09/12/2011 12:59 pm ET Updated Nov 12, 2011

Can 9/11 Prompt a More Peaceful World?

Ten years ago yesterday, we Americans suffered the most traumatic pain in living memory. Unlike the agonizingly long ramp-up we knowingly experience before full-scale wars, the al Qaeda attacks came literally out of the blue. Thousands of our friends and neighbors were murdered before our eyes, massacred in a rain of horror we will never erase from our minds. The pain was immediate. The pain was acute. The pain is still and forever with us.

Our vulnerability to this attack was not something predetermined, like the cyclical shedding of a lobster's armored shell. Our vulnerability was congenital -- the consequence of our being an open society that expects the best from ourselves and others, choosing not to become stunted within a hardened fortress but opting, instead, to welcome and embrace what the world has to offer. Even if that sometimes costs us. Dearly.

We were caught flat-footed, but the immediate response of public safety personnel and ordinary citizens alike demonstrated unparalleled levels of courage and sacrifice, brave Americans charging into almost certain death in an effort to rescue others from unquestionably certain death. On Sept. 11, 2001, we mobilized a shining model of "emergency response" to a devastating force that was, for that one day, monstrously beyond our control.

But Sept. 12 offered a new day, a day when we might demonstrate a different kind of response -- not an emergency response, but a calculated response reflecting the wisest, shrewdest, most forceful long-term strategy we might imagine for dealing with the kind of threat Sept. 11 had introduced to our land. Irrespective of anyone's opinion of the particular response our leaders at the time commenced on Sept. 12, 2001, I propose that we use today, and all our future Sept. 12ths, as a day for rededicating ourselves to the quest for such strategies.

I have deep respect for the term "growing pains." Over the course of my long lifetime, the truth it conveys has been reaffirmed many, many times: important growth always occasions some pain. Now, this is not to say that all pain is growthful; pure suffering doesn't automatically yield anything worthwhile. But growth -- the movement from one stage to a better one -- always necessitates the painful loss of something precious: namely, a reassuringly predictable status quo.

Ten years later, the question is whether the pain of 9/11/01 is a "growing pain" or not. The answer depends on whether what we are learning is moving us to a better place or not. Certainly, we have learned that our open borders offer scant deterrence to those who wish us ill. And we have learned that there are fanatical parties at large in the world who do wish us ill, many from outside our borders but some from within them, too. These lessons are rather self-evident, and we seem to be making efforts -- some wise and some rather futile if not counter-productive -- to erect fresh defenses against future atrocities.

But there are deeper lessons I yearn to harvest, lessons that might enhance our understanding of America's impact in this increasingly intimate global community where boundaries are now all but negligible. Fair warning: Seeking such lessons exposes us to the further pain of uncomfortable realizations.

I myself have experienced several growing pains vis-à-vis my beloved country. The first I recall came in May 1960, when President Eisenhower blatantly lied to American citizens about an incident involving our U-2 spy plane, which was downed while over Svedlovsk, Russia. I wasn't shocked about the spying; I was shocked that our President would lie to us. Subsequent years have provided all too many additional opportunities to become sadly accustomed to official deception from many levels of government (not to mention the world of business).

But on 9/11/01 I was still naive enough to be astonished by the television coverage of massive crowds in foreign cities rejoicing as they watched the World Trade Centers transformed into colossal funeral pyres. Who could possibly cheer as they witnessed thousands of human lives being incinerated? Who could hate us that much? Why?

Despite my limitless contempt for Osama bin Laden, I studied his litany of presumed offenses by America against his native Saudi Arabia, by which he justified his 9/11 attack. From his point of view, Americans had defiled his homeland through myriad economic exploitations and cultural contaminations. The charges were uncomfortably resonant with the muffled complaints we have heard for generations from citizens of banana republics and other countries who felt that American influence in their lands was broad and intrusive and relentless and occasionally ruthless. Charges not easily refuted, sometimes.

But I remembered something that my professor of theology once told us: Heretics are rarely wrong in what they assert. Their error is in taking a portion of the truth and absolutizing it to represent the entirety of truth. Not wrong in what they affirm, they err in what they deny. Their depiction lacks balance and wholeness. Similarly, Osama bin Laden chose to absolutize certain irrefutable impacts of American presence and react to them as though they were the entire truth and deserved to be dealt with accordingly.

The threat of such distorted thinking is always with us. And so, too, are our international actions that may trigger havoc. We now live in a world where, thanks to instantaneous communications and inextricable commercial interdependence, the proverbial flutter of a butterfly wing in one continent really may give birth to a tsunami half a globe away.

We can protect ourselves to a degree from such intemperate reactions by enhancing our defenses and our upstream intelligence to nip emerging attacks in the bud. This is essential.

But it is equally essential that we reassess America's own practices and policies and effects in this increasingly volatile and intimate global village. The Declaration of Independence reflected "a decent respect to the opinions of mankind" in 1776. Being respectful of such opinions as we pursue our legitimate interests around the world today will increase the peacefulness of the human community our children inherit tomorrow.

What better way to ensure that those whose lives were lost on 9/11 did not die in vain.