iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Yoani Sanchez

Yoani Sanchez

Posted May 11, 2009 | 10:44 PM (EST)

Video Proof: Cuba Violates Its Citizens' Constitutional Protections


Saturday, May 9, I went to the Melia Cohiba hotel to check if the Internet access limitations for Cubans continue. Several friends had told me that the measure had been rescinded... but I wanted to check for myself. So Reinaldo and I went and made this little video.

The "tourist" who appears to be reading the newspaper Granma is me.

To see the English Subtitles put your mouse over the square in the middle of the video.

Video Transcript

Reinaldo - Buenes tardes joven. Para comprar una hora de internet.
Good afternoon, Miss. I'd like to buy an hour of internet.

Mujer (Raquel) - Me permite tu pasaporte? Por favor.
May I see your passport please.

R - No, yo... carta de identidad es lo que yo tengo.
No, what I have is an identity card.

M - No, no le puedo vender una hora de Internet, porque la conexion aqui es solamente para extranjeros.
No, I can't sell you an hour of Internet, because the connection here is only for foreigners.

R - Discuple, es que yo no oigo bien.
Excuse me, I don't think I heard you clearly.

M - Que la conexion aqui es solamente para los extranjeros.
The connection here is only for foreigners.

R - Desde cuando es eso?
Since when is this?

M - Hace un mes.
Since one month.

R - Yo vine la semana pasada y me conecte.
I came last week and connected.

M - Y quien la vendia el ticket?
And who sold you the ticket?

R - No se el nombre. Como mismo no la he preguntado el nombre a usted, tampoco se lo pregunte a la...
I don't know the name. Just as I didn't ask your name, neither did I ask...

M - Mi nombre es Raquel.
My name is Raquel.

R - Si, pero usted no es la unica persona que trabaja aqui. Aqui hay una muchacha rubia...
Yes, but you aren't the only person who works here. There's a red-headed girl...

R - Hace ocho dias.
It was eight days ago.

M - Ya....
Now...

M - Hay una resolucion que dice que solamente es para extranjeros. Mire aqui...
There's a resolution that says it's only for foreigners. Look here...

R - Si.
Yes

R - Esta es la...
This is the...

M - Venga aca...y...a...ver.
Come here... and... see.

R - Pero esto es solamente en este hotel?
But is this only in this hotel?

R - Esto se esta haciendo en todos los hoteles?
Is this being done in all the hotels?

R - Si, porque yo me conecto frequentamente en el Nacional y en el Presidente.
Because I frequently connect in the National and the President.

M - Creo que en el Presidente, todavia no se ha establecido este sistema.
I think in the President they still haven't established this system.

R - Pero, eso es una cosa que viene... una resolucion. Usted me disculpa que le haga tantas preguntas.
But this is something that comes... a resolution. Forgive me for asking so many questions.

R - Es una resolucion para este hotel, para la agencia Melia, para...?
Is this a resolution of this hotel, of the Melia company, of...?

M - No, eso es una resolucion del MINTUR.
No, it's a resolution from MINTUR.

R - Del Ministerior de Turismo?
From the Tourism Ministry?

M - Si.
Yes.

R -- ... no sera del Ministerio de Comunicaciones?
It's not from the Communications Ministry?

M - Tengo entendido que tiene que ver con el MINTUR y con ETECSA.
I've been given to understand that it comes from MINTUR and ETESCA.

M - Porque de hecho, este nuevo tipo de conexion es de ETESCA.
Because of the fact that this new type of connection is from ETESCA.

R - Bueno y eso, como uno puedo discutir eso? Verlo con alguien?
OK, and this, how can one dispute this? See someone about it?

R - Vaya, no es con usted con quien lo voy a discutir, porque desde luego usted es una persona que esta cumpliendo con su trabajo.
Look, I don't have an argument with you, because after all you are a person who is just doing your job.

M - Si dirije alli, a la Conserjeria y alli usted refleja cualquier queja que usted quiera.
Yes, you can go to Reception and lodge any complaints you like.

