Considering the scale of our mistakes over the last decade in Iraq and Afghanistan, if we as a country truly want to pursue a leaner, smarter, more effective foreign policy, the first step we must take is to stop listening to the siren song of our own imperial rhetoric. We need to stop posing as benevolent caregivers and start being more honest with ourselves.
And that honesty extends to our own history. The French have a saying that translates to "the more things change, the more they remain the same." The appropriateness of that saying was brought home to me last week when a good friend of mine played an old campaign speech of William Howard Taft. In 1908, when he was running for president to succeed Teddy Roosevelt, Taft recorded several speeches on Edison-era cylinders. Fortunately for me, my friend collects vintage Edison phonographs and cylinders.
As I stood in front of the large trumpet-like horn of the player, Taft's voice came alive for me. As Taft sought to justify the U.S. invasion and occupation of the Philippines, it occurred to me that the rhetoric he was using a century ago was the same as that of Presidents Bush and Obama in justifying our most recent foreign misadventures in Iraq and Afghanistan. Taft, as we shall see, was if anything more direct and honest than our most recent commanders-in-chief.
The thrust of Taft's speech was that Americans were lifting up the benighted and "ignorant masses" of the Philippines. In Taft's words, we were involved "in a great missionary work that does our nation honor," one that "is certain to promote ... the influence of Christian civilization." Evidence of our progress included improvements to Filipino infrastructure such as the building of harbors, roads, and railroads. More evidence included our role in building up Filipino police forces to improve internal security. Education was also cited as decreasing "the dense ignorance of the ninety percent."
Having portrayed our presence in the Philippines as purely benevolent and disinterested, Taft ended with a rousing dismissal of critics who were advocating what today would be termed "cutting and running." To relinquish the "burden" of our civilizing mission in the Philippines, Taft concluded, would be "cowardly."
Considering Taft's rhetoric and comparing it to that of Bush and Obama, it's clear that little has changed in one hundred years. It's true that we no longer talk openly about spreading "Christian" civilization. And we're more circumspect about portraying native peoples as "dense" and "ignorant." But other than that, our imperial rhetoric hasn't changed at all. Our presidents still praise our country as being motivated entirely by benevolence; as evidence of our generosity and "progress," they still tout infrastructure built and native police forces trained; and they still dismiss critics of our imperial efforts as misguided (at best) or cowardly (of the worst kind of "cut and run" variety).
But the truth is that it's tragically hard to win hearts and minds overseas when we don't even recognize what's in our own hearts and minds. We venture forth on "civilizing" missions when our own culture could use some civilizing. We think we're pure of heart, but "civilizing" missions based on military occupation inevitably contain a heart of darkness.
Whether it's the presidential election of 1908 or our current one of 2012, we've heard enough speeches about how great and noble and honorable we are. To chart a new course, let's educate our own "ignorant natives" in the USA before we try to cure ignorance elsewhere. Let's rebuild our own crumbling infrastructure. Let's tame our own passions. And let's reconnect with a virtue that, though not unique to Christianity, was then and is now closely associated with it. The virtue? Humility.
To put this in words that may have resonated with Taft, the self-styled "Christian missionary," let's first work on removing the beam from our own eye before focusing on the motes in the eyes of others. For it's only after removing our own beam that we'll succeed in charting a smarter foreign policy -- as well as a far less hypocritical one.
To paraphrase Taft, it would be cowardly indeed to lay down the burden of removing that beam until our purpose is achieved.
Astore writes regularly for TomDispatch.com and can be reached at wjastore@gmail.com.
2. Whether you want to admit it or not, all cultures are not equal. Some are more advanced than others and some have a value set that is superior to the value set of others. Those facts have consequences.
Mutual respect between differing cultures is a good idea, but there are limits to cultural relativism, even for a cultural anthropologist. Culture-neutral humans do not exist for the same reason that all fish are wet.
3. It's not a good idea to allow the perfect to become the enemy of the good.
There are worse things than dying.
"...the first step we must take is to stop listening to the siren song of our own imperial rhetoric. We need to stop posing as benevolent caregivers and start being more honest with ourselves."
I agree with that.
We continue to follow our economic interest with our aid and military engagements. Iraq was a lie and a crying shame before [wo]man and g-d.
Afghanistan- Pakistan is an unwinnable engagement. The inhospitabe region they are fighting in has completely stomped Britain at its height and Russia at its military peak. Some of the area was hosting Al Queda but the movement itself seems to be amorphous enough to operate anywhere.
We've spent a lot of money and soldier's lives in those areas. As a country we went after the financing to 'terror networks'. We've also created a hit list for their leadership. We've changed how much of our budget is absorbed the new security state.
I say that Seal Team 6 looks like a better investment than a massive deployment.
The uproar is not about a crummy film. That was only the spark that ignited the dynamite. What the Muslims and the Middle East is in turmoil about is the very presence of Western influence in the lands of Muhammad, exemplified by the U.S.
It is an open revolt against Western colonialism, stretching back to the 18th Century’s rush for empire by the European powers. It’s a story that stretches all the way to the present with America’s “liberation” of Iraq and Afghanistan as well as its continued military (read “neo-colonial”) presence. The people of the Middle East are exploding over our misguided efforts to bring the blessings of freedom and democracy to a world that is diametrically opposed to those values. The U.S. support of radical dictators, particularly in Persia, Egypt and the rest of North Africa in the 1950s and beyond doesn’t help either.
What the Muslim World is saying is “get out!”
The only way that this crisis will ever be resolved is for Europe and the U.S. to pull entirely out of their internal affairs in the same way we did in Vietnam. Now that they have had their Arab Spring and a taste of their own brand of self-determination, the peoples of the Quran want to put their countries together their own way without outside influence.
b) It ain't gonna happen.
Not voluntarily. But in the long run, the US will bring itself down. It's current and future military expenditures (presently, $3 billion/day) will lead to that. Never say never.