvdh1
11:47 AM on 10/13/2012
The solution to the Perdue chicken waste is biomass gasification to electricity mini power plants located at each of the chicken farms. 35 percent of the chicken waste can be converted to biochar while giving the farmers income from electricity sales into the grid. Biochar is a stable form of carbon that enhances soil moisture retention and soil microbial activity. Biochar remains stable for thousands of years, which will dramatically reduce ghg emissions from the chicken manure.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:58 AM on 10/13/2012
It is just this type of corporate crap that Romney and Republicans are hoping to create more of: big business who take no responsibility for damaging and destroying our land, air, and waterways...all in the name of a buck. You cannot convince me that they do not worship money. They are trying to make us like China or India. They are the worst of the worst and must be stopped. Vote for Dems.
11:47 PM on 10/12/2012
While blaming others, most people do not know that their own urine is not required to be treated under the Clean Water Act, due to the fact that by using a test incorrectly, EPA ignored 60% of the waste in sewage, Congress clearly intended to treat under the act. Among this waste ignored is all the nitrogenous (urine and protein) waste, while this waste not only exerts an oxygen demand, just like fecal waste, but also is a fertilizer for alga, thus contributes to dead zones, now mostly blamed on runoffs from farms and cities.
In a recent article by Investigate West (www.invw.org) EPA claims not to be interested in controlling the oxygen demand caused by nitrogenous waste, even tough this in raw sewage is about 65% of that caused by fecal waste. However, as a fertilizer it stimulates the growth of alga, which after it dies causes an even larger oxygen depletion compared to that caused originally by fecal waste. Without removing nitrogen waste from our sewage, we simple are creating a man-made organic life cycle, requiring oxygen, in addition to the natural life cycles in open waters. Naturally this life cycle should occur on land and not in water. Time to hold EPA and many others accountable.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Moose Luck 99
GEOENGINEERINGWATCH DOT ORG
02:48 PM on 10/12/2012
PUMP OXYGEN INTO LOW OXYGEN AREAS!

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=low-oxygen-ocean-coastal

Shallower Coastal Waters

Oxygen-deprived areas in the world's oceans usually found in deeper water are moving up to offshore areas and threatening coastal marine ecosystems by spurring the die-off of some species and overpopulation of others

By Michael Tennesen

A plague of oxygen-deprived waters from the deep ocean is creeping up over the continental shelves off the Pacific Northwest and forcing marine species there to relocate or die. Since 2002 tongues of hypoxic, or low-oxygen, waters from deeper areas offshore have slipped into shallower near-shore environments off the Oregon coast, although not close enough to be oxygenated by the waves. The problem stems from oxygen reduction in deep water, a phenomenon that some scientists are observing in oceans worldwide, and that may be related to climate change.