R - Porque usted sabe que eso viola mis derechos constitucionales.
Because you know this violates my constitutional rights.

R - Porque esta escrito en la constitucion de nuestra Republica que esta prohibida la discriminacion por origen nacional.
Because it's written in the constitution of our Republic that discrimination based on national origin is prohibited.

R - Y entonces yo me siento discriminado porque tengo como origen nacional el de Cuba.
And I feel discriminated against because my national origin is Cuban.

R - Es como se dijeron aqui: "Esta Internet es para todo el mundo, menos para los mexicanos."
It's as if they said here: "This Internet is for the whole world except Mexicans."

R - Es lo mismo, no?
It's the same, no?

R - Me estan discriminando por mi origen nacional.
I'm being discriminated against for my national origin

R - No hay una sola ley o reglamento interno que puede ir por encima de los derechos constitucionales de los ciudadanos.
There's not a single law or internal regulation that can supersede the constitutional rights of citizens.

R - Diga yo, No?
Aren't I right?

M - Yo lo unico que tengo que... Bueno, pues cumplir con mi deber.
I'm just that one who has to... I'm just doing my duty.

R - Si claro, yo conozco eso.
Yes, of course, I know that.

R - Bueno Raquel, pues muchas gracias y esperamos a ver la proxima vez que venga aqui, ya seguro que derogado eso.
OK Raquel, and many thanks and I hope to see you the next time I come here, I'm sure this will be repealed.

M - A bueno... ojala... a ver.
OK... hopefully... we'll see...

Yoani's blog, Generation Y, can be read here in English Translation.

Saturday, May 9, I went to the Melia Cohiba hotel to check if the Internet access limitations for Cubans continue. Several friends had told me that the measure had been rescinded... but I wanted to c...
Saturday, May 9, I went to the Melia Cohiba hotel to check if the Internet access limitations for Cubans continue. Several friends had told me that the measure had been rescinded... but I wanted to c...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 82
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
01:19 AM on 05/14/2009
I guess Obama’s easing of U.S. Cuba telecommunications restrictions are now off the table. With the Cuban government’s crackdown on bloggers, computer usage, and soon to follow, a crackdown on satellite antennas and receivers; what need is there for the U.S to export to Cuba communications devices such as mobile phone systems, computers, software, and satellite receivers?
12:32 AM on 05/13/2009
I want to make a general comment about comparisons. Many writers refer to the problems in the U.S. and there are many. On the other hand, supporters of Castro often point proudly and say "people in Cuba live better than people in Haiti." OK. Point taken.

My point is... this is an article about Cuba from a Cuban perspective. And supporting Cubans who are working for freedom and democracy in their own country, doesn't mean that we think every other country in the world is already perfect so now it's Cuba's "turn". We all have a lot of problems. We all need to work on them. And Yoani is working on the problems in her country.

I for one, knowing the threat she lives under, can only applaud her tremendous courage and do everything I can, however small, to support her and show a little solidarity for her struggle. Cubans, like humans everywhere on the planet, deserve to live in a democracy that respects individual human rights. Cuba is not and does not.
07:01 PM on 05/12/2009
The re-imposition of internet apartheid at tourist hotels lends support to those who argued that the Castros regime would try to sabotage the recent overtures from the Obama administration on travel and remittances.
guajiro
posted 5 minutes ago
01:21 PM on 05/12/2009
Oh my Gawd!!! This horrible practice of capitalism in Cuba MUST BE STOPPED!! The idea that a business would provide service only for certain clients is world-stopping. I remember I went to a golf course one time, only to be run off by the staff when I could not produce the correct paperwork to prove I was a member. I decided to go dancing instead and went to a dance hall only to be told by the bouncer at the door that I had to have a membership there before I would be let in. I gave up and went swimming at the nearby beach and ran into an acquaintance who told me his "cousin" from Mexico was trying to get into the U.S. Turns out he had been apprehended by the border patrol and thrown back across into Mexico and now he was trying to get here again. A nearby stranger offered his opinion. His own "cousin", he told us, bought a canoe and then ditched the canoe in the ocean when he could see land in Florida and then swam ashore and told the border patrol officers he was Cuban. They let him in and awarded him U.S. citizen status as he was.....gasp........a Cuban and not Mexican. IMAGINE!!! Discriminating against Mexicans but not Cubans!!!! Oh my! And all this in the good ol USA. Hmmmmm.
12:23 AM on 05/13/2009
Raquel did not say the internet was only for paying guests.There might be good sense in that. No... she said it was for everyone except Cuban citizens. Everyone. Anyone who walks in off the street. Except the people who live in the country where the hotel is located and call it home. And... it was not the hotel's decision, she said. It was the government's.
10:13 AM on 05/13/2009
"guajiro"

