iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Will Travers

GET UPDATES FROM Will Travers
 

Primates as "Pets"? Not on Your Life

Posted: 07/19/11 04:55 PM ET

In bedrooms and backyards across America, people keep nonhuman primates as "pets." The desperate, misplaced need for this type of cruel companionship is alarming. Chimpanzees and monkeys belong not in our homes, but in the wild, and it is time for legislators in Washington, DC to take a firm stand against this epidemic.

Born Free USA is working to pass the federal Captive Primate Safety Act (S. 1324). Introduced on July 6 by U.S. Sens. Barbara Boxer (D-CA), David Vitter (R-LA) and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), the bill prohibits interstate commerce in nonhuman primates if they are destined for private ownership as pets. I hope this bill will become law before the end of the year. Senator Boxer said the ban is "long overdue." I could not agree more.

After the infamous 2009 case where a "pet" chimpanzee named Travis severely mauled and permanently disfigured a woman in Connecticut before being shot and killed, the bill was approved by the full House and by the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, but time ran out before it could be enacted into law. Must another tragedy strike before the legislative process fully runs its course?

Senator Blumenthal knows firsthand how vital this effort is:


Primates and other exotic animals are a public safety risk when kept as pets, as shown by the tragic accident that occurred in my home state of Connecticut. This bill is an important step toward protecting the public and correcting a vague and flawed federal law that fails to prohibit non-human primates as pets. This much-needed legislation will close this loophole and ensure that accidents like the chimp attack in Stamford never happen again.

Primate "owners" like to claim it is safe to possess these wild animals. Safe for whom? It is neither safe for the animals themselves nor the people who come into contact with them -- often young children. Primates are often physically manipulated to make them less dangerous -- I have heard of fingernails being removed and teeth being filed down. They may be chained or caged for hours a day, condemning them to a horribly deprived, sad, unnatural life.

And the people who come into contact with these animals -- these wild animals -- unwittingly put themselves at risk of injury. It could be the six-year-old girl in Michigan who thinks it is safe to pet the neighbor's macaque only to get bitten, or the friend of Travis's owner who is now enduring a facial transplant.

Born Free USA's exotic animal incidents online database tracks hundreds of wild animal attacks, including many by non-human primates. The list is much too long.

But it is not just about a direct attack, bite, mauling. Nonhuman primates also pose disease risks, including transmission of Ebola, tuberculosis and herpes-B.

Worth the risk? No way.

And what about the drain on communities when pet primates are no longer able to be kept by their owners? Amongst the 500 individuals at Born Free USA's Primate Sanctuary in Texas are many residents rescued from abusive captive situations which they endured as someone's "pet."

Of course, the problem of primate ownership is not exclusive to the U.S.

In the UK where I live, we face a similar and no less challenging situation, with a rampant illegal trade, an apparent increase in the availability of primates for sale as pets and recent deregulation of certain species.

The private keeping of primates as pets was reviewed under the UK Animal Welfare Act 2006, and a Code of Practice was produced. However, this Code serves only as a guide and is not legally binding; nor does it prohibit the keeping of any species of primates as pets.

The Dangerous Wild Animals Act 1976 regulates the private keeping of certain species of primates that have been deemed to be particularly dangerous to human health and safety in Great Britain. Primates of scheduled species require licensing and inspection, but it is widely acknowledged that there is considerable non-compliance and lack of enforcement of this legislation.

Too often the UK is seen to be leading on animal welfare issues. This time the US can show the way. Is it too much to hope that the emerging calls for action on this issue in the US could encourage the UK to follow suit?

