iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Wilfredo Amr Ruiz

GET UPDATES FROM Wilfredo Amr Ruiz
 

Republican Presidential Candidates on Islam

Posted: 12/02/2011 10:22 am

As republican voters near the time to elect their presidential candidate for the 2012 election, the candidates' respective religious perspectives become significant to many. One topic that does not escape public scrutiny is the candidates' stand on Islam and Muslims in America. It has become an important issue that calls the attention of both Muslim and non-Muslim voters. Noticeably some candidates appear not to realize that the American Muslim community has a significant number of political conservatives sympathetic to many issues within the Republican Party platform.

The GOP presidential hopefuls' stand on Islam and Muslims has been varied. Their stands have ranged from being thoughtful and considerate to being discourteous, rude and unappreciative of the history, losing potential support.

Some candidates have clearly opted to try to win votes by denigrating Islam and disparaging Muslims. Taking the lead in the anti-Muslim frenzy is Herman Cain, who has consistently held a hostile discourse on Islam, belittling almost anything or anyone resonating muslim. Among many instances we may take as example Cain's opposition to the construction of an Islamic Center in Murfreesboro, Tenn., unreasonably arguing that it's not religious discrimination for a community to ban a mosque. On this same line, Cain has also affirmed that he wouldn't appoint Muslims to his cabinet and even suggested to impose a loyalty test on any Muslim before allowing him to serve in his administration. His anti-Muslim rhetoric returned recently when he expressed that more than half of American Muslims are extremists based on a "trusted adviser" who informed him so.

Rick Perry has wisely distanced himself from the bigoted rhetoric and instead has a history of good and positive relations with the Muslims community. Perry endorsed Texas public high school teacher education programs on Islamic history. As governor he signed a Halal Law, which makes it a criminal offense to sell Halal and non-Halal meat in the same store without specifically labeling the two and to misrepresent non-Halal meat as being Halal. Governor Perry has held constructive ties with the Muslim Aga Khan's community and hosted their world known leader on his visit to Texas. He followed up by attending the inauguration of their Ismaili Jamatkhana Islamic Center in Sugar Land, Texas in 2002; and later laid the first brick for another of their centers in Plano, Texas in 2005. On the other hand, Perry's ties to the rest of the mainstream Muslim community as a whole are scarce, and his posture is mostly perceived as neutral, with neither "pro" nor "against" community stances.

Mitt Romney's relations with the American Muslim community have not been smooth. Recently, the Council of American Islamic Relations (CAIR) asked the presidential hopeful for the ouster of Dr. Walid Phares a recently appointed foreign policy adviser to his team. Phares authored "Future Jihad: Terrorist Strategies Against America" and also acts as an advisor to the U.S. Congress on the Middle East. According to CAIR he worked as an official in the Lebanese Forces, a Christian militia, and other militias that reportedly took part in various massacres of Muslims. The controversial appointment has certainly created a wave of controversy within the American Muslim community that waits for Romney to take their concerns into consideration.

Newt Gingrich's stance on issues related to American Muslims and Islam has been scornful. Falling victim to the Muslim hysteria on the debate on the Ground Zero Mosque, Gingrich compared the Islamic Community Center project to building a Nazi monument outside the Holocaust Museum. This was clearly a very insensitive position that will take more than a simple apology -- not that it is expected -- to amend.

Michele Bachmann has not demonstrated a capacity to engage the American Muslim community neither shown capacity to understand and respect diversity. Her comments on the civil uprisings that took place in France back in 2005 were very discomforting: "Those who are coming into France, which has a beautiful culture, the French culture is actually diminished. It's going away. And just with the population in France, they are losing Western Europeans, and it's being taken over by a Muslim ethic. Not that Muslims are bad, but they are not assimilating."

Rick Santorum has joined Gingrich's Islam-bashing team, expressing misleading comments on the question of sharia taking over the U.S. court system. On the most recent debate Santorum was even more assertive on his opinion on Muslims. When asked if he would support ethnic and religious profiling he replied: "The folks who are most likely to be committing these crimes ... obviously Muslims would be someone you'd look at, absolutely."

Among all candidates, libertarian leaning Ron Paul seems to be the one who have consistently pronounced himself distant from any expression that could be construed as Islamophobic. He issued firm statements condemning Pastor Terry Jones' controversial call for a "Burn the Quran Day." In September 2010 Paul stated: "This blame of all Muslims for the atrocities of 9/11 only makes things worse -- especially since it wasn't the Taliban of Afghanistan that committed the atrocities." More recently, on a CBS interview, Paul said that al Qaeda itself cited American intervention in the region as its motivation for attacking the U.S. and "to argue the case that they want to do us harm because we're free and prosperous I think is a very, very dangerous notion because it's not true."

John Huntsman is another candidate that for the most part has rejected to take a ride on the Islamophobia train that most republic candidates not only designed but are now fueling and giving hand-detailed maintenance.

