Giving Away Free Netbooks to Save America's Newsrooms
Not that long ago, I wrote about the bond between the Daily News and its unique readership here in Philadelphia, which surveys have shown tend to be much more blue-collar and more African-American , among other things, than the typical American newspaper customer. The numbers and the anecdotal evidence from the streets of Philly also suggest that our readers are somewhat less likely to be the kind of person who toils in front of computer screen all day -- meaning that a rapid move away from the emphasis on the print edition would leave thousands of ink-only readers in the dust.
But the problem isn't completely unique to the City of Brotherly Love. Most major American cities have a "digital divide" -- a sizable gap between computer ownership and usage in working class and poorer urban neighborhoods and Internet activities out in the more affluent suburbs. But a problem -- like the digital divide -- also creates an opportunity. The arrival of much cheaper and more user friendly laptops called "netbooks" make it possible to kill two birds with one stone. A massive philanthropic efforts by large news organizations to bring these simpler computers into once-deprived households would create a bond of community between the media and its new, grateful online readers, and also make it easier for newsrooms to move more quickly away from the expensive print distribution model and into a bold new digital age.
The New York Times had a fascinating article this week about netbooks. It said, in part:
Personal computers -- and the companies that make their crucial components -- are about to go through their biggest upheaval since the rise of the laptop. By the end of the year, consumers are likely to see laptops the size of thin paperback books that can run all day on a single charge and are equipped with touch screens or slide-out keyboards.The industry is buzzing this week about these devices at a telecommunications conference in Las Vegas, and consumers will see the first machines on shelves as early as June, probably from the netbook pioneers Acer and Asustek.
"The era of a perfect Internet computer for $99 is coming this year," said Jen-Hsun Huang, the chief executive of Nvidia, a maker of PC graphics chips that is trying to adapt to the new technological order. "The primary computer that we know of today is the basic PC, and it's dying to be reinvented."
If America's battered newsrooms were smart, they would jump on this. I know what you're saying, and you're right: Newspaper companies have not been smart, not for a number of years. Even now we struggle to catch up -- a lot of newspapers are now ambitiously launching...blogs (or in newspaperspeak, "blogs, which is short for Web logs") even as many of 2004's hot bloggers now spend much of their day on Twitter. It's not completely too late, though, for some real outside-the-box thinking -- not now, when having nothing left to lose is another word for freedom.
Big-city newspapers should be giving away netbooks.
They should have teams of people walking up and down the rowhouse streets of a city like Philly, giving these newfangled devices away to people who've been left behind by the Computer Age, and perhaps also offering them at reduced prices to people who can afford them and simply want easier or more convenient online access.
In return, these news organizations -- you really couldn't call them "newspapers" anymore if this scheme were successful -- would reap enormous benefits, including a community-relations coup and a closer bond with newfound online readers, a golden opportunity for branding their website (the Web address could, and should, be advertised on the new device), and the chartitable operation could even lead to a new news-gathering eco-structure (more on that in a second.) The newsroom-sponsored netbook drive would even offer flexability in the search for the Holy Grail of a new business model -- the goodwill generated by this could encourage voluntary donations from those with the ability to pay, in the mode of NPR, or it could possibly advance the paid subscription model coupled with free access to the neediest of the new netbook owners.
Here is an excellent article about how legislation could help newspapers reform as Low-Profit Limited Liability Corporations, which would allow news orgs to function more like a charity because of their demonstrrated "social benefit." The effort is sure to get snickers from a lot of people -- especially the politically involved on the left and the right -- who think that journalists are deluded into grossly overstating the social benefits we provide. That's a legitimate debate, but what if newsrooms put their remaining muscle behind a program to provide information to the public and close the digital divide at the same time? That's "social benefit" we can believe in!
Look, we all know that newspapers don't have much spare cash tucked under the mattress these days, not with so many in Chapter 11. But what if a newspaper like the Philadelphia Daily News were able to partner with one of the larger charitable organizations in town -- you (and they) know who they are -- to launch a netbook-giveaway program. What if the cost for these devices really comes down to $99 (and less if purchased in bulk). Do the math: A $1 million annual program could provide netbooks to some 15,000 families, and a 10-year program would close the digital divide in a large city like Philadelphia for good.
News orgs and their new philanthropic partners could leverage this effort in many ways. There surely could be an overt effort to link the computer giveaway to increasing readership of the news Web site. The netbooks could come programmed or even hardwired to automatically make Philly.com its homepage, or the data -- like email addresses -- collected through the project could be used to promote readership by blasting out major news stories.
But a truly innovative newsroom would find even more clever ways to use a program like this, to completely rearrange the relationship between the journalist and the community. By that I mean the people spending their work days giving away the computers shouldn't just be functionaries but "news evangelists" - people who could work with these new netbook owners to convert those who are motivated into a network of engaged citizen journalists. They could also serve as the newsroom's eyeballs in these now under-covered urban neighborhoods, working to come up with new story ideas.