1. This is not a business rule but a government imposed one. Read the transcript or watch the video, it was imposed by MINTUR ... the Ministry of Turism.

2. How can you justify that foreigners should have more rights than the citizens of that country. You really want to make that argument? Tell me what hotels in the US are you staying that they don't let you use internet access if you are a US citizen, examples please.
12:49 PM on 05/12/2009
And your point is?

Would you like to have Batista back?
06:00 PM on 05/12/2009
No just the same rights you and I enjoy
09:30 PM on 05/12/2009
Like the right to chose a public health plan over a private FOR-PROFIT health pan?

Or if I were black to sit in the front row of a bus right?
10:15 AM on 05/13/2009
So in Cuba the only choice is between a Batista like government or a family member of the Castro family?

You mean, there's nobody in the island who is capable of providing alternatives to the current and past regimes? What you are saying it's actually an insult to the Cuban people. You are saying there's nobody qualified but the Castro brothers and if it's not their repressive ways the only choice is a Batista like regime.

Very stupid statement.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ira7
10:17 AM on 05/12/2009
When the Repubs blast the nutty Libs, this blog is a perfect example of why they're right:

Some here are comparing the rights of people living in Cuba to those in the U.S.? You gotta be JOKING!

They're slaves there, for God's sake. And not acknowledging it doesn't make it any less true.
12:50 PM on 05/12/2009
You must be talking about the Chinese.
10:55 PM on 05/12/2009
Cuba's civil liberties and general level of freedom suck. Because of Cuba's militancy and defiance of (awful/often murderous) US foreign policies, it gets more than its share of slack from lefties in US who would scream bloody murder if they had to live in a system like that.
10:15 AM on 05/12/2009
Sorry to break it to you, but Cuba is not an American territory at all, and therefore in no way beholden to the Constitution. We would like them to be, but until we take them on as a territory, we have no place to complain about this sort of thing.

Especially using the misleading headline, as not even internet speech is free, as it is subject to moderators and the owners of the website being used.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
steamboat
03:00 PM on 05/12/2009
You are CORRECT. And using YOUR logic, these terrorists prisoners we have at GITMO and these Iraqi's, Pakistani's, and Afghans we bomb, strip naked in prison, etc. are NOT beholden to our Constitution, either.
06:22 PM on 05/12/2009
Did you watch the video or read the transcript? This is about Cuban constitutional rights, not the American constitution. Or did you think the US was the only country with a constitution?
06:32 AM on 05/12/2009
So what we have here is a number of commentors that use the internet, and their freedom of speech, to decry their lack of constitutional rights in America, while commenting on a superb article that illustrates a socialist country that denies it's citizens the internet and freedom of speech...Wow! The irony is so thick you can cut it with a knife!
06:25 AM on 05/12/2009
The only folks still complaining about Castro are the white Cuban one-percenters that raped the country and consolidated all of the wealth. All Castro did was stop the expokitation of the masses for the benefit of the few. The U.S. will support any government that operates under a trickle down economic theory, hence our continued support for China. The chickens are coming home to roost. A society based on greed and immorality will not last, enough said.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pancy
09:19 AM on 05/12/2009
But don't you think that Cubans should have the right to determine what kind of government they have?
12:51 PM on 05/12/2009
And who are you to ask? If you are an American you got the President SELECTED for you in 2000.
01:32 PM on 05/12/2009
Sure. U really think we choose our leaders. How naive. No one determines the type of govt they have. People work and grow the one they already have.
11:08 AM on 05/12/2009
NO. There are democratic socialists who are thoroughly disgusted by the legacy of unfreedom in Castro's Cuba. What a gift Fidel, and the rest of the Stalinist states, gave to capitalists. Cuba's lack of expression and liberty feeds the There Is No Alternative fallacy.
01:48 AM on 05/12/2009
That dialogue was Kafkaesque. I feel sorry for the Cubans, missing out on all the internet has to offer.

