Ferguson: A Tale of Two Narratives

As long as the perception gap exists, what can really be gained in Ferguson beyond a faction achieving its desired outcome? The current tension that is part of secondary narrative will temporarily go into remission.
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

It began with a report that a young, unarmed, black male was killed after being shot six times by a white police officer.

Ferguson, Missouri, population slightly more than 21,000, became the new epicenter for the nation's latest absurdity.

Plaguing the human condition in myriad forms, this particular brand of absurdity moves with impunity.

It revealed itself at the Fruitvale BART station in Oakland, tragically symbolized by ice tea and Skittles in Sanford, Florida, prompted overreaction to loud music at a convenience store in Jacksonville Florida, and along with Ferguson, have transformed these communities into places synonymous with the death of young black males that on face value, reasonable people would classify as absurd.

This particular brand of absurdity carries multiple narratives. The primary narrative was the shooting death of Michael Brown. This is why those concerned about the plight of justice have descended upon Ferguson.

While information is freely transmuted as fact, the only aspect that is indisputable is the shooting death of Michael Brown.

But the secondary narrative is an unending saga that began officially in 1787. Too large for any single event, it easily and conveniently engulfs the primary narrative.

It welcomes opportunist be they political, criminal, anarchist, or racist to be part of the story. In Ferguson, we also witnessed how those whose sworn responsibility to protect and serve the community became a militarization enterprise, the very embodiment of what not to do during crowd control exercises.

It is the secondary narrative, where the court of public opinion takes precedent, where rush to judgment replaces judicious deliberation, where emotion, preconceived notions, and rapidly changing information is more beneficial than fact.

This is where cheap historical comparisons are freely used to validate the position already reached, it is designed to titillate rather than inform, to incite rather than edify.

There is a narcissistic instinct in the secondary narrative as it makes itself primary. It renders the facts surrounding the death of Michael Brown to a subordinate consideration, while it tells itself and others it wants "Justice for Michael Brown."

But that understandable mantra is for a justice most likely based not on a system, but on an outcome that has been reached before facts are known.

But this phenomenon is not exclusive to one side. Those who support Darren Wilson, the officer who killed Brown, are equal partners in the secondary narrative.

This is not to suggest the secondary narrative does not have a place in the public discourse -- it does. But it is so consuming, it quickly puts individuals in a reactionary emotional overload long before the facts are available.

It does remind us tragically that America is a place pregnant with competing histories, oblivious to anything that does not correspond. This has been an ongoing tension in America since the civil rights movement of the 1960s.

The gallant pushback against America's failed promise of "We the People" toward its citizens of color resulted in the creation of fear among many whites that could not understand the transformative contrarian viewpoint.

America has long been hamstrung by a perception gap. In a Pew Research Center Poll released this week, Blacks, by 4 to 1, said events in Ferguson did raise important racial issues. Whites were more closely divided, with 37% saying the case raised important racial questions, while 47% said they thought race was "getting more attention than it deserved."

As long as the perception gap exists, what can really be gained in Ferguson beyond a faction achieving its desired outcome? The current tension that is part of secondary narrative will temporarily go into remission.

In this context, the secondary narrative that dominates news coverage not only diminishes the value of the primary narrative, it works against it own interests. Regardless of the outcome that spawned the tragic event that necessitated its appearance, the secondary narrative is invariably forced to post a "To be Continued" sign as it patiently awaits its next opportunity.

Popular in the Community

Close

What's Hot