Under Mounting Pressure, Starbucks Settles Yet Another Labor Dispute

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

Here comes my coffee spit take for the day. Starbucks just settled its sixth labor dispute in the past three years! According to the settlement, Starbucks must now allow Minneapolis-area workers to discuss unions and post union materials in break areas, and the company can no longer kick union sympathizers out of its stores.

This is a huge win for the IWW Starbucks Workers Union, an organization of over 300 current and former Starbucks employees -- the David to Starbucks' caffeinated, union-busting Goliath. Though really, it's a big win for all Starbucks employees, since unionization would enable workers to negotiate set hours, fairer wages and better benefits for everyone.

Angel Gardner, a Twin Cities barista and member of the IWW Starbucks Workers Union, said, "This settlement proves that Starbucks executives are not above the law and cannot block hard working baristas from making positive change. How can Starbucks claim that it maintains a positive work environment when one labor case after another exposes its lack of respect for employees?"

As I've written previously, it's deceptive for Starbucks to pretend to offer workers adequate wages and benefits. The reality is Starbucks routinely prevents employees from working enough hours to qualify for the company's health insurance, and the average barista earns $7.75 an hour. Then, when workers attempt to remedy this problem by forming a union, Starbucks violates labor laws by firing or intimidating them, going so far as to actively oppose the Employee Free Choice Act.

The Minneapolis settlement is also a win for the Stop Starbucks campaign, which the Seattle Times and other recent press coverage have credited with pressuring Starbucks into supporting workers' rights. Join 15,000 who have signed the petition insisting Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz allow workers to unionize. Then, enter the Stop Starbucks contest and get creative as you raise awareness about Starbucks' anti-labor practices.

Here comes my coffee spit take for the day. Starbucks just settled its sixth labor dispute in the past three years! According to the settlement, Starbucks must now allow Minneapolis-area workers to ...
Here comes my coffee spit take for the day. Starbucks just settled its sixth labor dispute in the past three years! According to the settlement, Starbucks must now allow Minneapolis-area workers to ...
 
Comments
12
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

I'm all for fair wages, but seriously....a union? Simply, businesses are there to make money for their shareholders. Benefits are just that, benefits. If you wanted employer funded healthcare, don't work a menial job that pays minmum wage.

In 2005 Starbucks spent more on healthcare costs than raw materials and realized that model wasn't sustainable. I realize they are a large profitable company, but they can't remain on that path if they have to provide healthcare for all their workers...­.especiall­y in a recession where their profits are what they were. That is unless Starbucks drinkers want to pay even more for their lattes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 PM on 06/04/2009
photo

Starbucks is hardly a long term career option.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 AM on 06/04/2009
- LeftRight I'm a Fan of LeftRight 106 fans permalink
photo

It should be able to be one....

Speaking of that, I worked in a grocery store when I was in high school. While there was only one person bagging groceries who wasn't in high school (she was a retiree) the rest of the store was available for people to make a career out of.... I know it's not the same as a Starbucks, but still....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:06 AM on 06/04/2009
photo

I'm just saying I would be very dissapointed in myself if that was the only options I had left myself.

I worked 4 years in a restaurant in High School washing dishes and bussing tables (25+ hours per week while in school); that experience more than anything else motivated me to move on to better options. Especially seeing the cooks and waitresses that were in their 40's with no better options.

Kids, do yourself a favor, get qualified for better career paths than barista.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:43 AM on 06/04/2009
- rf dude I'm a Fan of rf dude 20 fans permalink
photo


Imagine the irony of some future picket line at Starbucks

with workers carrying the usual signs, chanting the usual slogans

and drinking coffee from - where???
--

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 AM on 06/03/2009
- LeftRight I'm a Fan of LeftRight 106 fans permalink
photo

My guess would be either their homes or from someplace like 7-11, cause if they are picketing they will hardly be rolling in the dough!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:02 PM on 06/03/2009
- EndTheEcho I'm a Fan of EndTheEcho 9 fans permalink
photo

There a no 7-11's in Minneapolis. Got bought out in the 80s by SuperAmerica.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:02 AM on 06/05/2009
photo

one imagines from the number of competing cafes that sprout up around Starbucks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:15 PM on 06/04/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect


svn