The comments and actions that vilify Islam and Muslims -- or any other religion and its practitioners -- by the Republican Party presidential hopefuls show an evident betrayal of commitment to the freedom of religion consecrated in the U.S. Constitution. Exploiting Muslims for political gain will undoubtedly alienate them from a significant section of the voting public who hold religion dear to their hearts.

 

Follow Wilfredo Amr Ruiz on Twitter: www.twitter.com/AnalistaInter

FOLLOW RELIGION
 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:53 PM on 12/02/2011
If so many terrorists did not turn out to be Muslim, people might not be as concerned as they are. As far as Walid is concerned, CAIR need not be appeased by any politician; they are naught more than a marginalized player in the game -- only about 15% of Muslims in American feel CAIR adequately represents their interests...perhaps they want to more than victims.
09:20 PM on 12/02/2011
muslims need to vote for ron paul. he is their only hope.
06:56 PM on 12/02/2011
As an American I am glad to live in a country where people of different faiths are treated equally. In actuality, and not a lot of people are aware of this, but Christians are widely and discriminated and suffer from terrible human rights abuses in Muslim dominated countries, but for some reason the media doesn't focus on that too much...

I think the issue a lot of Non - Muslim Americans may have towards Muslims is not concerning their religion, but their assimilation into everyday American life/culture. These concerns are not unfounded. Obviously thousands of Muslims are well adapted and live great lives here, which is great. There are many exmaples like Rima Fakih (Miss USA 2010) and Dave Chappelle (a Comedian). However every now and then you hear of the practicing Muslim women who will not shake a man's hand when greeting him, because the Quran forbids her, or who will be covered from head to toe and unrecognizable in a burqa. Or a taxi driver who will refuse a passenger because she carries a small dog with her and that is considered unpure. Or a store owner who refuses to sell to open homosexuals. These practices are not western or American in nature. So, if it is possible to be Muslim and American at the same time, and I believe it is. Maybe some Muslims should think twice about being more culturally sensitive in the countries to which they migrate to. That is all.
06:36 PM on 12/02/2011
I have to say, Bachman surprisingly has a point, a vast majority of Muslims have not assimilated into French culture or Western culture for that matter. Yes, there are exceptions, but a great deal of Muslims living in western countries, live in separate social enclaves.

Many Muslim women will not shake a man's hand when greeting them, because they claim the Quran forbids them, a lot of them have a male family member who often escorts them to places, some wear a burqa by which they are virtually unrecognizable.

Muslim ca drivers will refuse to take a passenger who has a small dog with them, because dogs are unpure according to quran. Muslim owned business will sometimes refuse to serve opnly homosexual customers.

These practices are prermisible in the Middle East, but it's important for Muslims to understand that these practices do not fit well with the culture established in Europe, North America or Australia.

I have nothing against people practicing their own religion, Mosques being built, people celebrating their religious holidays. But just like I respect the fact that as a woman I should not wear a tanktop and a mini-skirt on the streets of Kabul, or hold hands and kiss my lesbian lover in downtown Terhan. Muslims should make an effort to be more culturally sensitive to countries in Europe or the U.S. who have allowed them to establish a new life.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarketAnarchist101
Make my enemies ridiculous.
08:12 PM on 12/03/2011
The fact of the matter is.. if you profess to be a freedom-loving individual then all of those things that you just mentioned are well within their right to do. As for Kabul and Terhan.. if we didn't meddle in those places in the first place.. and we traded with them like the good people we supposedly are.. freedom would have taken root there long ago.
11:53 PM on 12/04/2011
You're right, if Muslims in the U.S or other western countries want to dress or interact with other people differently it is obviously completely up to them. Any restrain on that would limit their personal freedoms in this country. t

As to the part about Kabul/Terhan, I agree, U.S foreign policy has for the most part been terrible towards the Middle East, as it has been for other parts of the world too, such as Latin America. So resentment against the "west" or the "U.S" in many parts of the world is understandable. Although, it manifests itself in a very different way in the Middle East, perhaps because the politics and religion are often intertwined.
photo
demisfine
Often correct, NEVER right.
03:46 PM on 12/02/2011
Keith Ellison is a pregressive representative from Minnesota who happens to be Muslim.
I wish we could STOP mentioning whether or not congress members are religious.
It shouldn't matter to anyone at all.
02:01 PM on 12/02/2011
There are legitimate concerns about Islam, especially post 9/11. This concern does not constitute anti-Muslim frenzy or hysteria.
05:44 AM on 12/03/2011
where is there frenzy? hysteria?? I don't see any. I sure do see a lot more anti-Semitism around though. And it IS being preached in some mosques!
12:30 PM on 12/02/2011
In the 2000 elections, most American Muslims supported George W. Bush. If we knew then what we know now, the decision may have been different.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James2039
Ahhh, so here's where you update this thingy...
12:25 PM on 12/02/2011
And again, Paul is the only exception to idiocy in the race. We need to get him elected president.