Pollan's 'Defense Of Food' Sparks Debate In Dairyland

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Pollan's 'Defense Of Food' Sparks Debate In Dairyland stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

RYAN J. FOLEY | 09/23/09 08:07 PM | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
This Tuesday, June 9, 2009 picture shows Knight Professor of Science and Environmental Journalism at UC Berkeley and author Michael Pollan at a special screening of 'Food Inc' at the Angelika Film Center in New York. One best-selling book advocating fresh, local foods is shaking up America's Dairyland. Pollan's book titled "In Defense of Food" urges readers to "eat food, mostly plants," and is the subject of a new program in which incoming freshmen can get the book free and many professors are using it in classes. Pollan will give a lecture Thursday, Sept. 24, 2009 at the Kohl Center in Madison, Wis. (AP Photo/Evan Agostini)

MADISON, Wis. — One best-selling book advocating fresh, local foods is shaking up America's Dairyland.

Students across University of Wisconsin-Madison's campus, organic grocers, scientists, and dairy farmers large and small have jumped into the debate on how food is produced and eaten. The discussions started last month when the university began giving Michael Pollan's book, "In Defense of Food," free to all incoming freshmen and school officials urged professors to use it in class.

"I have not seen the students this excited about something in years," Irwin Goodman, a horticulture professor who is vice dean of the College of Agricultural and Life Sciences said of the buzz on campus about Pollan's field-to-table philosophies.

The book urges readers to "eat food, not too much, mostly plants" and criticizes food companies and scientists for replacing traditional foods with unhealthier, highly processed substitutes and confusing consumers with health claims.

Pollan's work has been used on college campuses from the University of California-Berkeley, where he is a journalism professor, to Columbia University in New York City for courses ranging from science journalism to environmental politics. But the program at UW-Madison is unique because the book and related topics are being discussed everywhere from French and political science courses to an exhibit on the history of food. And Pollan is to speak at the 17,000-seat Kohl Center Thursday in the liberal college town.

Kelsey Ward, an 18-year-old freshman from Naperville, Ill., said she's talked about the book in chemistry and diversity classes, and with her roommate, a food science major.

"It's really cool how they've connected everyone on campus through this project," she said. The book, which earlier this year won the James Beard Foundation Award for best food writing, has prompted her to eat more salads and fewer processed foods.

But not everyone is so excited.

Story continues below
advertisement

Bill Bruins, who has a dairy farm near Waupun and is president of the Wisconsin Farm Bureau Federation, called the book "a direct attack on the way we farm today." His group is working with the university to have farmers go into classrooms to present their points of view.

"Pollan has narrow and elitist ideas about how you should eat and how farmers should (or shouldn't) feed a hungry and growing world," Bruins wrote on the farm bureau's Web site.

Another critic, John Lucey, is a UW-Madison professor and food scientist. Pollan blames food scientists for replacing food with "nutrients," and Lucey wrote on a university Web site that scientists have helped preserve foods longer, improved food safety and cut meal preparation time for busy parents.

UW-Madison Chancellor Biddy Martin started the "Go Big Read" program, in which the campus is asked to read the same book, and hopes it becomes a tradition. She was involved with a similar project for several years as provost at Cornell University.

She said she picked "In Defense of Food" because it covered several topical national issues. And as a bonus, Pollan was already planning to visit campus.

After facing criticism for picking Pollan, Martin has spoken to agricultural groups, hosted farmers at her university residence and visited a Madison-based agricultural company. At every turn, she contends the university is not endorsing Pollan's views and noted that many events will offer competing opinions.

"This is our core business at the university – taking something that interests a significant number of people and let people talk about it from every conceivable point of view," Martin said. "I love this give and take. That's what a university is about."

Pollan's Thursday lecture is in an arena normally reserved for presidential candidates and rock stars.

Hundreds of farmers wearing green will be there too, ready to answer questions about food production and tell their side of the story, said Laura Daniels, a dairy farmer in Cobb, Wis., who is organizing the group.

"To imagine the Kohl Center filled not only with faculty and students but with farmers and foodies from all over the state and beyond is extraordinarily exciting," said Sara Guyer, director of the Center for the Humanities and professor of English who was on the selection committee for the book.

