iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Wenonah Hauter

GET UPDATES FROM Wenonah Hauter
 

ExxonMobil CEO Rants Against People Who Care About the Planet

Posted: 07/18/2012 12:21 pm

For anyone concerned about climate change, Rex Tillerson, ExxonMobil's CEO, has the fast and easy solution: he wants you to just stop worrying about it. All those statistics, warming trends, rising ocean levels and severe weather events are nothing more than a little "fear factor" according to a speech given by Tillerson last month.

Isn't Fear Factor a game show in which people engage in risky and irresponsible behavior in the pursuit of money? So maybe what he said is true. Global warming is caused by people like Tillerson who engage in risky and irresponsible behavior in the pursuit of money.

Tillerson accuses environmental and consumer advocacy groups of fear-mongering when it comes to drilling and fracking for oil and gas, and he believes the general public doesn't have enough aptitude for math and science to comprehend the drilling process or to determine whether or not it's safe. But the "inconvenient truth" for Tillerson is that the science is not on his side. Two peer-reviewed scientific studies this year -- one in the journal Ground Water and another in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences -- have highlighted that the scientific question is no longer if drilling and fracking will end up contaminating vital aquifers, but when. Furthermore, there is a growing scientific consensus that natural gas is as bad as and may even be worse than coal when it comes to climate change.

But what was truly offensive about the CEO's recent comments is that he held out fossil fuels like oil and gas as the "God pod's" (as the executive suite at ExxonMobil's headquarters is known) Godsend to the world's poor:

[The poor] need fuel to cook their food on that's not animal dung. There are more people's [sic] health being dramatically affected because they don't even have access to fossil fuels to burn. They'd love to burn fossil fuels.

Contrary to Tillerson's self-serving missive, people are not dying to use fossil fuels, they're dying from using fossil fuels. If the resources were available there are many sustainable technologies that could be employed to improve the quality of life for people in the developing world, including cooking. The last thing impoverished people anywhere need is exposure to more toxins.

In fact, the World Health Organization attributes about 2 million deaths per year to air pollution tied mainly to the continuing use of fossil fuels. A recent report put out by the Better Future Project covers a whole host of other detrimental impacts on human health, the environment, global security and the world economy from out-of-control fossil fuel dependence.

The people of the United States are not immune to the heavy burdens caused by fossil fuel use, so it seems likely that those burdens would travel wherever consumers use energy. A National Academy of Sciences study finds that our own addiction to fossil fuels costs the U.S. about $120 billion each year in health costs and results in 24,000 deaths annually in this country alone, and that's with some of the toughest air pollution controls in the world in place. The human and environmental health toll in developing nations with few or no environmental regulations would rise almost as fast as Tillerson's profits.

Tillerson believes that the best way to adjust to climate change is not by decreasing our reliance on fossil fuels, but through wondrous feats of engineering. And just when you think the arrogance couldn't get worse, the CEO of the largest revenue-generating company in the world wants your government and your tax money to create and fund the technological workarounds needed to address the multitude of harms caused by his ongoing peddling of his very profitable product.

Among Rex Tillerson's other endearing opinions...

  • The public is ignorant: The industry's biggest challenge "taking an illiterate public and try to help them understand why we can manage these risks."
  • Water scarcity is not a problem (if you can move it around as you wish). "There is plenty of water; it's just not in all the right places."
  • The media is lazy. "Journalists act irresponsibly when they report on negative impacts of shale gas drilling because it scares the public."

If Rex Tillerson really cared about the world's poor he'd stand up and say what is no longer deniable: the longer we rely on oil, coal and gas, instead of renewable energy sources and energy efficiency, the worse our lives will be.

This post originally appeared at Food & Water Watch's blog.