The hypoxic seawater is distinct from the well-known "dead zones" that form at the mouths of the Mississippi and other rivers around the world. Those areas result from agricultural runoff, which lead to algae blooms that consume oxygen. Rather, the Pacific Northwest problem is broader and more mysterious
Oginikwe
I think therefore I'm dangerous
02:13 PM on 10/13/2012
Thanks for that link. :)
photo
plantbasedpunk
live from the PHX
12:33 PM on 10/12/2012
Many thanks to Kathy for fighting to good fight and taking on this monstrous corporation. This isn't just happening in the Chesapeake Bay, either. It's happening all over the country. Factory farming is polluting our waterways, destroying forests, poisoning the air and eroding the topsoil. Factory are one of the biggest contributors to global warming and produce more greenhouse gases than the ENTIRE world's transportation system. That's every car on the road, boat on water, train on tracks and plane in the air. Stunning!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kent Otho Doering
Ex -Pat in Germany- "Why Burn Money"-Pro-Renewable
08:04 AM on 10/12/2012
Now, a large poultry operation with guano - methane recapture- burning on fuel cells- with exhaust heat driving Stirling motors driving generators and providing heat hot water- for the farm buildings..would put at least 150 KW of power - going onto the grid every hour. - With a mandated feed in tarif-minimum of
7.5 cents per KWh to local utilities - grid parity price- that would give large scale poulty growers an extra income of about- 98.550 U.S.D. p.a../After taxes-80.000) They can take half that to cover remaining living expenses (with heat and power now free), and invest the other in agrarian co-op banks.
2000 poulty growers in the Chesapeake basin could thus produce- 300 MWh of power into the grid every hour. Clean tech. They could take half the profits from that- and form a co-op agrarian-energy co-op bank- i.e. annual capitalization at 100.000 million p.a.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kent Otho Doering
Ex -Pat in Germany- "Why Burn Money"-Pro-Renewable
05:59 AM on 10/12/2012
Gov. O`Malley could introduce legislation making it easy for the poultry farmers to form slaughterhouse co-ops! End of that exploitation. Farmer owned poulty slaugherhouse co-ops puts the money in the growers pockets, thank you. Second: the quano can be de-toxified. O`Malley and the Md. Legistlature could subsidize guano- methane re-capture- burnt on fuel cells for farm heat and putting power onto the grid. Average output per large farm- 300 KWh... that reduces the mass of the manure being spread on the fields and detoxifies it while making money for farmers Much less toxic runoff after methane extraction and reducing the mass. Germany is mandating and subdizing the build out on all poultry, dairy, and pig and beef feedlot operations. When all farms
are built out by 2025- it will put 30.000 MWh on the grid.
How would that apply to Maryland Poultry growers? See next comment.
photo
Inkosi
The gods themselves rage against stupidity
12:01 PM on 10/12/2012
Here is a better idea - outlaw factory farms!
02:20 AM on 10/12/2012
A wonderful person. I hope some day we can all live more sustainibly... Eating less meat, growing our own food in the back yard and making the most out of what we have. The average person who has a mere 400square feet (that is 40 feet by ten feet) for raising animals could raise 20 dual-purpose egg laying hens in thier back yard with one rooster (not all of them make a racket) and raise over 500lbs of chicken meat and 5500 eggs each year. No battery cages, no hormones, no antibiotics, all for around $825 a year.
To put that into perspective, that is organic, free range chicken meat at $1.60/lb and all the free eggs you could ever want. Or if we assume that 1 dozen eggs and 1lb of bone-in chicken are worth the same amount you are paying $0.85 for each lb of chicken and each dozen eggs. Still free-ranged and organic. You would have to eat 1lb of chicken and 15 eggs every day to consume all of that food.
And the manure could go on your own local garden and compost piles where it will help you grow massive numbers of prolific vegetables to eat and feed for your chickens the next year. Sustainible growing is an amazing thing.
photo
plantbasedpunk
live from the PHX
12:30 PM on 10/12/2012
This isn't possible or even economically feasible for many Americans. For example, me. $825 is a lot of money for me. My apartment is only 700 sq ft and I work a LOT so I have very little free time for maintenance, veterinary care etc. I find it's easier to just not eat animals. It's incredibly cheap and it produces 0 animal waste and lowers my carbon footprint drastically.
01:03 PM on 10/13/2012
But that's not feasible for all of the world either because there are just as many issues with growing plants as there are with raising animals. In fact there are many places animals can be raised that crops cannot. And in most of the world growing high-protien plants is very difficult but raising chickens is easy. Further more, in your 700sq foot apartment you DEFINATELY couldn't grow enough vegetables to feed yourself... Let alone provide food for 3-4 other people for an entire year the way these chickens would. And spending $825 a year on groceries is not that crazy... The average couple spends $300/month on groceries so over $3000/year. So I don't see how your points are relevant.
04:39 PM on 10/15/2012
I would like to order a couple of the non-crowing roosters if possible.In a few years I should be a very wealthy man!
11:58 AM on 10/16/2012
I said make a racket, not non-crowing. A rooster that crows once or twice a day is not crazy and not enough to be classified as a sound nusiance in most cities.
Although I am quite confident that you could breed a non-crowing rooster should you try.