POLITICS
12/19/2017 05:22 pm ET Updated Dec 19, 2017

6 Republicans Who Said They Oppose Arctic Refuge Drilling Just Voted To Allow It

Any oil and gas development “stands to disrupt this fragile, critically important landscape,” the lawmakers wrote last month.

WASHINGTON — Less than three weeks after signing onto a letter opposing the latest GOP-led effort to open up 1.5 million acres of Alaska’s fragile Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil and gas development, six House Republicans voted in favor of a tax bill that allows just that. 

In a late November letter to congressional party leaders, GOP Reps. Dave Reichert (Wash.), Brian Fitzpatrick (Pa.), Ryan Costello (Pa.), Patrick Meehan (Pa.), Mark Sanford (S.C.) and Carlos Curbelo (Fla.) ― and six of their colleagues ― said the refuge, also known as ANWR, “stands as a symbol of our nation’s strong and enduring natural legacy.”

“Any development footprint in the refuge stands to disrupt this fragile, critically important landscape,” the group wrote to House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.). 

But on Tuesday, Reichert, Fitzpatrick, Costello, Meehan, Sanford and Curbelo all voted in favor of the final tax proposal. The bill includes a provision, introduced by Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), that would require Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke to approve at least two lease sales for drilling — each covering no less than 400,000 acres — in the refuge’s coastal plain area. This 1.5 million acre region in northeast Alaska, also know as the 1002 Area, is home to polar bears, moose and caribou, and it has been the subject of a decades-long battle between energy companies and conservationists. 

Rep. Dave Reichert is one of six Republicans who voted to allow fossil fuel extraction in the Arctic National Wildl
Bill Clark via Getty Images
Rep. Dave Reichert is one of six Republicans who voted to allow fossil fuel extraction in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, even though they'd said it was a bad idea.

The other six signers of the letter — Reps. Frank LoBiondo (N.J.), Chris Smith (N.J.), Dan Donovan (N.Y.), Elise Stefanik (N.Y.), John Faso (N.Y.) and Leonard Lance (N.J.) — were among the 12 House Republicans who voted against the final tax bill. 

In a statement last week, Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) had dismissed Republican opposition to opening the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to energy development as “half-hearted” at best.

“It is now clear that the letter from twelve House Republicans opposing drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge was pure posturing,” she wrote. “If these Republicans want to stop their party from turning the refuge into an oilfield, they should vote no. Lip service won’t protect the Arctic.”

The letter did not specifically mention Murkowski’s measure. However, in an accompanying statement, Costello had urged Congress not to include changes to the refuge in the tax plan. Ultimately, that didn’t stop him and the others from voting in support of that massive legislation. 

Described by some as “America’s Serengeti,” the refuge covers more than 19 million acres in northeastern Alaska. Scientistsenvironmentalists and a bipartisan group of former Interior Department officials have warned that fossil fuel extraction there could spoil the landscape and harm the species that call it home.

The Trump administration’s fiscal 2018 budget, released earlier this year, called for allowing oil and gas drilling in the coastal plain. In May, Zinke signed an order to “jump-start Alaskan energy production.” He said at the time that the move was an “important first step in a smart and measured approach to energy development in ANWR.” 

The Congressional Budget Office estimates the ANWR provision would generate slightly more than $1 billion in federal revenue over the next decade — a figure that has been widely disputed. Within the drilling leases, the measure allows for 2,000 acres of the coastal plain to be developed above ground with wells and support facilities.

The Senate is expected to vote on the final tax bill later on Tuesday. 

CONVERSATIONS