 

Follow Wenonah Hauter on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@foodandwater

FOLLOW GREEN
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:22 PM on 08/13/2012
We need to do what we should have been doing when Jimmy Carter was president -- CONSERVATION. It's time to come to grips with the fact that we don't need a television in every room or three cars in the driveway. It's time to invest in decent public transportation, grants and tax breaks for energy efficiency and conservation. Stop giving billions in subsidies to the oil companies who make billions in profits and INVEST that money in solar on every roof, much more efficient design across the board. It's not a matter of "going all nuclear" which is just another form of societal suicide. We're so far behind all other developed countries in this regard it's ridiculous. We spend billions to invade other countries and kill innocent people to grab their petroleum resources. Can you cut back on your energy use if it means NOT HAVING A DEAD PLANET?????
11:48 PM on 07/19/2012
Turns out that Tillerson is just being a good businessman by disclosing this to the public. In doing so he is publicly warning the investor class of the possible lawsuits ahead and this will cya so to speak. Smart move on Exxon Mobile--after all Rex is an Eagle Scout!
09:01 AM on 07/19/2012
What would you use instead of the current hydrocarbon fuels to generate the electricity in your home? Nuclear is the only reliable source. Are you prepared to go all nuclear? Wind and solar are not 100% solutions. Hydrodynamic? Better be close to a dam. Renewable fuels? Not sufficient volume. Not anywhere close. So, what is your solution?
02:50 PM on 07/19/2012
100% agree. Exxon's arguments - good or bad - are not the issue. The issue is whether Ms Hauter drives a car, a train or a bus or a plane. What will she do when she cannot do that any more? What happens when the supermarket, which is a good long walk away when you have to carry 5 bags of stuff, gets its own deliveries by handcart? Does Ms Hauter use electricity to heat her home, cool her home, power her internet connection. What will she use when all that is history? The starving poor in Africa and Asia will survive. The overweight will struggle without elevators.
07:04 AM on 07/20/2012
What kind of argument is that, Richard? Not that Germany or Denmark have embarked on alternative energies and are way ahead of the United States in that regard. Even China is making advances in those industries and are now leading in the solar water heating segment and now electrical panels. Are we promoting these or subsidizing Fossil Fuels so they appear cheap in the marketplace? If so, why? No, we are not and hostile to them.
Blame the man on the street, not the policy makers on Capital Hill that promote the dirty energy mix because the the monies poured into their campaigns by Oil and Coal.
08:50 PM on 07/18/2012
Thank you so much, Ms. Hauter, for this rebuttal of Rex Tillerson's take on Global Warming. Sure, Mr. Tillerson's rationalization makes sense when one takes into consideration he made $34 million last year and Exxon-Mobile's met profit was $41 Billion! Sure, it is easy to adapt with that kind of oncome!
You are correct that Global Warming is killing the poor, and the rich are not too far behind. Shame on these Captains of Industry to be so smug and now it comes out they know better. To claim that climate models are not accurate is the reason for inaction is bunk! The proof is already here, ocean acidification, extreme weather events, seasomal changes, specie movement, plant zones northward moved my the USDA, record Arctic Ice Melt, to name just a few. These CEO's are just pretending they do not know.
01:07 AM on 07/20/2012
Michael, the issue is not to stop Exxon arguing with the world about climate science. Go straight to the jugular and put Exxon out of business. The oil companies are on the supply side. You are on the demand side. If you are serious, then the actions you can take today are: (1) stop using your car, your refrigerator, your air-con and heating; (2) do not have any plastics in your home. If you think that would just be a useless one-person gesture, then lobby your neighbours and politicians for an increase in the tax on the use of hydrocarbons. You would need to triple the price of gas on the forecourt just to get the price up to the European average. So, I am guessing, you would want to do better than that. Over to you.
07:11 AM on 07/20/2012
Richard, you are not at all thinking this through and being very simple minded. Please read Jeremy Rifkin's classic book, "Entropy: A New World View". We have created and designed a high energy flow society. To be HONEST, when I lived in Boston I DO NOT USE A CAR! Why? Alternatives were there because the community was DESIGNED for NO CAR use. The "price" of gas would be TRIPLED if the marketplace was charges the true cost of oil. but we are subsidizing these industries today because the politicans are bought and paid for, Please think a little more creative,