I know how that guy feels about his constitutional rights being taken, I miss mine, too. I only have the Third Amendment right left.
05:17 AM on 05/12/2009
Move to Cuba, you are free to do so.
12:25 AM on 05/13/2009
Kafkaesque is the best description I've heard so far. Exactly.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:47 AM on 05/12/2009
I'd rather be without some of the internet than without healthcare.
03:48 AM on 05/12/2009
Who is preventing you from obtaining health care? Answer: Nobody. Your simple statement, that you think is so profound, is instead merely simple.

Did you know that the constitution of Zimbabwe gaurantees health care to all of its citizens? Would you like to guess what percentage of people there ever SEE a doctor? Writing something down on paper is not the same as delivering the goods.

As for healthcare, go buy you some pal. It's all over the place!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
steamboat
10:16 AM on 05/12/2009
You are right and now that the truth is coming out, Cuba is vastly OVERRATED and offers an inferior healthcare. Why Chile, Costa Rica, Columbia, and Dominica's are rated higher.
12:53 PM on 05/12/2009
Healthcare is astronomical in cost and there are no alternatives other than FOR-PROFIT insurance schemes that offer bad healthcare.
08:37 AM on 05/12/2009
When have you walked into a hospital and been denied healthcare?
12:53 PM on 05/12/2009
People die in the USA for lack of medical care in the USA. You don't want to get in this argument.
12:17 AM on 05/12/2009
Cuba economic embargo China full speed ahead?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pancy
09:10 AM on 05/12/2009
I agree, but China does not have a powerful constituency in America that can determine elections.
12:57 PM on 05/12/2009
Cubans were irrelevant in the last election.
photo
flamflurm
The name's Flurm. Flam Flurm.
12:02 AM on 05/12/2009
This should surprise no one. Still, thank you Ms Sánchez for your courage (and your picture).
11:59 PM on 05/11/2009
Good journalism, but do we really need video proof that Cuba violates its citizens' constitutional rights? It wasn't exactly a big mystery...just as we don't need any more proof about North Korea.
08:33 AM on 05/12/2009
Sadly, we do need this. Just ask Hollywood.
09:59 AM on 05/12/2009
Check out the stories from a supposed Cuban intel officer that suggest that many of the "Castro loving Left" in Hollywood were blackmailed into showing public support. Lord knows, mos of them are dumb enough to be easily blackmailed.
11:58 PM on 05/11/2009
One doesn't need "video proof" to know that the U.S. violates the constitutional rights of it's own citizens... But, I'm interested to know more about this particular article/contribution.

It doesn't acknowledge the political or ideological background of its author; nor does it address the constitutional protections that are violated by the U.S. of its citizens (ie. Marriage rights); nor does it place the video in context to whether or not cubans can access internet any where else or if there is (I assume there is) a digital divide, the likes of which we have here in the U.S.

Is this the 'worst' violation of Cubans' constitutional rights at this point? More context would be appreciated. ...
12:28 AM on 05/12/2009
no, the worst violation would probably be the fact that there are political prisoners languishing in Cuban prisons for no other reason except that they spoke out against the current regime.

How's that for context.
08:36 AM on 05/12/2009
The US has held political prisoners too, you know - look up Lyndon LaRouche.
12:34 AM on 05/12/2009
Apparently the hotel internet rentals are reserved for guests, not locals, and the author sees this as a communist outrage.
photo
flamflurm
The name's Flurm. Flam Flurm.
05:52 AM on 05/12/2009
...but no one else has a connection.