Miriam Grunes, executive director of the Madison-based Research, Education, Action and Policy on Food Group, said the book is helping "to showcase what small, sustainable farm products look like."

"It's a really important topic for young people to be thinking about as they become consumers and decision makers for the future, to be aware of the way food does come to our table," she said. "It's great the light is being shined on those issues. Too many people are disconnected from them."

MADISON, Wis. — One best-selling book advocating fresh, local foods is shaking up America's Dairyland. Students across University of Wisconsin-Madison's campus, organic grocers, scientists, and d...
MADISON, Wis. — One best-selling book advocating fresh, local foods is shaking up America's Dairyland. Students across University of Wisconsin-Madison's campus, organic grocers, scientists, and d...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
31
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- bmonaghan I'm a Fan of bmonaghan 5 fans permalink
photo

Read his book and it changed how I shop and what foods I consume. This article is related - interesting how being a responsible consumer can change for the better not only our environment but also our health.

http://www.prlog.org/10351789-making-herbal-tea-cool-why-its-not-just-for-grandma-anymore.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:11 PM on 09/25/2009
- jones I'm a Fan of jones 13 fans permalink
photo

"...Lucey wrote on a university Web site that scientists have helped preserve foods longer, improved food safety and cut meal preparation time for busy parents."

Yeah..... they really have judging by the size of most Americans.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:15 AM on 09/25/2009
photo

Isn't that a classic technique - ignore what you are being accused of, and try to shift focus to an alleged benefit.

Sure, preparing fake "nutrients" is quicker than preparing real food.
Sure, fake "nutrients" have a longer shelf life than real food.
Sure, fake "nutrients" are less more sterile and therefore less vulnerable to bacterial contamination than real food.

But none of that answers the fundamental criticism of fake "nutrients": namely, that they harm the body of the consumer in ways that real food does not.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:07 AM on 09/25/2009

I have no idea what you mean by 'fake nutrients' .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:32 AM on 09/26/2009

Now more than ever we need to reintroduce home-ec classes in our high schools. Every kid should know how to cook basic food, and cook it well. Maybe we should change the name to food science or something that will sound a bit more trendy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:54 PM on 09/24/2009

I sure could have used it. If it wasn't for Trader Joe's, and my juicer, I'd be helpless!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:50 PM on 09/24/2009
photo

I'm betting none of Milwaukee's old school media will cover. Hope I'm wrong. 10 people at Tea Party? 20 cameras! Shows why TV ratings/nu­mbers/data don't reflect the culture as a whole.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:36 PM on 09/24/2009
- spilkus I'm a Fan of spilkus 4 fans permalink
photo

He is a rock star. Strike that, He is a rock God!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:15 PM on 09/24/2009

He's Reverse-Elvis! Rock on, Mike!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:52 PM on 09/24/2009
- elcerritan I'm a Fan of elcerritan 12 fans permalink
photo

Agreeing with all the comments posted (only 6 so far in this new thread).

Just want to add something about the "convenience" argument often advanced in support of processed food. How hard (and time consuming) is it, exactly, to boil a pot of potatoes or pasta; boil, steam or saute a bunch of veggies (you name it: green beans, broccoli, squash, chard, etc., etc.); and saute or broil a piece of meat. You can do this in half an hour or less. Things that take longer (dried beans, stew or pot roast, etc.) can be cooked on the weekend or in a slow-cooker while you're at work, and then frozen or eaten over a period of several days.

I've certainly eaten more than my share of "convenience", highly processed, pre-prepared foods, and looking at them as objectively as I can, most of them weren't really more convenient than basic food made from scratch, and frankly a lot of them don't taste all that good: too salty, too sweet, often with a "sameness" about their taste that masks the flavor of the underlying ingredients, with a slighly "chemical" quality about them. You don't have to be Julie Child to get off the "convenience" food juggarnaut. Three pots/pans, your basic ingredients, and half an hour (and sometimes less) are all you need to turn out a perfectly reasonable meal. Anybody who thinks that's hard needs professional help.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 PM on 09/24/2009

I agree with you, it's not that hard to prepare fresh foods.

In the article, food scientists are defended by John Lucey who brags that they have "cut meal preparation time for busy parents." So they can do what exactly? Earn more? Consume more? Be more efficient drivers of the economy?

