Generally, I think my fellow Yahoo! Finance Expert gives pretty solid financial advice. Sure, she's compromised somewhat by her endorsements like MyFICO.com, but she seems to genuinely care about helping people, the opposite of an irresponsible stock hustler like Jim Cramer.
However, after reading her profile in the New York Times Magazine, I realized that I think her priorities are totally screwed up. She seems to equate financial security with being rich.
I mean, maybe this is obvious, since she wrote a book called The Courage To Be Rich. But really, that's such BS.
If we learned anything from the past year's fiscal insanity, it's that financial security, financial integrity, and financial freedom have nothing to do with having a ton of money. You have financial security if you are able to cover your basic expenses and save for the future. You have financial integrity if you're not fronting by buying a bunch of crap you can't afford while neglecting your future. And true financial freedom, for life, means the ability to live well within your means, regardless of the fluctuations of the market. These are all dynamic ways of being in the world, not static numbers.
Okay, you might argue that "basic expenses" does require a certain dollar value per year, but I think it's all contextual. You could live on the beach in Goa for $10,000 a year, and as long as you play enough guitar to clear $11,000 in tips, presto, you have financial freedom.
This was the part of the story I found the most galling:
"She has been reluctant to work on school curricula on personal finance, because she says students can't learn empowerment from people who aren't empowered, and teachers, she says, are too underpaid ever to have any real self-worth."
Seriously?? Suze is suggesting that people who go into teaching aren't empowered and don't value themselves because they're too big of losers not to become a stockbroker or a TV personality like she did? Teachers, who do the most important job in our society, have no self worth because they're underpaid? Okay, you might agree that they are underpaid, but objectively in most places in the US they make a solid middle class living, with security and benefits that are unheard-of in most careers. Teaching is an enviable career to a huge chunk of the American public. This is incredibly out of touch.
Suze's right about one thing: young people shouldn't be learning about personal finance from her. This is the same kind of GOP-style, rich-person-worshiping BS disguised as "empowerment" of the common person that got us into trouble in the first place.