THE BLOG
11/20/2014 01:13 pm ET Updated Dec 06, 2017

PETA Really Needs to Respond to the Charges That Its Workers Stole and Killed a Family's Dog, Then Sent a Fruit Basket

WAVY

These allegations are so grotesque, they'd make the perfect smear campaign.

As you may have heard, Wilbur Cerate, a Virginia man, claims that last month, two People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals staffers turned up at his home when he wasn't there, loaded his daughter's Chihuahua, Maya, into a van, and then euthanized her.

Three days later -- this is the real kicker -- the PETA workers are said to have then brought the grieving family a fruit basket.

Parts of this were caught on surveillance video.

Accomack County Sheriff Todd Godwin told WAVY -- the first local news outlet to pursue this bizarre, sad story -- he charged the dog-nappers with larceny, only to see the charges dropped by the Commonwealth Attorney because, as the paper put it, "there wasn't enough evidence to prosecute."

On Wednesday, DELMARVA Now got the names of those who were charged: Victoria Jean Carey, who appears to do HR for the group, and Jennifer Lisa Woods, another longtime PETA staffer who seems to have been quoted in a 1997 article advocating for the "compassionate" euthanasia of homeless cats. (Sure, that was nearly 20 years ago -- but PETA still has a web page up entitled "Euthanasia: The Compassionate Option.")

Godwin told the paper that "both individuals were working on behalf of the PETA Community Assistance Program when the theft occurred."

Horrific on its face. Too horrific to be true?

Prominent folks working to reduce pet euthanasia, like Nathan Winograd -- a leading advocate in the no-kill movement -- seem to believe that this terrible incident could have happened as it's being reported; that it fits in with the controversial group's regular practices and philosophies.

So what the heck does PETA say about all this?

That this didn't happen the way it's been reported?

Or that the workers were going around taking Chihuahuas on their own initiative and outside of work hours?

Was Maya taken and killed by accident?

Or does PETA believe, as an organization, Maya is better off dead?

Can they at least offer some explanation for the fruit basket?

No. They've been completely, distressingly silent.

Here's a video of WAVY's reporter trying to get a response from someone at PETA's Norfolk, Virginia, headquarters:

DELMARVA Now was similarly unsuccessful. And we at HuffPost have also been trying all week to get anyone from the organization to tell us anything about what actually happened here in Virginia, to the Cerate family and their tiny dog.

I personally have been sent to a lot of voice mail boxes without getting a single return call, and was even hung up on once. Emails go unreturned.

Meantime, a group that seems to have benefited from Maya's death is The Center for Consumer Freedom, a D.C. nonprofit whose interests include promoting beef consumption, making sure pigs aren't raised more humanely and -- this one's unrelated -- easing drunk driving restrictions.

CCF has been engaged in a long and nasty campaign against PETA, the Humane Society, and others whose work poses a threat to those in the meat industry.

Unsurprisingly, CCF has released a gleeful-sounding blog post about this story -- which has been picked up by a whole lot of conservative publications -- while also calling on PETA to "come clean with the public about what's going on here."

As a near-lifelong vegetarian who is deeply concerned with reducing animal suffering, I don't often agree with the meat industry's shills.

But in this case I do: It's past time for PETA to explain.

Because until we know more, all we can say about this terrible story is that a family is grieving, and some professionally sinister mustache-twirlers have that much more ammunition in their war against animals.