Where is the value in this versus spending time lovingly preparing food for children who need the time, the care and the nutrition? Beats me--and I say this as someone who worked full time and made preparing fresh food for my children a priority.

Priorities, priorities.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:30 PM on 09/24/2009
- elcerritan I'm a Fan of elcerritan 12 fans permalink
photo

Fanned and faved.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:51 PM on 09/24/2009
photo

A lot of it has to do with time management and meal planning, as well as actually knowing how to cook. You know, things that people just aren't good at anymore.

Cooking is easy. You don't have to be a gourmet chef to make a halfway decent dinner, especially if you've planned the meal in advance, and the more you do it, the better you get at it. If people actually knew how to cook, actually made their own meals and their own snacks, and didn't allow themselves to remain helpless, I'm not kidding - the weight of the average American would drop by at least fifty pounds.

There are seriously people out there who will go months, even years, without having a real dinner cooked at home that didn't come from a box. When they do, you start to understand why people used to say grace at the table. They're thankful. It doesn't taste or make them feel like crap. They feel good eating it, they feel better afterward, and that really says something because for once, a meal is a happy occasion for them. Not only is subsisting completely off of processed food obscenely unhealthy, they're missing out.

I don't force the issue, but people owe it to themselves to live better with what they've got. That being concerned over what your food actually is and where it comes from, and wanting to establish even some measly measure of food independence is considered 'elitist' is just downright insulting.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:18 PM on 09/24/2009
- elcerritan I'm a Fan of elcerritan 12 fans permalink
photo

Fanned and faved.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:51 PM on 09/24/2009
photo

You cannot cook until you know how to eat. To my dismay, we have even lost that skill.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:33 AM on 09/25/2009
photo

On Wisconsin!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:31 PM on 09/24/2009

A 'direct attack on the way we farm today ....' Well, yes! I understand that small-scale farmers, within driving/walking distance of everyone is unrealistic. And Americans are unlikely to go with the full-scale 'seasonality' of food - especially if they live in the North. However, there can definitely be an improvement in the way we eat. Check out the Nation from September 21. Great stuff. http://www.thenation.com/issue/20090921

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:16 PM on 09/24/2009
- elcerritan I'm a Fan of elcerritan 12 fans permalink
photo

Co-sign.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 PM on 09/24/2009
photo

Isn't that the whole point of the attack - namely that the way we farm today is wrong?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:10 AM on 09/25/2009
- arabianway I'm a Fan of arabianway 7 fans permalink

If one has ever driven past a dairy, and I know most people probably have not, the stench is unbelievable. Modern dairys are Corporate enterprises, nothing like what one might imagine (fancifully) if you hadn't actually seen or smelled one. Milk that comes from these dairys is not healthy food by any stretch of the imagination.

Cudos to UW Madison for this great educational move. Clearly the students liked it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:41 AM on 09/24/2009

Agree. I stick to rice milk.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:52 PM on 09/24/2009

Ever driven by your local septic/sewage treatment plant? Do you like the smell of dog poop warming on the sidewalk? Even been in or near a rice field or paddy - especially the ones fertilized with 'night soil'? If a family farm incorporates as part of their financial planning, are they now evil ''Corporate enterprises'?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:36 AM on 09/26/2009
- thebassguy I'm a Fan of thebassguy 5 fans permalink
photo

it's great and it's about time. It will be up to the young folks to change the way we eat.

Processed foods, foods packed with added sugers (espec those un-natural ones), fats and sodium, fruits and veggies grown with tons of pesticides, big slabs o'protein at every meal, and eating every food all year 'round - these are things that need to be changed so we can be healthier.

I think this is the real "health care" debate we'll need to be having in this country.

I hope everyone reads Pollens books and Marion Nestle's too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:30 AM on 09/24/2009
- JScott I'm a Fan of JScott 20 fans permalink

Jeez farmers and big ag object because Michael tells people
'think about where your food comes from'-wow is that subversive or what?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:28 AM on 09/24/2009

This in an incredible step forward in changing the way American's perceive their role in the food chain. EVERYONE MUST read Pollan's works. In fact, "Omniovre's Dilemma" is much more in depth study of the role of factory farms in our society. "In Defense of Food" is topical and more mainstream.

