Restaurants have plenty of highly debated policies -- telling customers how they can order, who they're allowed to bring, how they can pay and even how long they're allowed to hang out. You can't even loiter in a Starbucks anymore (unless you want the po-po involved). We decided to take a look at both sides of some of the most controversial restaurant policies out there -- let us know where you stand on each one!
Fine with the cash policy. As long as they display it clearly in front of the restaurant.
If there are dress codes, I tend not to want to stay anyway. Too stuffy.
If it's a small restaurant, I understand about time limits.
No kids. Hmm, that's a bit rough. On the other hand, many parents don't seem to have taught their children table manners.
If it's a popular joint and has a line up anyway, their food must be worth the no reservations.
No substitutions is only OK if its a cheap and cheerful place.
Automatic tip is not on. I would like to decide how good the service was and pay accordingly.
Artists are also frequently commissioned to do certain works, and, especially when you get to more collaborative efforts, such as film, novels, and video games, must be able work within the guidelines of their commission. One could say a chef is commissioned to cook.
The table is provided for the dining experience and conversation related thereto.
Some people might decide that it is their location for an evening of conversation with friends where no one has to clean up afterward and, by the way, a meal is conveniently prepared and served as well.
If people are waiting to dine it may be costing the restaurant hundreds of dollars per hour to provide a conversation area after the meal is complete. Is that fair?
of course, if you can afford to go to fine dining restaurants and pay for their food, not leaving a tip is a little stingy in my opinion.