05/30/2012 08:52 am ET Updated Jul 30, 2012

Jack Hitt On Bunch Of Amateurs: A Search For The American Character

In Bunch of Amateurs: A Search for the American Character, author Jack Hitt contends that what he calls "the Golden Age of American amateurism" is far from over. On the contrary, the amateur's dream is the American dream. One of the great unspoken liberties in our country, writes Hitt, is still the ability to "walk away from everything that one is. Whether it's fleeing a repressive nation for this new place or simply out the back door for the garage -- that is real freedom."

A contributing editor to the New York Times Magazine, Harper's and public radio's This American Life, Hitt explores this freedom from multiple angles, offering a slew of info-rich and sometimes hilarious portraits of amateurs who walked out those back doors and into their garages, driven by creative obsession and an "intoxicating sense of possibility." According to Hitt, it's this very sense of possibility, hardwired as it is into our DNA, that's responsible for the entrepreneurial drive and inventive spirit of our country.

Hitt goes back to our beloved Ben Franklin, who he credits as being the founding father of our tradition of home tinkering, and whose redemptive autobiography Hitt refers to as "an amazing piece of revisionist history." He goes on to chronicle everyone from a tattooed young woman in the Bay Area trying to splice a fish's glow-in-the-dark gene into common yogurt (in, of all things, her kitchen salad spinner) to amateurs with home-brew DIY biolabs and rogue astronomers. Hitt reveals just how deeply the amateur spirit is embedded in the American conscience, and why our future lies not in the boardrooms of big businesses, but in the garages, offices, and backyards of American's inventing class.

I recently spoke with Hitt about America's brand of genius amateurism.

You write that "the cult of the amateur is the soul of America." That's a big statement.

The essential idea of the amateur is that you begin with nothing and you go off into your metaphorical garage to find something new. In some ways, it's like reliving the founding of the country. We're a nation of immigrants, but we're also a nation of indentured servants and slaves. Everybody came here either being driven out by somebody else or being dragged here against their will. We have these national and patriotic myths about coming here for liberty and freedom and so on and sure, and that's true. But it's also true that the Puritans were driven out of Europe because they were considered terrorists and extremists. And, of course, slaves were dragged here against their will. Many people in the 18th century were indentured servants.

It's really in our DNA that you can become anything, because the country was founded on that sort of idea, almost desperately so. And I think that's still with us. There's something very American in the basic sense that you can just walk off and create a new self. You know, Fitzgerald famously said, "There are no second acts in America." Of course, he got it completely wrong. There are nothing but second acts in this country. There's always another career waiting for you once you walk away from the first one or the second one.

You also suggest that one characteristic of the American amateur is a "sense of possibility, pretend and play" that's not linked to money, power or prestige.

That's absolutely right. And another characteristic is a completely different relationship with failure. I run across this constantly with people. Consider private enterprise: If you keep screwing up, you're fired. That's how it goes. So your projects become very narrow in focus and design. You work on things that you know will succeed. You run across this with astronomy, for example: You have these giant telescopes that cost zillions of dollars and you only have a few hours to use them. As a professor in astronomy, you're not going to just freelance some hair-brained idea.

Amateur astronomers, on the other hand, are the ones staring at the universe for all kinds of unusual things, or doing things that require enormous amounts of time because they don't need to care. If they can find an extra planet, a planet outside of our solar system, through hours and hours of tedious labor, they'll do that because it's a thrill for them. And that leads to all sorts of collaboration between amateurs and their professional cohorts. Those are very healthy relationships.

Steve Jobs was iconic amateur turned superstar, multimillionaire innovator. How does he fit into the landscape of amateurs in general? Doesn't everyone in America want to be the next Steve Jobs?

I think that the cycle of amateur enthusiasm turns on an economic timeline. Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak went into the Cupertino garage in 1976, during the doldrums and stagflation years of the Ford administration. I don't think that's a coincidence. David Packard and William Hewlett went into a Palo Alto garage in 1938 and started inventing their machinery. I don't think that's a coincidence, either. I think that that today we're living in the maker and DIY movement era. Not a day goes by when you don't hear about a DIY biolab in New York or something of that sort. I'm in New Haven, Connecticut, where you can find these $50-a-month workshop labs. Amateur inventors can go and hang out with other amateur inventors and talk about their ideas and get feedback from others. The idea of the lone ranger in the garage isn't really accurate.

It's not a coincidence, by the way, that there are now all of these amateur contests where big companies are trying to harness home brew and attract real talent by offering these million-dollar prizes. All of the contests that NASA has now, for example, were born out of frustration by the Defense Department with defense contractors who were not really delivering on the robotic car. Their contest was called the Grand Challenge. They figured, "Hey, what the hell, every tenth person in America has got a car in the backyard that they're tinkering with. Why don't we see if those people know how to solve this problem?"

So they set up the Grand Challenge and offered a few million dollars of prize money. Now NASA and the Defense Department runs that. And we now have robotic cars. People forget that Charles Lindbergh flew the Atlantic Ocean and then created the modern American aviation business, but he was actually flying for the $25,000 Orteig prize. It was an amateur contest to see if somebody could convince people that flying across the ocean was possible and safe.

So we're seeing so many of these sort of exploding examples of amateur pursuits. I think in the future, instead of renovated garages like David Packard's in Palo Alto, we're going to start seeing registered landmark status for dorm rooms.

Though it's not all youth-centered, is it? What about people in their post 50s who are out there pushing the innovation envelope in their garages?

Being young and foolish helps, but yes, you often hear of some guy who retired and wandered off to his garage to work on something he'd been thinking about for 50 years.

Is the amateur revival a strictly American phenomenon?

Amateur pursuits exist all over the planet. I don't want to just say that they're strictly an American pursuit. But I do think that this is such a part of our DNA. You read a great deal about how China is trying to understand America. A lot of their business feels very imitative there; the big piracy problems are in China. It's an economy based largely on copying. And I think one of the things that they'd very much like to understand about America is how we create [more] Steve Jobs'. So here's the bad news for China: What really creates the Steve Jobs' is freedom. You can hoist the flag now, because that's what it is -- just the habit of freedom of the thought. You can't inject that into a Chinese graduate student in college. You can try and God knows, the Chinese government will try, but Communism is just a lousy breeding ground for creativity.

The belief that job creation happens from the top down rather than from the ground up is just toxic. Start-ups are where the job creation happens. And they're not going to happen at Wal-Mart. Creativity comes from people who have the foolish nerve to walk out of a research lab or a backyard garage or dorm room and say, "You know what? I think I'm going to start a company."

Check out the slideshow below for 14 ambitious Americans who made it big.

14 Ambitious Amateurs