As for those arguing that Pollan is an Elitist... be weary of the Straw Man. Pollan does not attest to have an answer for feeding the American Machine. He does not attest to explain how a family of seven is supposed to feed their kids, who have baseball practice, then soccer, then swimming, ect...

His argument is that Americans are being deceived by Corporate Interests into thinking that Reductionist Science can seamlessly alter and increase the efficiency and quality of our foods. This is simply not true, and our food has become increasingly worse for us since the creation of Farm Subsidies in the 70's. Consider that the disease, Adult Onset Diabetes was NOT a disease until companies like McDonalds and Coca-Cola switched to High Fructose Corn Syrup as their main sweetening agent. Links like these are simply undeniable, except by Corporate Farmers. This is the ONLY myth Pollan wishes to address. Break down the myths FIRST, come up with SOLUTIONS SECOND.

If being healthy is being elite... well then... call me Elitist, Happy Elitist.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:55 AM on 09/24/2009

Indeed. Having read all of his work except the newest one, I don't get 'elitist' at all. That is just right-wing corporate-speak for "he scares us."
If anything, Pollan is very even handed. He wants farmers to succeed and he wants people to be healthy. He wants farm subsidies to work for a common good, rather than a fat, diabetic America. Those who are threatened by him haven't read him. However there are a bunch of lefty-food­y-vegan-ty­pes [I'm fine with vegan, but not the stupid ones] who use Pollan and are aggressive and make stupid simplistic statements that antagonize farmers. They are arm-chair farmers, ...argo-di­lettantes. These are as much the enemy as the suits, for they polarize the situation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:27 PM on 09/24/2009
photo

It is not difficult to feed a large family with a busy life style - it is a matter of modifying eating habits. Most countries organize their food eating around a principle of staples-an­d-variatio­ns. Asians do it. Latin Americans do it. Americans seem to think they need to give themselves the luxury of eating steak and potatoes one night, and chicken and rice the next night, and hamburgers and french fries the third night.

In our house we follow a staple-variation principle. We cook a pot of beans that lasts 4 days. We cook a pot of quinoa or brown rice that lasts 4 days. And we just worry about preparing the garnishes, sides, and maybe on occasion a meat dish. It is a fundamental principle ... it is only Americans who don't follow it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:31 AM on 09/25/2009

From Wikipedia:
One much-publicized 2004 study found an association between obesity and high HFCS consumption, especially from soft drinks.[44] However, this study provided only correlative data. One of the study coauthors, Dr. Barry M. Popkin, is quoted in the New York Times as saying, "I don't think there should be a perception that high-fructose corn syrup has caused obesity until we know more."[45] In the same article, Walter Willett, chair of the nutrition department of the Harvard School of Public Health, is quoted as saying, "There's no substantial evidence to support the idea that high-fructose corn syrup is somehow responsible for obesity .... If there was no high-fructose corn syrup, I don't think we would see a change in anything important." Willett also recommends drinking water over soft drinks containing sugars or high-fructose corn syrup.[46]

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:48 AM on 09/26/2009
photo

The day I stopped drinking soft drinks and beverages made with sweeteners, I stopped gaining weight and started losing it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:02 PM on 09/27/2009
- Kaviraj I'm a Fan of Kaviraj 42 fans permalink
photo

It is significant to address the problems but without a solution to the present situation nothing will change.

The best solution IS organic farming on smaller plots and in greater variety. However, the problems of pests and diseases do not disappear, because farming will still be a lrge-sacle enterprise, because it makes no difference in acreage.

Thus an alternative must be found for pesticides, herbicides and fungicides that poison our food, water and environment.

At the risk of getting the laughers on my neck I porpose to use homoeopathic medicine in that function. They have been proven to work and are verified by scientific reports of tests done by reputable universities in India, Pakistan, Brazil and France, Germany and the UK.

Farmers who switch discover that a single spray protects their crops for 3 months, is non-poisonous, leaves no residues and is dirt-cheap to boot, compared to poisonous substances from Monsanto CS.
It will boost the economy because of the huge difference in price/effectivity standards. Farmers no longer need subsidies when they start making money.

This is a win-win method and interested parties i like to direct to www.considera.org

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:50 AM on 09/27/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect