Instead Of A Fork In The Road I've Come Upon A Roundabout

I've been feeling rather lost lately. I made a decision about a year ago to take a risk and pursue a passion and a life dream, and now I'm not so sure I made the right choice. Let me explain.
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

2015-05-17-1431881913-4602098-RoundAbout.jpg

I've been feeling rather lost lately. I made a decision about a year ago to take a risk and pursue a passion and a life dream, and now I'm not so sure I made the right choice. Let me explain. When my son left for college two years ago I entered an existential crisis and found myself suddenly living in a vacuum, a very quiet vacuum. And in the midst of all that silence I began to question the meaning of life, and more specifically, the meaning of my life. I questioned whether I was making a real contribution to this world, and I questioned my purpose, and whether this was all there was to life. I felt compartmentalized, somewhat irrelevant and increasingly invisible.

I believed I was at a crossroads, a fork-in-the-road if you will. I imagined that if I pursued one fork-path, I would accept my life choices, throw in my youth towel, and age quietly, without question or challenge. But if I chose the other fork-path, I would find a way of transforming the many losses of middle age -- full-time mothering, my youthful passions, good skin tone and my body's ability to regulate its own temperature, into opportunities -- life-altering, and transformative opportunities. I imagined this path would involve renewed authenticity, resilience and increased vitality, where I challenged the status quo and increased my visibility. Then I began to wonder if there were other women out there who felt the way I did, and I wondered if I had something to contribute to the conversation.

The desire to make a meaningful contribution to this world was not a new one for me. I became a social worker because I wanted to be an agent of change; I wanted to rattle cages and advocate for social justice; I wanted to connect deeply with others, and walk alongside them on their life journeys. But somewhere along the line I entered the world of academia and began writing about topics that had the greatest likelihood of getting published in academic journals. I found my career exciting and intellectually stimulating, but ultimately too constraining. I felt increasingly disconnected from my social work roots, and from the lives of real people. And I found myself increasingly disconnected from myself.

I decided that the contribution I wanted to make was writing books about things I cared about, that were personal to me, and one of those books I wanted to write was about women and middle age. I did not want to write this book as an objective scholar, but as a sister, walking right alongside other women, hand-in-hand, soul-to-soul. This book would be about my own journey as a middle-aged, empty-nesting, single-mom, and the journeys of the middle-aged women around me. I wanted to open up a dialogue, stir things up and challenge the status quo, so that our collective paths could be paved with more daring authenticity and radical transparency. And since I wasn't sure I could accomplish this while engaged in full-time university life, I picked the fork-path less traveled and quit my job.

Fast forward one year and I must admit that I have absolutely no idea if I made the right choice.

When I was pondering this decision I had a vision of what my new life would look like. I pictured it full of vibrant and powerful women, and writing groups, lots and lots of writing groups. I pictured new friendships and new opportunities. I pictured more creativity, more flexibility, less compartmentalization, and more freedom. During busy stretches I feel excited and optimistic, convinced that I made the right decision. But then there are other stretches, like the one I'm in now, when I have nothing on my calendar for weeks, when my savings account is dwindling, when I'm not on track to meet my writing goals, and when I miss aspects of university life, such as the camaraderie with colleagues and students (to be honest, I also miss health insurance and a regular paycheck). On these days, when I find myself in a passion wasteland, I wonder what the heck I was thinking, and I question whether I really was at a fork in the road, or just a roundabout where I am now destined to travel in an endless circle, going nowhere.

There are many decisions in life that fall squarely into good/bad, right/wrong categories. Sleeping with someone else's spouse, drinking and driving, stealing, sending drunk texts to the man who just rejected you: all bad, wrong decisions, because they are either immoral or it's obvious that no good will come from them. But there are a whole lot of other decisions, which I call lifestyle decisions, that fall squarely in the gray you-zig-I-zag zone, and those are the decisions I struggle with the most.

Lifestyle decisions often determine the quality and course of our lives -- who we date (and marry), who we break up with (and divorce), what careers we pursue, whether we follow our life's passions, and at what cost. These decisions are based less on some moral code of right and wrong, and more on our personal preferences, our accrued wisdom, and our ability to manage risk. Lifestyle decisions are risky because they don't come with giant red arrows pointing the way, which for many of us, makes these types of decisions scary because the worthiness of our decisions are assessed less on our preparedness, our courage, and our intentions, and more on the outcome of our decisions; in other words, whether we succeed or fail. And there are always variables that influence the outcomes of our lifestyle decisions that we can neither anticipate nor control.

I wonder though -- what makes any lifestyle decision a success or failure? Does an undesired outcome render a decision bad? Or are there really no bad lifestyle decisions at all, only the failure of not pursuing our passions? Do I feel discouraged right now because I made a foolish decision to leave my job for some unrealistic pipe dream? Or am I just experiencing a bump in the road -- a sort of passion-pursuing "hump day" that I just need to push through? And if the outcome of my decision doesn't look exactly as I imagined and I return to academia before I write my book, does that mean that my efforts and risk-taking were all for naught?

Some people never pursue their life's passions because they are unwilling to face the possibility of failure. They manage the inherent risks in lifestyle decision-making by never making a decision at all. They live safe lives. They live timid lives. But I don't want to live a safe life. I want to live a bold one, which means that the decision to pursue my passions cannot be evaluated solely on a pre-determined concept of a successful outcome, but rather on the lessons I have learned, the ways I have grown, the experiences I have had, and the contributions I have made.

So while I may be feeling a bit lost right now and unsure of my decision, and while I do not know what the future holds or what the outcome of my choice will be, I will not regret my decision to leave my job. By taking this risk I have created space in my life, space that could not have existed any other way, and I just have to trust that something good will fill that space -- wonderful experiences, life lessons, new people and opportunities, new contributions, and the knowledge that I was courageous enough to try; and hopefully, a wildly popular book about women and middle age.

Earlier on Huff/Post50:

Betty White
AP
Doesn't it seem like Betty White has been around since David torpedoed Goliath with a slingshot? Our favorite golden girl is only 94 though. Even though Miss Betty White began her career in the 1940s on radio, and later appeared on late night talk shows and game shows (including "Password") in the 50s and 60s, she wasn't really a household name until, at the age of 51, she began playing "The Happy Homemaker" Sue Ann Nivens on "The Mary Tyler Moore Show" (1973-1977).
Morgan Freeman
Getty
Who doesn't love Morgan Freeman? This Academy Award winner paid his dues and then some. Freeman worked for several years as an actor, but really came into his own playing chauffeur Hoke Colburn in "Driving Miss Daily" at the age of 52 (although he was 50 when he was nominated for Best Supporting Actor in the film "Street Smart").
Sharon Osbourne
Getty
Heavy metal vocalist Ozzy Osbourne has been famous for over 40 years as lead singer of the English band Black Sabbath. His wife, Sharon, however, did not become a household name until their family reality show "The Osbournes" premiered on MTV in 2002. Just barely 50, Sharon became a media darling, which opened up many doors. She went on to become a judge on "America's Got Talent" and has been co-host of the CBS daytime show "The Talk" since it debuted in October 2010.
Regis Philbin
Getty
Regis Philbin was comedian Joey Bishop's sidekick on the ABC television show "The Joey Bishop Show" from 1967 to 1969 and hosted his own local talk show -- "A.M. Los Angeles" -- from 1975 to 1983. But his name wasn't exactly on the tip of our collective tongues until he became a daytime staple with Kathie Lee Gifford in 1988 on "Live with Regis and Kathie Lee" when he was 57. His vibrant, caustic, yet fun-loving personality pushed him over the top sometime after the show began to gain in popularity with daytime viewers.
Abe Vigoda
Getty
Born in 1921, Abe Vigoda captured the role of Salvatore Tessio in the film "The Godfather" in 1972 at the age of 51. His next big role came in 1975 when he signed on to play Sgt. Phil Fish on the television series "Barney Miller." And that's when Vigoda -- who passed away in 2016 -- really became a household name.
Tom Bergeron
Getty
Sure, Tom Bergeron became the host of "Hollywood Squares" in 1998 and of "America's Funniest Home Videos" in 2001, but he didn't really become widely known until joining the wildly popular "Dancing With the Stars." The amiable host was 50 when the show premiered in 2005. After more than 20 seasons as host, it appears he's a keeper.
Mike Wallace
Getty
Maybe Mike Wallace was well-known in some hard-core news circles, and perhaps he was on a first-name basis with a few news junkies many moons ago, but it wasn't until he laid his groundwork as a superb gotcha reporter on "60 Minutes" which he did from 1968 (after he turned 50) until 2008 -- that his star really began to shine. This well-respected news journalist sadly passed away on April 7, 2012 at the age of 93.
Samuel L. Jackson
Gabe Ginsberg via Getty Images
Born in 1948, Samuel L. Jackson appeared in more than 100 films before the age of 40. However, it was only after he landed the role of a hitman in "Pulp Fiction" in 1994 that his star really began to shine. For this performance, Jackson received a Best Supporting Actor nomination.
Andy Rooney
Getty
Andy Rooney is another personality that seems to have been around since the beginning of time, and we're all glad to have been the recipients of his off-the-wall satirical takes on human nature. In 1978, at the age of 59, Rooney began his "A Few Minutes with Andy Rooney" segment on the CBS news show "60 Minutes," continuing through 2011. He made us laugh, he made us cry, he made us think. It doesn't get better than that. Rooney died on November 4, 2011 at the age of 92 only a few weeks after his last appearance on the show.
Joy Behar
Getty
Joy Behar was 54 when she was cast as one of the original members of "The View," which made its debut in August 1997. A few years before that, you could catch Behar doing hilarious stand-up comedy on television. But she only became a household name sometime after "The View" became a must-see, daytime television talk show.

Popular in the Community

Close

What's Hot