A GOP Strategist's Memo To Bernie Sanders After Last Night's Democrat Debate
Hillary is nervous...
TO: Bernie Sanders, Socialist
FROM: Arnold Steinberg, Republican Strategist
RE: Last Night's Debate
It's highly unlikely you will win the Democratic nomination. But I hope you do. In a general election, you will be this generation's George McGovern.
I still remember when voters, including disaffected Democrats and a majority of independents, saw McGovern as the loony-tunes who would give their hard-earned money to able-bodied Americans who chose not to work. You are an aging white ideologue who will properly be perceived not as a savior of America's middle class, but as a radical who will destroy it. Even for a nation that under President Obama has moved so far to the left, you will be seen as offering no hope and no change.
It's not a good sign when Saturday Night Live already parodies a leftist like you. Larry David will make you into a lunatic. And in general election debates when you're challenged to defend your utopia, you'll stumble, because you're a clueless Marxist.
Hardened feminists will see you as an older white guy (all of six years older than Hillary) who stopped the course of human history. It is, they feel, destiny for a woman to become president, and you would have stolen the nomination and thus deprived Hillary of what is rightfully hers. In disgust, some female voters will stay home in November. And don't expect Hillary to campaign for you. She will not be your running mate unless her 23-and-me DNA suggests that your health is worse than hers.
On the subject of health, you're under pressure to release your health records. I hope you do this week. We can see if you have fewer bathroom breaks than Hillary. I think questions will be raised about her health.
Now, onto health policy. A few days ago, I watched your spokesman explain how workers, through higher payroll taxes, will "pay" for "free health care." Once younger voters realize they will pay for all your "free stuff," many will not vote for grandpa. And if Donald Trump found Jeb Bush to be "low energy," wait until the millennials see you campaigning among your peers at an old-age home. They'll wonder why you don't just stay there.
Trump has it right. You made a fool of yourself when you let Black Lives Matter steal your microphone. Get some testosterone to bring you up to Hillary's level. Nearly a half century ago, the president of San Francisco State College stood up to some Black Power protestors. The image of this short guy pulling the wires from the loudspeakers on the protesters' van went, as they now would say, "viral" and he ended up being elected to the U.S. Senate. On second thought, you are so far gone the FDA would never approve the mega-dosage of testosterone for you to be credible in our predatory world.
But if you are not the nominee, you might bloody Hillary. Be even more aggressive than you were last night. You are gaining in some national polls, and victories in Iowa and New Hampshire could give you momentum. Moreover, if Hillary encounters headwinds, you might poll better in general election polls than she does, an illusion suggesting your viability in November. The resulting synergy would further boost your primary election polling.
Chelsea Clinton has imprudently attacked you as an opponent of Medicare. "I don't want to live in a country that has an unequal health system," Chelsea said. "So I don't want to empower Republican governors to take away Medicaid, take away health insurance for low income and middle income working Americans and I think very much that's what Sen. Sanders' plan would do."
What a stupid maneuver, because (a) it lowered Chelsea into attack mode; (b) it is implausible and thus (c) it gives you the moral high ground. Hillary refused to repudiate Chelsea, so Hillary will lose credibility. You should continue to talk like an elder statesman. Indeed, in response to Chelsea's attack, you released a photo of you and Hillary. She inscribed the 1993 photo, "To Bernie Sanders with thanks for your commitment to real health care access for all Americans." Perhaps you'll use the photo as a prop. You look somewhat older, but Hillary has really aged.
"I have never run a negative radio or television ad in my life," you said the other day while campaigning in New Hampshire. "It is my very strong hope that I never will." That's not exactly a Sherman-like statement about negative campaigning. And, fortunately for you, Hillary now is running scared, so she will, as The Donald would say, "throw the first punch." You have the money for ads -- they could help you.
So far, you've been very clever. Your "two visions" ad takes on Wall Street and implies she backs the rich crooks, but you never mention her name. Of course, Clinton pursues the same technique. Her ad doesn't mention you by name but the script is: -"It's time for pick a side. Either we stand with the gun lobby, or we join the president and stand up to them. I'm with him."
Hillary is nervous, and that's good for you because she gets aggressive. The Bill Cosby melodrama in the age of Law and Order SVU can reprise not only Bill Clinton's infidelity, but rather the allegations of his sexual assaults, and Hillary's role in trying to silence the alleged victims. You can now say that infidelity is not the issue, but a cover-up of sexual assault would be another matter.
The just released 13 Hours film may resurrect Benghazi. You can hopefully say you have seen the movie, and cover yourself by criticizing Republicans for partisanship. But not coming to the rescue of Americans under siege would be another matter.
And there is the specter of an expanded government investigation of Hillary. You can still say there are more important issues than her "personal email." But a violation of the law, or improper influence peddling through gifts to the Clinton Foundation, would be another matter.
Bernie, after last night, there are only two debates left. You now believe you can win. You need to gracefully confront Hillary, so that she become shrill and negative.
The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by WesternJournalism.com.
http://www.westernjournalism.com/arnold-steinberg/