Nonhuman primates are celebrated as our closest living relatives, but they are still wild animals. Whether acting out of instinct or intent, "pet" primates are capable of wreaking terrible havoc on human primates who pay the tragic price when things, inevitably, go wrong.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:18 PM on 07/23/2011
Some of you should research what actually happens in the exotic hobby and you will find this propaganda to based solely around lies and extreme blanket statements.Do you not understand that most of these sanctuaries that are pushing anti-exotic legislation are merely exotic owners or previously exotic owners themselves?They have no special training over any other exotic owner.The only thing that separates them is that they petition the public to support the cost of keeping their exotics instead of taking responsibility and caring for the ones they have out of their own pockets like the far majority of exotic owners tend to do and simple permits (permits anyone can get, might I add).They then spread lies about how many people are hurt by exotics.Do you know how many? 0.4 people are hurt by exotics a year.That's less than one person hurt a year.This is far, far less than injuries and deaths caused by horses or domestic dogs every year.These extremists will then misinform the naive public about how these animals are taken care of.Sure there are extreme cases just like any other animal owner, domestic or otherwise, and there should be action taken.Except, these extremists don't bother with those people.They rip animals away from people that take superb care of them by defaming the owner to the ignorant public.
03:24 PM on 07/23/2011
A lot of these animals are taken away from people that devote attention to their animal and placed in sanctuary where they hardly receive human contact at all.These exotics were born and grew up in captivity.They can't be released in the wild and they have come to need human contact of those they bond with.As far as primates go, primates receive vaccinations for zoonotic diseases and responsible owners (most exotic owners are this way) follow safety protocol.They don't treat these animals as pets.They understand the safety concerns and address them.This is just hate and fear mongering by people that seek monetary gain in attacking innocent people.It's sickening and it's sickening that a bunch of you just decide to jump on the bandwagon without doing any simple research yourselves.
05:04 AM on 07/23/2011
I can't believe the statement that things "inevitably go wrong." I don't think Travers knows what he's talking about.
08:13 AM on 07/22/2011
Bravo, Will! It is outrageous that anyone is allowed to keep primates -- or tigers, bears, zebras, alligators, pythons, etc. -- as "pets." How many people must have their faces literally ripped off, lose lives and limbs, before this appalling practice is stopped? The only reason people acquire these animals is for a warped desire to be "different," but the animals will live and die in misery for someone's whim. Lawmakers must stop ignoring this serious issue and take decisive action without delay.
photo
naturallady
http://chimptrainersdaughter.blogspot.com
03:23 PM on 07/21/2011
I am so disappointed that Senator Barbara Mikulski won't co-sponsor this important legislation. I asked her to explain why she wouldn't, but all I got was a form letter. Sad.
03:25 PM on 07/23/2011
I commend her. At least she knows that such illogical blanket statements spreading lies and false statistics shouldn't be supported.
photo
naturallady
http://chimptrainersdaughter.blogspot.com
04:39 PM on 07/23/2011
Are you basing your "commendation" on any facts? Since you support keeping chimps like Travis in neighborhoods, you might have heard some Congressional speakers at your anti-animal conventions. If Senator Mikulski has made any statement, pro or con, on this bill, it would help all voters if you would share it with us.
08:12 AM on 07/21/2011
I think that the fact "pet" primates suffer huge mental issues from being someone's 'pet' is something that should be considered. I have worked with many capuchins that used to be someone's pet and that are completely messed up. Many self harm believe it or not, and are also violent. It is natural for them to rank family members when they get to a certain age and this is why they attack, as they view people as a member of their troop. I think that the primate pet trade should be banned as they are not good pets!
03:26 PM on 07/23/2011
The issue is that most exotic owners don't treat them as pets. They treat them with respect and care for them as they should. I have also worked with primates and none have ever come to harm themselves.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:11 PM on 07/20/2011
I think you'd do better if you didn't add drama and untruths to your stories. I checked the database for the "too many to list" exotic incidents. I thought you were talking about monkeys, first of all, but when you want to make it appear that there are thousands of terrible incidents, it becomes exotics in general. Anyway, most of the so called incidents that did involve monkeys, didn't involve biting at all. Next, since when do monkeys in the US carry Ebola? LOL! Too funny and an outright lie. They may carry a lot more than that over in the Amazon but as you well know, monkeys have not been imported to the US, for the pet trade, in over 30 years now. As far as carrying TB, monkeys are tested for TB the same as we are and IF a monkey did test positive, the monkey most likely got it from a human! Oh, and the Herpes B, you also know that there haven't been any incidents of the Herpes B virus outside of a lab and that was induced on purpose. And the Herpes B virus is NOT carried by ALL monkeys anyway, if a monkey outside of the US does have the virus, it would be a macaque and most likely a Rhesus. Even then, it is still considered very rare!
Why use scare tactics that have no truth whatsoever? This is an unjustice to the monkeys that you profess to care about!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gsmith9072
01:40 AM on 07/21/2011
Thumbs up
12:14 AM on 08/14/2011
Seriously, why subjugate me (your possible neighbor) to the possibility of your monkey having one of these mentioned diseases and biting me. Are you bonded so that when this monkey gets loose and rips my face off, and I need a $1M dollar face transplant, I can collect from you?

Some people smuggle monkeys into this country. Also, not every monkey owner will be testing their monkey for any deadly diseases as often as they should. These laws making private ownership of monkeys illegal will create a framework to punish those people that are caught.

If you are a private monkey owner, I will take whatever legal remedies available to evict you from my neighborhood. Living near a private monkey owner is called a negative externality. Why would I want to take the risk of your monkey getting loose, biting me, and infecting me with a deadly disease?

If you want to own a monkey, move to a country that does not care, like Somalia.