This netbook model would help solve two of the biggest problem facing today's newspapers: It would increase online readership and brand loyalty while speeding the move away from paper and thus the high costs of newsprint, printing presses and delivery trucks that are associated with it. It would not solve the revenue problem of online journalism, but it would buy some time and allow newsrooms to get their foot in the door, or on the rowhouse stoop, until that problem is solved.
Investing money to grow the brand and attract new readers, as opposed to a death spiral of cost-cutting? Crazy talk, I know. But Hunter S. Thompson, who would not have allowed journalism to die without a fight, said famously that when the going gets weird, the weird turn pro. And this idea might actually be weird enough to work.
Loading comments…
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
I just won a Dell Mini 9 netbook at a trade show last week. I am now buying a larger, 32 GB solid state drive because the 8 GB drive won't cut the mustard when it comes to running applications on the road, not to mention the USB-powered external hard drive I'll need to store data and to transfer to my desktop external hard drive that I use for backup.
Wouldn't it be better if they came up with a netbook that has a DVD burner built in? That would be dynamite!
ooh, I really need to proofread.
Blue collar and low income Philly will never be wired. Cuppa coffee and a paper at the WAWA.
P.S. Despite the number of responses (your Twitter post), you are a voice of intelligence and creative thought. Ever since your coveager of the Kerry campain -- I'm the military mom-- you have been on my must read list. It's not who posts responses.
Nita Martin
Not netbooks. Wifi hot spots. Cheaper, more effective. Branded. People will buy the computers to get the free wifi.
Agree
Newspapers and other "News Providers" should be championing Open Source software.
This would be a great place to start and help in their cause to re-invent themselves.
India is working on bringing to market a $20 netbook, which makes a lot more sense than giving away $99 ones.
The tricky part is how do the recipients connect to the web? With the money saved on really cheap netbooks spending should include turning an entire city like Philadelphia into a WiFi hotspot with free internet service for all. And, the same should apply to any city's newspaper wanting to follow that pattern.
I seriously doubt that giving out netbooks will improve readership, although donating some netbooks with Ubuntu Linux (Or Windows XP if you can afford it ) to poor kids in schools wouldn't be a bad idea.
If you read the entire NYTimes article, you'll see the $99 price is predicated on the consumer buying a data plan, the way cellphones are now sold "cheaply" because of the 2 year plans that accompany them. So the carrier will make money and the news organizations will continue to not make money from folks reading their news online. And the consumer will pay more than they do now for a newspaper, although they will have access to more than just their local daily. The cheapest way for people to get the basic news is to listen to the radio or watch TV, and that's what a lot of people did even before newspapers started posting on the Internet.
I think this would be an ad dependent model, not paper version-subsidised.
What a sense of humor! You expect the newspapers to target African-Americans with free computers to access the online version that would depend on a paid subscription model coupled with free access to the neediest (African-Americans) of the new netbook owners.
Oh, and paid for on the front end by a massive philanthropic effort by the newspapers who, last I read are looking to go bankrupt. I realize this may come as a massive shock, but a bankruptcy judge is most likely not going to allow them to spend themselves even deeper in debt just to be philanthropic.
Second shock, people in poorer urban neighborhoods are not likely to see any value in paying for the subscription model, assuming that they could afford it, which they most likely could not are they would not be in that neighborho
Hmmmm.....
There's just something about holding the paper in one's hands, turning the pages, scanning up and down. Scrolling and reading a monitor too much makes my hand and head ache.
So far I'm not too impressed with the durability or reliability of computer electronics, either. Seems like something major is always in conflict, or a power surge blasted right past our surge protector & fried this or that, or we've acquired a virus or are dragging a load of adware, it's just a slow day on the net...what
I'd rather see newspapers try various current events games and givaways a la NPR's "Wait Wait Don't Tell Me", and more reader interaction articles than just the staid "letters to the editor" section.
You CAN take take a netbook to the bathroom, but if there's no toilet paper, the newspaper is more useful.
Great, lets give away electronic devices so people can carry them around all the time so they may read the news. After all it's much better than a lightweight portable, foldable medium you can recycle over and over again.
Newspaper can be recycled six to eight times (roughly). That pulp doesn't last forever and cannot be recycled "over and over again". The costs of logging, manufacturing, and transportation cannot be ignored here. Do those costs outweigh importing more devices from China? That's a good question.
Really, I think the news industry should try to get their act together on the software-side before they go anywhere near distribution of specialized hardware.
One problem: Newspapers exist to serve advertisers.
How ya gonna get all those ads on that iddy biddy screen?
I guess they'll just have to switch to an NPR model.
This article and your idea is far too smart for the average newspaper person. They cannot see or understand doing things differently than they always have done.
I suppose your too smart to use pen and ink too.
"You're", and for me it's about 5-6x faster to type than to write, where a keyboard is available.
If you buy gasoline, you changed the way you buy gasoline when self-service pumps were introduced. Try finding a gas station wher an employee of the station pumps the gas into your car for you. The public learned to use sefl-service gas pumps. It will work for newspapers to open a web site & give cheap computers to readers. There are many people who want to read local obits & sports scores. They will learn to use cheap, dedicated computers.
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with
